g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

'Pep' Guardiola sack watch

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
3. Only Paisley, Ancelotti and Zidane have 2+ at 3. It's crazy the standards Pep has to reach to convince people :lol:

Except he wins the treble every season he has flopped basically.
The only time Pep won it is when he was at peak Barca with peak Messi-Xavi-Iniesta. The latter 2 also won every international honor in the same time period.

Ironically Pep never reached a CL final since 2011. Sir Alex never went more than 9 years between finals to Pep's already 10.

Klopp by comparison has already been in 3CL finals in the same timeframe. Ancelotti has a CL as well, and don't get me started on Zidane.

So yes, Pep is a good domestic manager, but he still has to prove himself on the European stage.
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
12,054
Supports
Man City
I just wrote down all of the City team he inherited. I did not mean all of them were World Class. I am also not arguing whether Pep improves players or not. It is obvious he does. He also makes the team much more than the sum of its parts with the system he employs.
But with an unlimited cheque book I don't see his signings better than his predecessors. KDB, Sterling, Aguero, Kompany, Silva, and Fernandinho at their best are better players than what Pep has brought in. Pep is responsible for them being at their best in many cases obviously. Out of Pep's signings I would count Ederson and maybe Bernardo Silva at that level. Pep gets judged to a different standard than other managers because he will likely be in contention for GOAT by the time he retires.
Regarding Klopp getting battered. If you have unlimited money and want to play the best football you bring in Pep. No one can dominate the way Pep does. If you have a budget and want to win you bring in Klopp. These two are the best managers in the world and both have their specific use cases. Klopp's team has been decimated with injuries. He doesn't have a second XI worth as much as his first like City has so we can't really read too much into this battering.
Fair point and I misunderstood. But there is also the argument that City under Pep haven't went looking for a marquee signings because they had those players and replacement of a similar stand weren't going to come in and be rotated. For example you don't go looking for Bruno when you have KDB or vice versa. You don't go sniffing at Kane when you have Aguero. And we had already pre-purchased Silva for Silva. But now those players are coming to an end, he will have to bring in the replacements who hit said standard Will Dias be as good as Kompany? Unlikely but he's so far shown he could be. Will Silva or Foden become the next Silva? again time will tell, we'll see in 3 or 4 years. But his challenge for now is replacing Aguero. Those players are only out the door, we should wait to see how their replacements get on before saying they aren't as good.

I absolutely agree on Pep is better at polishing a diamond and Klopp better at polishing a turd.

But we have to keep in mind for all the media bollix, Klopp had 9 of his best XI at the weekend, he chose to put his better midfielders in defence. He had Alisson, TAA, Robertson, Fabinho, Henderson, Thiago, Salah, Mane and Firminio on the pitch. If theres an argument to be made Fabinho will be VVD's partner, then with Wijnaldum, he had 10.
City had arguably 9 of their first XI on the pitch, Ederson, Cancelo, Dias, Stones, Zinchenko, Rodri, Gundo, Sterling and Mahrez. Should Klopp had played Henderson in midfield and one of his new signings or a kid at the back?

Instead he pulled the exact same bullshit Pep did last season with Fernandinho and is reaping the same results. He's weakening midfield to bolster defense. Liverpool have loads of squad depth.

They might not have cost what Cities have but in midfield alone they have Thiago, Fabinho, Hendo, Wijnaldo, Keita, Jones, The Ox all going for 3 positions. They have Mane, Salah, Firminio, Jota, Little Shaq and Origi for attacking positions 6 players for 3 positions. They left themselves short at the CB just like City last season. They went into the season with 3 cb's and weirdly lost all 3, City made the same mistake last terms and were without Laporte and Stones (personal problems) for much of the season. The difference being City had Otamendi. Other than that it was either a cdm at cb or a youth player in Garcia. This injury crisis of Liverpool's is media bollix and not something that hasn't been seen before. They can field 9 of their first XI week in week out, just like City last season with stop gaps in defence, but Klopp is choosing to weaken his midfield for no reason, just like Pep. They are missing 2 first team players and 1 sub. My point here is worth doesn't matter, he has them and has 10/11 or 9/11 of his best XI/world class players available.

Like Pep last season, they need to put square pegs in square holes instead of fannying about are ruining 2 key area's of the pitch to try and patch one which is seeing them have a season pretty much on par with Cities failings last seasn.
 

Thunderhead

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
3,156
Supports
City
I am assuming Pep has a big say at City simply because City built their entire management structure around him for many years before he was even appointed. They bought his brother a club in Spain on top of that. You don't do all of that and then not give him complete control over everything football related.
Liverpool transfers only became this world class after Klopp joined so again I assume it is him.
he has a say but doesn't have anything like overall control, Txiki is the main man for player recruitment

And also what is with the crap about unlimited cheque book, I'd love it if he had an unlimited cheque book but that's simply not true, yeah he has more than most to spend but to say it's unlimited is just daft.
 
Last edited:

NasirTimothy

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
2,388
Supports
Enyimba F.C.
I'm not sure how people arrive at their expectations. To win the title every year in in Germany for Bayern Munich or Italy for Juventus might be considered normal, but in the PL 1 in 2 is phenomenal given there will always be strong challengers. Sir Alex won, what was it, 13 in 20+? Of course, Sir Alex was on a different level of greatness considering he both A) Built our dynasty and B) maintained, and didn't have the obscene wealth City do (but we were still bloody rich regardless). However, no matter what your wealth, the PL has other big clubs, and can never be a league you can expect a Bayern or Juventus type domination. For a manager to come in and win 3 in 5 is absolutely fantastic and one should be grateful for that if they're City fans. This is their most successful period. Of course he could have done better in the CL, but let's not forget that even all time great managers win the competition 1-2 times in their entire 20+ career span. So with the cups, winning it is special. Not winning it is the norm. People forget this.
The bolded part is the point I made and the thing that people just don’t seem to understand.

Take the greatest managers in the history of European club football. Fergie, Michels, Herrera, Lippi, Sacchi, whoever. They have at the most 2 European Cups/Champions Leagues. Pep already has 2 and he just turned 50.

Only 3 managers have 3. That’s Paisley, Ancelotti and Zidane. And of those 3, only Ancelotti has won with multiple teams. And it’s worth noting that Ancelotti has been much less successful in winning league titles than Pep.

The European Cup has been around for nearly 70 years and in all that time only one manager has done what people are assuming that Pep should be be able to do easily. It’s ridiculous and betrays a lack of knowledge of football history
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,178
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
I am assuming Pep has a big say at City simply because City built their entire management structure around him for many years before he was even appointed. They bought his brother a club in Spain on top of that. You don't do all of that and then not give him complete control over everything football related.
Liverpool transfers only became this world class after Klopp joined so again I assume it is him.
Regarding Klopp: Reports have it that he didn't want Salah and was convinced by his consultants, the scouts etc. Obviously the coach has much say in transfer activities and should be in regular exchange with scouting and transfer departments but I don't think he is in charge of it. He probably gives them profiles of players he needs and they try the best they can to find solutions who check all the boxes. However, I assume his involvement lessens the more long term oriented the deal is meant to be.

City obviously prepared everything for Pep years in advance, that's true, and they'll sign no first team player without his blessing but I doubt he's more involved than that. I mean, we're talking about someone obsessed with coaching, someone who most likely spends 12+ hours a day in developing the team, scouting opponents, etc. Like in every economy, modern developments favor specialisation above generalisation. I don't think you can be a world class coach and at the same time be a world class director of sports.
 

NasirTimothy

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
2,388
Supports
Enyimba F.C.
The only time Pep won it is when he was at peak Barca with peak Messi-Xavi-Iniesta. The latter 2 also won every international honor in the same time period.

Ironically Pep never reached a CL final since 2011. Sir Alex never went more than 9 years between finals to Pep's already 10.

Klopp by comparison has already been in 3CL finals in the same timeframe. Ancelotti has a CL as well, and don't get me started on Zidane.

So yes, Pep is a good domestic manager, but he still has to prove himself on the European stage.
You can’t point to 3 players in his team as the reason that he won 2 in 3 years, that’s nonsensical. All the managers you mentioned had good players in their teams. Please bring a sensible argument to the table
 

kaiser1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
2,123
Supports
Bayern Munich
The only time Pep won it is when he was at peak Barca with peak Messi-Xavi-Iniesta. The latter 2 also won every international honor in the same time period.

Ironically Pep never reached a CL final since 2011. Sir Alex never went more than 9 years between finals to Pep's already 10.

Klopp by comparison has already been in 3CL finals in the same timeframe. Ancelotti has a CL as well, and don't get me started on Zidane.

So yes, Pep is a good domestic manager, but he still has to prove himself on the European stage.
Pep left Barcelona almost 10yrs ago, How many times have they won it since then? Messi is still with them, Iniesta played till 2017 This is Peps 12th season as a coach. He has made 7 CL semis almost the same number as Ferguson and much more than most managers

If you have only 3 coaches in the 70yr history who have done better than you, how else are you expected to prove yourself in the European stage?

Pep is a good domestic manager by winning "just" 2 CL titles, how do you describe Ferguson who is seen as one of the best of all time? Or do you think by the same standards, Ferguson proved himself at the European stage
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
Pep left Barcelona almost 10yrs ago, How many times have they won it since then? Messi is still with them, Iniesta played till 2017 This is Peps 12th season as a coach. He has made 7 CL semis almost the same number as Ferguson and much more than most managers

If you have only 3 coaches in the 70yr history who have done better than you, how else are you expected to prove yourself in the European stage?

Pep is a good domestic manager by winning "just" 2 CL titles, how do you describe Ferguson who is seen as one of the best of all time? Or do you think by the same standards, Ferguson proved himself at the European stage
Barca did win it in 2015. They also won the Treble that year so it's not like it was just down to Pep's genius. The fact that Barca went off the rails since then is a totally different topic.

The reason I'm scrutinising Pep so much is because he only managed top dog teams. Every team he has managed already had an insane squad or teams with limitless cash. And for all of that he hasn't even reached 1 CL final in the last decade. That is a failure in my book and a big spot on his CV.

If you want to compare him to Sir Alex, just tell me this: how many times were United the favorites?

A grand total of 2. In 2008 and 2009. And in both cases United got to the final. In most CL editions United were always lagging behind their European counterparts, yet still punched above their weight. Can't remember one instance when one of Pep's teams had to punch above their weight though...
 

NasirTimothy

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
2,388
Supports
Enyimba F.C.
Barca did win it in 2015. They also won the Treble that year so it's not like it was just down to Pep's genius. The fact that Barca went off the rails since then is a totally different topic.

The reason I'm scrutinising Pep so much is because he only managed top dog teams. Every team he has managed already had an insane squad or teams with limitless cash. And for all of that he hasn't even reached 1 CL final in the last decade. That is a failure in my book and a big spot on his CV.

If you want to compare him to Sir Alex, just tell me this: how many times were United the favorites?

A grand total of 2. In 2008 and 2009. And in both cases United got to the final. In most CL editions United were always lagging behind their European counterparts, yet still punched above their weight. Can't remember one instance when one of Pep's teams had to punch above their weight though...
It doesn’t matter how much money he’s had to spend or which teams he took over. It also doesn’t matter how many times he gets to the final. That’s something that might bother people now but it’s not a concern of posterity. No one remembers losing finalists and no one remembers how much Real Madrid spent on their CL winning squad in 1960. In 50 years time, all people will care about is 2 things

1. What did he win?
2. How did his teams play football?

That’s all that matters and he’s doing pretty well on both fronts. 8 league titles (could soon be 9) and 2 European Cups, the sextuple with Barca etc. and he’s only just turned 50.

The fact of the matter is that in 50 years time, whatever Pep has spent on his squads will look like chicken feed to people then.
 

NasirTimothy

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
2,388
Supports
Enyimba F.C.
Pep left Barcelona almost 10yrs ago, How many times have they won it since then? Messi is still with them, Iniesta played till 2017 This is Peps 12th season as a coach. He has made 7 CL semis almost the same number as Ferguson and much more than most managers

If you have only 3 coaches in the 70yr history who have done better than you, how else are you expected to prove yourself in the European stage?

Pep is a good domestic manager by winning "just" 2 CL titles, how do you describe Ferguson who is seen as one of the best of all time? Or do you think by the same standards, Ferguson proved himself at the European stage
Basically, if he retired today, he’d still be one of the greatest managers of all time. So everything from here on out is just gravy for him
 

footballistic orgasm

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
656
Supports
No team in particular
Barca did win it in 2015. They also won the Treble that year so it's not like it was just down to Pep's genius. The fact that Barca went off the rails since then is a totally different topic.

The reason I'm scrutinising Pep so much is because he only managed top dog teams. Every team he has managed already had an insane squad or teams with limitless cash. And for all of that he hasn't even reached 1 CL final in the last decade. That is a failure in my book and a big spot on his CV.

If you want to compare him to Sir Alex, just tell me this: how many times were United the favorites?

A grand total of 2. In 2008 and 2009. And in both cases United got to the final. In most CL editions United were always lagging behind their European counterparts, yet still punched above their weight. Can't remember one instance when one of Pep's teams had to punch above their weight though...
The last paragraph is laughable. United was and still is one of the richest clubs in the world and you're trying to act as if United has always been under dogs. Fergie s teams were beaten in europe because the other teams were better on the pitch, no more no less.
You can talk about Pep not winning the CL or getting to the final (no one really cares about getting to the final if you don't win) yet with City, but the clubs that have won it within that time frame are historical european giants Bayern, Real Madrid and Liverpool.

Regarding the fact that Pep only manages top dog teams (City wasn't a top dog team if we're being honest, unless we're talking only from a financial point of view), why do you think that is though? Why are all this top teams going after Pep?
 

gibers

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2017
Messages
1,065
Location
UK
The only time Pep won it is when he was at peak Barca with peak Messi-Xavi-Iniesta. The latter 2 also won every international honor in the same time period.

Ironically Pep never reached a CL final since 2011. Sir Alex never went more than 9 years between finals to Pep's already 10.

Klopp by comparison has already been in 3CL finals in the same timeframe. Ancelotti has a CL as well, and don't get me started on Zidane.

So yes, Pep is a good domestic manager, but he still has to prove himself on the European stage.
And what did Barcelona do the season before Pep? You can't say he had peak Messi and Xavi when Barcelona were in the process of leaving before pepe came, Messi was injured every 13 games and never had a full season without injury, he shifted out Deco and Ronaldinho.

Even people in Spain where saying that Xavi and Iniesta couldn't play as CMs together, the same thing they said about KdB and Silva here.

Go and look at the time he took over. They finished 3rd and had to give Madrid a pasillo.

If it's so easy to win CLs with Messi why does Barca have only 1 since Pep left? The squads Ancelotti had to win the cl are currently better than anything Pep has and Ancelotti consistently flopped in the league. Then I guess Zidane is the greatest of all time.

Quick question isn't Arrigo Sacchi an all time great coach because he only won 2 European cups with Milan, despite the fact that English teams were banned and he had a stacked squad?
 

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
And what did Barcelona do the season before Pep? You can't say he had peak Messi and Xavi when Barcelona were in the process of leaving before pepe came, Messi was injured every 13 games and never had a full season without injury, he shifted out Deco and Ronaldinho.

Even people in Spain where saying that Xavi and Iniesta couldn't play as CMs together, the same thing they said about KdB and Silva here.

Go and look at the time he took over. They finished 3rd and had to give Madrid a pasillo.

If it's so easy to win CLs with Messi why does Barca have only 1 since Pep left? The squads Ancelotti had to win the cl are currently better than anything Pep has and Ancelotti consistently flopped in the league. Then I guess Zidane is the greatest of all time.

Quick question isn't Arrigo Sacchi an all time great coach because he only won 2 European cups with Milan, despite the fact that English teams were banned and he had a stacked squad?
They made one of our best ever teams park the bus both home and away. And that "crappy" Barca team pushed us to the limit. Let's not pretend they were 7th in the league and canon fodder in the CL like current Barcelona is.

They also had an insanely stacked squad. Only Ronaldinho was on the wane. While Iniesta and Messi were coming into their prime. Xavi is a difficult one. I remember a year prior he wanted to leave and we were strongly linked with him. But at the time he was starting to find some form. This core Barca team had won the CL 2 years prior before Pep took over.

Now, about this point:
If it's so easy to win CLs with Messi why does Barca have only 1 since Pep left? The squads Ancelotti had to win the cl are currently better than anything Pep has and Ancelotti consistently flopped in the league. Then I guess Zidane is the greatest of all time.
That's one more than Pep in the same time period and I never claimed it was easy. What I claimed though is that Pep has always been one of the favorites to win it. That was the reason he was brought to Bayern, to solidify their European dominance. And he didn't deliver. Same for City.

There is more to football than just win things with stacked squads. There are rebuild processes, team creation, identity creation for the club you manage. This is why if you ask any Barca fan who is better between Cruyff and Pep, 9/10 will tell you Cruyff despite the fact that he didn't win remotely the same amount of trophies as Pep did.

Now I'm not claiming that Pep is a fraud or anything crazy like that. You have to be delusional to think so. What I am saying is that he has still a lot to prove if he is to be classed among GOAT managers like Sir Alex.

Re: Sachi, I have no idea. I've never followed Italian football in general. I do know that he is regarded as having assembled one of the best defensive teams of all time though.

The last paragraph is laughable. United was and still is one of the richest clubs in the world and you're trying to act as if United has always been under dogs. Fergie s teams were beaten in europe because the other teams were better on the pitch, no more no less.
You can talk about Pep not winning the CL or getting to the final (no one really cares about getting to the final if you don't win) yet with City, but the clubs that have won it within that time frame are historical european giants Bayern, Real Madrid and Liverpool.

Regarding the fact that Pep only manages top dog teams (City wasn't a top dog team if we're being honest, unless we're talking only from a financial point of view), why do you think that is though? Why are all this top teams going after Pep?
If it's laughable, why prior to 2007 were dumped out by all the top teams in the competition. Every time we faced Madrid, Milan or even Bayern(over 2 legs) we got kicked out and outplayed. While we weren't exactly Burnley tier, but we weren't favorites going into those ties.

Re: your last question: Why is Jose even getting a job these days? Reputation

Pep was brought in to solidify Bayern's dominance after their Treble season. He failed his task. He was brought to win a CL for City. He failed again so far.

Just to reiterate my point: I'm not saying he is a bad manager or fraud. You have to be delusional to think that a man who is about to win 3PL titles in 4 years is bad manager. What I am saying is that he was still a lot to prove before he'll be classed as trully one of GOATs.
 

Needham

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
11,808
In the current English universe the only way this guy ever gets sacked is if he mispronouns.
 

renandstimpyfan83

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
600
Location
SNG
Supports
Real Oviedo/England
The mental gymnastics some people are doing here in order not to admit what a great coach he is and how what he's good what he's doing at City is, is very funny IMO
Highest points per game (2.34) of anyone who has managed more than five PL matches.

Ferguson (2.16), Conte (2.14), Klopp (2.12), Mourinho (2.04), Wenger (1.96) and Ancelotti (1.91) all had massively stacked squads too so it’s not like comparing apples and oranges.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,590
Hes a great coach and excellent at improving players to take them to the next level

The question mark however will be if he's able to do that at 'lesser' teams
He probably will never have to do it if he can have his pick of teams to manage and the ability to take a good team, and spend to make it a great team.

He's won a lot of domestic trophies (and had luck too like his run in the fa cup and EFL cup when he won the domestic treble where he only faced two or three premier League teams and won two of them on penalties)
His record in the European Cup is a disappointment since leaving Barca however, in the same way I feel Fergie should have won more than 2 European trophies or made more finals at least)
Pep however should have at least reached the semi finals with City and the draws theyve had.

I do question if he could do what Fergie did with Aberdeen or what Jose did with Porto (and I know the easy joke is if he wins it with city it shows he can do it with a small club)

I wanted pep after lvg but Pep would not have suited us as the set up was there at city.

His next job will be telling and interesting
 

PepG

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Messages
1,211
Supports
Ajax
His next job will be telling and interesting
Pep Guardiola: “In the first season we did not win and the club supported me. In another club, maybe I would be out. In the #UCL
we never made it past the QFs. Another club I would be out. They convinced me to extend the contract because I felt they wanted it..
I dont think Pep is going anywhere anytime soon. His contract ends in the summer of 2023 but i feel that he will stay more.. May be till 2026 to make it 10 years as a manager of City..who knows..
 

Noot

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
623
Supports
Manchester City
Ironically City usually get good prices for players. Pep and spending = Augustus Gloop and chocolate.
This. Dias, Laporte, Cancelo, Rodri, Stones, Walker, Sané, Bernardo, Ederson, Jesus, Gundogan, Zinchenko, all signed for what ended up looking like decent or even great fees.

Before Pep there was De Jong, Kompany, Zabaleta, Touré, Silva, Kolarov, Milner, Dzeko, Agüero, Clichy, Fernandinho, Sagna, De Bruyne and Sterling.

City's whole policy is to sign players for fees that might look too high at first but feel like good value by the time they leave. I don't think they get enough credit for that.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,590
I dont think Pep is going anywhere anytime soon. His contract ends in the summer of 2023 but i feel that he will stay more.. May be till 2026 to make it 10 years as a manager of City..who knows..
That would be interesting as it's rare for managers to do that long a period these days

I mean every thing is set for him, he has a good mix of players and can spend loads (but may only need to sign two or three a season to maintain things) . Will be interesting too cos he's gone for the defensive solidarity approach more than attack and score more, which may benefit him in a CL run as that will surely win it for him either this year or next few years.

Replacing Aguero will be key too. Get haaland and the league is yours every year to throw away.
 

Pep's Suit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
1,705
That would be interesting as it's rare for managers to do that long a period these days

I mean every thing is set for him, he has a good mix of players and can spend loads (but may only need to sign two or three a season to maintain things) . Will be interesting too cos he's gone for the defensive solidarity approach more than attack and score more, which may benefit him in a CL run as that will surely win it for him either this year or next few years.

Replacing Aguero will be key too. Get haaland and the league is yours every year to throw away.
Yeah, I think 3-4 players will be signed this summer: ST, DM, probably LB, maybe AM/winger.
 

Mark_Barca

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
2,268
Supports
Barcelona
Imagine bumping this for the first time in 2 months because they lost one game playing many of their reserves when the league is over. :lol:
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,626
Imagine bumping this for the first time in 2 months because they lost one game playing many of their reserves when the league is over. :lol:
Yep.
Played a stupid lineup, but not much issue in the scheme of things.

Imagine if they go out midweek now, that'd be golden.