g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Declan Rice

Status
Not open for further replies.

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,468
Location
Birmingham
Water carrier.
Fred is a better player. My two cents.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
23,036
Location
Somewhere out there
It's almost like you've forgotten how poor Rice is on the ball. Philips has played some lovely passes this tournament. Rice looks like he's juggling a hot potato.
You’ve gotta be off your nut not to see that Phillips is clearly superior on the ball. I mean, even Southgate told them to swap positions half way through that second half so they could get Phillips deep who a) actually wants the ball and b) can play a progressive pass.

“Literally nothing he does better” :houllier:
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,074
Location
Austria
For 30 mill I'd say let's give it a try. Nothing I've seen from him would suggest he anything more than that.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,496
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
I think Philips was actually worse than Rice last night, caught on the ball couple of times and could have been punished. Rice on the other hand is obviously not suited for a team that sits deep like the Danes did last night especially alongside a similar player. On the other hand Hojbjerg and Delaney are hardly conference player like some wish to paint them in this thread and many of the English players looked dominated and inferior in duels and for prolonged periods of time.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,157
It's almost like you've forgotten how poor Rice is on the ball. Philips has played some lovely passes this tournament. Rice looks like he's juggling a hot potato.
Exactly :lol:

I'd argue he's even worse off the ball when we're in possession. That half position he takes up between Shaw and Maguire is fecking infuriating. He's hiding away from getting the ball in the middle of the pitch.
 

Houdini

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
2,199
Rice is just an option if you want to park the bus desperately. He is good in disrupting attacks but nothing more. Too little for a TOP team but usable as a sub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sultan

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
23,118
Location
Inside right
I think, far more important than how bad he is at playing the ball forward, the worry yesterday is that what he's supposed to excel at he was absolutely dire at with Denmark running through England's central core and straight at the backline at will until they gassed.

If he's a terrier, one-man wall of defence, then perhaps the lack of ambition in his passes or his need for multiple touches to control simple balls could be forgiven, but if he's a defensive sieve when really needed, then there's no reason to look in his direction.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,809
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
this place lurches in extremes. Yesterday the weight of the occasion got to a number of the English players. Id blame that rather than being out right poor for a number of the below par performances. The only thing we learned yesterday though is Rice solves nothing for us. He wont help us breakdown a low block and I severely doubt he'd make a partnership as flawed as Lindeloff - Maguire any safer without help
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,468
Location
Birmingham
I disagree, alongside Pogba and Bruno, I think it could work nicely.
Two players with poor to inconsistent short passing game and a third who is very mediocre on the ball. Great combination.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Tbh I've never ever rated Henderson (partly of my bias as an United fan) but the fact he's miles better than Rice say it all. 100m my arse.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,625
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
I think Philips was actually worse than Rice last night, caught on the ball couple of times and could have been punished. Rice on the other hand is obviously not suited for a team that sits deep like the Danes did last night especially alongside a similar player. On the other hand Hojbjerg and Delaney are hardly conference player like some wish to paint them in this thread and many of the English players looked dominated and inferior in duels and for prolonged periods of time.
Midfield was the part of the pitch where I thought we were better.

Also on paper really. Between Rice and Phillips vs Delaney and Højbjerg, I'd choose the latter two.
 

Lewnited

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2017
Messages
896
This place has had me thinking I'd lost my mind at times with the views on this guy! £70-80m should get you a DM a couple levels above Rice. Those who think Fred isn't good enough at transitioning the ball through midfield would be in for a rude awakening if we bought Rice.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
The problem with the forum is every midfielder has to be a Carrick level passer or Busquets without acknowledging that those two in their primes were some of the best footballers in the world in the midfield. Your not going to come across those levels of talent at the ratio of assessing your average number of midfielders.

Rice is tactically the most important midfielder for England. He screens the defence very effectively positionally, if you want a good example of what the team would look like without him, picture United and Maguire getting exposed rinse and repeat in 1v1s, skinned if the opposition drag Harry to the channels and use pace against him which has happened almost on a game by game basis throughout the early / mid season last year. If you take the amount of times this lead to goals / chances created in context, United would have pushed city far closer for a title race if the midfield did their job more accordingly when out of possession.

Rice isn't great in possession, but I'd prefer him over Fred due to his defensive discipline. Fred constantly loses possession which will always expose United because Solskjaer isn't a manager that teaches his teams ball retention effectively. The issue with Rice is not too far from Pogba, he'll need the right players around him in order to balance the midfield.

I'm always shocked to see how highly regarded Fred is, he's easily the most replaceable player in the squad along with Lindlelof if the team is required to go up a level.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Tbh I've never ever rated Henderson (partly of my bias as an United fan) but the fact he's miles better than Rice say it all. 100m my arse.
I'm likewise.

Henderson is definitely better than RIce and Phillips. However, I would say all three are underwhelming (United bias probably).
 

sleepehead

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
129
The problem with the forum is every midfielder has to be a Carrick level passer or Busquets without acknowledging that those two in their primes were some of the best footballers in the world in the midfield. Your not going to come across those levels of talent at the ratio of assessing your average number of midfielders.

Rice is tactically the most important midfielder for England. He screens the defence very effectively positionally, if you want a good example of what the team would look like without him, picture United and Maguire getting exposed rinse and repeat in 1v1s, skinned if the opposition drag Harry to the channels and use pace against him which has happened almost on a game by game basis throughout the early / mid season last year. If you take the amount of times this lead to goals / chances created in context, United would have pushed city far closer for a title race if the midfield did their job more accordingly when out of possession.

Rice isn't great in possession, but I'd prefer him over Fred due to his defensive discipline. Fred constantly loses possession which will always expose United because Solskjaer isn't a manager that teaches his teams to retain possession quickly. The issue with Rice is not too far from Pogba, he'll need the right players around him in order to balance the midfield.

I'm always shocked to see how highly regarded Fred is, he's easily the most replaceable player in the squad along with Lindlelof if the team is required to go up a level.
The problem is his talent isn't worth 70-90 million that west ham want. He's really worth 30-50 if he wasn't English; for a midfielder he's not a deep lying playmaker, he doesn't really create for his team, he doesn't really pick out a perfect pass, and he doesn't really bag ton's of goals. Do I think he's talented at what he does? Yes, but not for the quoted price we would be idiots for paying that much for him. We wonder why teams try to pull ridiculous amounts for transfers on us, but at the same time act like the team should just pay whatever is asked. I honestly doubt any team goes for him, for the price being quoted. 70-90 million is a generational talent that can change the team for the next 5-10 years, I'd rather drop that on Groetzka at least he's shown more and he won't even be quoted for that much.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,496
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
Midfield was the part of the pitch where I thought we were better.

Also on paper really. Between Rice and Phillips vs Delaney and Højbjerg, I'd choose the latter two.
There is serious underrating of the danish team imo, but i'd still take Rice and Phillips personally.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,496
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
Two players with poor to inconsistent short passing game and a third who is very mediocre on the ball. Great combination.
Inconsistent short passing? You talking about Bruno and Pogba? I disagree. And mediocre on the ball? Yes he is no Busquets, but Rice is pretty solid on the ball, and improvement on what we have playing there at the moment.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
23,036
Location
Somewhere out there
Rice is tactically the most important midfielder for England. He screens the defence very effectively positionally, if you want a good example of what the team would look like without him, picture United and Maguire getting exposed rinse and repeat in 1v1s, skinned if the opposition drag Harry to the channels and use pace against him which has happened almost on a game by game basis throughout the early / mid season last year. If you take the amount of times this lead to goals / chances created in context, United would have pushed city far closer for a title race if the midfield did their job more accordingly when out of possession.
feck me, so Harry's a liability that looks good now because of a limited midfielder, one who was utter shite at screening last night and yet Harry was still top.

Your memories of our last season are so far off it's insane.
 

redmeister

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
1,466
I don't think Rice is a long term starter for England, but Skipp is too young at the moment and has only just had a break out season in the Championship. But I'd be very surprised if Skipp wasn't England's starting DM in the next year or two.
 

Banana Republic

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 16, 2018
Messages
1,427
That wasn’t an untypical performance from Rice, last night.
He can play better, but nothing that sets the world on fire.

I posted a few months ago, that one of my mates and his son are WHU season ticket holders and that my wife’s brother and his son ( my nephew) are dyed-in-the-wool WH fans.
My mate and his son and my BiL and nephew don’t know each other, but they all agree that although they like Declan Rice, they don’t rate him as anything more than a good homegrown West Ham lad and a good team player, but not consistent enough.
They rate Thomas Soucek much higher and put WH’s midfield improvement down to his arrival.
My nephew thinks it’s hilarious that Utd fans are drooling over Rice and that he’s being rated to be sold for stupid money.

I’ve been with my mate to a couple of home matches at the London Stadium and on both occasions the opposition just brushed past him a few times. He was tidy at sweeping up at the back of MF, but when under no pressure.

Hopefully the blinkers are now off and more people can see how limited this lad really is.
There’s no way Utd should be considering him, even as a squad player.
 
Last edited:

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
Fortunately I don't see us spending big to bring rice in, I am still not sure why Phillips is getting game time, other than that first game he doesn't look great, Southgate needs to swap out Phillips for Henderson.

I am also unconvinced what Mount brings to the team, I would replace him with Grealish who definitely offers more.

Saka was also pretty underwhelming for me, at almost every stage I felt like we would have been better starting Sancho and then bringing Saka on once the game got tired. Against the italians I think Saka might struggle and I really like him when he is used correctly.
 

KennyBurner

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
4,673
Location
ATL
It's almost like you've forgotten how poor Rice is on the ball. Philips has played some lovely passes this tournament. Rice looks like he's juggling a hot potato.
I wouldn’t even bother replying. Delusional statement if so ever saw one.
 

KennyBurner

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
4,673
Location
ATL
You’ve gotta be off your nut not to see that Phillips is clearly superior on the ball. I mean, even Southgate told them to swap positions half way through that second half so they could get Phillips deep who a) actually wants the ball and b) can play a progressive pass.

“Literally nothing he does better” :houllier:
I was wondering at points why the hell declan rice was trapped with the ball far up the wing. I would even say I was impressed he managed to hold up the ball so far up and pass it back safely which he loves doing.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,384
The problem with the forum is every midfielder has to be a Carrick level passer or Busquets without acknowledging that those two in their primes were some of the best footballers in the world in the midfield. Your not going to come across those levels of talent at the ratio of assessing your average number of midfielders.

Rice is tactically the most important midfielder for England. He screens the defence very effectively positionally, if you want a good example of what the team would look like without him, picture United and Maguire getting exposed rinse and repeat in 1v1s, skinned if the opposition drag Harry to the channels and use pace against him which has happened almost on a game by game basis throughout the early / mid season last year. If you take the amount of times this lead to goals / chances created in context, United would have pushed city far closer for a title race if the midfield did their job more accordingly when out of possession.

Rice isn't great in possession, but I'd prefer him over Fred due to his defensive discipline. Fred constantly loses possession which will always expose United because Solskjaer isn't a manager that teaches his teams ball retention effectively. The issue with Rice is not too far from Pogba, he'll need the right players around him in order to balance the midfield.

I'm always shocked to see how highly regarded Fred is, he's easily the most replaceable player in the squad along with Lindlelof if the team is required to go up a level.
Carrick's best season for Man Utd came when he was partnering Tom Cleverley in centre midfield. Its baffling to me that you can watch what Busquets did against Italy, see how much him being subbed affected Spain, and still talk about Rice in the same bracket as these players.

If Man Utd have any ambition to get back to the top of English football, players like Carrick and Busquets are the benchmark not players like Rice.

He's a good player. Nothing more. Certainly not a player we should be paying scores of millions for.

I think, far more important than how bad he is at playing the ball forward, the worry yesterday is that what he's supposed to excel at he was absolutely dire at with Denmark running through England's central core and straight at the backline at will until they gassed.

If he's a terrier, one-man wall of defence, then perhaps the lack of ambition in his passes or his need for multiple touches to control simple balls could be forgiven, but if he's a defensive sieve when really needed, then there's no reason to look in his direction.
Exactly this and to some extent I don't blame Rice for that. Many people seriously underrate Denmark, who have excellent transitions from back to front, they're not that easy to defend against. However, when people are talking about dropping upwards of £50m on the English Schneiderlin that gives me pause for thought.

My suspicion is people see in Rice what they want to see because they want to believe he will 'unlock' Pogba, or something to that affect. So when Rice blocks a passing lane, or chases back after someone and wins a 50/50, they see a player who will cover for Pogba and let us play 4-3-3 with Pogba and Bruno in the middle. That causes them to block out all the times he gets sucked towards the ball or is left standing by a bit of quick thinking/passing.
 

youngrell

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
3,622
Location
South Wales
I've said it before and I'll say it again, we need someone to get the ball into Bruno and the other forwards from deep in midfield, and Rice is certainly, 100%, not that player.

Whether it's £30m or £80m, he is still not that guy.
 

Murder on Zidanes Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
29,095
Just don't see it with him. I am sure I am probably wrong but just looks like a solid DM. Could that help us bridge the gap? Perhaps but I think we need something or someone with more X-Factor.
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,102
Carrick's best season for Man Utd came when he was partnering Tom Cleverley in centre midfield. Its baffling to me that you can watch what Busquets did against Italy, see how much him being subbed affected Spain, and still talk about Rice in the same bracket as these players.

If Man Utd have any ambition to get back to the top of English football, players like Carrick and Busquets are the benchmark not players like Rice.

He's a good player. Nothing more. Certainly not a player we should be paying scores of millions for.



Exactly this and to some extent I don't blame Rice for that. Many people seriously underrate Denmark, who have excellent transitions from back to front, they're not that easy to defend against. However, when people are talking about dropping upwards of £50m on the English Schneiderlin that gives me pause for thought.

My suspicion is people see in Rice what they want to see because they want to believe he will 'unlock' Pogba, or something to that affect. So when Rice blocks a passing lane, or chases back after someone and wins a 50/50, they see a player who will cover for Pogba and let us play 4-3-3 with Pogba and Bruno in the middle. That causes them to block out all the times he gets sucked towards the ball or is left standing by a bit of quick thinking/passing.
It would he interesting to see how many people still want Rice if or when Pogba leaves
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,265
Location
We all love United
Such a dull player. Passes five yards back and sideways and does nothing else. Such a difference to the likes of Busquets who has so much technical ability to control a game in the same position they both play. Rice can’t do that for the money West Ham wants

If we want someone like Rice, Harry Winks is probably available for a third of the price
 

ThreeCorners

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Messages
40
Such a dull player. Passes five yards back and sideways and does nothing else. Such a difference to the likes of Busquets who has so much technical ability to control a game in the same position they both play. Rice can’t do that for the money West Ham wants

If we want someone like Rice, Harry Winks is probably available for a third of the price
Was just about to say this as well, I am astounded at the prices quoted for him. Maguire is better at dribbling and passing forwards than he is.
You can see Denmark just backing off him all the time because they know he couldn't hurt them.

Central midfield is a real weakness in the England team, quite funny we have had a period where we were spoilt for choice in that position (Gerrard, Lampard, Scholes, Carrick, Hargreaves), and now it seems we have too many options in the wing forward department.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,377
Rice is just an option if you want to park the bus desperately. He is good in disrupting attacks but nothing more. Too little for a TOP team but usable as a sub.
He's supposed to be, but Denmark ran right past him a number of times last night. If he can't stop them what use is he for us.

We need a player who can position themselves well, tackle, play at a high tempo, and move the ball forward. Rice ticks one, maybe two, of those boxes. We already have Fred who can do at least three of them.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,384
It would he interesting to see how many people still want Rice if or when Pogba leaves
Good point. My suspicion is, if Pogba does leave this summer or next, the clamour for Rice will vanish pretty quickly.
 

yamo123x

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Messages
3,030
Location
england
I don't think Rice is a long term starter for England, but Skipp is too young at the moment and has only just had a break out season in the Championship. But I'd be very surprised if Skipp wasn't England's starting DM in the next year or two.
Bet you he isnt...
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
I think Philips was actually worse than Rice last night, caught on the ball couple of times and could have been punished. Rice on the other hand is obviously not suited for a team that sits deep like the Danes did last night especially alongside a similar player. On the other hand Hojbjerg and Delaney are hardly conference player like some wish to paint them in this thread and many of the English players looked dominated and inferior in duels and for prolonged periods of time.
Like I said, not fit to lace Fred's boots.

Some players look good in teams that sit back and contain space like West Ham, but when you try and play a more expansive style his weaknesses show.

He's lucky Henderson isn't fit or Bellingham isn't another year older, he'd be nowhere in this side.
He's supposed to be, but Denmark ran right past him a number of times last night. If he can't stop them what use is he for us.

We need a player who can position themselves well, tackle, play at a high tempo, and move the ball forward. Rice ticks one, maybe two, of those boxes. We already have Fred who can do at least three of them.
100%

Rice has shown to be a good ball winner in contained spaces due to being a big lad who's got the knack of nicking the ball away. As soon as the pitch is open though he just looks plain average.

Anybody thinking he'd walk into our team and look better than Fred or Mctominay are in for a big surprise, he'd be the flop of the century at that price!. Look how much stick Pogba gets for being £89m, imagine Rice for anything over £60m :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.