Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,783
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Isn't he a former player and La Masia product?
That's correct, he is, which then makes me wonder why he hasn't been linked to Barcelona in recent weeks. I do remember those links surfacing a couple of years back, though, but they amounted to nothing and also came from weak sources.
 

Pep's Suit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
1,705
Tough market for Spurs, Arsenal and Newcastle. Seems like most players wait for bigger clubs so they can't secure their first or even second choices and have to turn to third or fourth.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
Very reasonable deal, should work for both parties if Lingard really wanted to go given he’d risk getting a big injury before his contract expires in the summer
Would perhaps be the most shrewd piece of business I can recall witnessing from the Glazers. Lingard leaving on a free but the offset of the survival bonus could in a sense cover a fee for the player.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Load of rubbish, the only thing stopping us getting him is the board not wanting to pay a paltry €10M or Rangnick doesn't want him, Leeds and Roma are not competition for Manchester United despite our current woes.

Tough shit, we were all frustrated when he made zero effort to go to West Ham in the summer when it was obvious to anyone with half a grain he wasn't going to get much game time here no matter what fairytales Ole was telling him,
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,730
£4M off the wage bill with the Martial loan, another couple of Mil off the wage bill with Donny to Palace and possibly £15M in the kitty from this Lingard/Newcastle deal.....are we going to actually get a midfielder in or just stand holding our dick until the summer with an unnecessary obsession with Rice.
Dick holding until the summer
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,677
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Lingard was the one who wanted to stay and fight for a place, or so he said. I assumed he just wanted to stay and coast his way towards free agency and a nice signing bonus, and now he's mad that the club won't let him leave for peanuts whilst still under contract? Why should they?
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,944
No wonder Lingard is livid. Crazy stuff.
We have definitely been playing hardball the couple of years. We got a decent Lukaku fee and we’ve been quite insistent on loan fees and wages generally. We should find a solution here but I think it’s good that we are playing tougher now.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,614
Would be hilarious, my mate's a Spurs fan and he's spent the last week trying to convince me he's Robben, Yaya Toure and Bergkamp rolled into one.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
3,944
That's correct, he is, which then makes me wonder why he hasn't been linked to Barcelona in recent weeks. I do remember those links surfacing a couple of years back, though, but they amounted to nothing and also came from weak sources.
Maybe because Fati got injured again.
 

Mick1

Full Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
407
Some horrible takes on the Lingard situation.

He refused to leave to "fight for his chance" 2 summers in a row, running down his contract.

Now he has 6 months left, and he is allegedly refusing going to Newcastle on a permanent, and would like to run down his contract on loan.

Crazy stuff we re even entertaining the loan. If he wants to leave so bad, he can accept the permanent deal, but that might reduce his sign on bonus.

For context, can you imagine players going into the last year's of their contracts asking for loans? If Pogba came in during the summer asking to be loaned to Real Madrid, before going there on free anyway, would we accept?

Very dangerous precedent to allow happening. If players don't want to sit on the bench ( which we should be doing to players running out of contract time), then they can leave on permanent. Not run down their contracts on loan.

For context, imagine Martial wanting to extend his Sevilla loan until his contract runs out, taking 30+ million value off his contract. Don't think we d entertain it.

Loans are for player development, or players needing gametime to be put in shop window, or to make a claim if they find form.

The 4 mils the club is set to pocket is not worth allowing players such as Lingard to absolutely bully the club out of any return on investment.

No player is bigger than the club, and there are no salaries we can't afford. I'm positive had we kept Pogba on the bench last season, he d have had a lot more motivation to leave on a permanent, and we wouldn't have to pocket circa 50 mils loss for that reason.

I miss the days of SAF bullying the players into realizing they are a non entity when compared to the benefit of the club
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,173
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
Real Madrid chief scout went to watch Endrick in a cup final then heading to Monaco to look at Tchouameni, who they've apparently decided will be Casemiro long term replacment.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,579
Possibly Tchouameni and Camavinga, Mbappe on a free. Maybe Haaland as well. Exciting time to be a Real fan.
 

Herman Toothrot

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2021
Messages
1,755
Some horrible takes on the Lingard situation.

He refused to leave to "fight for his chance" 2 summers in a row, running down his contract.

Now he has 6 months left, and he is allegedly refusing going to Newcastle on a permanent, and would like to run down his contract on loan.

Crazy stuff we re even entertaining the loan. If he wants to leave so bad, he can accept the permanent deal, but that might reduce his sign on bonus.

For context, can you imagine players going into the last year's of their contracts asking for loans? If Pogba came in during the summer asking to be loaned to Real Madrid, before going there on free anyway, would we accept?

Very dangerous precedent to allow happening. If players don't want to sit on the bench ( which we should be doing to players running out of contract time), then they can leave on permanent. Not run down their contracts on loan.

For context, imagine Martial wanting to extend his Sevilla loan until his contract runs out, taking 30+ million value off his contract. Don't think we d entertain it.

Loans are for player development, or players needing gametime to be put in shop window, or to make a claim if they find form.

The 4 mils the club is set to pocket is not worth allowing players such as Lingard to absolutely bully the club out of any return on investment.

No player is bigger than the club, and there are no salaries we can't afford. I'm positive had we kept Pogba on the bench last season, he d have had a lot more motivation to leave on a permanent, and we wouldn't have to pocket circa 50 mils loss for that reason.

I miss the days of SAF bullying the players into realizing they are a non entity when compared to the benefit of the club
I'm not quite as angry as you, but I think that's about right, though I cannot imagine that he promised anything from Solskjær other than he can make a contribution. If Ronaldo and Sancho rocking up to Carrington at great expense didn't give him any indication of which way the wind was blowing then he's not smartest cookie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.