Spurs Documentary: All or nothing

[sammsky1]

NO idea but I found this amusing.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/read-what-ofcom-thinks-47-8987533

Arse Mild language, generally of little concern.
Arsehole Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Balls Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Particularly vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact, especially for women.
Bastard Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact. Less problematic when used to refer indirectly to someone who is cruel or nasty.
Beaver Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Beef curtains* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Bellend Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen by some as a childish word often said in jest. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bint Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as potentially derogatory by women, but men also find the word problematic.
Bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bloodclaat* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Among those familiar, seen as vulgar and crude. Strongly disliked by women when meaning discussed.
Bloody Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion, and not usually as a directed insult.
Bollocks Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Not generally offensive but somewhat vulgar when used to refer to testicles. Less problematic when used to mean 'nonsense'.
Bugger Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion when making a mistake. Seen as much stronger when used in a clearly sexual context.
Bullshit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Clunge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Cock Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Cow Mild language, generally of little concern. Commonly viewed as a humorous insult.
Crap Mild language, generally of little concern.
cnut Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Especially distasteful and offensive to women and older participants.
Damn Mild language, generally of little concern.
Dick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Dickhead Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Fanny Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude, particularly by women.
Feck/Effing Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Often seen as humorous. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Flaps Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
feck Strongest language, unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as strong, aggressive and vulgar. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Gash Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Ginger Mild language, generally of little concern. Typically viewed as a humorous insult, however more aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Git Mild language, generally of little concern. Tyically viewed as a humorous insult.
God Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participantswhen used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Goddam Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. Seen as slightly stronger than 'God' because it is more aggressive. Some recognition that this might offend religious people.
Jesus Christ Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participants when used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Knob Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Minge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Minger Mild language, generally of little concern. Viewed as a humorous insult. More unpleasant than offensive. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Motherfecker Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Seen as very aggressive when intended to hurt or offend.
Munter Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Pissed / pissed off Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Neither meaning – drunk or angry – particularly offensive but more problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly.
Prick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Punani Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by those familiar.
Pussy Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Much milder when used to mean weak or ineffectual but still seen as problematic by some.
Shit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Common language used in everyday life but problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly. Concerns about children learning the word.
Snatch Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many.
Sod-off Mild language, generally of little concern.
Son of a bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed..
Tits Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact.
Twat Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Less problematic if describing a rude or obnoxious person, but still potentially offensive.

*An asterisk indicates the words were recognised by less than 40 per cent of the people surveyed by Ofcom.

saving for future reference!

Perhaps @Damien and the Mods can tell us which is or isn't appropriate on a similar scale on the cafe?

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

saving for future reference!

Perhaps @Damien and the Mods can tell us which is or isn't appropriate on a similar scale on the cafe?

Hope I don't get a ban, but i did check it over after posting.

 

[Murder on Zidane's Floor]

I found it hilarious how he bollocked the entire team for not doing enough, moments after his feckup lead to a goal.

Hahahaha a man after my own heart.

 

[sammsky1]

Hope I don't get a ban, but i did check it over after posting.

Just posted in in the general

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

Just posted in in the general

You will fall with me!!

 

[EvilChuck]

Props to Amazon they’ve smashed this documentary. Brings us such a good insight into a top club.

Pretty sure they were filming Spurs

 

[ayushreddevil9]

Pretty sure they were filming Spurs

 

[ChaddyP]

NO idea but I found this amusing.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/read-what-ofcom-thinks-47-8987533

Arse Mild language, generally of little concern.
Arsehole Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Balls Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Particularly vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact, especially for women.
Bastard Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact. Less problematic when used to refer indirectly to someone who is cruel or nasty.
Beaver Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Beef curtains* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Bellend Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen by some as a childish word often said in jest. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bint Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as potentially derogatory by women, but men also find the word problematic.
Bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bloodclaat* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Among those familiar, seen as vulgar and crude. Strongly disliked by women when meaning discussed.
Bloody Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion, and not usually as a directed insult.
Bollocks Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Not generally offensive but somewhat vulgar when used to refer to testicles. Less problematic when used to mean 'nonsense'.
Bugger Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion when making a mistake. Seen as much stronger when used in a clearly sexual context.
Bullshit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Clunge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Cock Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Cow Mild language, generally of little concern. Commonly viewed as a humorous insult.
Crap Mild language, generally of little concern.
cnut Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Especially distasteful and offensive to women and older participants.
Damn Mild language, generally of little concern.
Dick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Dickhead Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Fanny Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude, particularly by women.
Feck/Effing Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Often seen as humorous. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Flaps Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
feck Strongest language, unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as strong, aggressive and vulgar. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Gash Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Ginger Mild language, generally of little concern. Typically viewed as a humorous insult, however more aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Git Mild language, generally of little concern. Tyically viewed as a humorous insult.
God Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participantswhen used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Goddam Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. Seen as slightly stronger than 'God' because it is more aggressive. Some recognition that this might offend religious people.
Jesus Christ Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participants when used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Knob Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Minge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Minger Mild language, generally of little concern. Viewed as a humorous insult. More unpleasant than offensive. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Motherfecker Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Seen as very aggressive when intended to hurt or offend.
Munter Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Pissed / pissed off Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Neither meaning – drunk or angry – particularly offensive but more problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly.
Prick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Punani Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by those familiar.
Pussy Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Much milder when used to mean weak or ineffectual but still seen as problematic by some.
Shit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Common language used in everyday life but problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly. Concerns about children learning the word.
Snatch Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many.
Sod-off Mild language, generally of little concern.
Son of a bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed..
Tits Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact.
Twat Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Less problematic if describing a rude or obnoxious person, but still potentially offensive.

*An asterisk indicates the words were recognised by less than 40 per cent of the people surveyed by Ofcom.

Shit and Jesus Christ are in the same category? quite amusing this list

 

[simonhch]

Hilarious how they tried to make out they beat a whole bunch of elite clubs to Bergwijn.

 

[2 man midfield]

NO idea but I found this amusing.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/read-what-ofcom-thinks-47-8987533

Arse Mild language, generally of little concern.
Arsehole Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Balls Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Particularly vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact, especially for women.
Bastard Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact. Less problematic when used to refer indirectly to someone who is cruel or nasty.
Beaver Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Beef curtains* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Bellend Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen by some as a childish word often said in jest. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bint Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as potentially derogatory by women, but men also find the word problematic.
Bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Bloodclaat* Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Low recognition. Among those familiar, seen as vulgar and crude. Strongly disliked by women when meaning discussed.
Bloody Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion, and not usually as a directed insult.
Bollocks Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Not generally offensive but somewhat vulgar when used to refer to testicles. Less problematic when used to mean 'nonsense'.
Bugger Mild language, generally of little concern. Frequently used in everyday language to express emotion when making a mistake. Seen as much stronger when used in a clearly sexual context.
Bullshit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Clunge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful, especially by women.
Cock Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Cow Mild language, generally of little concern. Commonly viewed as a humorous insult.
Crap Mild language, generally of little concern.
cnut Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Especially distasteful and offensive to women and older participants.
Damn Mild language, generally of little concern.
Dick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Dickhead Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Fanny Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude, particularly by women.
Feck/Effing Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Often seen as humorous. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Flaps Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
feck Strongest language, unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as strong, aggressive and vulgar. Older participants more likely to consider the word unacceptable.
Gash Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Ginger Mild language, generally of little concern. Typically viewed as a humorous insult, however more aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Git Mild language, generally of little concern. Tyically viewed as a humorous insult.
God Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participantswhen used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Goddam Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. Seen as slightly stronger than 'God' because it is more aggressive. Some recognition that this might offend religious people.
Jesus Christ Mild language, generally of little concern when used to express emotion. A concern for older or more religiously sensitive participants when used as an obscenity. Some recognition that this may offend religious people.
Knob Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many. Less problematic when used in a humorous context, and generally considered slightly milder than 'cock'.
Minge Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as crude and often derogatory, particularly by women.
Minger Mild language, generally of little concern. Viewed as a humorous insult. More unpleasant than offensive. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Motherfecker Strongest language, problematic for some even post-watershed. Vulgar, derogatory and shocking for both men and women. Seen as very aggressive when intended to hurt or offend.
Munter Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. More aggression or specific intent to hurt heightens impact.
Pissed / pissed off Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Neither meaning – drunk or angry – particularly offensive but more problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly.
Prick Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Less problematic when used in a humorous context.
Punani Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Not always recognised. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by those familiar.
Pussy Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Much milder when used to mean weak or ineffectual but still seen as problematic by some.
Shit Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Common language used in everyday life but problematic when used aggressively or repeatedly. Concerns about children learning the word.
Snatch Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful by many.
Sod-off Mild language, generally of little concern.
Son of a bitch Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed..
Tits Medium language, potentially unacceptable pre-watershed. Vulgar or sexual use heightens the impact.
Twat Strong language, generally unacceptable pre-watershed. Seen as vulgar and distasteful when used to refer to the vagina. Less problematic if describing a rude or obnoxious person, but still potentially offensive.

*An asterisk indicates the words were recognised by less than 40 per cent of the people surveyed by Ofcom.

How is snatch stronger than shit?

 

[Eddy_JukeZ]

The bit about Rose and Jose was great.


I find this more interesting than the City one, because there's more drama.

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

How is snatch stronger than shit?

Honestly no idea .

 

[Salt Bailly]

I've definitely noticed a reduction in shit's impact in recent years, I'm always hearing in on pre-watershed tv.

Yet to hear anyone come out with beef curtains though I mustn't watch enough of The Inbetweeners....

 

[Renegade]

Just finished ep 2 and Jose’s love for Dier is painful. £100m could have been spent on him and Rose a couple seasons ago. Let that sink.

These documentaries make the coaching and pep talks look so sunday league. Managing footballers looks like a pain in the ass.

 

[Offside]

Yeah I find it interesting how the player team talks before the games are so similar to Sunday league. “Let’s fecking do these” etc. Lloris seems like a great leader.

 

[2 man midfield]

They’re definitely cutting out all the significant tactical stuff. Can’t see Jose wanting to give away important secrets like what colour bus he draws on his tactics board.

 

[clarkydaz]

Rose does have a point, Rooney said something similar that he would drop players and wouldnt explain why.

Rooney being dropped was the most obvious decision in football

 

[roonster09]

Just finished ep 2 and Jose’s love for Dier is painful. £100m could have been spent on him and Rose a couple seasons ago. Let that sink.

These documentaries make the coaching and pep talks look so sunday league. Managing footballers looks like a pain in the ass.

Jose's dream duo, Rose and Dier. Would have been our problem now.

 

[parkthebuslads]

Is there a way around having to stop and start it for the subtitles?

 

[balaks]

I haven't seen it yet but based on that Rose clip I cannot see why anyone would want that kind of thing to be in the public domain, as fascinating it may be I'd be cringing if I were a Spurs fan

I stopped reading after that.

 

[balaks]

Hilarious how they tried to make out they beat a whole bunch of elite clubs to Bergwijn.

Um... we did? He was on most top European clubs radars, including Utd. Probably best you actually do a bit of research before making comments like that.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/foot...-bergwijn-transfer-manchester-united-13910296

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8205573/man-united-psv-bergwijn-25m-transfer/

 

[roonster09]

Watched 4th and 5th episodes, it's better with all the injuries, transfers part. Wish they went in more depth, especially the Eriksen transfer.

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

Watched 4th and 5th episodes, it's better with all the injuries, transfers part. Wish they went in more depth, especially the Eriksen transfer.

Have to say that was a total farce that interview, Eriksen came out of it looking like he didn't care about money and Levy came out of it looking like he would happily be paying Eriksen £300K a week ... Loved the way Levy looked right at the camera during it.

 

[acnumber9]

Um... we did? He was on most top European clubs radars, including Utd. Probably best you actually do a bit of research before making comments like that.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/foot...-bergwijn-transfer-manchester-united-13910296

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/8205573/man-united-psv-bergwijn-25m-transfer/

The Sun and The Mirror are definitely reliable sources. United have probably scouted most players Spurs have signed at some stage. Doesn’t mean they were beat to his signature.

 

[roonster09]

Have to say that was a total farce that interview, Eriksen came out of it looking like he didn't care about money and Levy came out of it looking like he would happily be paying Eriksen £300K a week ... Loved the way Levy looked right at the camera during it.

Yeah, it's Jose and Levy PR videos.

 

[balaks]

The Sun and The Mirror are definitely reliable sources. United have probably scouted most players Spurs have signed at some stage. Doesn’t mean they were beat to his signature.

No proof that we didn't though and plenty of evidence to suggest we did - or at least a lot of top clubs monitoring the situation.

 

[roonster09]

No proof that we didn't though and plenty of evidence to suggest we did - or at least a lot of top clubs monitoring the situation.

 

[balaks]

Well it's true isn't it??!

I'm getting annoyed by that guys suggestion that if Spurs sign anybody that automatically means no top clubs could have been in for them. That's total nonsense.

 

[roonster09]

Well it's true isn't it??!

That was a weird question. How can anyone prove that Spurs didn't beat any club to sign this player?

Other way is possible as you can show links which says clubs made bids for the said player .

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

Yeah, it's Jose and Levy PR videos.

No problem admitting it, I find most of it quite bland but I do like seeing the physios and the team talks, the rest is mostly for foreign fans to raise the profile of the club and show of the stadium.

 

[balaks]

That was a weird question. How can anyone prove that Spurs didn't beat any club to sign this player?

Other way is possible as you can show links which says clubs made bids for the said player .

So the other guy gets to make statements and not back it up with anything but in my response to it I am required to provide proof? Ok mate!

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

Well it's true isn't it??!

I'm getting annoyed by that guys suggestion that if Spurs sign anybody that automatically means no top clubs could have been in for them. That's total nonsense.

Man just let it run off your back its much easier than rising to it. Jose will implode, Kane is injury prone and done blah blah blah we have been here long enough to ignore it.

 

[roonster09]

No problem admitting it, I find most of it quite bland but I do like seeing the physios and the team talks, the rest is mostly for foreign fans to raise the profile of the club and show of the stadium.

I think it's for money. If I'm not wrong Spurs get around 10 million and also good marketing too on one of the biggest platforms.

Tbh I enjoyed it. Wish they cut out these silly PR things and showed what actually happened, instead of staged interviews, conversations.

Loved the part about Tanganga.

 

[LilyWhiteSpur]

I think it's for money. If I'm not wrong Spurs get around 10 million and also good marketing too on one of the biggest platforms.

Tbh I enjoyed it. Wish they cut out these silly PR things and showed what actually happened, instead of staged interviews, conversations.

Loved the part about Tanganga.

That's exactly why I watch it, doesn't matter who you support seeing young kids that emotional shows how much it means to them.

 

[roonster09]

So the other guy gets to make statements and not back it up with anything but in my response to it I am required to provide proof? Ok mate!

Yes, because if you beat other European clubs for his signing, then where are the links about the bids made for this player?

Player being in club's radar means nothing, in this age and era, every player is under every club's radar. That's why they have scouts. Unless club makes the bid or approaches the player, how can any club beat other clubs?

 

[roonster09]

That's exactly why I watch it, doesn't matter who you support seeing young kids that emotional shows how much it means to them.

Yeah, it's great to see when the academy player steps up to first team. It means so much to them.

 

[Vidyoyo]

Agreed the Tanganga focus is nice. Although it was a little jarring seeing him so much and then in the 4th episode it mentioning about his Premier League debut (against Liverpool).

 

[balaks]

Yes, because if you beat other European clubs for his signing, then where are the links about the bids made for this player?

Player being in club's radar means nothing, in this age and era, every player is under every club's radar. That's why they have scouts. Unless club makes the bid or approaches the player, how can any club beat other clubs?

I have no idea - but we do have the club's chief negotiator stating it as fact. This is such a silly thing for us to be arguing about because none of us can possibly know the answer or what is true or not.

 

[balaks]

Agreed the Tanganga focus is nice. Although it was a little jarring seeing him so much and then in the 4th episode it mentioning about his Premier League debut (against Liverpool).

I really enjoyed the Tanganga bits as well. Seems like a very down to earth, humble guy - really good player too.

 

[roonster09]

I have no idea - but we do have the club's chief negotiator stating it as fact. This is such a silly thing for us to be arguing about because none of us can possibly know the answer or what is true or not.

We should take everything with a pinch of salt in the PR shows tbh, he won't be saying we had a free run for a highly rated player. Our CEO said there are 700 million ManUtd fans and he stated that as a fact. I for one don't believe that btw, he said that in investors conference call as part of PR show.

Yeah it's a silly argument, just was curious on how you wanted other poster to prove, I mean how can anyone prove that no club was interested? Its easier to prove when clubs are interested as we will see lot of news about club trying to sign players and making bids for them.