- Joined
- Sep 3, 2017
- Messages
- 698
- Supports
- No team in particular
How so? They're not mutually exclusive things. Barca when Pep arrived was not the best team in Spain (hadn't won anything in 2 years and finished 19points behind Madrid) and Pep went to Dortmund where there was no pressure to win immediately, and after that went to Liverpool where he had time to build.Saying Pep needs best squad to win is bs but Klopp only wants team that will give him time and doesn't have pressure to win
Either both are true or both are bs.
You can clearly see that both aren't the same thing.
What does the fact that they won the Euros before Pep arrived have to do with anything? Italy just won the Euros, so are you suggesting that Chiesa or Jorginho amongst others are world-class players?Xavi and Iniesta won a lot for Spain. They did not just perform under Pep and they won even before Pep Euro 2008.
Messi is a special talent and it is not just Pep making him good.
Talking about Spain, you can't deny the fact that they imitated Barca's style of play a lot more from 2009 with more Barca players in the team (there were only 3 in 2008), they played differently during the Euros in 2008.
Good thing I never said it was just Pep that made Messi good right?
The same team lost to United the year before. The same team also lost some other important games, so how does it work? When they win, it was thanks to the players and when they lose it was Pep's fault?Nothing to do with Iniesta, Xavi, Messi being on Peps team
Klopp is the best.
The idea to play Xavi and Iniesta (just like Silva and KDB) together through the middle had to come from somewhere right? I'm sure you believe just anyone could have come up with those ideas.
Funny how some of you are trying so hard to argue against the opinions of these great players about Pep being a great coach when they actually know better.