Churchill is taught in schools from primary school and highschool. You cannot escape the man.
Winston Churchill
- Thread starter Cascarino
- Start date
Exactly my point, bringing down his statue changes nothing
Yeah the comparisons are barmy to say the least.
This thread just goes around in circles. As another poster pointed out earlier I very much doubt the statue will be taken down. What will happen is it will remain covered for a while, the lockdown will be lifted, and gradually people will return to normal life. Off the back of that the violent element of there far left and far right "protests" will lose interest and latch on to something else. In doing so the rest of the mature population can continue to push and work towards meaningful, lasting positive change. A great start would be reviewing the educational curriculum.
It does because a statue is a celebration whereby the complexity of the man’s character and thoughts are not taught. In an educational setting you can learn the nuances of a man who was a product of his time, but also a racist.
Wait what !? I can't tell if this is a serious point of not ?
Again you're reasoning for keeping the Churchill statue up
would make it impossible to bring any statue down. You can see why you're argument a bit useless here.
?
But ok if it changes nothing why are you against it coming down ?
As an atheist I find your defence of the bigoted institutions who burned thousands of people to death for not believing in their nonsense after death fantasy deeply offensive.
Imagine what it must be like to walk past, not a statue on a street but massive buildings topped by the very symbols of oppression at the center of every town and village paid for by the unjust tithing of the the poor, mercilessly extracted by force of arms and harnessed by tyrants to subdue the masses.
Lets be consistent I say, take down your buildings celebrating bigots and murderers and cleanse the history of oppression once and for all.
Bit of a side note but if we're talking about the dark side of the British empire being addressed more in schools then maybe the bubble of myth-making around WW2 could also do with being punctured.
Both true. These statues are nothing more than a symbolic battleground in a shift in political culture and historical awareness. Everybody understands this is the core issue (which is why the row is so fierce), and it doesn't hurt the message at all. Quite the opposite.
Good post but what will make anyone change the National Curriculum?
Perhaps a petition? Get some influential people to speak out about it? In fairness now is a perfect time to go down this route when you consider much of the population have been home schooling. This would have the most long lasting impact on our future generations rather than the neanderthal fighting and vandalism both sides have displayed in parts over the past week. That just breeds further division in my opinion without any meaningful purpose.
I think the statue should be in a war museum for historical context, not in a public place. I think it's a bit much to ask people not be be offended by his statue displayed in central London while still being subjected to racism and xenophobia on a regular basis. It's fine if people are grateful for what he did during WW2 and can separate that from his other actions but that's easier to do as a white British person.
This has been on the agenda for years. Its also part of the BLM agenda too. Plenty of petitions have been signed, plenty of influential people have spoken about it.
Hopefully something is done this time.
Goes both ways that if you want to be clever.
No adult should have this level of attachment to the removal of inanimate fecking objects
When the inanimate object is a celebration of a bygone era which is no longer acceptable in modern society, I think it’s probably fair?
Why?
You seem to get offended very easily.
Go and ransack all churches /mosques/temples then I suppose because of actions of other Christians/Muslims/Hindus. Would make a whole lot of sense and you'd totally end up not getting in trouble.
You can't cleanse history of anything. What you can do is change the present. And while taking down a few symbols of hatred shouldn't be standing aloft, I don't think it's part of a genuine solution.
People: Slavery was centuries ago, get over it!
Also same people: History is important, leave our celebratory statues of racists, slavers and warmongers alone.
Also same people: History is important, leave our celebratory statues of racists, slavers and warmongers alone.
You mean like church's who condemn homosexuality?
I have said I’d happily see the dismantling of organised religion across the world and replaced with places for those who believe to gather where there isn’t the connection to the systemic oppression of millions throughout history.
The union flag could be seen as a racist symbol. Should we change that aswell? You would be literally getting rid of every monument in Britain from over 100 years ago its madness.
Every country has a past good and bad. Its only been the last 50 years or so, that the world has been a bit more stable.
Of course, the people doing these things know the media drives it. They're not interested in the BLM movement, it's just another cause to pin their name to. They are the Antifa/Momentum types who just want to cause trouble however they can, and they know attacking things at the heart of British culture is the easiest way to do that. They're at every protest trying to do the same thing and every time the original aims get forgotten as everybody focuses on these small groups of idiots trying to stir things up.
The people I'm referring to = in the videos of the statues being vandalised and the people starting violence at the protests, they are almost always white middle class millennials. Hardly the oppressed minorities.
I’d agree that the union flag and flag of st. George can be seen as racist symbols. That’s because racist nationalists hijack them, not because they are intrinsically racist.
Until the US were dragged in because of Pearl Harbour And the soviet union were dragged in because hitler betrayed their alliance and invaded them. Britain were the only ones to do the right thing and declare war on Nazi Germany once their aggressive plans became apparent and manifest.
What a curse to be British
It must be quite annoying to have the whole world (including half your own population) weigh in on your history and demand repentence and reparations and whatnot for the deaths of a millions of people, despite the fact that since 1688 it is by far the country which has contributed most to human freedom and prosperity. Despite all its cruelties you'll be hard pressed to find a more benign Empire in human history in terms of leaving a lasting legacy of lifting generations of people out of poverty, bondage and repression.
And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
It must be quite annoying to have the whole world (including half your own population) weigh in on your history and demand repentence and reparations and whatnot for the deaths of a millions of people, despite the fact that since 1688 it is by far the country which has contributed most to human freedom and prosperity. Despite all its cruelties you'll be hard pressed to find a more benign Empire in human history in terms of leaving a lasting legacy of lifting generations of people out of poverty, bondage and repression.And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
Just a small mention for Canada, Australia, New Zealand.... South Africa (not sure whether I should mention SA)....
Edit. Of course all of the ahem...Commonwealth countries should get a mention too, before I am bombarded with outrage....
I'm not being serious, but I am trying to make a point. In this debate it is not about what is offensive, its about what offends you. ( not you personally). There is no empirical scale we can measure each statue against to decide which stay and which go. If we did try to make a cold clear analysis, organised religious buildings would go the way of the monastery post Henry.
That's always how it works. There are plenty of people we all know who are genuinely good and see their faith (which they strongly believe in) as a force for good. Now while I have little interest in it myself, I doubt religion is inherently evil either. It's usually somebody or a group that takes a philosophy and bends it to their crooked tune, or applies something archaic and misguided (usually specific sections etc) which doesn't belong in today's world.
I'm just interested in how far we go with the history thing. As an Indian, watching Brits dismantle their own past leadership who indeed hand blood (especially ours) on their hands, is mildly amusing. But the logic of this exercise seems to be a bit strange. Also, it has to be said that racism is only evil of all the evils to have existed in this world. So if we have to, we should extend this to all sorts of misdemeanors.
What a curse to be British
And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
Almost a 'what have the Romans ever done for us' kind of question.
The history of the British Empire does not belong to the U.K. or the British people, for reasons that are fecking obvious.What a curse to be British
And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
We can only have these conversations because of what many people sacrificed 80 years ago. Could you imagine if Chamberlain stayed in office? Things might of been very different. Everyone seems to be sh*tting on everything British at the minute.What a curse to be British
And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
People are offended far too easily. It's often what stifles genuinely constructive discourse and progress. And I'm not sure what cold and clear analysis you seem to be suggesting be done. Religious places serve a purpose for those have faith. Because XYZ belonging to that religion or its clerics/priests was an Uber cnut isn't sufficient basis to disband it given it is for the people who use it and their belief. Not would that ever be allowed except for being proposed in armchairs couch potato panels such as this thread.
Or you could be more honest and say,
My history is important to me but your history isn't.
Your history is important to you but mine isn't.
Then at least we can understand the debate better, but that means we have to live with being hypocrites and it seems we all like being right more than we like getting along.
I'd agree with that.
You think that’s a curse, try being of African descent.What a curse to be British
And now it boils down to "Let's remove the statue of the guy who symbolizes facing and defeating an existential threat to everything we value".
It's good you mentioned them and fair, but without Britains declaration of war at the time, the course of the war may have been completely different. The vast majority of Europe may now have been Nazi Europe. You're right, Britain was not comepletely alone.
Since attachment to symbols and the willingness to march for and against different ones is a constant throughout history, you are probably a bit late to that one.
I don’t get your point
I don't mean to be argumentative but both Britain and France declared war at the same time, I think the Commonwealth and Empire (oh fe*k) declared war a week later. But I could be wrong.
They're pretty bloody closely interlinked though, eh?