“ If De Bruyne (£68m) has an off day, City have Mahrez (£61m), Sterling (£57m), Silva (£45m), Foden, Gundogan (£24m), & Ferran (£21m)

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
The point is our squad is capable of doing better than it’s doing.

It’s capable of not having three consecutive 0-0 draws and barely a shot on target.

It’s capable of not losing to Sheffield fecking United.

Forget about City, I don’t care about them, I’m only bothered about United and in my view we’re limited by our manager.

I’ve not changed my mind on this in however long it’s been that he’s had the job, but no doubt I’ll be called knee jerk or whatever other soundbytes get thrown around on here.
If you think we’re limited by the manager that means you think that without Ole we’d be a lot better off.

how many points/goals do you think Ole has limited us by?
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,163
Location
Manchester
If you think we’re limited by the manager that means you think that without Ole we’d be a lot better off.

how many points/goals do you think Ole has limited us by?
What are you looking for here, a game by game breakdown?

Give it a rest Wum, I’ve neither the time nor the inclination to entertain that level of silliness.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
So we need another 300 million to beat Sheffield, West Brom and Crystal Palace?

Okay then.
No.
We might need another two hundred million to catch up with one of the best teams of all time. Who have a massive head start, spend more and have a deeper squad.

fecking hell, some of you honestly don’t grasp simple concepts.
Teams don’t always beat others who they are better than.
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
We have spent around 275 million. Of that roughly 35 million was on teenage talent not ready to make an impact.

We have raised roughly 100 million in that time.
This is a good way to think of it. This is the last game United played before Ole took over:

De Gea

Darmian,
Bailly,
Lindelof,
Young

Dalot,
Lingard,
Hererra,
Matic,
Rashford,
Lukaku

Fellaini, Mata and Martial made it off the bench. Jones didn’t.
Has the roughly 150 million pound net spend in that time been value for money?
I don't think it was to be honest. I look at the individual transfers and I don't think we spent that well. I look at 80m for Maguire and can't see why we couldn't have gotten a better CB for that price. I look at 40m for VDB who Ole doesn't seem to rate or trust can't help but think that could have been spent better than just rotting on the bench. 35m for players who as you say who might take years to become a first teamers when in the title of the thread we can see Torres was available for 21m and could have been a solid contributor this season. We paid an 10 million loan fee to extend Ighalo's stay and he barely got a kick. It's not just players brought during Ole's time either, Fred is a waste of 50m, Pogba has not lived up to a world record transfer, we made Sanchez the highest payed player in the league and there's probably more I'm not remembering right now.

I think there is something deeply wrong with how we identify players or with the people who's job it is to secure the best deals for the club. At this point I feel like the squad is fundamentally flawed across all lines and until we rectify the issue, it will be near impossible to close the gap on a side who can beef up the squad with top end players at will.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
I don't think it was to be honest. I look at the individual transfers and I don't think we spent that well. I look at 80m for Maguire and can't see why we couldn't have gotten a better CB for that price. I look at 40m for VDB who Ole doesn't seem to rate or trust can't help but think that could have been spent better than just rotting on the bench. 35m for players who as you say who might take years to become a first teamers when in the title of the thread we can see Torres was available for 21m and could have been a solid contributor this season. We paid an 10 million loan fee to extend Ighalo's stay and he barely got a kick. It's not just players brought during Ole's time either, Fred is a waste of 50m, Pogba has not lived up to a world record transfer, we made Sanchez the highest payed player in the league and there's probably more I'm not remembering right now.

I think there is something deeply wrong with how we identify players or with the people who's job it is to secure the best deals for the club. At this point I feel like the squad is fundamentally flawed across all lines and until we rectify the issue, it will be near impossible to close the gap on a side who can beef up the squad with top end players at will.
Sorry; just a quick one... you think we paid ten million for Ighalo’s loan fee?
 

big rons sovereign

New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2015
Messages
6,160
Chose to spend £135m on Maguire and AWB, didn't improve the defence.

Chose not to sign a right winger or a (fully fit 50+ games a season) out and out centre forward.

And no, going after an overrated £120m English winger who we couldn't afford doesn't constitute properly addressing the right wing issue. No different to absolving Moyes from any blame because we somehow didnt manage to sign Gareth Bale.

Martial used to offer some creative output, now has nothing to offer. Rashford is playing the worst football he ever has in his career in the last 6 weeks or so. Why are they both declining? Why did Ole spend £40m on top goal-scoring midfield talent from the Eredivisie only to never play him?
Ole doesn't spend a penny, nor does he do any negotiation.
That's left up to bollockhead and his mate from uni.
If yer gonna throw shit about spending, throw it upstairs at the clownshow.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,320
Can you do the same for players outside of City. Which players in the league are currently bang in form?

Salah,
Mane,
Firminio,
Kane,
Son,
Aubamayang,
Werner,
Abraham,
Pulisic,
We're not trying to be like any of those teams though are we?

City is the benchmark, and so was Liverpool until this season. If we can't get the best out of our players, it doesn't matter if we've got a team full of Emile Heskeys or a team full of Lionel Messis. We will always underperform.
 

jem

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
9,328
Location
Toronto
Something something gameplan

I keep saying it to people at work, City bought a 70 million defender in summer to replace the 55 million defender that wasn't working. Its turned out that an older 50 million defender has worked better with the 70 million player. People in the media have literally forgotten about the -existence- of Nathan Ake, who really wasn't that much cheaper than Harry Maguire.

Man Utd have a 60 million defender that hasn't quite worked, alongside a 25 million defender, a 30 million defender, and a youth player. Up front, two youth team promotions, a free signing, a 35 million striker and a 9 million championship buy.

Its the wasted money spent by OTHER managers that has caused us some consternation but it's sort of interesting to consider where our players came from in relation to cities. Dean Henderson looks like an an improvement over what many might have said was the best goalkeeper in the world 2 years ago. Its strange times.
How do you figure that?
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
We're not trying to be like any of those teams though are we?

City is the benchmark, and so was Liverpool until this season. If we can't get the best out of our players, it doesn't matter if we've got a team full of Emile Heskeys or a team full of Lionel Messis. We will always underperform.
No. We want to be number one.

obviously.
However, at the moment every team in the league is struggling. Every single one. They all look bollocked, they all can’t score and they all struggle against the teams lower down. Every one.

Apart from City.
Some of that will be down to coaching.

of course, the other thing is that they have a much deeper squad with incrddible players who they can constantly rotate.

how many people play FF and bemoan City. “You never know who is going to start.” Bet you all have said it or heard someone say it.

the point is that is why they’re currently doing well. Certainly a part of it.
Whilst we are “the best of the rest”. Not where we want to be. But a lot better than where we were.
 

Lewnited

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2017
Messages
885
The point is apart from City we have had a better season than every other squad. That is the point.
I mean if you want to look at the league from the most one dimensional point of view possible, sure. Our league position in isolstion is nothing to complain about, but as with everything in life there's context. Taking form in to account, the chances of us beating City on Sunday are pretty slim. That means that we could find ourselves in a position on Sunday where we sit 3rd behind Leicester, while allowing either Chelsea or Liverpool to gain five points on us over the course of two match weeks.

The league table is dynamic and as it stands our form is trending downwards more so than some of the teams around us like Chelsea. We can look at the league table as a static point of reference now, but the reality is that we've hit a pretty bad run of form and there's no evidence that the manager, or to be fair the players, know how to turn it around.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
I mean if you want to look at the league from the most one dimensional point of view possible, sure. Our league position in isolstion is nothing to complain about, but as with everything in life there's context. Taking form in to account, the chances of us beating City on Sunday are pretty slim. That means that we could find ourselves in a position on Sunday where we sit 3rd behind Leicester, while allowing either Chelsea or Liverpool to gain five points on us over the course of two match weeks.

The league table is dynamic and as it stands our form is trending downwards more so than some of the teams around us like Chelsea. We can look at the league table as a static point of reference now, but the reality is that we've hit a pretty bad run of form and there's no evidence that the manager, or to be fair the players, know how to turn it around.
Fair enough. We could drop to third after playing City.

of course then we’ve played City, Chelsea, Everton and Arsenal twice and remain one point behind second withplenty of “winnable” games to go and injured players returning.

point is - as of now - were in a good spot.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,163
Location
Manchester
No,not game by game. Just points. Or goals. Ballpark figure.
I’ve no clue off-hand, but you know as well as I do that there have been a litany of examples of games where we’ve looked collectively clueless as a team and/or been screaming out for changes that haven’t been made.

You always do the same dancing around from excuse to excuse talking about City spending X amount or our “net spend” (vomit) or whatever, but the fundamental point is that this squad is capable of more than it is achieving.

I don’t know who the “right” man is, but I’m pretty well convinced it isn’t Ole sadly.

This isn’t a new position and it’s not a knee jerk reaction to the last three games or whatever other shite you’ll jump to, yet you and your ilk will still run around calling anyone with a different view to you on this an idiot or say they have a lower level of intelligence than you or whatever that bullshit was, making a thousand threads to distract from the reality.

At the end of the day, if Ole wasn’t who Ole is, he’d have nowhere near the level of backing he still gets.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,103
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
Thoughts team?
So what is the problem? That City have gathered good players over the years, while we were spending just as much but on wrong players?

Naming van de Beek among the injured players was a nice touch. We're clearly missing him on the bench.
 

MattofManchester

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
3,804
No.
We might need another two hundred million to catch up with one of the best teams of all time. Who have a massive head start, spend more and have a deeper squad.

fecking hell, some of you honestly don’t grasp simple concepts.
Teams don’t always beat others who they are better than.
Who's talking about catching up? That takes time.
It's the manner of the results that have been problematic for some time.

But you don't need a deeper fecking squad to beat those three bottom teams. The quality we have should be enough.

The excuses are getting ridiculous now.

The problem is there's a manager who has failed to correct the issue of playing against low block teams for two years now. Not a few months. Not a season. 2 and a half seasons and he hasn't fixed it.
Our forwards become dead in the water unless they can run in behind, which most of the time is not the case.
Our players have noticeably regressed this season which is very worrying.
Not one or two players. Four or five.

Honestly, we could come back in 5 years with the same shit and you'd still be finding ways to defend it.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
I’ve no clue off-hand, but you know as well as I do that there have been a litany of examples of games where we’ve looked collectively clueless as a team and/or been screaming out for changes that haven’t been made.

You always do the same dancing around from excuse to excuse talking about City spending X amount or our “net spend” (vomit) or whatever, but the fundamental point is that this squad is capable of more than it is achieving.

I don’t know who the “right” man is, but I’m pretty well convinced it isn’t Ole sadly.

This isn’t a new position and it’s not a knee jerk reaction to the last three games or whatever other shite you’ll jump to, yet you and your ilk will still run around calling anyone with a different view to you on this an idiot or say they have a lower level of intelligence than you or whatever that bullshit was, making a thousand threads to distract from the reality.

At the end of the day, if Ole wasn’t who Ole is, he’d have nowhere near the level of backing he still gets.
A) it’s not my fault there is scientific evidence that people who support Ole have higher IQs. (Evidence: the RedCafe forums)
B) there have been about four pro Ole threads compared to fifty ole out threads.
C) no one is calling you knee jerk.
D) sorry you are wrong so much.
 

Counterfactual

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
3,313
Location
Mobil Avenue station
No no no, last night Ole clearly had the opportunity to bring on VDB who would have moved the ball a lot faster than Matic or Fred but he chose not to. He could have brought on Diallo to bring on something different to what Rashford and Mason was offering and he chose not to. Ole does not adapt tactics based on how the game plays out - he has a fixed game plan and continues to make like for like substitutes. We should be able to beat the likes of Palace, WBA, Sheffield Utd easily on most occasions with the squad we have yet we always struggle against them....
eh?
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Who's talking about catching up? That takes time.
But you don't need a deeper fecking squad to beat those three teams. The quality we have should be enough.

The excuses are getting ridiculous now.

The problem is there's a manager who has failed to correct the issue of playing against low block teams for two years now. Not a few months. Not a season. 2 and a half seasons and he hasn't fixed it.
Our forwards become dead in the water unless they can run in behind, which most of the time is not the case.
Our players have noticeably regressed this season which is very worrying.
Not one or two players. Four or five.

Honestly, we could come back in 5 years with the same shit and you'd still be finding ways to defend it.
But we have beat those teams this year. More than anyone else. Apart from City.
Instead of listing them three you could list Leeds, Southampton or Newcastle who we comfortably dispatched.

We don’t have a right to beat teams lowerdown the table. L
 

reddev3

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2018
Messages
451
it's nonsense, why has he left off martial, Cavani and Greenwood. Two of which were brilliant last year and the other has been good this year yet he adds Gundogan who has been brilliant for about two months of his city career, Ferran who has barely kicked a ball and Mahrez who city fans were calling crap at the beginning of the season, It is the coaching.

The very fact half those city players were crap at the beginning of the season until Pep changed things around proves it's the coaching/management.

Why is nothing ever Ole's fault? every dropped point, it's either not his fault the players can't pass, not his fault the defenders can't defend or not his fault the players can't finish.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,163
Location
Manchester
A) it’s not my fault there is scientific evidence that people who support Ole have higher IQs. (Evidence: the RedCafe forums)
B) there have been about four pro Ole threads compared to fifty ole out threads.
C) no one is calling you knee jerk.
D) sorry you are wrong so much.
I say this with all due respect, you’re a fecking moron.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,934
Location
Somewhere out there
feck me, if only we haven't been just as shit in many games when we had Bruno, Rashford, Pogba, DvB, Greenwood, Mata, Martial to call upon. And a 50m full back and 80m CB.

Poor us.

Half those players he named are that good BECAUSE of Pep.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,947
Location
Sunny Manc
We’ve got a better squad than most of the league, and yet it’s absolutely no where near City and probably Liverpool as well. Second place is actually flattering us.

The “who would you take from the 99 and 2008” thread hits home as to how comparatively poor this squad is.
 

Blueman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
179
Supports
Man City
From a city fan pov. If any of those guys are having an off day they still work hard. That's the key, hard work. Same with SAF.

If martial is having an off day utd are a man down. Same with rashford, lingard when he was there.

Like SAF the most important thing is team spirit, hard work and belief/confidence. Individual creativity comes way down the list.

All pep has done is buy humble hard working players that are technically good, he's given them a good game plan and makes them stick to it.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,035
I kind of get it. Without the other creative players through the middle and if Bruno goes off or was injured, the only real option is to play mctominay and fred in a 442 and old fashioned wingers which we dont have, they are inverted and come inside rather than stay wide and cross.

I’d love to see an experiment of greenwood left and rashford right trying to cross for cavani and martial. I actually think we are tactically limited with our personnel sometimes
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
Sorry; just a quick one... you think we paid ten million for Ighalo’s loan fee?
Yeah I felt like I read that somewhere but it was actually 6m to extend it to January of this year. That said 6m for 3 or 4 appearances probably wasn't worth it really.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
From a city fan pov. If any of those guys are having an off day they still work hard. That's the key, hard work. Same with SAF.

If martial is having an off day utd are a man down. Same with rashford, lingard when he was there.

Like SAF the most important thing is team spirit, hard work and belief/confidence. Individual creativity comes way down the list.

All pep has done is buy humble hard working players that are technically good, he's given them a good game plan and makes them stick to it.
Oh yeah, thank gosh you have those hard working players that’s golly gee brilliant that they work so hard.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,587
Keep seeing people say everything's alright because we're second in the league. Do you guys feel like we're about to springboard from that? Next season, with Guardiola at City and Klopp at Liverpool, do you feel like we're challenging for the title next season? Is this a building block? Or do you feel like we'll drop back into 3rd-6th territory again?

Do we just keep waiting for Guardiola to leave and hope City have planned poorly for his successor? Because no way we can compete with City and Pep?
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
22,953
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Keep seeing people say everything's alright because we're second in the league. Do you guys feel like we're about to springboard from that? Next season, with Guardiola at City and Klopp at Liverpool, do you feel like we're challenging for the title next season? Is this a building block? Or do you feel like we'll drop back into 3rd-6th territory again?

Do we just keep waiting for Guardiola to leave and hope City have planned poorly for his successor? Because no way we can compete with City and Pep?
Yes. I think that with two signings now we can really push on. Never felt like that in the last few years. Think next year if luck falls our way and we signed a RW and a CB we can go for it.
 

dpansheth

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
1,086
We spent closer to City than Pool, may be the explanation is we dont have recruitment strategy or we end up paying more because we dont have an elite manager for players to buy into.
Edit: there's a huge gulf in technical abilities of City players and ours. Their team looks "coached"