Zen86
Full Member
Hopefully this brings the arrogant little twat back down to earth againHe dyed his hair trying to be Gazza too.
Hopefully this brings the arrogant little twat back down to earth againHe dyed his hair trying to be Gazza too.
Same is being said about everyone else on the pitch, especially Kane too. Underperforming, can’t handle the big stage etc etc.The so-called Stockport Messi isnt quite the same without Kevin Dr Bruyne and co is he?
He had a couple of moments. Kane and Sterling were far worse, it should have been Sterling to come off.The hype train can't even make comms recognize when he had a shocker. Alan Smith surprised he came off Hes been woeful in both games and he let him off by saying it was the easy choice because he's young but "did well". Was tumescent.
He did nothing, but the problem is that he's not even close to Sancho's, Rashfords or Grealish's current level. It's like picking Parker ahead of Carrick in midfield levels of bad decisions.He had a couple of moments. Kane and Sterling were far worse, it should have been Sterling to come off.
He had no moments.He had a couple of moments. Kane and Sterling were far worse, it should have been Sterling to come off.
He really did.He had no moments.
The manager makes you overrun the ball, run down blind alleys and make wrong decisions? Okay then.Same is being said about everyone else on the pitch, especially Kane too. Underperforming, can’t handle the big stage etc etc.
Perhaps, just perhaps, this is a manager thing.
Just a thought.
Sancho and Rashford on the wings, Grealish and Mount in the midfield 3 should be it. Sancho and Grealish are among the most creative players in world football. Yet are on the bench.Not a great game but he's clearly very talented and has had some nice touches.
Not helped by playing so far up. He should be in the mix of it in midfield. Philips instead of Rice and Foden/Mount in a three.
Grealish or Rashford in the front three.
Which moments then?He really did.
Yeah he's quite small and still young. He's a late bloomer for sure IMO. Obvious talent but Southgate isn't helping him playing him in an unfamiliar role in which there are multiple far better and more proven players available. That's the biggest issue. Leave him to be an impact sub, it's what he's more suited to at this point.I think he’s an amazing talent but it will be interesting to see how he develops. It took Pep long enough to integrate him but even now the fact is he plays for an ultra dominant club side and decorates games rather then being at the heart of things, which with his talent you’d hope for him to be.
Christ I didn’t take notes but he played well in the first half - didn’t he have a chance at one point? A couple of runs? He certainly did better then Sterling, Kane etcWhich moments then?
No, he was shite in the first half and the only thing he did was control an offside ball nicely and then feck up the offside chance.Christ I didn’t take notes but he played well in the first half - didn’t he have a chance at one point? A couple of runs? He certainly did better then Sterling, Kane etc
Each to their own mateNo, he was shite in the first half and the only thing he did was control an offside ball nicely and then feck up the offside chance.
He’a gonna be a cracking player I’m sure of that, but it that was a “good first half” from an England attacker versus Scotland then my Lord we’re horrendous."Had some nice touches"
You can’t even tell me one of his good moments you claimed he had, versus Scotland at home.Each to their own mate
Looking like an absolute twat now. Two dreadful games with a spotlight on his head
Jack got 27 minutes.The saviour jack grealish was just as shit.
Is almost half an hour on the pitch nothing to you ?Jack got 27 minutes.
Compared to 63 minutes, he completed 3 dribbles to Foden’s 4, got fouled more, had much better passing accuracy.Is almost half an hour on the pitch nothing to you ?
Hes coming on against a tired defence. His fouls won were all near the halfway line. Did feck all.Compared to 63 minutes, he completed 3 dribbles to Foden’s 4, got fouled more, had much better passing accuracy.
So yeah, it means something, but coming on is always tougher and he still outperformed him.
The game had turned into a complete shambles long before Grealish came on.The saviour jack grealish was just as shit.
During which he did very little.Jack got 27 minutes.
That's my point. They are all playing shit. It's on the manager.The game had turned into a complete shambles long before Grealish came on.
Oh for sure. But it can still work out if he picks his best and most talented players who can do stuff on their own. That means Grealish, Sancho, Rashford should all probably start in the 3 behind Kane.That's my point. They are all playing shit. It's on the manager.
For City he was best when used as a false 9 and had a Pep system with Mahrez/Silva, De Bruyne, Gundogan to support him. He wasn't used that much as a creative force for them.Was better than Sterling and Kane, I do not think this style of foorball is suiting him, hes more of a linkup player.
The managers main fault was the starting lineup, Foden being one of those mistakes.That's my point. They are all playing shit. It's on the manager.
He was probably the 2nd most creative player in the City team in the 2nd half of the season.For City he was best when used as a false 9 and had a Pep system with Mahrez/Silva, De Bruyne, Gundogan to support him. He wasn't used that much as a creative force for them.