Odion Ighalo - 6 month loan deal done

Status
Not open for further replies.

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,668
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
But seriously, some amzingly OTT reactions to this. I mean...how does anyone think this is replacing Lukaku??? If Rashford didn't get injured, we wouldn't even be looking for a striker. It's a 6 month loan deal for a Prem proven striker. We're not signing a player to take us to the next level. We're a Martial injury away from throwing in the towel upfront. This looks like a sensible deal, at a time when it was almost impossible to get anyone you'd really want in.
I think quite a few people were getting wet at the prospect of being able to lose their shit because we didn't sign a striker in the window. Now we've done that they've been robbed the at the chance of unadulterated outrage at Solskjaer, Woodward and the board.
 

Fooza

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
3,139
Jim White mentioned Aston Villa rejected the chance for Ighalo to join them yesterday. :lol: Jim and his imaginary sources. Muppet
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
To all crying people here - who did you expect us to sign on 6 month loan in January? Ronaldo? There is pretty much 0 choice. It’s 6 month loan ffs, if he is shite then whatever but he might just score a few goals and help the team. We got nothing to lose really so stop moaning.
Are you hired by Woodward to write such complete bullshit? Ton of strikers transferred in this winter window, pretty much all of them better than Ighalo. We didn't have to make it a loan, if we had balls to close Haaland. But even in loans - Cavani was doable. Lots of other choices.

Some of you people sound like by signing fecking Ighalo we have signed in-form Messi. Just because he has six-pack on some photo, apparently he's in-form. As if that is what in-form for EPL means... Somebody even had a nerve to say that Ighalo played better in African Cup than Mo Salah. I guess we are going to conclude then that we just signed somebody who is better than Salah? Incredible
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,440
Having the extra body is the important thing as it allows for a rest to some players and I would rather see him come on than lingard when needing a goal

No obligation to buy
Inexpensive
He will want to be here and prove himself so will work hard

I don't see an issue with this
 

MileStolar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
826
Location
Vancouver, Canada
Can we sing his name like we used to sing Radamel Falcao?

Lo lolo lolo lolo Odioooon Ighalooo
Lo lolo lolo lolo Lo lolo lolo lolo
Odioooooon Ighalooo oooo
 

podurban2

Full Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
5,842
Why I have doubts? Because I didn't rate him particularly highly when he was last in England.

More to the point, he's another striker on our books whose box-play is far from his biggest strength. As an alternative to Rashford and Martial, all he offers is inferiority. I would have preferred someone with a different toolset to give us a change off the bench. But I guess Ole has a preference and our options were limited.
No I meant why it was good business? :p
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
It is sort of an act of desperation, In the sense that we are desperate for another forward.

would we prefer Lautaro Martinez, haaland,dembele? Sure. but that’s not happening now.
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,173
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
You are completing missing the point. Nobody is advocating that Lukaku should have stayed. But when you let Lukaku go, you have to replace him at least with something equal. Ighalo is not even in the ballpark of Lukaku, not just now, but he was never even close to Lukaku's level. This is a fecking embarrassment.
Skill wise he might not be but he'll put more effort in for the team, Lukaku was pure lazy with a poor attitude, something Ighalo probably trumps him on. I also think we put our eggs in the Haaland basket until the move didnt make sense for us and injuries happened.
 

VojjE

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2016
Messages
155
I can't believe Ole, who didn't want a Lukaku kind of player, goes and gets in someone who is just that, and nowhere near as good even when fit.
How is he even similiar to Lukaku? He's got pace, a good first touch and good dribbling technique and works hard to create space.
 

Guapa

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
730
Hope it works out for both parties.Good luck Ighalo.
 

Jonnymufc

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
697
Location
London town
Assuming someone is running around trying to find a current United shirt in Shanghai for him to hold up for a pic
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
Like Many said above , Ighalo is a fan of the club. He will be over the moon at signing with us. He definitely won't be a mercenary who is here for the money..if anything he will be here to prove himself and see if he can get a permanent contract.

I don't know he will be a prime RvN , but I don't think we will moan about his workrate. I think he will work his socks off. Let's just hope he gets the rub of the green and he can score a few. Let everyone laugh at him, We need to get behind this lad. If it doesn't work out, hey ho.
Seriously, the people moaning (critics) are probably of those who keep statistics of how many licks their wife gave them during a blowjob and then use it against her.

The thing is, we may not be in an ideal situation but the truth is we're going towards a better direction and we're in this together so let's suck it up and just keep a little positivity going.
 

Twam

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
361
Location
Southern Ireland
I would say there was also the idea of not wasting Bruno's talents, put a proper traditional striker in front of him.
 

United Pro

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
2,702
Location
London
Just what we wanted. A striker who cant finish his shots
I mean Ighalo will help from the bench and will add numbers to a fairly depleted forward line up. But I am sceptical whether he would be a better option than perhaps Greenwood from the bench. We'll have to see I guess.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,257
If he is motivated and stays fit, he could surprise quite a few people on here. Thought he was good at Watford most of the time.
Lifelong Utd fan he’ll be motivated alright.
I grew up near Watford and know a few match going fans. He can be a handful on his day and is a good poacher. Quick too.
Good option for us in the circs he’ll do well I think.
Good move from the club, very happy with this. At the very least he might shame martial into making a run now and then......
 

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
Are you hired by Woodward to write such complete bullshit? Ton of strikers transferred in this winter window, pretty much all of them better than Ighalo. We didn't have to make it a loan, if we had balls to close Haaland. But even in loans - Cavani was doable. Lots of other choices.

Some of you people sound like by signing fecking Ighalo we have signed in-form Messi. Just because he has six-pack on some photo, apparently he's in-form. As if that is what in-form for EPL means... Somebody even had a nerve to say that Ighalo played better in African Cup than Mo Salah. I guess we are going to conclude then that we just signed somebody who is better than Salah? Incredible
Yeah, I am fecking hired by Woodward :lol: You know feck all and just spouting BS yourself. Maybe Haaland simply didn't want to join us, maybe Canavi wants to go to Atletico or maybe we just didn't want to spend £40m on mediocre players like King and rather spent the money on Bruno. Don't pretend you know what's happening behind the scenes.
 

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Okay, friend of mine who is a massive Watford fan talking about Ighalo used a word to describe him joining United: "Unbelievable."

"He was brilliant for Watford but not sure he is United quality. I'd have gone all out for Cavani or Mertens. Even Giroud. Watford fans were sad to see him go when he did. We got £30m for him and he went for big wages. I'd have him back at Watford, yes. Good enough for us. Villa turned him down, apparently.
"It is Plan Y. Smacks of a bit of panic."
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
I mean Ighalo will help from the bench and will add numbers to a fairly depleted forward line up. But I am sceptical whether he would be a better option than perhaps Greenwood from the bench. We'll have to see I guess.
Listen, forget the bench. This geezer is gonna start games, I can guarantee you. He will be absolutely positive for greenwood and will kick martial up the bum.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,349
Skill wise he might not be but he'll put more effort in for the team, Lukaku was pure lazy with a poor attitude, something Ighalo probably trumps him on. I also think we put our eggs in the Haaland basket until the move didnt make sense for us and injuries happened.
OK, but Haaland signed more than a month ago. We had plenty of time to recover even from that major feck-up. Lukaku exited as an asshole, but just "effort" is also not sufficient. We are playing at the top level. Six pack abs and attitude won't cut it.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,917
Location
W.Yorks
Okay, friend of mine who is a massive Watford fan talking about Ighalo used a word to describe him joining United: "Unbelievable."

"He was brilliant for Watford but not sure he is United quality. I'd have gone all out for Cavani or Mertens. Even Giroud. Watford fans were sad to see him go when he did. We got £30m for him and he went for big wages. I'd have him back at Watford, yes. Good enough for us. Villa turned him down, apparently. "
I'm sure if either were available we'd have gone for them.

Chelsea literally wanted to get Mertens so they could move Giroud on and couldn't get it done. So it's not that straight forward evidently.
 

Hester_manc

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,130
Location
Denmark
He comes from the Chinese league and I fear he is not on the same fair level as he showed in Watford. He has played for a long time in a league where there are some really good players, but many, many bad ones.
 

Megadrive Man

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
367
Supports
Liverpool
United are struggling to score goals, so you have signed a goalscorer on a short term deal.

You are struggling to create goals so you have signed a creative midfielder who can also score goals.

Knowing how hard it is to get good players in January, would you not have taken that at the start of the window?
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,668
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Okay, friend of mine who is a massive Watford fan talking about Ighalo used a word to describe him joining United: "Unbelievable."

"He was brilliant for Watford but not sure he is United quality. I'd have gone all out for Cavani or Mertens. Even Giroud. Watford fans were sad to see him go when he did. We got £30m for him and he went for big wages. I'd have him back at Watford, yes. Good enough for us. Villa turned him down, apparently.
"It is Plan Y. Smacks of a bit of panic."
Villa couldn't afford his wages (£100k a week) which is why they turned him down. Inter and Spurs tried to sign him today but he wanted to join us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.