Minimum Bar for Continuity in Ole's Third Full Season

Crashoutcassius

Full Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
10,320
Location
playa del carmen
8 to 10 more points and a continuation of the good things I saw the last couple of seasons. These are subjective so maybe not for this thread. For the concrete, 8 to 10 more points
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,290
I think putting a barometer like winning X or getting X far in a cup is quite unfair as sometimes you have little control (what if we get an insane UCL group stage draw or draw Munich in the last 16? Or draw a big side in a cup?)

I think what @OleBoiii said is fair. If you have to put a minimum barometer then securing champions league football is probably about right, but also just because he has secured champions league football it doesn’t mean he wouldn’t deserve to go.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
Yes, it happened. In the last century. Seriously, that's the last time you didn't need 80+ points to win the league.
Sure, but it can still happen. That's my point.

What if City wins the league next year with 81 points(same as Leicester 5 years ago) and we finish 2nd with 79 points. Does that mean that Ole must be sacked? This is why setting these minimum demands is so hard. Points don't tell the full story. The only thing that matters is to do better than your opponents.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,214
Location
Tool shed
I actually can't believe people would be ok with us just qualifying for the CL and nothing else. Unbelievable really. Feels like getting the low expectations in early so it's easier to defend him if we do actually underachieve like that.
 

Pavl3n

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
1,899
80+ points
League cup winners and not making it past the QF in the FA Cup or semi-final in the League Cup and final in the FA Cup
Proud performance in the QF of the CL.
 

GlasgowCeltic

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
5,335
Would be interested to know what Oles own targets for the season are, youd assume the clubs target will always be 4th. I just hope if the title looks possible he talks like a manager whos serious about winning the league this time and not just hapy to be involved
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,290
I actually can't believe people would be ok with us just qualifying for the CL and nothing else. Unbelievable really. Feels like getting the low expectations in early so it's easier to defend him if we do actually underachieve like that.
If you’re referring to my post or Ole’s that’s not what either of us are saying.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,214
Location
Tool shed
If you’re referring to my post or Ole’s that’s not what either of us are saying.
You're setting a minimum barometer by which it's potentially acceptable for us to keep Ole. I'm saying it's crazy for the minimum bar to be CL qualification.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
I actually can't believe people would be ok with us just qualifying for the CL and nothing else. Unbelievable really. Feels like getting the low expectations in early so it's easier to defend him if we do actually underachieve like that.
It's the min bar. As long as that's cleared then other considerations come in to play.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,158
Location
Manchester
80+ points
Domestic cup
QF/SF in the CL

2 out of 3 of those would probably be enough, with the first being a necessity.
Pretty much this.

There’s zero excuse for not putting together a genuine title challenge this season. And that means being in the race until right at the end, not 15+ points behind but banging on about being in second.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
It's a really crappy min bar, though. Expectations should be much higher.
My expectations are higher. It's not the 'what do you think this team should be capable of' thread though.
 

Grylte

"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
14,014
What is the absolute minimum Ole would have to do across all competitions for you to say Ole has earned at least another year with us?
Why is Ole the only manager we've ever had, or that i have ever heard of, that has always had this "have to win this or that to be allowed to stay" hanging over him?
It is just because he isn't a well known or hipster manager. Only that. I have said before, and i stand by it, had we hired Poch, and he had done 100% the same things as Ole, and had exactly the same results in every game, people would have been happy. Even if Poch won feck all. It's just because of Ole's name and CV - even if Poch's CV isn't all that either.

He is doing well, building a nice squad, the academy is looking nice. I am happy at the moment.

I'm happy if we're putting up a fight in the competitions we're in, the squad keeps improving, and some youngers are given a chance and does well.
Winning something is a good bonus.
 

VanDeBank

Ma’am
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
4,862
Silverware. I'll make an exception if he makes a good CL run and loses the league on the last day.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
80+ points, with the results actually being a fair reflection of the performances (so not like 2017/18) in the league is the absolute bare minimum.
This. Also a trophy would be great.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,290
You're setting a minimum barometer by which it's potentially acceptable for us to keep Ole. I'm saying it's crazy for the minimum bar to be CL qualification.
Yes I said that’s a minimum bar but I also said if that’s all we did it doesn’t mean Ole doesn’t deserve to go.

It’s a really hard conversation to have because context is key. Based on your criteria you set what if we finish second on 79, lose a domestic cup final, and go out of the last 16 in a hard fought game against PSG or Munich? Would he deserve to go then? I really don’t know. :lol: I think it’s hard to set expectations so precisely, however failing to qualify for the champions league is absolutely a sackable offence.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,787
Location
india
Why do we always focus on the bare minimum? The point is to achieve greatness, not just about do enough and tick enough boxes for your current manager to 'earn' another year.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,247
The goal should always be to set out to win all the trophies played in. However, that's not entirely possible, so if he doesn't do that, here's what I'd accept as long as the team is playing well and enjoyable to watch. If the football turns shit and he's still not close to winning, I'd consider looking at a change.

Proper go at a title challenge. Not conceding that it's over in February, in a fight right to the end.

Latter stages of the Champions League - at least past the first knock out round. After that it's the luck of the draw, I don't think that there's too many teams in Europe this team can't beat if they show up with the right attitude.

And go out to win either the FA cup or League cup, these players need to get the taste of winning.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
I actually can't believe people would be ok with us just qualifying for the CL and nothing else. Unbelievable really. Feels like getting the low expectations in early so it's easier to defend him if we do actually underachieve like that.
Like @Berbasbullet said: you're missing the point.

Football is crazy. There are so many variables at play. Even setting "CL football" as a bare minimum could in some scenarios be a bit harsh. Consider the following outcome:

1. Early on we get several long-term injuries to our best players in multiple positions whereas our rivals are largely spared.
2. We play better football than least season and finish 5th with 75 points, only 10 points behind the 1st place. We also win both domestic cups and reach the CL final.

In this scenario we have improved in every possible metric apart from league position, but we've still failed to get CL football. Not only that, but we possibly did it with a weaker team(considering the injuries).

Would you want Ole out even then?
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
80+ points
Domestic cup
QF/SF in the CL

2 out of 3 of those would probably be enough, with the first being a necessity.
Yes, either 2/3 of those would be a good season for me and I’d be happy for Ole to continue.

Of course I want it all but I need to manage my expectations a bit.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,214
Location
Tool shed
Yes I said that’s a minimum bar but I also said if that’s all we did it doesn’t mean Ole doesn’t deserve to go.

It’s a really hard conversation to have because context is key. Based on your criteria you set what if we finish second on 79, lose a domestic cup final, and go out of the last 16 in a hard fought game against PSG or Munich? Would he deserve to go then? I really don’t know. :lol: I think it’s hard to set expectations so precisely, however failing to qualify for the champions league is absolutely a sackable offence.
Well yes, though I'd probably revise my original post to "mount a title challenge" instead of "80+ points". I thought it was obvious from what I said but some people are being pedantic about it, but there you go. Your above scenario is again being quite pedantic, it's basically right on the line of my criteria without quite being there and a very, very, specific circumstance, much different to "securing CL football", like you said before.

Put it another way, the absolute minimum that should be expected from any manager, at any club in order to not get sacked is progress. If we simply "secure CL qualification" then that is not progress, it's the exact same as we've done for the last two years.
 

Tibs

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
13,774
Location
UK
1st and a cup win

We finished 2nd and got to a final and a semi last season....add Sancho and Varane and we should finish the job off - even more so if we keep Pogba,

Anything less and he should be out, and I'm sure he knows that himself and uses it as a motivator. Success is the minimum from now on
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
Top 2 with a title challenge for most of the season

Top 4 with fa cup final appearance/league cup win/CL semi appearance.

I also want to see improvement on defending set pieces. Absolutely no reason we don't improve here other than lack of effort from the coaching staff. I would also like to see someone more seasoned than Carrick/McKenna brought in if we struggle during the season
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,214
Location
Tool shed
Like @Berbasbullet said: you're missing the point.

Football is crazy. There are so many variables at play. Even setting "CL football" as a bare minimum could in some scenarios be a bit harsh. Consider the following outcome:

1. Early on we get several long-term injuries to our best players in multiple positions whereas our rivals are largely spared.
2. We play better football than least season and finish 5th with 75 points, only 10 points behind the 1st place. We also win both domestic cups and reach the CL final.

In this scenario we have improved in every possible metric apart from league position, but we've still failed to get CL football. Not only that, but we possibly did it with a weaker team(considering the injuries).

Would you want Ole out even then?
I'm not missing the point, you're just trying to hammer home a dumb one.

If your boss gave you minimum expectations in order to keep your job would you turn around to him and go "ah come on, that's not fair, what happens if I get hit by a bus and end up in hospital? Oh sure, it's not likely to happen because it's a freak scenario, but it could!"?
 

RedPed

Whatabouter.
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
14,558
Get closer to City (maybe Liverpool) after 38 games?

Not sure we can outright claim ourselves to be favourites to win the league next season, but bringing the gap to the champions down to <5 points would be very nice. It would mean we were challenging to the very end.

We've always had decent cup runs under Ole, even when our team was shite, so I expect that to continue
He already did that last season?

I have a low bar as I don't believe we have a divine right to anything. I would be happy if got top 4, became more dominant at Old Trafford, got to a couple of finals and destroyed a few more teams during the season. I don't want to be struggling against the likes of Brentford, Brighton, Palace, Watford etc. this season. We should be putting teams like that away. I want to see more 6-1, 9-0 thrashings and for Ole/the team to set a few more records along the way.

That would be a more complete assessment of progress rather than lucking out in a cup competition.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
Sure, but it can still happen. That's my point.

What if City wins the league next year with 81 points(same as Leicester 5 years ago) and we finish 2nd with 79 points. Does that mean that Ole must be sacked? This is why setting these minimum demands is so hard. Points don't tell the full story. The only thing that matters is to do better than your opponents.
Well, it's not that he MUST be sacked in that case - but that would be an absolutely massive disappointment, a monumental chance wasted. I'd want him to go, unless it was down to a massive injury crisis, because after signing Sancho and Varane I'd expect a much more significant improvement than that.

I think doing better than your opponents doesn't tell the full story either. In the 21st century Premier League, at least one team always reaches 80+ points. If your team can't do that after three years and significant investment, that's damning and it indicates a certain limit - even if two or three rivals have poor seasons, you still won't win the league because there's always at least one team that is capable of getting that 80+.

On the other hand, imagine a different hypothetical scenario where we get 90 points but Liverpool, City, and Chelsea all have amazing seasons and go 90+ so we finish 4th. I'd be happy to continue with Ole then because in that case we do see that he is capable of creating a consistent, strong team, a side that in pretty much any other season would have won the league.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,290
I'm not missing the point, you're just trying to hammer home a dumb one.

If your boss gave you minimum expectations in order to keep your job would you turn around to him and go "ah come on, that's not fair, what happens if I get hit by a bus and end up in hospital? Oh sure, it's not likely to happen because it's a freak scenario, but it could!"?
Yes because an injury crisis or a tough cup draw = getting hit by a bus. :lol:

Well yes, though I'd probably revise my original post to "mount a title challenge" instead of "80+ points". I thought it was obvious from what I said but some people are being pedantic about it, but there you go. Your above scenario is again being quite pedantic, it's basically right on the line of my criteria without quite being there and a very, very, specific circumstance, much different to "securing CL football", like you said before.

Put it another way, the absolute minimum that should be expected from any manager, at any club in order to not get sacked is progress. If we simply "secure CL qualification" then that is not progress, it's the exact same as we've done for the last two years.
That’s exactly why I’m saying it’s really hard to quantify a ‘minimum expectation’. If it narrowly misses a very specific criteria like you set do you sack him? Which is why the only criteria I can think of that would be fair and without context needing to apply (even this is slightly unfair) is to qualify for UCL.

But like I said even if he achieved that I might not be opposed to the sack.
 

JTRI

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
89
Close the gap at the top to put up a real sustained title challenge even if we ultimately fall short and look like we belong against the big hitters in the CL. We can’t be a team in transition forever and although I do think there has been progress under Ole for the money spent we have to push on now.
 

OleBoiii

New Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
6,021
I'm not missing the point, you're just trying to hammer home a dumb one.

If your boss gave you minimum expectations in order to keep your job would you turn around to him and go "ah come on, that's not fair, what happens if I get hit by a bus and end up in hospital? Oh sure, it's not likely to happen because it's a freak scenario, but it could!"?
Several teams have won the CL and done poorly in the PL. Many teams have had terrible luck with injures over the years. The scenario I described above isn't that crazy.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,448
He already did that last season?

I have a low bar as I don't believe we have a divine right to anything. I would be happy if got top 4, became more dominant at Old Trafford, got to a couple of finals and destroyed a few more teams during the season. I don't want to be struggling against the likes of Brentford, Brighton, Palace, Watford etc. this season. We should be putting teams like that away. I want to see more 6-1, 9-0 thrashings and for Ole/the team to set a few more records along the way.

That would be a more complete assessment of progress rather than lucking out in a cup competition.
That wasn't Liverpool, that was Lollerpool.

I'm talking about the Liverpool who were challenging City to 95 points in the previous 2 seasons. I fully expect them to challenge again with VVD back, and we must try to keep pace.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,537
Ideally it would be going into the last 6-8 weeks with even a relatively small hope of winning the league and for us to put in more convincing and controlled performances (I'm not sure going behind and then fighting back in most away games is going to be sustainable with crowds back). I would imagine as long as he makes top 4 he's safe but I would hope that my targets are achievable.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,010
Location
Croatia
"Progress" and "we are getting there" are over. This is his 4th season here with basically whole squad being "his".
Title challenge (having around 85 points) and one cup is a must. Everything else is for sack.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,684
Location
Singapore
I am not sure winning the league is realistic but if Ole can do this:
- Beat teams that we are suppose to beat
- Better points return against the top 6

By doing just 2 things, we will winning or close to winning the league.
 

RedPed

Whatabouter.
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
14,558
Why is Ole the only manager we've ever had, or that i have ever heard of, that has always had this "have to win this or that to be allowed to stay" hanging over him?
It is just because he isn't a well known or hipster manager. Only that. I have said before, and i stand by it, had we hired Poch, and he had done 100% the same things as Ole, and had exactly the same results in every game, people would have been happy. Even if Poch won feck all. It's just because of Ole's name and CV - even if Poch's CV isn't all that either.

He is doing well, building a nice squad, the academy is looking nice. I am happy at the moment.

I'm happy if we're putting up a fight in the competitions we're in, the squad keeps improving, and some youngers are given a chance and does well.
Winning something is a good bonus.
Wanting to get rid of Ole, claiming he had not won anything....but then wanting to replace him with Poch who also had not won anything was just a bizarre piece of logic touted on here for months.