European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,331
Location
The stable
BT will be the biggest loser in the TV game. They've invested millions into the champions league and now it could become a B grade competition.

Sky could still broadcast Premier League games as they have done. Amazon could muscle in and get more games though
 

diarm

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Messages
16,790
"Europes Greatest Clubs."

Villa and Forest have both won the European Cup since Spurs last won a title.
 

Neo_Mufc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
10,162
Wonder how long it'll take to have kick off times to suit Asian TV/viewing audience?

Or to play some games in other countries... The Man United Globetrotters.

Or sell United as a franchise and relocate them.

The longer this goes on, the more I think up stupid things. Bed
La Liga have already been doing it to suit the asian audience.
 

tjb

Full Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,330
The issue is who owns the fundamental rights to administrate the game's format and rules
Thats the thing. They will sort all of that out in the short term. The main thing is, its a coup of UEFA. The big clubs are clearly not happy with them and in truth they have a right not to be. I think an agreement will eventually be made or a new governing body will be created, but for all the top clubs to come together like this, it has to be for far more reasons that simply greed.

Imo UEFA and the individual leagues huffing and puffing will only lead to more alienation. FIFA and the leagues will eventually fold as the game is only popular today because of these teams and players. This is basically a public arbitration. UEFA overemphasized their power and the clubs who made them what they are are fighting back. Talk of greed, death of football, is all an exaggeration. Its annoying and it will take some time, but this matter will be resolved.
 

RyRoc

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
1,120
Location
Kingston
Who cares how good they were 15+ years ago. People dont watch the name or the history. They watch the team and Arsenal's current team isn't very good. You know they could solve that problem with some kind of qualification, like earning more points than their peers over a season. That way the elite european competition has the elite teams in it. Or i guess we could just assume Arsenal will be one of the 15 best teams in europe for the rest of existence becasue they're called arsenal
Effectively yes! Or at least that's what they want under this model with the big teams get even bigger and richer that's part of the aim of it.
 

BaillyBaillyBailly

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2014
Messages
243
Location
Altrincham
Why though? Winning the league is still winning the league. We want to keep Liverpool from getting 20. We wanna get the 21st. Need to break City's Hegemony. The only thing it would change is that 6 of the clubs would not care about the top 4 battle and isn't that what our fans make fun of us for these days? Caring about the top 4 trophy? West Ham and Leicester still want the top 4.
I think its relevant more in terms of the way the clubs will look at it, and the way they look at it will, no matter what fans think, eventually be the way we look at it.
If winning the EPL is no longer much of a financial bonus for the Glazers they will tell the manager to focus on Super League games regardless of the EPL fixtures. If United have a EPL game vs Liverpool on Saturday and a Super League Quarter Final vs Madrid on Wednesday and the board tells the United Manager to ignore the league game he will. If fans start seeing that the focus is not on the league then winning the league becomes less important.
 

Jezpeza

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
2,034
What the hell are you on about?

This is a huge feck you to all the other clubs, telling them they're beneath these 15 founding clubs.

The audacity to form an "exclusive" group of clubs goes against the nature of football's unpredictability where a team can grow into a top team organically but then also have a couple of dark years where they're not among the big boys.
pretty much this. Entitled owners who have had their pockets hurt when they werent good enough to qualify for champions league. Arsenal arent a patch on leicester atm but the owners want to ringfence the money they think the football universe owes them, and give two fingers to the champions league and spirit of football. The whole of football is based on the idea that its an infinite game with all sorts of outcomes. Look at Bournemouth for instance - nearly dropped out of league two then rode the leagues up to the premier league. West Ham have a small squad and some financial issues but look as though they might finish higher up the table than the raining champions.

This super league is a pisstake because theres no route in or out. Its not a competition its an exhibition.
 

littlepeasoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
5,344
Location
Give peas a chance.
It will be fascinating (perhaps morbidly so) to see how managers, coaches and players respond to this publicly now we know the stance of their clubs. I expect most will tow the party line, but conversely could mean a massive shake up in personnel. Wasn't Klopp, for example, really against the idea?
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
If the various governments actually decided to do something about it, there is absolutely nothing these clubs could do to stop them.
Football clubs have countries as owners now, major foreign investors. Boris was trying to unlawfully let Saudi Arabia buy Newcastle ffs.
Theyll do nothing about it.
 

Hoof the ball

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
12,297
Location
San Antonio, Texas.
So, if the founding group grows from 12 to 15 and those 15 are in it every year, how are the 5 chosen to compete in the competition in that given season? I take it 'top four' won't be a thing anymore?
 

Giggs' right foot

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
1,032
Wonder how long it'll take to have kick off times to suit Asian TV/viewing audience?

Or to play some games in other countries... The Man United Globetrotters.

Or sell United as a franchise and relocate them.

The longer this goes on, the more I think up stupid things. Bed
With the news of this wank league being confirmed by our club, I'm genuinely struggling to see the incentives the Glazers might have for NOT just selling the naming rights of Old Trafford to some American shit firm. Today they just took a dump on every fan of the club - feck all will happen - so why not say feck it, and rename Old Trafford the Coca-Cola Arena? Already fits with the colors. I wouldn't put anything past these...... people.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,947
I'm all ears for reforming the CL and all that.

But to form an "exclusive" group of European clubs in an arbitrary period of time is completely unfair to all the other clubs in European football. It goes against the beauty of unpredictability, where a couple of good transfers and a good coach can make clubs like Atalanta qualify for the CL and make Ajax or Lyon reach the semi's.

Hell, there is no guarantee that Liverpool will be as big as in 50 years as they are now. Or Spurs. Or Inter Milan. Maybe they get overtaken domestically. But none of that matters anymore because this group of 15 founding clubs have decided they are exclusive and the rest can go feck themselves.
 

Karel Podolsky

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
1,421
Location
Borneo Jungle
Supports
Ex Laziale
So you're suggesting that we won't want to win the league because we will be in the SL anyway? Better tell the players to pack it in, no point lads, you'll get paid regardless
This.
The clubs and players will be happy to win the League beside competing in ESL. Finishing #2 instead of #3 etc.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Thats the thing. They will sort all of that out in the short term. The main thing is, its a coup of UEFA. The big clubs are clearly not happy with them and in truth they have a right not to be. I think an agreement will eventually be made or a new governing body will be created, but for all the top clubs to come together like this, it has to be for far more reasons that simply greed.

Imo UEFA and the individual leagues huffing and puffing will only lead to more alienation. FIFA and the leagues will eventually fold as the game is only popular today because of these teams and players. This is basically a public arbitration. UEFA overemphasized their power and the clubs who made them what they are are fighting back. Talk of greed, death of football, is all an exaggeration. Its annoying and it will take some time, but this matter will be resolved.
If there's more than greed involved then they've done a bloody terrible job of managing to actually communicate that to anyone. Given that currently about 95% of football fans are raging against them, including fans of 40 years plus like myself ready to stop supporting our clubs.
 

Fox outside the box

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
418
They invest money the club makes because of our history.

They do it to keep us vaguely competitive and therefore keep the money flowing into their pockets. The fact it’s not enough to take us beyond City doesn’t matter to them
I agree
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. It's all a very transparent money grab.
Well yeah, it's obviously being done to make money. Nobody is clever for thinking that, I haven't seen any of the statements coming from those involved claim this is an act of charity.

Yes, they want to make money. So does everyone in football. Sky, BT, the Premier League etc etc etc. Wanting to make money isn't 'the' bad reason.

To make money though, they need a good product, so even if it's for selfish reasons, they will want it to be a good product. You've created a hidden agenda that I don't see existing.

Do you think that they think that they are hiding the money aspect or something? When someone builds a stunning hotel, it is ultimately to make money, their interest in guest enjoyment isn't genuine, it doesn't go past wanting it because it leads to more money. They want high satisfaction because they've invested heavily and want a hefty return. I've never cared if the motivations behind creating something is purely greed, as long as I like the product. I know when I buy a coca cola product that I'm contributing towards some greedy wanker's Christmas bonus. I know that when I buy a TV, when I pay to watch a film, when I pay for a Netflix subscription, when I nip through Maccies on the way home and get a McFlurry. I know it when I buy a game like Cyberpunk 2077. The fact that the ultimate goal of those at the top is to make as much money as possible, it doesn't stop me from buying into that. If I held everything to that regard, I'd do nothing, ever. I'd boycott everything.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,299
I want to hear from Klopp and Ole and Pep most of all.

We'll find out if they have the spines to stand by their principles.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,307
One last point. People talking about how unfair it is the Oil Clubs have been allowed to do whatever they want.

Real Madrid are looking to get sponsorship money from the Middle East and a few years earlier removed the cross from their crest, for that's worth.

The fight between the 'traditional' clubs and the Oil clubs is just another version of Old versus New money, just in football terms.

In the end, the small person supporting their beloved club loses out.

I want to hear from Klopp and Ole and Pep most of all.

We'll find out if they have the spines to stand by their principles.
I honestly fully expect Klopp to nope out and I think this may be related to their form this season. So much of the news stories in this recent season make a lot more sense now.

Pep works for the Arabs, soo....
 

HerrLeinad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
352
Supports
Bayern München
It's Bayern, Dortmund and PSG who declined to get involved.
I'll be honest, I think there will be too much economical pressure on us in the long run to stand by that decission. If the ESL goes forward it's either to join it or risk behind completly left behind...
 

Ole's screen

Full Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
926
Location
Right next to Ole’s seat
Supports
KC Chiefs
I think its relevant more in terms of the way the clubs will look at it, and the way they look at it will, no matter what fans think, eventually be the way we look at it.
If winning the EPL is no longer much of a financial bonus for the Glazers they will tell the manager to focus on Super League games regardless of the EPL fixtures. If United have a EPL game vs Liverpool on Saturday and a Super League Quarter Final vs Madrid on Wednesday and the board tells the United Manager to ignore the league game he will. If fans start seeing that the focus is not on the league then winning the league becomes less important.
This already happens though when we play PSG - City - PSG this season. And in reality, the opposite of what you said will happen. Since the SL isn't super incentivized (you get a large chunk of the money for just participating) whereas the PL is, surely the boards would tell the manager to focus on the league since who cares if we're bottom of our SL group that year?
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,947
What if a European Super League would have been formed around 1980 and it would have included Nottingham Forest after their back-to-back European Cups?

The randomness of this "exclusivity" at an arbitrary moment in time is a complete disgrace.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
So, if the founding group grows from 12 to 15 and those 15 are in it every year, how are the 5 chosen to compete in the competition in that given season? I take it 'top four' won't be a thing anymore?
Whoever bends over with lube i suppose.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,307
What if a European Super League would have been formed around 1980 and it would have included Nottingham Forest after their back-to-back European Cups?

The randomness of this "exclusivity" at an arbitrary moment in time is a complete disgrace.
There is nothing random about these 15 clubs. It's the 'sort by revenue' option on the filter, not the 'sort by trophies' one.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
American plutocracy vs Meritocracy. I hope Europe does better and show those yanks who's boss - at least when it comes to football.
They're trying to replicate the "world series" which takes place in one country. The lot of them should be kicked out.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,304
If the various governments actually decided to do something about it, there is absolutely nothing these clubs could do to stop them.
This
The political capital in the UK is unique Vs anywhere in America.
You could see MP's losing seats over this let alone what could happen if fans united and organised.
But what could they do?

These clubs aren't refusing to play the domestic leagues, they're essentially only saying they'll play a different continental league than the one UEFA is organizing
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
ClubEuropean TrophiesEuropean Super CupsEuropean TotalDomestic LeaguesDomestic CupsCharity ShieldsDomestic TotalOverall LeaguesOverall CupsOverall Super CupsOverall Total
Manchester United6282017215820232366
Liverpool104141916165119262065
Arsenal221317164613191648
Chelsea516615425620531
Manchester City11613625614626
Tottenham Hotspur33212923215926
Aston Villa213712322714425
Everton119592396924

Spurs don't deserve to be a permanent founder club forever and ever for all of perpetuity. They're only ahead of Villa and Everton because of Charity Shield wins, having won a grand total of 2 league titles.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,307
In fairness to him, that crossypicket fella has spent all day doing a pretty good impression of one.
And then he said he hand't read the article or the details.

I try to stay cynical in life, partly due to my life experiences and on days like these, I can't say I have cause to doubt myself.

The only thing that stopped me from seriously believing the paid shill bit was the fact he'd had over 10k posts.
 

Kounan

Full Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
1,420
Location
Sarajevo, BiH
I'll be honest, I think there will be too much economical pressure on us in the long run to stand by that decission. If the ESL goes forward it's either to join it or risk behind completly left behind...
Maybe not from financial point of view, as you will have enough money and still more then other teams in Germany and most of Europe, so you will win titles. But form a sporting point of view you probably will want to start competing with "the best".

But let be honest, you did no make this decision because it's moraly correct, but because this status in German football suits you and that is perfectly fine.

When it comes to PSG, we all know that they had their own reasons and "moral" is not one of them.