Premier League Gameweek 26

MayosNoun

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
3,576
Supports
Chelsea
How was that not a foul on Werner? These officials doing everything they can to ensure Liverpool don’t ‘slip’ too far behind in the top 4 race.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
21,019
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
Surely there has to be a better technology in the 21.st century??!

This is so uninspiring and increases the doubt that VAR is a good thing.
The technology is just fine, as shown in other countries. Don't know why the Premier League persists with their ridiculous line/armpit/whatever methods.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,108
Location
Denmark
Any sensible person would call that a fair goal by Werner. VAR wasn't implemented to cancel those kinds of goals. Nobody wanted that. It's how children would enforce rules. No place for common sense.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,394
Any sensible person would call that a fair goal by Werner. VAR wasn't implemented to cancel those kinds of goals. Nobody wanted that. It's how children enforce rules. No place for common sense.
The line also said he was onside :lol:
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,342
Location
?
I mean feck Liverpool and all but I can’t help have a cheeky giggle about this after Tuchel’s ranting last weekend. Karma is a bitch, isn’t it.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,741
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Once it starts measuring from armpits and sleeves, they need to accept some sort of margin for error. Feet and knees being offside is a bit clearer, but they seem to measure on a different part of the arm each time.
 

Bastian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
18,764
Supports
Mejbri
this is sabotage

they're sabotaging VAR
Yeah, it needs competence at the other end. It has been nothing short of a disaster in the Premier League. Comprehensively made the game worse. If they had decent refs and decent video assistant refs, it would be fine.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,108
Location
Denmark
The technology is just fine, as shown in other countries. Don't know why the Premier League persists with their ridiculous line/armpit/whatever methods.
It's not fine. It's clearly not precise enough for close offside decisions. Seems entirely arbitrary whether the frame is freezed exactly when the ball is played, or split seconds before or after. That can be the difference when an armpit hair can make you offside. You're right, though, a margin of error and a dose of common sense would help.
 
Last edited:

Red Stone

Full Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Messages
8,769
Location
NZ
Surely there has to be a better technology in the 21.st century??!

This is so uninspiring and increases the doubt that VAR is a good thing.
The technology is fine. The people using it are not. All VAR has done is remove all doubt about the ineptitude of referees.

In other countries, such as The Netherlands, they have clearly defined rules about the margin of offside required to have it overturned. In the PL it seems completely arbitrary at times.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,561
Supports
Everton
How can you be offside with your arm when if the ball hits any part of your arm during an attack the goal will be disallowed for handball? It doesn’t make sense.
 

Hansi Fick

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
5,057
Supports
FC Bayern
How can you be offside with your arm when if the ball hits any part of your arm during an attack the goal will be disallowed for handball? It doesn’t make sense.
You can't. They made a blatantly wrong call. Proper outrageous, honestly.
 

DickDastardly

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
7,298
Location
Mean machine 00
The technology is just fine, as shown in other countries. Don't know why the Premier League persists with their ridiculous line/armpit/whatever methods.
Any technology that does this "Line drawing" thingy....it looks like a human being is behind the drawing of the lines.

I don't want that.
I want a fecking supercomputer that could beat any chess player behind the line drawing....not some wanker in the VAR room.

I have ZERO faith in this, regardless of the stupid armpit rules.
 

Summit

"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
51,054
How can you be offside with your arm when if the ball hits any part of your arm during an attack the goal will be disallowed for handball? It doesn’t make sense.
Really don't know. Thought you could only be offside for a body part you could legitimately score a goal with.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,394
It's not fine. It's clearly not precise enough for close offside decisions. Seems entirely arbitrary wether the fram is freezed exactly when the ball is played, or split seconds before or after. That can be the difference when an armpit hair can make you offside. You're right, though, a margin of error and a dose of common sense would help.
Don't all players wears trackers now? Surely it can just be done like that which would be accurate enough and then. Like goal line tech, the refs watch buzzes. No need for the waiting or reviews. Get on with the game.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,971
The technology is fine. The people using it are not. All VAR has done is remove all doubt about the ineptitude of referees.
It’s clearly not, you’ve got some bloke guessing where an imaginary line is on someones arm and then judging it on a mm. That’s not fine no matter how well he knows the rules.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
How can you be offside with your arm when if the ball hits any part of your arm during an attack the goal will be disallowed for handball? It doesn’t make sense.
It won't be if it hits the upper part of your arm, as you're allowed to play the ball with that part. That's where the offside lines are being drawn from too.

The problem is that because that isn't an actual body part, it's hard for them to be consistent in where they draw the line.
 

Jev

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
8,108
Location
Denmark
Once it starts measuring from armpits and sleeves, they need to accept some sort of margin for error. Feet and knees being offside is a bit clearer, but they seem to measure on a different part of the arm each time.
True. Where the armpit begins seems entirely subjective and coincidental. It would be simple if it was the lower part of your body but when you draw the line at an arbitrary place on the arm, you're bound to get inconsistencies.

It's just baffling watching this week after week when everyone, players, fans, coaches, pundits, can see how ridiculous it all is. Everyone apart from the clowns in charge.
 

RobinLFC

Cries when Liverpool doesn't get praised
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
21,019
Location
Belgium
Supports
Liverpool
It's not fine. It's clearly not precise enough for close offside decisions. Seems entirely arbitrary wether the fram is freezed exactly when the ball is played, or split seconds before or after. That can be the difference when an armpit hair can make you offside. You're right, though, a margin of error and a dose of common sense would help.
It's been around a lot longer in Belgium than in the PL and if anything it has made offside decisions easy as (as opposed to handballs, tackles or stuff) it's either black or white, you're onside or not. The PL just completely misuses the system with their weird lines and triangles and angles and whatnot.

Not sure a margin of error would help either because then where would you draw the line? It would just shift the discussion from onside/offside to "how much offside was he", wouldn't solve anything. Just look at countries where it's working and AVOIDING debate instead of causing it, and use those methods.

It’s clearly not, you’ve got some bloke guessing where an imaginary line is on someones arm and then judging it on a mm. That’s not fine no matter how well he knows the rules.
You're discussing the method of how the technology is used, not the technology. Which, I agree, is wrong in England. There's nothing wrong with the technology in itself if applied correctly.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Don't all players wears trackers now? Surely it can just be done like that which would be accurate enough and then. Like goal line tech, the refs watch buzzes. No need for the waiting or reviews. Get on with the game.
They're planning to introduce something like that for the Qatar world cup.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,971
It's been around a lot longer in Belgium than in the PL and if anything it has made offside decisions easy as (as opposed to handballs, tackles or stuff) it's either black or white, you're onside or not. The PL just completely misuses the system with their weird lines and triangles and angles and whatnot.

Not sure a margin of error would help either because then where would you draw the line? It would just shift the discussion from onside/offside to "how much offside was he", wouldn't solve anything. Just look at countries where it's working and AVOIDING debate instead of causing it, and use those methods.


You're discussing the method of how the technology is used, not the technology. Which, I agree, is wrong in England. There's nothing wrong with the technology in itself if applied correctly.
What technology have I missed that’s not using a line but more accurate?
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,652
Just get rid of the thing and go back to how it used to be.
We'd soon realise how shit that was. I'd rather they just sorted their rules and refereeing.

I don't really see why humans are drawing those lines. Can they not invest in technology to check multiple frames and if a percentage mark it off it's off.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,266
Location
Manchester
I find it mad that they don’t have a decent camera angle for almost every VAR incident. They have to implement more cameras, surely.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,561
Supports
Everton
It won't be if it hits the upper part of your arm, as you're allowed to play the ball with that part. That's where the offside lines are being drawn from too.

The problem is that because that isn't an actual body part, it's hard for them to be consistent in where they draw the line.
Yeah, that doesn't make sense because I could have a bigger upper arm than you and how do you decide where the upper arm begins in a fair manner!