If the season is voided the premier league teams would not get the TV revenue which means teams like Aston Villa would not meet the FFP demands therefore is required to sell. Its already been rumoured they need to sell to meet the FFP requirements.Please elaborate on this, I don’t understand what you mean. Do you know their owners at all, or just assume they are skint?
Good price if his sold for that amount.My mate Aston Villa fans think Grealish will be sold for around 40m.
Sessegon didn't really perform to the level Grelish is showing. I think he will still go for 40-50m if they get relegated.I think they go down anyway if the season resumes. i just remember when Sessegnon was quoted at 90 million, then Fulham were relegated and sold him for 25
I’m merely pointing out the misconceptions you have about football in general.The one who needs to understand the situation is you, but it seems that you prefer to have an idea that suits to if you are the one who in charge as the manager of the club not Ole.
Let me ask you something. Why did Jose Mourinho, Deschamps & Ole (this season) decide to play Pogba in the deeper role of the 4231 formation? What asset does he have that others in United team & France National team don't have which make those managers to play Pogba in there, even though he is known as box to box or player who should play further than where they played him?
Have a think, and if you can find the answer, it'll give you the direction to where why Grealish isn't suitable replacement for the role & task that Pogba had under Mourinho, Deschamps & Ole (this season).
Fled the scene of an accident he must have been full drunk or on drugs, police still haven’t located him.If the drink driving stuff is true then we shouldn't sign him. Apparently he's also ignoring phone calls from Aston Villa.
What’s not to understand? He’s got his mate carrying his other flip flop so he could wear a sweet women's slipper.Idiot!
I don't understand his footwear
Exactly, [Irrelevant point] killed a 22 years old girl that was with him in a drunk driving incident, in wet conditions, going 110kmh in a 50kmh zone, he's enjoying his career without anybody talking about it at all and without even doing a month of prison. let alone 'not having his big move'.I really do wonder why people who say something to the effect of 'career over/ no big move for him then' don't think about other players who have continued to have successful careers after committing comparable or worse crimes. [Irrelevant point] anyone?
Ighalo would give, he is and always will be a stop gapMeant Greenwood. What would happen to his growth? We’d have martial Greenwood and Ighalo fighting for minutes. Something would have to give.
People love a negative tweet that has pre filled in all those presuming spaces for them. If there’s any truth in it then it’s a police matter. If not people need to stop believing any shite they read...We're all presuming it's him then and not someone else who knicked his car and crashed it?
That'll show him.I just paid £50m for this muppet in FM. Oh well, such a shame I forgot to inclunde him in a matchday squad........................the next 4 seasons.
Who?Hate to say this because I had high hopes for Grealish but if he's big mates with Mcormack then I wouldn't go anywhere near him.
*Assumption, uk law is somewhat similiar to Norwegian lawThe annoying thing is if it was any of us that got drunk or high crashed a car then fled and avoided police we would be looking at jail time but Grealish will get a slap on the wrist with maybe a donation to a alcohol awareness charity..
I get that there is a chance that it might not be him but everything is pointing to it being him.*Assumption, uk law is somewhat similiar to Norwegian law
The court can take into consideration a persons employment when considering a verdict for crimes with a low damage outcome. So for example Jack, who is a professional footballer and can potentially lose his employment if he is sent to prison, will be a candidate for non-incarcerationary sentencing, ie. probation, fines and community service. First time offenders also get a easier time of it than a repeat offender. Other people can of course lose their jobs if they are sent to prison as well, which is why courts won't do that if they can avoid it.
A few things: We have no idea if Jack was driving. We do not know if the police have taken a bloodtest to determine if Jack was in fact intoxicated. Can the police prove Jack was driving? All things that will be considered.
A comparable situation:
Footballer Saido Berahino has been convicted of drink driving after getting behind the wheel of his Range Rover a few minutes after falling victim to a knifepoint robbery. He was disqualified from driving for 30 months and fined £75,000 at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court.15. mai 2019
Berahino was stopped going 177 km/h drunk off his ass.
This looks, and I say looks becase all we see is a nice car with dents in it and Jack Grealish with two footballs sewn into his calves, like property damage and a hard to prove case of intoxicated driving. Unless someone admits to it, for some weird reason.
What really irks me is the fact he went out to party. There are millions who are sacrifcing everyday joys right now to help stop the spread of this virus, and this assclown can't even do that. No one got hurt so I'm willing to let that one go if he gets counceling and takes a public stance for his stupidity. But ignoring the pandemic effort, is just so low.
I can't really comment on all criminal litigation because money do hire amazing lawyers for example, but it's a bit of a misconception that the average bloke is treated differently than a famous person. (The US does not apply, the US court system absolutely do treat you differently. Affluenza laws for example). In general, and especially a case like this, fenderbender + alcohol, you won't be treated differently if its your first time being in trouble. What will be different is the size of the fine, the bloke with the money will receive one that is substantially bigger. Fines are supposed to reflect your income in some cases.I get that there is a chance that it might not be him but everything is pointing to it being him.
Am sure some kind of camera footage will come out in the near future but again if you have money you get an easier ride than the average bloke on the street it’s not really fair is it?
No confirmation it was him at all. People are presuming it's him because of that Tweet and because he got leathered once when he was 19 and it appeared in a newspaper.Is it confirmed its him? Or are we all presuming hes guilty in the court of caf based on that tweet?
I mean if it is him, then yeah, chain him to a radiator or whatever, but 'if'...