Apparently the appeal is going to be "fast-tracked" and resolved before first qualifiers take place in July.
Manchester City banned from CL for 2 seasons and fined 30 million euros | CAS - Ban lifted, fined 10 million
- Thread starter roonster09
- Start date
Piss myself if they get their trophies taken off them like Juventus did. My ribs would hurt for months.
Won’t happen, and even if it did it would take months to rule that.
The FA will want to keep them in the league to keep the top more interesting. Relegating the only team capable of competing with Liverpool right now is a bad move for the ‘brand’
Even better when you remember we’d get given a PL title off the back of it!
You’ll see José doing a stark bollock naked lap of honour at the next Spurs home game, with a full back tattoo of Pep going “twiIiiiiccccceeeee” if it happens.
Yeah true, it would be a shame if Liverpool are the only elite team. However, if the crime is worthy or relegation than I say
That was match fixing though wasn't it? A different issue completely.
Yeah but it will be interesting to see how they deal with this as they’re calling it ‘financial doping’ and treating it the same as actualll doping
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Some people shouldn’t be allowed on the internet.
Who announced this?
Well said. City could have invested money slowly and within the rules but they wanted instant success. Pity that Liverpool have become unnaturally good now because of it though.
The meltdown for city fans will be hilarious but this just helps liverpool's dominance.
Imagine if city won the cl this season
Imagine if city won the cl this season
Course it will be,there is no way this ban is going to be upheld when City's legal team have so much money to throw at it.
It's going to be a long wait if we finish 5th to find out if we qualify.
They wont be thrown into L2 but i'd be tempted to disqualify them for further participating in the Pl this season.
Also, though City themselves wont be involved in European football their results will obviously effect those teams who are fighting for European qualification.
City's result would also effect the league as a whole. Who wants to get relegated by a team who,arguably, shouldn't even be in the division from here on.
Dump.Their.Ass.
City's result would also effect the league as a whole. Who wants to get relegated by a team who,arguably, shouldn't even be in the division from here on.
Dump.Their.Ass.
Where are all the City fans full stop, they’ve been strangely quiet the past few weeks after the bullishness if the last cpl of years
Money can't do much here.
Honestly if you cheat you deserve to be punished, simple as. I've stated already what I feel about Uefa and how why they've done it but for our part, do the crime, do the time.
Manchester will be plastic free now.
I’m sure there is but UEFA like to punish the English, they can’t stand us, never have, same goes for FIFA.
What happened to Juventus when they were found guilty of corruption? The Italian FA relegated them to serie B, they came straight back up the following season and within a couple of years back in the champions league, UEFA did feck all and FIFA just threatened the Italian FA with some sort of punishment if Juventus appealed against the findings.
Real Madrid sold their training ground for what was regarded as a massively inflated fee to Madrid council, apparently the site was valued at 400k and then a few years later bought from Real Madrid for 245m wiping out Real Madrid’s 170m debt overnight.
Just 2 questionable incidents that I can think of off the top of my head but would any of those gone unpunished or at the least not been investigated if it had happened to major clubs from England that had involvement in the champions league? I would argue not.
I’m sure city will get the punishment overturned or reduced after all money is king.
Its been conflicting from the start, obviously I believed my club despite not being the biggest fan of our owner. I don't think it belittles the teams achievements, they are a phenomenal team but its a stain on the club.
Even if we get off on a technicality (which I think we will), it still tarnishes the achievements for sure.
I still have issue with ffp, its very reason for existing but thats a different argument. The minute the club struck a (rather dodgy) deal with Uefa in 2014 they agreed to FFP, for me we should have taken it on there and then. Not doing so said "hey we think ffp is fine", If you sign up to something you follow the rules and its looking like we didn't. As a club they should have known that when that dodgy deal was signed if the truth came out, Uefa would hang us to cover their own arses.
The only way the club can come out of this with any respectability is if CAS find Uefa wrong. If we get off on this with a "Uefa were leaking info" technicality, there will be a black mark for sure.
The rules and structure of football is the problem here.
Financial fair play actually means unfairly permanently entrenching the same teams at the top of football. Restricting any further upstart teams buying their way to the top.
Guardiola was going Juventus end of season anyway imo. I reckon City only get one season ban on appeal. Will still wreck them through, player's will want to go too and motivation all messed up with no CL.
Good part of this is 5th this season or next might get CL spot. Depressing part is can only see Liverpool winning the title by 20+ points again next season, no other team can get close to them apart from a strong City team.
Financial fair play actually means unfairly permanently entrenching the same teams at the top of football. Restricting any further upstart teams buying their way to the top.
Guardiola was going Juventus end of season anyway imo. I reckon City only get one season ban on appeal. Will still wreck them through, player's will want to go too and motivation all messed up with no CL.
Good part of this is 5th this season or next might get CL spot. Depressing part is can only see Liverpool winning the title by 20+ points again next season, no other team can get close to them apart from a strong City team.
Well at least his other favourite teams Barcelona, Juventus, PSG and Bayern should win the league to ease his plastic heart.
click bait from a once reputable outlet
UEFA will appoint their snidest, Madrid supporting ref for City’s next CL match.
feck them. Yeah, it’s infuriating that Liverpool will gain the most from this but the Bloo cnuts have had this coming from day one.
feck them. Yeah, it’s infuriating that Liverpool will gain the most from this but the Bloo cnuts have had this coming from day one.
very obviously a spoof account.
Pretty much, which is why I'm hoping that regardless of City's fate, FFP gets destroyed and football has a serious conversation about notions of fairness.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The whole world is leaving E
It’s not true though is it? Spending money wisely trumps spending money unwisely even if it’s lots of it, Liverpool spent nothing last summer window and are top of the league. The likes of Sheffield Utd and Wolves are competing with Chelsea and Utd having spent far leads over the last 10 years, financial fair play is there so clubs can grown organically, it’s not there to keep the status quo. As what is the status quo? Liverpool who haven’t won the league in 30 years? Leeds who are in the championship? Aston Villa who have just been promoted?
He forgot to add Sir Alex Ferguson pulling the strings while Cathy Ferguson demonically laughing in the background.
Anyway keep spending, Pep.
I think that FFP was put in place to protect clubs going bust but also to protect the top clubs. So you have sympathy from me, just like the glazers should not have been able to straddle United in debt to buy the club.
The football City have been playing (tactical fouls aside) is a joy to watch. Which makes it so depressing having to watch the utter garbage of watching United for nearly 7 years.
It is true. You can't point at anomalies as proof against the overall trend. Look at the top leagues across Europe. Look at who makes it to the final stages of the CL year after year.
As for growing "organically" you can't mention Liverpool without mentioning Southampton, a club who did everything right yet are in danger of relegation due to... Yeah.
This doesn’t refute anything I said. Man United didn’t lie about where their money was coming from and there were years of work and marketing and stability under Ferguson that enable him and others to spend that money on players legally.
Even at that, Ferguson at his peak didn’t sign Carlos Tevez permanently. He sold players like Ronaldo because he had to. He had no way of paying them double under the table to keep them sweet. Sergio Aguero, one of the greatest strikers in the world over 10 years, and we hardly even as much as read a gossip column talking about Madrid/Barcelona. I wonder why!
Ferguson, Wenger and others also had to work for years to balance their squad and keep those who weren’t in the team happy. Do you really think that players like Jesus, Mahrez, Gundogan, Rodri, Silva etc... would be happy on the bench if it wasn’t for the extra, illegal, salary and payments?
Their squad is an artificial construction and exists purely on the basis of illegal spending and false documentation and their entire financial spreadsheet is one big farce to make it all happen.
They win the league cup every year because they are the only side who can field 200k players in every position while still resting their key stars.
They haven’t just infringed in the rules, they have smashed them and made a mockery of what other clubs have to deal with every season.
Last edited:
Yes it most definitely is true, it entrenches teams who already have high revenue in that position. That is the point of financial "fair play", stops investors pushing any further clubs to the top of the football tree.
Yes clubs are being mismanaged so are struggling this season, including Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs for different reasons.
Money doesn't directly turn in to points, medium term though, the big established football brands will rake the cash in and are pretty much guaranteed to be top teams now, forever. That (Chelsea, PSG, City etc) is why UEFA introduced it, so no more teams can do that threatening the already established elite.
Here's an excerpt from 2012. Not sure how ironclad this agreement is. If it is City's plan of defense becomes more improbable.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idAFJOE82K06A20120321?irpc=932
Yep.
You also have to note with Liverpool that they benefitted from that ludicrous Coutinho fee, and spent world record fees at the time, on both a keeper and a defender. Following a string of 20-40m level signings.
So we can't just pretend they've done it some sort of noble way, just because of not spending last summer for a one off.
that’s good news. Although I really wouldn’t be surprised if City find a way of delaying it
Would that mean Liverpool win the title from last season? That wouldn’t be good!