European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
What gives UEFA the right to determine who should play where? Don't understand this all of a sudden love for UEFA. Fifa wants a similar league for Africa. So most likely it will get ratified. Champions league can continue without them. Also Clubs do need to play in competition ratified by FIfa or UEFA. They have voluntarily removed themselves from European competition. That's about it. If UEFA could, they would have removed them from this year competition. They didn't because legally they can't do anything. Next year is different because these clubs will no longer be member of European club competition. They don't need UEFA permission to play in domestic league
This is wrong, they do need to be licensed to play in the leagues. Rangers can’t just rock up in the premier league next year and say hi guys we fancied this league for a change.
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,602
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
It's boring because there's no competition, no stakes.

We'll see about that, mate. If you think that the EPL, the UEFA and the FIFA are just going to bend over and let you take the piss out of them, your fans and football in general while robbing them in the open, think again.

Also, the sense of entitlement and arrogance of posters like yourself are absolutely incredible.
It's really not entitlement. It stink to high heavens but, let's not forget, the FA, PL, UEFA, FIFA are all greedy fecks aswell. This is just a fact, and it is likely that they won't kick the clubs out. As a United supporter, I hope I'm wrong. The owners may have just sparked something that will force them out. I hope they get pillaged by the associations and are forced to leave.

I just don't think they will as there is so much money in the ESL anyway and it could potentially get even bigger if they don't play domestic games.
 

The Man Himself

asked for a tagline change and all I got was this.
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
22,406
Who do you think is going to purchase the club and not do what the Glazers did? United isn't a small investment, only businessmen will touch it.
Who's going to buy the club ? This is the number one issue.
Oh it will need change in ownership structure too. I was going by the tweets of govt wanting to work on that. Long long shot of course.
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
There's only one answer for this.

The amount of jobs related to the PL in the UK is significant. I read but cannot post the source that 1% of UK GDP is the PL (or football but for the purposes of this it's basically the same).

The government are already struggling to find additional revenue sources, they don't need rich Yanks to come and destroy more jobs and bankrupt more clubs.

This is the only reason politicians are on the fans' side.
Are you trying to portray saving jobs as a questionable motive?
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,637
I still find it odd we can mobilise governments, FA’s, UEFA/FIFA in an instant when it comes to a breakaway European competition.

But racism, no chance.
Because this could cost some very wealthy people a lot of money.
 

fck

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 26, 2018
Messages
228
Supports
Bayern
Sorry to spoil the party but lot of them won't happen in reality.

No one is kicking them out from domestic leagues as they have repeatedly said they want to stay.
The narrative that esl is boring is laughable when you have the same 14 teams competing in EPL every year. If that's not boring, this won't be either.
The epl is still going to be there but the revenue would be split. Means, you won't get this much money from the broadcasters. It won't be the cash cow that it's now.
I know you want this desperately to happen but (sorry to spoil your party) the PL can and will survive without the TOP 6 for sure. There are tons of much smaller leagues around the world that are able to survive without a problem. As another poster said this would actually be quite exciting as 10 teams could probably win the PL after the exclusion. And after the failure of the SL in a couple of years the 6 teams will come back and start the journey back to the top from the lower leagues. This would be riveting stuff.. imagine the story lines.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
No one told they won't commit. If you are watching United vs Burnley 2 times a year , you will watch United vs Barca 2 times an year ( atleast I would watch for sure)
Of course they won’t put their all Into it if nothings on the line, you’re being stupidly naive to think otherwise
 

SeanyC

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
386
Was loving Wolves Twitter page this morning...fair play to them! In all seriousness, there are millionaires out there that hate this and if it goes ahead the PL will be fine, at this rate I’d love to see a match up of Leicester, West Ham, Southampton Everton etc for the title
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
They'd just play in the CL?
Why? The revenue would be less than they could probably get by talking some Saudi company into buying broadcasting rights for.

Why do they want to win the Champions League when everyone would just say it is a second rate competition anyway?
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,997
There's only one answer for this.

The amount of jobs related to the PL in the UK is significant. I read but cannot post the source that 1% of UK GDP is the PL (or football but for the purposes of this it's basically the same).

The government are already struggling to find additional revenue sources, they don't need rich Yanks to come and destroy more jobs and bankrupt more clubs.

This is the only reason politicians are on the fans' side.
If you are the politician that have the fans their football clubs back in their hands, that's a lot of guaranteed votes.
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,432
Location
Nnc
Of course they won’t put their all Into it if nothings on the line, you’re being stupidly naive to think otherwise
You are assuming. Why would you think they won't pull when it's such a global event ?
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,107
Location
NYC

Hoping City, Chelsea and Athletico back out ASAP. Then force the likes of Spurs to freak out. We unfortunately know the Glazers will be the last. We need the pressure to mount even more
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
No one told they won't commit. If you are watching United vs Burnley 2 times a year , you will watch United vs Barca 2 times an year ( atleast I would watch for sure)
And I certainly won’t be buying tickets or paying tv subs to watch United play Barca in this fake meaningless league as I would and have done to see them play Burnley
 

Crimson King

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
3,090
I want it to happen and fail, we can carry on in the EPL without the big 6. It would have some financial issues likely but eventually things would work out better.

Then the big 6 come back after ESL fails, tail in between their legs realising they need the other 14, and stop been idiots with all the silly ideas, 39th game, overseas games, uneven money share, veto votes etc. Let them back in with 30 point deductions for 4 seasons and 4 year European ban
Wishful thinking. EPL clubs need the broadcast money to survive these days, and that would shrink significantly from what was currently on offer. If you even took one of Manchester United or Liverpool out they wouldn't offer as much, let alone with the other 4 gone too. Then they'll likely be looking to get in on the ESL action, so that would eat into what they're willing to pay...it would be a financial nuclear meltdown for pretty much every club without huge external backing.

The entire pyramid would collapse and there wouldn't be a league to come crawling back to. They know this, unfortunately, which is why they're pushing ahead with it. It's why owners like the Glazers should have never been allowed and stopped when we were protesting it. But, alas, most opposition fans were laughing into their Weetabixs about the prospect of Utd going tits up under the strain of the straddled debt. The same debt that has driven the Glazers to fatten their cash cow and take the club even further away from what football clubs are supposed to be. They exist in a grey area of business and community asset in this country, but in the US they're 'franchises' that are moved around at will. I have no problem with people investing in clubs to eventually make money, but the prospects of that return should have always been limited by what can be expected given the nature of the sport. This would have deterred people like the Glazers, who from day 1 when they wanted to break the collective TV deal set themselves against the nature of football.

I'm not accusing you of anything, I have no idea how you felt about all this back then, most likely you didn't really care, but many of us here feared something like this would become inevitable.

Also, kicking them out the league or deducting points would just push them further and they'd most likely set up a full league in direct opposition to national leagues without any financial support like they're currently offering. It also just punishes the fans and players, not the owners. They'd just sell the players and what's left of the club's off for scrap if the league didn't work out and they were then banned from everything else.

Despite the understandable anger around it, the solution will have to come from a level head and not teeth gnashing. Because, unfortunately, the footballing world does need these big clubs.
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
You're either being very disingenuous or purposefully thick.

Rashford earns loads of money from endorsements and that is based on this image and public perception which is very positive due to his actions outside his profession.

Now we come to a point where morals and ethics in his day job is questioned and all of a sudden my (and that of others) expectations of his behaviour and principles should change?

What kind of moral hypocrisy is this? If you want to be paid and not be questioned about where your money comes from, stop trying to portray yourself as anything but a mercenary.

This is valid not just for Rashford but for all of them, especially when it concerns the values of the club.

The only person who I can see agreeing with your point is some posh rich boy who's used to behaving hypocritically. I expect better from these working class footballers.
No I am being realistic and not getting carried away. I view footballers as normal human being and won't expect them to do something that you and I will never do. Their bank account is simply not something that should make a difference in how they are perceived. If you are accounting that then maybe you should look inwards rather than calling others thick. It's easy call others to do something and then call them selfish.

Most here work for morally ambiguous company and are well off than a huge percentage of population. It's unfair to expect them to come out against their employers. Same applies to footballers
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,847
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
It’s not laughable when on one hand you get a load of rich prima donnas Who don’t have to commit 100% in a league you can’t be relegated from or be successful to play in and on the other hand you get players who actually need to play to win in a competitive league with consequences of failing or rewards for achieving. I know which I’d rather watch.

Of course it's laughable, the PL won't exist if the top 6 aren't in it. There'd be no interest in it from worldwide supporters and the finances will collapse.
Those involved in the ESL will never be in danger of being relegated from their National Leagues in the current PL setup and it should be an extremely competitive league playing top matches all the time with a trophy or trophies at the end of it.

Personally I would like things to stay as they are but if it does change and the ESL happens then I'm all out a United supporter and will watch every match I can.

But thinking the top six can be ejected and things will carry on as before is equivalent to believing in Starmer's unicorns in the sunlit uplands.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,467
Are you trying to portray saving jobs as a questionable motive?
I seriously question people's reading comprehension.

What I am saying is if the ESL turns around and says we'll create (net) more jobs, the government will change its tune.

Now this is not the case but don't delude yourselves into thinking Mr Serial Liar is in this out of pure altruism.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,195
Location
Where the grass is greener.

Hoping City, Chelsea and Athletico back out ASAP. Then force the likes of Spurs to freak out. We unfortunately know the Glazers will be the last. We need the pressure to mount even more
What kind of source is that :lol:

Its absolutely gutting that we'll never pull out of it, if it's to crumble it'll happen around us. Our owners are scum.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063

Hoping City, Chelsea and Athletico back out ASAP. Then force the likes of Spurs to freak out. We unfortunately know the Glazers will be the last. We need the pressure to mount even more
I was going to say that looks an extremely unreliable source but then I saw its bio says "sharing the most reliable transfer news on Twitter and debunking false rumours", in which case it must be true.
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
But he wont. He isnt the emperor of the super league, one man wont hold all the power. Its just an old man pontificating. Same way UEFA said they could charge ppv for last 15 mins of games only.
Why would the others not be on board with rule changes? The only motve here is greed. They'll obviously adjust the rules to "make it more exciting" and make room for more commercial revenue.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,023
Location
France
Oh it will need change in ownership structure too. I was going by the tweets of govt wanting to work on that. Long long shot of course.
So the government is going to purchase United for billions, change its structure and presumably sell it for a loss?
 

Crustanoid

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
18,511
The current format is the founders and qualifying teams but it might change in the coming seasons to invite more and better teams than those fallen form grace like Arsenal, Ac/Inter Milan or never reached top Spurs. Maybe more fair qualification based on performances could be introduced later.. Could be the original idea of Champions league in the end just founded by different people. But yeah someone has to end up 15th hehe.
Maybe points should be awarded for how many trophies won in the past, how much money the owners have and how many shirts they sold that year
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,838
You are assuming. Why would you think they won't pull when it's such a global event ?
Because when there’s nothing on the line why would they risk playing through injury or risking it in that fifty fifty tackle, there’s no relegation from it, there’s no having to do well to get into it. They’ll play for personal pride maybe
 

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,432
Location
Nnc
It's boring because there's no competition, no stakes.

We'll see about that, mate. If you think that the EPL, the UEFA and the FIFA are just going to bend over and let you take the piss out of them, your fans and football in general while robbing them in the open, think again.

Also, the sense of entitlement and arrogance of posters like yourself are absolutely incredible.
It's not arrogance. It's a fact . Stop being emotional and think through this. Take a step back and stop overreacting. I too don't agree with the way it's implemented but there are lot of facts missing in that post. Being emotional won't take you anywhere. Be practical and find measures to stop it.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,061
How does a super league get past competition and monopolies (not the game :nono: ) laws?
Competition and monopoly laws apply in a business sense rather than a sporting sense so I don't think they really apply.

It'll just be the case that the PL are still able to advertise their product and compete in the marketplace and whatever, even if their top clubs are Palace and Burnley.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Incidentally, when the ESL say the remaining 5 places will be open, is there anything stopping those open spaces being filled by teams from outside Europe in Club World Cup style?
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,637
Why? The revenue would be less than they could probably get by talking some Saudi company into buying broadcasting rights for.

Why do they want to win the Champions League when everyone would just say it is a second rate competition anyway?
Wouldn't they say the same about a rival Super League without most of the big clubs?
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,273
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
The worst part of this whole thing is that we are probably only 2nd to Madrid in being the driving force behind this, I'd much rather be one of the 14 teams left behind rebuilding the Premier league.

Have to hope for some contractual point that voids contracts etc meaning its not feasible to take off.
I'm desperately hoping it all falls through but if Glazers remain in charge, it'll leave a stain on our club ... fingers crossed Govts and associations hit them with everything and it doesn't just fail but puts the kybosh on future ones.. they sell up and feck off back to America.

Gotta dream?
 

ReddBalls

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
992
I seriously question people's reading comprehension.

What I am saying is if the ESL turns around and says we'll create (net) more jobs, the government will change its tune.

Now this is not the case but don't delude yourselves into thinking Mr Serial Liar is in this out of pure altruism.
I certainly don't think highly of Johnson, rest assured. But whatever his motives are, it's a good thing if he can stop this from happening.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,744
Never heard of him though he's followed by a number of journos. I'd be inclined not to take it too seriously unless it's reported by someone more credible from a football background.
He's well known as a journalist in politics circles. Sports journalists are the least reliable of the species in general so I would be interested in what he has to say.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,583
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Incidentally, when the ESL say the remaining 5 places will be open, is there anything stopping those open spaces being filled by teams from outside Europe in Club World Cup style?
I do think the longterm plan is for a World Super League.