Next permanent manager | Poll updated

Who should be the next permanent manager?

  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 113 7.4%
  • Erik ten Hag

    Votes: 1,300 84.7%
  • Julen Lopetegui

    Votes: 10 0.7%
  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 79 5.1%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 32 2.1%

  • Total voters
    1,534
Status
Not open for further replies.

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,112
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Pity we didn't go for Simeone before he renewed his contract in July. I think he would have been a great fit and I believe the challenge at Utd would have really interested him.. Don't know about Mancini, good coach but not the right guy for me, and it seems he's settled into the national scene. Too big a club for Potter but Rogers is worth more consideration, Zidane a definite no-no imo.
I can't believe in 2021 people still wanting Simeone. Truly baffling. I know they won the league, but its been a big no thanks for many many years as far as I'm concerned.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
I can't believe in 2021 people still wanting Simeone. Truly baffling. I know they won the league, but its been a big no thanks for many many years as far as I'm concerned.
No to Diego. He’s anti football. We’ve seen 8 years of this crap football.
 

goptun

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 15, 2021
Messages
253
Why wouldn't he? Its not as big a job ad the Madrid job. The premier league is the dominant league in the world now, and he'd have Ronaldo, Varane and Pogba here to manage - all players he has some sort of positive relationship with. I think he would love the challenge and love having 3 key players that he already has a relationship with.

I think people are being too idealistic. They see Pep and Klopp achieve success and have a dream that someone like them can become our manager. The reality is that the majority of managers with that style also just aren't good enough for a top club and quite often flop at a big club. People might say Tuchel... but Tuchel also plays way too defensively that United fans would never be that happy with him. Realistically we will just keep getting normal managers and not try and shoot for gold with a ideologist that may or may not suit our wishes anyway. Which is fine. There is no reason for them to be any worse. People just think everyone falls on one end of the spectrum or the other, where it's either pure vibes or pure Pep/Klopp football, when there is a massive area in the middle where teams can be very well coached without needing to be absolutely set in their ways style wise.
Well, aside from the quote from his agent which said as much, he's only ever been linked with a move to Juventus (does his name ever come up when a big club is on the hunt for a new manager?). The quotes from his agent were fairly definitive, stating that Zidane has no interest managing in England due to stylistic differences. That doesn't suggest a man ambitious to take on the most competitive and high-profile league in the world.

I'd say Klopp falls pretty well in the middle, likewise the likes of Nagelsmann. Does anyone see it in such binary terms? The primary points I'm seeing are that people feel Zidane had a perfect setup in Madrid which obviously wouldn't be replicated here (as well as his heart possibly not being in it) and that Conte is abrasive and known to have very public spats, as well as typically playing 5 at the back and being short-termism in his signings. Both are legitimate concerns. There really isn't a right answer so there's a perfectly valid debate on both sides. We've had successive managers that have failed to implement any consistent identity or style, all the while our biggest rivals have done exactly that while winning the biggest honours in the process. It's surely little wonder people are clamoring for the same here.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,017
He wouldn't leave the Italy job before the World Cup. If we are looking for a new manager come summer 2023, he could be a candidate, though. That is also the earliest I could realistically see Ole being replaced.
It is indeed a bit too early speculate on the next manager. But there's no harm done if executive management begin evaluating options now. Problem is, can we really trust the same executive management team that gave us Moyes, Van Gaal and Mourinho to find the right successor to Ole?
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
Problem is, can we really trust the same executive management team that gave us Moyes, Van Gaal and Mourinho to find the right successor to Ole?
This is the crux of it for me.

We’re talking about an exec team that’ve proven, repeatedly, that they are not capable of making even sensible - let alone successful - managerial appointments…

As much as it’s blatantly obvious that Ole isn’t a good coach at this level, I wouldn’t trust them to replace Ole with the right person AT THE RIGHT TIME.

They’ve shown time and time again that they’ll wait until the team has been dragged into toxicity and / or such dramatic levels of underperformance before pulling the trigger that when the new manager comes in, it’s a literal rescue job with inevitable ‘bounce’, but no calm period to instil a proper brand of footy.

It makes the job very difficult from the off. Whereas with clubs who have capable exec teams they’ll pull the trigger WAY before the team has sunk so relatively low, and they’ll also have the ability to make normal, sensible appointments.

Think of Lampard at Chelsea - given a chance, began failing - BANG, trigger pulled, Tuchel in.

Rodgers at Liverpool - finished 2nd, started losing ground, Klopp becomes available - BANG, trigger pulled.

Pellegrini at City - same process.

Utd’s exec team are simply not capable of doing this. They wait until the situation is utterly rotten, and then make a bad / surreal appointment.

This is WHY you have Ole as Utd manager in the first place!

So bizarrely, as crap as I think Ole is, and as easy as it think it would be for most football execs to make a simple and well suited upgrade to him, I simply do not trust the Utd board to be able of doing so.

In short - they’re worse at their jobs than Ole is at his.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,732
Location
india
What I’m wondering is who will be making the choice:
  • The money/marketing men (Woodward, whoever is “succeeding“ him)?
  • The Proper Football Men (Murtogh, Fletcher)?
  • The players (Ronaldo, Varane etc.)?

I don’t suppose we’ll ever know, but after all the speculation it would be really interesting to find out who’s really in charge.
Sorry but :lol:
 

Ikon

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
2,414
So bizarrely, as crap as I think Ole is, and as easy as it think it would be for most football execs to make a simple and well suited upgrade to him, I simply do not trust the Utd board to be able of doing so.
In short - they’re worse at their jobs than Ole is at his.
This is absolutely my feeling too.
If and when Solskjaer does get the bullet, you just know in your water, that the appointment will be a wrong 'un, and the previous 8 years will be repeated all over again... :rolleyes:
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
He won 3 CLs in a two horse race in la Liga? First of all; la liga is always a 3 horse race with atletico. Secondly, he won 3 CL in a row, which competes with every team in Europe. And he made Real Madrid into the best side in the world for 3 years. Great group of players, sure. But individual quality doesn't lead to success, maybe once you could call it a fluke even if it was the CL. But he won 3 CL in a row, and won the league twice in his 4.5 seasons in charge there. He's a great manager. You're looking for pedigree? There is no manager with more of it other than Pep (and he doesn't have as many CL wins despite managing for 3 times as long). It's funny you say Tuchel. Zidane has done a lot more in his managerial career than Tuchel has.
Tuchel at Dormund 68 wins and 17 defeats in 108 games, with a win percentage of 62.96%.
Tuchel at PSG 95 wins, 19 defeats in 127 games, with the best win percentage in Ligue 1 history (75.6%) and the highest average of points per game (2.37)
Tuchel at Chelsea - straight in and wins CL

Seems pretty good to me - and Spain is not always a three-horse race once you get past January...
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I asked if you would take pep after SAF retired, which would have been 5 years on the job too
Sorry I didn't see you ask that... I was screaming on here for us to go for Pep and shouted loud when it became clear the board had advance notice of SAF's retirement and could have lined up Pep. But if you think Zidane is the new Pep, I'm afraid I think you are deluded
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,976
delusional - Wenger (as much as it pains me to admit) transformed an entire club
Arsenal were perhaps the same level before and after he left them.

He had some good early years during his tenure with all the French players he brought in, but let's not pretend Arsenal were minnows before him
 

jamesjimmybyrondean

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
7,093
Being realistic I think some names have been mentioned but how many are actually attainable. I think the likes of Mancini and Enrique are not leaving their national team until after the world cup. Zidane may be available now but does he want the job? Reports have said he's waiting for the France job after the world cup. Potter and Hassenhutl are other names mentioned but I doubt the club will consider them unless they make top 6 at least

I think realistically the club could end up looking at Ten Hag, Rodgers and Conte. Ten Hag will be my preferred choice. Rodgers will have to get top 5 again with Leicester and Conte will have to agree to our new transfer policy we developed under Ole for me to consider either of them over Ten Hag
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,772
This is the crux of it for me.

We’re talking about an exec team that’ve proven, repeatedly, that they are not capable of making even sensible - let alone successful - managerial appointments…

As much as it’s blatantly obvious that Ole isn’t a good coach at this level, I wouldn’t trust them to replace Ole with the right person AT THE RIGHT TIME.

They’ve shown time and time again that they’ll wait until the team has been dragged into toxicity and / or such dramatic levels of underperformance before pulling the trigger that when the new manager comes in, it’s a literal rescue job with inevitable ‘bounce’, but no calm period to instil a proper brand of footy.

It makes the job very difficult from the off. Whereas with clubs who have capable exec teams they’ll pull the trigger WAY before the team has sunk so relatively low, and they’ll also have the ability to make normal, sensible appointments.

Think of Lampard at Chelsea - given a chance, began failing - BANG, trigger pulled, Tuchel in.

Rodgers at Liverpool - finished 2nd, started losing ground, Klopp becomes available - BANG, trigger pulled.

Pellegrini at City - same process.

Utd’s exec team are simply not capable of doing this. They wait until the situation is utterly rotten, and then make a bad / surreal appointment.

This is WHY you have Ole as Utd manager in the first place!

So bizarrely, as crap as I think Ole is, and as easy as it think it would be for most football execs to make a simple and well suited upgrade to him, I simply do not trust the Utd board to be able of doing so.

In short - they’re worse at their jobs than Ole is at his.
Certainly seems like they are shooting from the hip. Instead of having certain targets they deal with it when the situation becomes unbearable.
 

Lastwolf

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,733
Location
Brick Sofa
.....

Think of Lampard at Chelsea - given a chance, began failing - BANG, trigger pulled, Tuchel in.

Rodgers at Liverpool - finished 2nd, started losing ground, Klopp becomes available - BANG, trigger pulled.

Pellegrini at City - same process.

.....
It's not really the same process at all. Manager changed sure but the story behind them, the project involved and the planning is very different.

Lampard was always on borrowed time, it was fairly clear from the outset that it was a PR move to keep the fans onside while they dealt with the fall out of not being able to sign players for 15minutes, as soon are results weren't amazing and they had cart blanche to buy all round them again, he was screwed. Chelsea have been trigger happy on sacking a manager throughout Abramovichh's reign, the fact that it's netted two champions league is more luck than forethought.

Rogers had a decent run one year (got a 4 year contract) then fell off, arguably because they sold his best player 2 years running and replaced them with a coupla players that added up to the same value from Southampton. Admittedly Rodgers was on a downward trend and Klopp was still available after the summer, which was a bit insane, it was a good call but they largely accepted that a rebuild was on the cards and gave him 3 years or so before they were a competitive force again.

Pep to City, was a feathering of the nest that occured over many months, if not years, it's the only one that I'd consider planned out in advance. Once he was ready to come, it was done. Who knew if you get "the best manager of his generation" and spend the low low price of about a billion = success.

-----

I'm not sure Ole is the man long term, I understand it's not likely given what we've seen it's not nailed on that we'll win any trophies but I don't see anyone out there worth sacking him for.
 
Last edited:

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,694
Did Ole manage in the CL at Molde or Cardiff?
Back in 2015 Ole's Molde ended top of Group A in the Europa league, 4 points clear from third place Ajax. That group had Celtic and Fenerbahce in it as well.
 

lefty_jakobz

I ❤️ moses
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
3,648
Hansi Flick to replace Ole please. Ole wont be leaving for atleast another year possibly two- Flick just took over the German NT, so highly unlikely to happen, but heres hoping
 

Borussin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
304
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Hansi Flick to replace Ole please. Ole wont be leaving for atleast another year possibly two- Flick just took over the German NT, so highly unlikely to happen, but heres hoping
I get the impression that Flick isn’t really that into club managment. He is 56 years old, and has been working in football for 25 years, yet has only spent 1 and a half seasons as a manager / trainer at the top level, and 5 years as trainer at regional league level. His other work has all been as assistant trainer and sporting director.

I think now he is in the ultimate job he wants to be in and will remain coach of Germany for quite a time and there is a good chance he will never work at club level again.
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
Hansi Flick to replace Ole please. Ole wont be leaving for atleast another year possibly two- Flick just took over the German NT, so highly unlikely to happen, but heres hoping
Unlikely. Of current NT managers who are good, Luis Enrique is the most likely one who we can actually attract and I think he’d do well.

Mancini and Flick won’t leave their jobs yet I think, and Barca are after Roberto Martinez but I am not personally convinced by him.

I know people want continuity, so if we want to continue not pressing and playing mostly on the counter, maybe Santos from Portugal? :lol:
 

Stig

Full Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
1,612
The next manager should be someone who has won the Champions League recently, or at least challenged for it. The club are yet to try that level of appointment, which is crazy.
I though Mourinio won the Champions league with a couple of clubs at least.:smirk:
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
I though Mourinio won the Champions league with a couple of clubs at least.:smirk:
And at the time it wasn't a bad appointment. Just because it ended up being mediocre (we still won a few small trophies which is better than current team) doesn't mean you should abandon the criteria for hiring a good manager.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I don't know much about him but the Atalanta manager would have been good to see if we were a club with a little less pressure.
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
Tuchel at Dormund 68 wins and 17 defeats in 108 games, with a win percentage of 62.96%.
Tuchel at PSG 95 wins, 19 defeats in 127 games, with the best win percentage in Ligue 1 history (75.6%) and the highest average of points per game (2.37)
Tuchel at Chelsea - straight in and wins CL

Seems pretty good to me - and Spain is not always a three-horse race once you get past January...
I know it's against the recent trend here but tbh I don't rate Tuchel. After seeing how PSG played against us, we met them four times I think and I was not impressed with Tuchel at all. His CL at Chelsea was really lucky if you look at how they ended up in the final. And how Pep fecked up.

I watched Chelsea against City the other day and imo we did a lot better against City in the last two seasons despite having a much weaker team than the current Chelsea. And the current City is not stronger than the City in the last two seasons, if not weaker.
 

Flytan

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,754
Location
United States
I know it's against the recent trend here but tbh I don't rate Tuchel. After seeing how PSG played against us, we met them four times I think and I was not impressed with Tuchel at all. His CL at Chelsea was really lucky if you look at how they ended up in the final. And how Pep fecked up.

I watched Chelsea against City the other day and imo we did a lot better against City in the last two seasons despite having a much weaker team than the current Chelsea. And the current City is not stronger than the City in the last two seasons, if not weaker.
We don't have a much weaker team than Chelsea, they're just coached better. But yes, tuchel does shit the bed sometimes. We can't have done much better VS city since the mini table has us at the bottom against top 6 sides. Granted the "counterattack" style ole had when he first got here does hurt city more than most other styles
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
We don't have a much weaker team than Chelsea, they're just coached better. But yes, tuchel does shit the bed sometimes. We can't have done much better VS city since the mini table has us at the bottom against top 6 sides. Granted the "counterattack" style ole had when he first got here does hurt city more than most other styles
Tbf Chelsea hardly even managed to counter attack City the other day. They played like they were hoping for a draw.

If you look at the top 6 mini table of season 2019 2020 we came second only two points after Liverpool.
https://www.planetfootball.com/quic...-head-to-head-table-in-2019-20-liverpool-top/

The 2020 2021 was much tougher as the top teams now respected us more and didn't attack us much like in 2019 2020. While we were not strong enough to attack and score against them so we drew 0-0 a lot. We lost three matches against the top 6 of which one was against Spurs largely because of the Martial's red card. Another against Arsenal because of Pogba conceded a stupid penalty. The last one was against Liverpool.

https://www.planetfootball.com/quic...-head-to-head-table-in-2019-20-liverpool-top/

And I think you've misunderstood a bit. I was talking about our squad the last two seasons not the current one. Especially season 2019-2020.
 

AaronRedDevil

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
9,572
Seriously though. Is there Anyone available right now who'd be an upgrade. Anyone but conte and Zidane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.