Ah the good old attack the posters "intention" if you`re unable to fight the arguments. I don`t give a shit about City, I actually would like to see them get Messi simply for the fact that I would like to see him in another league. Given that the club I mainly support will linger in lower league football for the forseeable future I am quite apathetic towards the big clubs. I don`t belittle their success I just call it out for what its down to: money. The difference they`ve put in between them and other clubs is not down to being smarter, more progressive or more innovative. They simply could afford to spend big on every freaking aspect there is in professional football.
You always pull up strawmen like bad management of ManUnited or Schalke just to legitimize that logic, if any other club had such a shitshow of transfer blunders like City in recent years you would be the first to put that down to shit management, yet because it does not hurt them financially it`s just "a setback on the road". If you have an infinite money stream you can simply afford to blunder on every instance. While for other clubs the question to hire an additional scout or to extend the stadium are big financial decisions with huge potential downsides, City don`t have to think twice, they just spent and figure out if it worked afterwards.
City spent big on every level related to professional football while still being the biggest net spender on transfers, they don`t have to consider or balance like other clubs whatsoever. But clowns like you act that they`re just the smarter kid in class that has success because its "long term vision" and innovation while all the other kids are just to dumb to comply with this strategic masterclass.
Yeah, I`m just as apathetic, I simply dislike people telling fairytales.
City had a philosophy and saw it through. They pursue this road for almost 8 years now. If you like it or not, they don't just throw money out the window but know what they're doing. They try to sign players with a certain profile that is compatible with Guardiola's style and began doing so three years before he even arrived. And they also walk away from transfers they deem too expensive, see Sanchez for example, so they rarely have these really big screw ups in the dimensions of Coutinho, Dembele or Griezmann. I also can't imagine they'd ever spent 80m on Maguire or 90+m on Pogba in a pre-Neymar market.
Yes, they spend much and yes, without a huge financial backing you've got no chance to establish yourself as an elite club, not denying that. But it isn't a guarantee. Since 2012, City has spent 866m on transfer fees according to transfermarkt, United is not far behind in the same time frame with 818m and Barca's 560m isn't too bad, either. Especially since Barca has the highest wage bill in world football. However, Barca despite all their spendings are still completely reliant on one single player and United is only now starting to look as if they could maybe become a title contender again in the next 2-3 years if they get their recruitment on point.
So yeah, your opinion is short sighted. If you take a closer look, you can't argue that their management isn't superior to that of most clubs out there. Reducing their success to their financial prowess is not fair but most people don't really care because they don't think City deserve a fair assessment anyway.