Dudu
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2012
- Messages
- 4,961
NZ don't have the same batting depth though.That last over makes the NZ powerplay look much better. It'll be close this.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
NZ don't have the same batting depth though.That last over makes the NZ powerplay look much better. It'll be close this.
I like the people in this thread but my ex boss is English, and he's never short of words when India loseThat's mean.
Sri Lanka 2014?I really want ENgland to lose but they are class
NZ would be the worst team to win a T20 world cup
Fair enoughI like the people in this thread but my ex boss is English, and he's never short of words when India lose
True. But please just let me be pessimistic without your rational views spoiling itNZ don't have the same batting depth though.
Just looked the team up. WAy better than this team surely. 3 great batsmen, Malinga and decent spinners for sub continentSri Lanka 2014?
Yup. I also would never declare any T20 with 165 on the board 'over'. Early wickets and everything changes. On a good pitch you'd chase his 3/4 of the time, but that's by no means 'over'.It read like half the people in the thread had never watched a T20 before.
True. But please just let me be pessimistic without your rational views spoiling it
I might be in the minority, but I have no concept of what a good score is till the match is over in T20Yup. I also would never declare any T20 with 165 on the board 'over'. Early wickets and everything changes. On a good pitch you'd chase his 3/4 of the time, but that's by no means 'over'.
Nonsense.Sri Lanka 2014?
I don’t remember ever seeing so many singles.Exciting test match this. Could these two see out this evening session? Only 11 more overs to survive
England had one more wicket in the bank and a deeper batting line up. NZ are going to have to start taking more risks now and can't afford to lose many wickets.NZ have done well to steady things here. Only 10 runs behind where England were. However, you can still see how hard it is to get the ball away. Its so similar to the ODI WC final its crazy.
This is true, but these two came together a bit sooner and are therefore now better set.England had one more wicket in the bank and a deeper batting line up. NZ are going to have to start taking more risks now and can't afford to lose many wickets.
Yeah true, I forgot England lost Bairstow as well so there was no wicket in the bank.This is true, but these two came together a bit sooner and are therefore now better set.
I've not been massively impressed by any of them all tournament. Doull and Hussain the pick maybe?CAnt believe they had 30 comms to choose from and decided Sammy, Danny Morrison are the 2 they want for the knockouts
No balls = cheatingWhy do no balls cost a run and a free hit, where as wides are basically zero punishment?
Of all the new comms - of which theere are a lot - I like Shane WatsonI've not been massively impressed by any of them all tournament. Doull and Hussain the pick maybe?
Of course. Fecking cnuts will take the game away from us.Have a bad feeling about these two at the crease.
I’d argue a no ball is just inaccuracy with your foot.No balls = cheating
Wide balls = inaccuracy
Tbf he is from NZCAnt believe they had 30 comms to choose from and decided Sammy, Danny Morrison are the 2 they want for the knockouts
He was quite fun. Better than Steyn.Of all the new comms - of which theere are a lot - I like Shane Watson