Ole Gunnar Solskjær | 2021/22 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,414
Location
Berlin
(again sorry for long post, but having only 5 posts per day)

I didn't quote you, why did you have get defensive and respond directly to me? it was a generic comment on a nothing point which you seem to have made above which waffled on a lot without really saying anything which is what it seems most Ole criticism is nowadays when it's not extreme gymnastics. Someone else replied to you to help you make sense of what you've seen from the team the entire year. There is no other 'wisdom' to be shared other than that.
Oh right. You didn't quote me. So you jump in the middle of a debate, adressed one of the participants to talk about a generic fictive person that coincidentally has the same opinion as I do. And when I adress you, I am defensive and you don't know why. Got it, strange world out there. Lets leave it at that.

It's incredible how someone like you still can't see the improvement within our players from before Ole took in charged to now. These are bunch of players that were written off and questioned when they were under Mourinho and now people started to believe they can actually fulfil their potential. Well, it's not like I can take it from your own mouth because so far you provided nothing to back it up.
Wait, what? There is a claim that some particular improve takes place. I doubt it to some extent. And now you want me to prove it isn't there? I mean with all due respect: thanks for bringing one detailed example but it seems you feel like all doubts have been erased now. They aren't. Let me get into that:

Without a doubt, there has been a change in the player Luke Shaw. I think it is certainly valid to conclude that Ole improved him as a player. But I don't think this is the only possible explanation. Lets have a look:

Category 20-21 | 19-20 | 18-19 | 17-18 | 16-17 | 15-16 | 14-15 | 13-14(S)
Apps 23 | 20 | 29 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 15 | 35 |
Assists 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |

AvgP 50.6 | 47.6 | 57.2 | 43.4 | 34.8 | 54.2 | 33.8 | 40.1 |
PassSucc 84.3 | 87.4 | 83.3 | 84.9 | 85.6 | 86.0 | 86.7 | 79.1 |

Cross p.G. 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
KeyP p.G. 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |

Dribblings 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
Disp p.G. 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.3 |
Bad ctrl p.G 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 |

(Data from whoscored, sorry for formatting, it looks better in the editor, where I added around 10.000 spaces ^^)


So what do we get here:
- The number of assists has a positive trend. The numbers now are alright without being awesome. Numbers of the past are low...
- The number of passes made hasn't increased (probably a lot down to system).
- The Pass success rate is pretty stable on high level since the beginning.
- The number of crosses have increased. But I can't believe somebody explained the concept of crossing to Shaw this year for the first time, more likely he gained the confidence to execute it.
- The number of key passes has increased to the 7th highest number in the league, highest number for all leftbacks.
- Number of Dribblings per game are pretty stable.
- Number of being disposessed per game is stable. Was better in the past, maybe also connected with system.
- Number of bad controls went up (probably also connected to riskier system)

So the one significant number here is key passes.

Whoscored-definition for key pass: The final pass leading to a shot at goal from a teammate.

So I guess crosses are key passes?

So Shaw added crosses to his game, which increases the number of key passes he has. Even if it isn't just the crosses, that is good and surely an improvement. Him being the best left back in the league though - well this year surely. But how does he look in comparison to other left backs (in terms of involvement in attack). Lets have a look:

(same seasons as above)
Shaw
Assists 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
KeyP p.G. 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |

Robertson
Assists 5 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 2* | 4* | 2* |
KeyP p.G. 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
(* = playing for Hull)

Cresswell
Assists 7 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
KeyP p.G. 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 |

(Data from whoscored)

Shaws number of assists is relatively low. He's probably better in total due to his good defending. His numbers might be higher with better chance conversion in our team, but that actually applies to the other ones as well...

About your timeline:
  • Under Mourinho: A talented left back who is being written off and people started to talk about new left back is needed because people didn't think he can fulfil his potential anymore. https://www.redcafe.net/threads/new-left-back.426899/
  • 18/19 when Ole was hired: He won our POTS and yet people still have doubt in him and talked about new left back to upgrade him. https://www.redcafe.net/threads/new-left-back.426899/page-27
  • 19/20 showing improvement and being well developed. Some people started to change their mind about it but there are still people who doubt in him. https://www.redcafe.net/threads/left-back-position.457175/
  • 20/21 now turning into one of the best left back in the league:
    • People questioned Luke Shaw ability going forward before but now, had 5 PL assists and among the top one out there in term of creating chances (see below pictures taken early this month for more detail).
    • For more detail in comparison to other LB in the PL (see also pictures below, taken now). And you can see that Shaw is better in most of the aspects.
Let me I re-phrase that a bit:

Under Mourinho: A once seen as very talented left back who is not the same player since having a serious injury. Mourinho even singled him out occasionally shattering his confidence. Near the end there were small glimpses of the former Shaw. Many were asking for a new left back.

18/19 when Ole was hired: He won our POTS and yet people still have doubt in him and talked about new left back to upgrade him. With the negative influence of Mourinho stopped the whole team was flying. Shaw was in line with that, fans were still questioning if he has what it takes to be Uniteds LB as he was mostly above average and the position was heavily considered for an upgrade.

19/20 The positive character of the new manager, likely encouragements and a way less negative play style benefitted all technically good players, same with Luke Shaw. He gained more confidence and became one of the key performers for United. He did that mostly by becoming more of an outlet on the left side, creating a good partnership with Rashford. He ended the season with 0 goals and 0 assists though. When United brought in Telles the move was very much welcomed by most of the fans.

20/21 Now turning into the current best left back in the league. His very good 1st touch and his very reliable passing got him a bigger role in the buildup of Uniteds game. Since New Year he starts to make driving runs into the box - reminiscend to the early Shaw. He scored one goal and has 5 assists until today. (Cresswell with 7 assists, Digne with 6 assists and Robertson with also 5 assists are the other leftbacks in the current top 20 assisters in the league.)

As a reference point and for context,
Season 19/20 Robertson ended the year with 12 assists, Digne with 7 and Azpilicueta with 6.
Season 18/19 Robertson ended the year with 11 assists, Matt Richie with 8, Holebas and Sessegnon with 6 (last two not in the Top20)
Season 17/18 Cresswell ended the year with 7 assists, Chris Brunt (36 years old) with 7, Ben Davies and Azpilicueta with 6 (last two not in the Top20)

(Data from Whoscored)


My timeline is depicting the exact same period of time as yours. Is there anything in there, what wouldn't be confirmed by the majority of fans?

My conclusion: Shaw has improved as a player. The deciding factor is questionable, one of the more likelier ones being the technical work with Ole. For me personally I seems it is more the trust that helps him to get back to his best (seeing that he didn't reach new heights except for key passes this season), being a bit under pressure by Telles might also fired him on. The level of improvement in offensive output is visible but isn't exceptional when not just compared to himself under Mourinho but to the rest of the league as well.

As Shaw is the prime example of players that supposedly have improved due to specifically Ole being here, your "evidence" is not fully convincing. I understand your stance, I see what you see but my conclusions are different. This sounds as if I want to bash the player. I don't. But in contrast to you, I see the player improvements as more down to feel-good and finding some sort of system and play style that suits the players more than the one under Mourinho. I do so, because the exact same level of improvement is observable with Rashford, McTominay and probably Fred. I'll happily credit Ole for achieving that but there are managers out there being able to bring some level of feel-good-factor, are able to agree on a system with the players that suits them more AND to bring even more to the table. I understand the support for Ole and it is justified in principle, what I don't get is the extent of support. And from what I understand, I am not alone on that.
 
Last edited:

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,794
Location
Trondheim
A good manager rotates and can still gets good performances, through tactics and management. It's not like the team we put out there lacked individual quality.

What have you seen today that resembled that?

Actually forget that even, the team just seem like they didn't even want it enough...that to me should get you concerned.
Do you know how many times SAF lost points after an away game in Europe?

Look it up, think about it, come back and make a new post.

This isnt a computer game
 

Crustanoid

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
18,511

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
They are PR ing it for the Glazers. You’re sucked in. How many others are the same?
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
All they care about is Champions League qualification. They don’t know football. They aren’t United fans. They are business men, and business wise getting top 4 is a phenomenal success.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,329

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
The management of the club is deluded to the core.

Remember the briefs after crashing out of the CL about expectations of competing for the league and other trophies under Ole, that shit was funny.
 

Andersonson

Full Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
3,794
Location
Trondheim
This idiot rested Fernandes today but played him against Real Sociedad in the 2nd leg game......he has no clue how to use his squad.

And every good coach would have brought off Fred at half-time (Great coaches even before half-time).
Tad silly this.
Im not sure you could spot a great coach if you saw one.
 

ManU Irish

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
24
The loss today is totally on Ole, once you play Matic and Fred in the middle you are finished the rest of the team won't function. Rodgers cleaned us out on tactics side.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,867
Let's see where we are come the end of the May. Our realistic target for this season was finishing top 4 with 75+ points plus maybe winning one of the cups. Both still possible.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,426
Location
Nnc
I really thought he would make a tactical change at half time. With 3 at the back, their full backs and forwards were high up pressing and we were literally stuffed. That's exactly how they scored the first goal. The warning signings were already there yet he waited until we went behind to make a sub. That was again like to like changes. Cavani will do nothing, if there is no service .

Should have just matched their formation, and moved Pogba to middle.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,336

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
I'm not cynical enough to believe Ole was originally hired so to make it easier for these twats to sell us this shit, I don't think Woodward is smart enough for that frankly.

But it's beyond doubt now that Ole will keep his job come what may, provided CL group stage football is maintained, because he's the only way the Glazers can sell the demolition job of our status as a team that challenges for major titles, or even as a club that cares about titles in the first place.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
Funnily enough, I've seen some of the extremist Ole-in guys shitting on a lot of our players after the match and labelling their defenders 'fanboys'. Oh my god, the irony is too much :lol:
This.

Apparently we’ll challenge for the trophies we struggle in next season because, you know, progress just happens out of thin air.

Least Ole is happy to be here.

We are going nowhere lads
But, but, but the Dressing Room is SOOOO much happier according to Caf ITKs who’ve never even been within 5 miles of Carrington!
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,497
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
I'm not cynical enough to believe Ole was originally hired so to make it easier for these twats to sell us this shit, I don't think Woodward is smart enough for that frankly.

But it's beyond doubt now that Ole will keep his job come what may, provided CL group stage football is maintained, because he's the only way the Glazers can sell the demolition job of our status as a team that challenges for major titles, or even as a club that cares about titles in the first place.
It's dark times for United. We can see that we're going nowhere unless we have a team that is absolutely littered with top quality players in each position and their backup players are so good they can come in and we'll see no drop off in levels. All this without a well coached team like every other top team in history has had.

The Glazers need to drop another £500m on Ole's vision. Grealish, Sancho, a top class CB to get the most out of our £80m CB, a better attacking RB, Haaland, a top class DM, better backup to Bruno, a back up CF, then a few really good squad players to sit with £40m VDB on the bench. Then we'll be ready to challenge for the PL and CL in the same season. We'll never see financial a return on that sort of investment, but who cares? At least we might be able to make Ole successful, which is what it's really about.
 

bdspeedy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
1,991
Location
Ventura Highway
The rot, the apathy, the complacency, like shit, all roll down hill. As long as the sponsorships still pay out. As long as the "fans" still buy the shirts and the tv money rolls in for our owners and board, we will never win the league or any BIG trophies. What's the point of Ole out when we're run by bankers with ZERO football acumen who don't care if we win anything?
 

He'sRaldo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
3,203
It's dark times for United. We can see that we're going nowhere unless we have a team that is absolutely littered with top quality players in each position and their backup players are so good they can come in and we'll see no drop off in levels. All this without a well coached team like every other top team in history has had.

The Glazers need to drop another £500m on Ole's vision. Grealish, Sancho, a top class CB to get the most out of our £80m CB, a better attacking RB, Haaland, a top class DM, better backup to Bruno, a back up CF, then a few really good squad players to sit with £40m VDB on the bench. Then we'll be ready to challenge for the PL and CL in the same season. We'll never see financial a return on that sort of investment, but who cares? At least we might be able to make Ole successful, which is what it's really about.
Yup, seems like this is what Utd is about nowadays. Trying their best to make the club legend successful.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,502
After his initial appointment, I was of the view; he is one of the worst managers in the league. I was wrong, Ole has done well overall. Next year he we will be even better because I expect atleast one good signing. His conservative style will ensure top 4 next season as well. Ole outers really need to stop saying that Ole is useless, because he clearly is not. It only destroys their argument.

Ole's vision of football is what I have an issue with. Our gameplan is same against almost everyone and it seems to mainly defend and quick transition to attack heavily dependent on individuals expressing themselves rather than any fixed routines. I just don't see this style leading to a CL or a PL. Forget even that for a bit, I don't enjoy watching our performances even when we win other than the City game.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,497
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
After his initial appointment, I was of the view; he is one of the worst managers in the league. I was wrong, Ole has done well overall. Next year he we will be even better because I expect atleast one good signing. His conservative style will ensure top 4 next season as well. Ole outers really need to stop saying that Ole is useless, because he clearly is not. It only destroys their argument.

Ole's vision of football is what I have an issue with. Our gameplan is same against almost everyone and it seems to mainly defend and quick transition to attack heavily dependent on individuals expressing themselves rather than any fixed routines. I just don't see this style leading to a CL or a PL. Forget even that for a bit, I don't enjoy watching our performances even when we win other than the City game.
I'm intrigued to hear your thinking behind this? Because to me it sounds like Ole's improvement/level correlates nicely with the quality of players at his disposal or the amount of money he can pump into the team. Apart from a happy, positive environment for players, I struggle to see exactly what he brings to the table.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,632
Can't win every game but the drop off between our starting 11 and the backup is scary
The Ole's "rebuild" involves needing a 100m striker, a 100m RW, and 60+m CM. Throw out also an experience attacking RB just for certain game to cover a 50m RB. And maybe a 50+m CB. After we get all those players, then we can say that is Ole's team.
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
I don’t understand him talking about players being tired when he made I believe 1 sub in the last 2 games. Hasn’t integrated VDB at all this season and over uses players to the point of injury.
 

Zhagzi

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 20, 2019
Messages
98
Im curious, what makes you think that? Why do you think one of the greatest managers of all time like Pep wouldnt do a better job than Ole?
Might be because the minute Pep had injuries to Aguero and Laporte, their form dipped insanely. It goes to maybe show, that if Pep doesn't have spectacular players in all positions, he can't make it tick like he is now. Just an idea.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Wait, what? There is a claim that some particular improve takes place. I doubt it to some extent. And now you want me to prove it isn't there? I mean with all due respect: thanks for bringing one detailed example but it seems you feel like all doubts have been erased now. They aren't. Let me get into that:
WTF are you on about. If you want to believe your own shit not mine then you are free to do so. You are the one replying my post first because you disagree with it. If you can’t back it up with evidence and counter it while I could back mine with evidence then why should I take it from your mouth.

Without a doubt, there has been a change in the player Luke Shaw. I think it is certainly valid to conclude that Ole improved him as a player. But I don't think this is the only possible explanation. Lets have a look:

Category 20-21 | 19-20 | 18-19 | 17-18 | 16-17 | 15-16 | 14-15 | 13-14(S)
Apps 23 | 20 | 29 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 15 | 35 |
Assists 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |

AvgP 50.6 | 47.6 | 57.2 | 43.4 | 34.8 | 54.2 | 33.8 | 40.1 |
PassSucc 84.3 | 87.4 | 83.3 | 84.9 | 85.6 | 86.0 | 86.7 | 79.1 |

Cross p.G. 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
KeyP p.G. 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |

Dribblings 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
Disp p.G. 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.3 |
Bad ctrl p.G 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 |

(Data from whoscored, sorry for formatting, it looks better in the editor, where I added around 10.000 spaces ^^)


So what do we get here:
- The number of assists has a positive trend. The numbers now are alright without being awesome. Numbers of the past are low...
- The number of passes made hasn't increased (probably a lot down to system).
- The Pass success rate is pretty stable on high level since the beginning.
- The number of crosses have increased. But I can't believe somebody explained the concept of crossing to Shaw this year for the first time, more likely he gained the confidence to execute it.
- The number of key passes has increased to the 7th highest number in the league, highest number for all leftbacks.
- Number of Dribblings per game are pretty stable.
- Number of being disposessed per game is stable. Was better in the past, maybe also connected with system.
- Number of bad controls went up (probably also connected to riskier system)

So the one significant number here is key passes.

Whoscored-definition for key pass: The final pass leading to a shot at goal from a teammate.

So I guess crosses are key passes?

So Shaw added crosses to his game, which increases the number of key passes he has. Even if it isn't just the crosses, that is good and surely an improvement. Him being the best left back in the league though - well this year surely. But how does he look in comparison to other left backs (in terms of involvement in attack). Lets have a look:

(same seasons as above)
Shaw
Assists 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
KeyP p.G. 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |

Robertson
Assists 5 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 2* | 4* | 2* |
KeyP p.G. 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
(* = playing for Hull)

Cresswell
Assists 7 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
KeyP p.G. 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 |

(Data from whoscored)

Shaws number of assists is relatively low. He's probably better in total due to his good defending. His numbers might be higher with better chance conversion in our team, but that actually applies to the other ones as well...
Irrelevant and none of what you wrote counter mine. Let’s have a look:
  • Why should the number of passes and pass success rate matter in here? Everyone can make more passes and higher pass success rate by just passing the ball backwards. So your point is irrelevant.
  • Even if you want to say it’s down to player gained more confidence in crossing, gaining player’s confidence is also part of manager’s job and it’s also part of man management from the manager. So your point doesn’t counter mine.
  • So his key passes increased. So your point doesn’t counter mine.
  • His dribbling is around the same number as Robertson, one of the best left back in PL means it’s already a fine number without needed improvement to be top left back to win PL. So your point is irrelevant.
  • Last thing, number of assist is really not something you need to keep specifically focus on here. Like what you said, Shaw and others assist numbers could go higher depends on the higher chances conversion so when you mention assist means what you need to focus on is the chances he created. Luke Shaw chances creation is higher.
About your timeline:

Let me I re-phrase that a bit:

Under Mourinho: A once seen as very talented left back who is not the same player since having a serious injury. Mourinho even singled him out occasionally shattering his confidence. Near the end there were small glimpses of the former Shaw. Many were asking for a new left back.

18/19 when Ole was hired: He won our POTS and yet people still have doubt in him and talked about new left back to upgrade him. With the negative influence of Mourinho stopped the whole team was flying. Shaw was in line with that, fans were still questioning if he has what it takes to be Uniteds LB as he was mostly above average and the position was heavily considered for an upgrade.

19/20 The positive character of the new manager, likely encouragements and a way less negative play style benefitted all technically good players, same with Luke Shaw. He gained more confidence and became one of the key performers for United. He did that mostly by becoming more of an outlet on the left side, creating a good partnership with Rashford. He ended the season with 0 goals and 0 assists though. When United brought in Telles the move was very much welcomed by most of the fans.

20/21 Now turning into the current best left back in the league. His very good 1st touch and his very reliable passing got him a bigger role in the buildup of Uniteds game. Since New Year he starts to make driving runs into the box - reminiscend to the early Shaw. He scored one goal and has 5 assists until today. (Cresswell with 7 assists, Digne with 6 assists and Robertson with also 5 assists are the other leftbacks in the current top 20 assisters in the league.)

As a reference point and for context,
Season 19/20 Robertson ended the year with 12 assists, Digne with 7 and Azpilicueta with 6.
Season 18/19 Robertson ended the year with 11 assists, Matt Richie with 8, Holebas and Sessegnon with 6 (last two not in the Top20)
Season 17/18 Cresswell ended the year with 7 assists, Chris Brunt (36 years old) with 7, Ben Davies and Azpilicueta with 6 (last two not in the Top20)

(Data from Whoscored)


My timeline is depicting the exact same period of time as yours. Is there anything in there, what wouldn't be confirmed by the majority of fans?

My conclusion: Shaw has improved as a player. The deciding factor is questionable, one of the more likelier ones being the technical work with Ole. For me personally I seems it is more the trust that helps him to get back to his best (seeing that he didn't reach new heights except for key passes this season), being a bit under pressure by Telles might also fired him on. The level of improvement in offensive output is visible but isn't exceptional when not just compared to himself under Mourinho but to the rest of the league as well.

As Shaw is the prime example of players that supposedly have improved due to specifically Ole being here, your "evidence" is not fully convincing. I understand your stance, I see what you see but my conclusions are different. This sounds as if I want to bash the player. I don't. But in contrast to you, I see the player improvements as more down to feel-good and finding some sort of system and play style that suits the players more than the one under Mourinho. I do so, because the exact same level of improvement is observable with Rashford, McTominay and probably Fred. I'll happily credit Ole for achieving that but there are managers out there being able to bring some level of feel-good-factor, are able to agree on a system with the players that suits them more AND to bring even more to the table. I understand the support for Ole and it is justified in principle, what I don't get is the extent of support. And from what I understand, I am not alone on that.
That’s biased though because 3 reasons here
  1. So you choose not to believe the one that you call ‘’more likelier ones’’ because it doesn’t suit your argument.
  2. You made zero sense now to reply my original post that I had conversation with SAFMUTD. Because what he said was managers influence big time a players potential/level. And if we use your personal assumption about Shaw gained more confidence to be better due to the trust then that’s also part of man management from the manager and down to manager’s influenced.
  3. Luke Shaw chance creation is among the top list out there based on the pictures I showed you in previous post and even if we use whoscored, Luke Shaw key passes so far this season is actually higher than any of key passes that Robertson made in 17/18, 18/19, 19/20. So there is exceptional number and also improvement in his offensive area.
Are you not reading and forgetting this post (below) that I replied to you yesterday, and specifically the bold one?
Your examples and points/logic don't suit to what happened to some of our players improvement. Because our players showed improvement year by year under Ole, not just one time improvement and stay on that same level. A good example is if you read the Shaw's case, I showed timeline of Shaw's development and improvement. That's down to combined man management, coaching and player's natural development.
 
Last edited:

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,527
Blew the chance to prevent city from winning the double or even worse the treble. Now that is in the hands of other teams, we should sit here and pray they dont do it.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,480
Blew the chance to prevent city from winning the double or even worse the treble. Now that is in the hands of other teams, we should sit here and pray they dont do it.
Quad?
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,480

This says it all from the club. Like we can all argue over Ole sure. There are positives and negatives.

But to say phenomenal success is an absolute piss take. This club is fairly fecked.
Phenomenal success....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.