predator
Youth NITK
What's wrong with him?
He just can't behave.
He just can't behave.
Means he has to go to court to defend the charge as the prosecution believe they have grounds to win the caseWhat does charged mean? Why are people already writing him off?
No but theres a pattern there.... He deserves the benefit of the doubt legally, but not morallyThe charge still has to be proven.
Why is everyone assuming he's guilty ? Just because he banged his brothers wife doesn't mean he's guilty now for assaulting these two women.
That's a fair point. He's still a piece of garbage for doing what he did, it doesn't mean he's naturally stepping up to assault women. In the court of law it's innocent until proven guilty, but rarely in the court of public opinion unfortunately.The charge still has to be proven.
Why is everyone assuming he's guilty ? Just because he banged his brothers wife doesn't mean he's guilty now for assaulting these two women.
Agree with this although the episode with his brother does taint ones view.If the allegations are true,then obviously his actions can’t be condoned.But we still don’t know the entire story...Giggsey may prove to be innocent at the end of the day.The basic tenet of law is innocent until proven guilty...
thisHe needs to stop the sauce and get some help. What an absolute plank.
You have to realize the court of public opinion is full of people with agendas and pre-conceived notions. Who justify their pre-conceived notions with the idea, "it's the court of public opinion, I don't need to be correct about this feeling I have".That's a fair point. He's still a piece of garbage for doing what he did, it doesn't mean he's naturally stepping up to assault women. In the court of law it's innocent until proven guilty, but rarely in the court of public opinion unfortunately.
That was when the allegations of this case first happened in November.Wasn’t he recently suspended from being on the touch line? What was that for?
That was when the story first came out and the incident was under investigation.Wasn’t he recently suspended from being on the touch line? What was that for?
Hate to say this, but exactly.He always seemed really robotic and unemotional, like there's no soul behind those beady eyes.
I get a sociopathic vibe if I'm honest.
That was when the allegations of this case first happened in November.
Same minute, basically the same message.That was when the story first came out and the incident was under investigation.
Wow. Just wow.Maybe he’s just going through a mid life crisis...And just because he’s charged doesn’t mean that he’s going to be convicted...
Same last name, same post content. Nothing to see here.Same minute, basically the same message.
This probably deserves an investigation in & of itself.
Same minute, basically the same message.
This probably deserves an investigation in & of itself.
Just a Gunnar Solskjær family trait.Same last name, same post content. Nothing to see here.
Hope y’all don’t have kids, especially sons.Just a Gunnar Solskjær family trait.
Nah, we're happy as we are.Hope y’all don’t have kids, especially sons.
Please don't remind me of that post!RYAN GIGGS WAS A GREAT PLAYER BUT A TERRIBLE PERSONALITY
HE CLASHED WITH RHODRI BECAUSE HE WAS SHAGGING HIS MISSES
EVEN THOUGH HE COULD HAVE ANY WOMAN HE WANTED
SHITE PERSONALITY
HE WON PLENTY AT CLUB AND NOTHING AT NATION
NATION
NATION LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVEL
Good for them!Nah, we're happy as we are.
This is a tangent but I hate this saying. There can be smoke without fire- smoke machines. And sometimes (the minority of the time) that's what criminal allegations against celebrities are- smoke machines, people making artificial smoke to simulate real flames. We have to be extremely careful with using the logic that allegations = guilt.Isn't this more than the first allegation of assault and or domestic violence. No smoke without fire. Guys a twat. Needs to have the law thrown at him
The best!Please don't remind me of that post!
Given that you don't know the circumstances, I'd say that's a pretty baseless allegation.There’s two sides to every story. This doesn’t prove he’s done wrong or is a bad person. He’s still Ryan Giggs. If he was joe bloggs I doubt this would have even got anywhere with the police.
What? Go out and assault a women then let me know how that works out for you.There’s two sides to every story. This doesn’t prove he’s done wrong or is a bad person. He’s still Ryan Giggs. If he was joe bloggs I doubt this would have even got anywhere with the police.
I’d say probably the exact opposite.There’s two sides to every story. This doesn’t prove he’s done wrong or is a bad person. He’s still Ryan Giggs. If he was joe bloggs I doubt this would have even got anywhere with the police.
The best!
There is a difference in how the opinion is said. "I think he is guilty" sounds like an opinion.People always say "innocent until proven guilty" in these types of threads, like Redcafe is running a criminal trial against whoever it's about.
I'm not sure what people think that means, but it isn't "you can only form opinions about someone and whether they likely did something if it's proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court".