Bosws87
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,729
I turned off ray tracing completely while it is fantastic it’s not worth the performance cost I’d rather have all the other bells and whistles.
I've had my code and been dispatched eta 15th for arrival.At least credit the guy in this thread who gave you the idea
I've been looking at this last few hours too. More just because it's a cheap way to get Stadia Premiere. I hope xCloud ends up working on the Chromecast Ultra at some point with it being Android.
Though it is off-putting that it could be a month from now before I get a code to claim the free Chromecast.
they’d never recover from it. They have to patch this like crazyImagine CDPR just abandoned it after a few months?
visual cue to show your in stealth mode making no noise, but the AI is that thick it’s irrelevantIs there a way to turn off the screen going dark around the edges when you crouch?
Is there a reason for that? I assume it's not just to remind you that you're crouched..
So a reminder that you're crouchedvisual cue to show your in stealth mode making no noise, but the AI is that thick it’s irrelevant
I agree, it is odd how badly they've fecked it. But then again Google do have plenty of previous.They have made some pretty big decisions in the marketing space built around future proofing Chrome and it's products, and they called out Stadia's potential and importance to their strategy a lot during that process.
That they have then let the ball drop on it like they have seems strange to me, so I wouldn't be surprised if they dumped it either.
They can still turn it around though if they do refocus. The challenge for them is that Microsoft have jumped on streaming so quickly and can match them for cloud infrastructure, and already have an established roster of studios, IP and audience.
visual cue to show your in stealth mode making no noise, but the AI is that thick it’s irrelevant
So a reminder that you're crouched
They have multiplayer and DLC to release.Imagine CDPR just abandoned it after a few months?
Is it much better for you on the visual mode vs the high framerate? I'm playing on stadia too (macbook) and graphics are ok but ideally would've wanted better, don't really see much off a difference between visual and high framer rate.20 mins into stadia game... all going well. One bug so far. Took a long time to get the controller settings right. Graphics were terrible (really bad) on high framerate mode. Seems 30 fps locked on visuals mode.
Ahh, young Jake. All good, buddy. Still strumming?Alright mate! How's things?
Pubic hair coloring.This is the disappointing thing for me...there's not actually a really good game buried beneath it. It's ok at best.
I invite anyone to tell me a single gameplay element that is either new, or not been done a lot better before....go!
It was ridiculed for a reason, not because of the score itself, but the actual review, the reviewer skipped tons of content, barely played any side quests in an RPG. She shouldn't be given any RPG/Open World game to review again with this kind of approach. A terrible reviewer with horrible past reviews.Journalists attack? Most of them gave it a 9.
Unless the title means Journalists are attacked, then that’s true because one was for giving it a 7 and was ridiculed.
Not a gameplay element, and you can't even pick your own colour past the presets. 2/10.Pubic hair coloring.
Care to elaborate? For a start, how do you know she skipped a ton of content?It was ridiculed for a reason, not because of the score itself, but the actual review, the reviewer skipped tons of content, barely played any side quests in an RPG. She shouldn't be given any RPG/Open World game to review again with this kind of approach. A terrible reviewer with horrible past reviews.
On the other hand, CP 2077 deserves that 7 because of horrible state it is in, it probably deserves a 4/10 on last gen consoles. But I am playing it on PC and enjoying the heck out of it.
Early on in Cyberpunk 2077, there's a series of side quests that has you tracking down rogue taxis run by faulty AI. You have to talk one of the taxis down from suicide as it contemplates driving off a bridge, while another needs to be brute-forced into behaving, and a third is an obvious reference to a famous video game AI that manipulates you as you chase it down. It's one of the best minor questlines in the game, an intriguing and surprisingly human substory that rewards you with lots of much-needed cash. It's also an excuse to send you to every corner of Night City, a clever introduction to all the areas you haven't yet been.
I spent a lot of my playtime following side-quest threads like this one, excited about the premise and hoping to find something as interesting or fun or rewarding at the end and, in many cases, I did.
She admitted in an youtube interview and in another place. It's a well known fact at this point.Not a gameplay element, and you can't even pick your own colour past the presets. 2/10.
Care to elaborate? For a start, how do you know she skipped a ton of content?
Links and context please.She admitted in an youtube interview and in another place. It's a well known fact at this point.
Not a gameplay element, and you can't even pick your own colour past the presets. 2/10.
Care to elaborate? For a start, how do you know she skipped a ton of content?
Past terrible reviews, I am presuming Geko doesn’t agree about her giving last of us 2 a 8/10, which is bizarre as his whole stick was to hate on the game. Strange.Kallie played Cyberpunk 2077 for 50 hours, completing a variety of side quests and character arcs as well as one ending for the main story. She played a female Nomad V and specialized in hacking. Review code was provided by CD Projekt Red.
I can't be bothered to chase videos just so you can believe me, basically she rushed the story, she never changed her gear, never got cybernetics, felt the open world was too overwhelming, was overwhelmed by skill trees, some side quests and decided they were meaningless despite many other reviewers confirming the side quests are integral to the game and even intersect with the main story.Links and context please.
He knows that. He is hiding behind the fact he hasn't actually posted what he means and where he gets it from..Past terrible reviews, I am presuming Geko doesn’t agree about her giving last of us 2 a 8/10, which is bizarre as his whole stick was to hate on the game. Strange.
She played 50 hours of the game and that’s more than enough to forge a opinion.
You can't and you won't because you already know I have seen those videos and know what you've watched and will absolutely destroy both you and the piece of shit slurring that review. The very fact he ignores way worse reviews from the off to focus on her should tell you his point, then it only gets way worse from there.I can't be bothered to chase videos just so you can believe me, basically she rushed the story, she never changed her gear, never got cybernetics, felt the open world was too overwhelming, was overwhelmed by skill trees, some side quests and decided they were meaningless despite many other reviewers confirming the side quests are integral to the game and even intersect with the main story.
Terrible review, this is not her kind of game and that is fine, so it is basically Gamespot's fault giving the review to her.
Who ignores what? Which piece of shit? Are you ok? Do you need some help? You are literally not making any sense, I mean I know you like to create your own narratives and go with it, but this is too early for that to be honest.He knows that. He is hiding behind the fact he hasn't actually posted what he means and where he gets it from..
For example...
You can't and you won't because you already know I have seen those videos and know what you've watched and will absolutely destroy both you and the piece of shit slurring that review. The very fact he ignores way worse reviews from the off to focus on her should tell you his point, then it only gets way worse from there.
Stop being a coward. If you have something to say then say it. If you can pick apart a single piece of that review for yourself, then do it.
Hey, I'll even help you...lets take what she said about not doing the cop quests. Now do you disagree that they just aren't that important and you have better things to do or not? And does the time you have to play affect that decision?
Oh his buddy the quartering.He knows that. He is hiding behind the fact he hasn't actually posted what he means and where he gets it from..
For example...
You can't and you won't because you already know I have seen those videos and know what you've watched and will absolutely destroy both you and the piece of shit slurring that review. The very fact he ignores way worse reviews from the off to focus on her should tell you his point, then it only gets way worse from there.
Stop being a coward. If you have something to say then say it. If you can pick apart a single piece of that review for yourself, then do it.
Hey, I'll even help you...lets take what she said about not doing the cop quests. Now do you disagree that they just aren't that important and you have better things to do or not? And does the time you have to play affect that decision?
Post "the other place". Post the video and explain exactly what she says that leads you to your views. You can't be bothered to, but you have time to ramble on and once again not answer any questions? You can't answer exactly what about her reviews is the problem?Who ignores what? Which piece of shit? Are you ok? Do you need some help? You are literally not making any sense, I mean I know you like to create your own narratives and go with it, but this is too early for that to be honest.
I was talking about her youtube interview and you are mentioning god knows what, fecking psycho.
That's definitely one of his sources, though not his only one.Oh his buddy the quartering.
Saw a lot of reviewers on my timeline telling him to go feck himself. Funny how the morons who were targeting this reviewer have now done a uturn and moved onto targeting the company itself judging by the userscores on metacritic.
I like you, but this isn't funny.Look at these two arguing again
No, I can't be bothered to, I am way past answering your fantasies, I answered until I saw how stubborn with your predefined narratives you are. That is the real sad thing, you thinking you got everything figured out and spewing some random shit, mentioning random people, I just checked Quartering Bojan mentioned, he is one of those gossip drama channels which I don't waste my time watching. But you are doing good old you, thinking you know everything, cheers!Post "the other place". Post the video and explain exactly what she says that leads you to your views. You can't be bothered to, but you have time to ramble on and once again not answer any questions? You can't answer exactly what about her reviews is the problem?
Do that, then let's talk about what exactly your problem is, because as always you can't and won't answer. You'll keep trying to turn it on me, you'll keep posting your smilies, but you'll never answer. The sad thing is people will just see this as us two arguing again, when in fact it should be about your incredibly questionable views that no one else asks even simple questions about and why you refuse to answer.
I don’t even know what’s going on to be honest. Do me a tl;dr? Are you both on the beers?I like you, but this isn't funny.
Exactly on script. You won't answer a single question, yet repeat over and over your little buzzwords like "narrative".No, I can't be bothered to, I am way past answering your fantasies, I answered until I saw how stubborn with your predefined narratives you are. That is the real sad thing, you thinking you got everything figured out and spewing some random shit, mentioning random people, I just checked Quartering Bojan mentioned, he is one of those gossip drama channels which I don't waste my time watching. But you are doing good old you, thinking you know everything, cheers!
Ooooh yeah, he hit me real hard, I am shivering over here, I don't know what to do man, I am donezo!Exactly on script. You won't answer a single question, yet repeat over and over your little buzzwords like "narrative".
And @Bojan11 hit you hard with the Quartening mention didn't he? I didn't even need to, funny, What's also funny is you seemed to watch that whole thing rather quickly and want to now distance yourself despite him exactly describing your views...Funny that.
Post your other sources, post your reasoning for her bad reviews. Literally post anything to back yourself up. Otherwise, you'll continue to be a plain simple coward just like all who think like you do.
Read the TLOU 2 thread. Read this thread. Google what he's talking about.I don’t even know what’s going on to be honest. Do me a tl;dr? Are you both on the beers?
Can’t remember the whole of it. But Geks was saying weird stuff in the last of us 2 thread and lot of people on here called him out over it and he was refusing to answer. Just kept repeating himself. He wasn’t just specifically moaning about the gameplay because if he was @Redlambs would have agreed with him because the gameplay on those games is average.I don’t even know what’s going on to be honest. Do me a tl;dr? Are you both on the beers?
Another predictable coward response.Ooooh yeah, he hit me real hard, I am shivering over here, I don't know what to do man, I am donezo!
We'll ignore your issues with the "interview" for now, what's the other place?She admitted in an youtube interview and in another place. It's a well known fact at this point.
Let's not forget the very fact his "agenda" posts was around the time of the original leaks. That part is important too.Can’t remember the whole of it. But Geks was saying weird stuff in the last of us 2 thread and lot of people on here called him out over it and he was refusing to answer. Just kept repeating himself. He wasn’t just specifically moaning about the gameplay because if he was @Redlambs would have agreed with him because the gameplay on those games is average.
Just check his posts in that thread.