Manchester United's Chief Scout and Head of Global Scouting have left the club

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
We’ve had a “marginalised” Chief Scout and Head of Global Scouting “for years” and apparently moving on from that scenario isn’t going to change anything.
Well if they have been marginalised, other people must have been doing their jobs. If those people are still in post, all that will have changed is the salary bill and maybe a couple of offices freed up.

That said, simply getting rid of people hanging round the place on fat salaries doing sod all won’t do the workplace culture any harm.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,539
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Joel Glazer certainly seems more involved than he used to be. Maybe because he and his siblings no longer had absolute confidence in Woodward.

With any luck things will start to go better under the new regime and he will feel able to back off again.
I think after Fergie they assumed they could leave everything to the manager apart from dithering over when to release funds and for what. I reckon he became more hands on sometime during or after Moyes and we’ve never looked back as the man would say….
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
30,018
Location
England
Watch now as Lawlor goes to a rival and they become the new Dortmund. Let’s just hope Murtough actually knows what he’s at. It wouldn’t be like us to get an appointment right let alone lots of appointments. I’ve also read on here from one of our members (and I’ve suspected it myself) that the day to day running of the club is clunky and everything is kicked up to america and the time difference can leave people waiting around an extra day before making even the most simple calls.
The below is also my biggest worry.

 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
Indeed. Wouldn’t it have been nice if the club* had established this before taking him on, and planned accordingly? The fact that everyone was so surprised when he got rid of the whole backroom team was a major sign that there had been no transition plan at all.

* and SAF, though I’m not inclined to blame him as it really wasn’t his job.
I believe that SAF ended entangled in his own web. The guy resisted any modernisation (DOF, technical director etc) because that would have stifled his complete control over the football side of things. He couldn't possibly force the new manager to live with restraints he never accepted in the first place.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,539
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
The below is also my biggest worry.

Which goes to show he’s involved in the micro management of the club. This is definitely not the guy to micromanaging a club back to success. I’m also fairly sure the glazer kids all have a say on major transfers and that’s why our sagas go for 75% longer then other clubs. I have a feeling they look at it it like it’s literally money out of their pockets and the speed at which we operate (and backtrack) makes us look totally indecisive
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,605
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
:lol:
If Lawlor had indeed been marginalised (possibly because of an unwillingness to embrace modern comms technology) then why has he been kept on until now? Surely it would have been better to pension him off generously?

So it looks like Murtough either:
  1. hadn’t a clue what was going on until it was spelled out to him by Ralf; or
  2. was well aware of it all but was prevented from doing anything about it by Woodward
1. = @devilish 2. = @Adnan - take your pick…

I’m Team @Adnan right now, but may well swap sides depending on how things go over the summer.
I'm going with Adnan. Either Woodward prevented him or Murtough just simply didn't care enough, the club was in a deep shit and there were so many things to fix that its understandable people didn't know where to start. Also devilish is a Juventus fan what does he know about Murtough?
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
The youth academy isn’t what it once was, and is in no way on par with City, but it has turned around in recent years.

Where are you getting that Murtough was in charge of scouting? However now it looks like restructuring is happening so there we go.

The women’s team are doing well - the lack of facilities is a lack of investment. Is that his fault? It also looks like its Being rectified.

Edward Woodward only left his post properly in February the responsibility of sacking Ole was still firmly on his shoulders.

Yes we had that new structure in place but again it was still hamstrung by Woodward being around.

Murtough also has a long career. Edwards, prior to being made director with Klopp around, was not viewed as having done a good job. Liverpool’s recruitment was poor. They had one very good season under Rodgers admittedly, but the football structure was seen as a joke. It’s crazy what a good manager can do to reshape that.

Regarding Fletcher being hired, it’s a really lazy point that people use to beat the club with. It’s pretty common place in football :

Cech is Chelsea's technical director just under a slightly different job title, with no prior experience.

Monchi became Sevilla’s Sporting Director immediately after he retired as their goalkeeper.

Tixiki Begiristain retired, became a commentator and then 3 years later became the DoF at Barcelona.

Michael Zorc became sporting director at Dortmund immediately after retiring in 1998.

Hasan Salihamidžić retired in 2012 knocked around as a pundit and then became sporting director at Bayern in 2017.

Before going into management Zidane was appointed as advisor to the president at Real Madrid in 2009 and was one of the key decision makers alongside along with general director Jorge Valdano and sporting director Miguel Pardeza.

It's really quite a common occurrence that former players take up key roles in important positions in top top clubs. And most of these have taken on bigger positions than Fletcher.

Resigning Cavani this season was as much on Ole as it was anyone and at the beginning of the season was it such a mistake? Greenwood was being developed to be our future CF and what would be the issue having Cavani around to fill the squad. Varane give it more than a season before you are so sure his a sick note. Rangnick has been pretty damning about our medical team, so you shouldn’t be surprised if they get some restructuring too. Heaton was bought in as a third keeper, I don’t know why that’s so weird to you. McShane is a coach at u23 level, why is that something you keep mentioning? I mean it’s weird that he plays, but it seems to be a new concept they are trying out. Who knows it it works.

Sancho again too early to say, but give it a season also with hindsight being how it is. At least we have a semi alright left winger now, Rashford is looking like shit.

Mata was given a contract with the view that we would then take him into the business side of the club. Also frankly when he’s come on recently he’s been our best player. But again was Mata’s contract Murtough’s choice.

Show me where Pogba’s 400k contract renewal is being reported by a reputable journo.

I mean I responded to Rangnick point. If we had limped to fourth with a counter attacking manager do you think we would be about to go through this massive wholesale change we are about to bring in. I mean just re read my initial response to you.

I don’t know why a good third of your post there is you just repeating points I responded to and not responding to my response.

The new structure with Murtough as football director has existed in reality since February. What’s the point of getting all twisted before we see if it works or not. It’s entirely possible with Rangnick giving his honest thoughts, Woodward out of the picture and ETH coming in, that we’re in for a ride back to being a somewhat competitive footballing side. You seem to want to shut that party down before it’s getting started.
https://www.manutd.com/en/news/deta...t-of-football-director-and-technical-director

This appointment builds on the work John has already undertaken in recent years, working closely with Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and the rest of the football staff to create the structures, processes and culture to deliver sustained success on the pitch. This has included successful overhauls of the club’s Academy and recruitment department.



Do you really think that the CEO of a multi billionaire company would micromanage everything? Do you seriously believe that an accountant would go on signing the players he liked as if he's on football manager? These days football had grown so big that even managers struggle to keep up with transfers. In fact that's why full time specialists like DOFs and head of recruitment are appointed. Now in the absence of such role at United the club relied on a small group of people to call the shots ie the famous transfer committee. That included the manager but also football people close to Woodward. Who could be closer to Woodward then Jon Murtough ie a guy whom under his reign ended up at the top of the football pyramid? Jon ended up the boss of both SAF's protegees ie Lawlor and Fletcher but also Woodward's own matey from University ie Judge. That's the very personification of a Woodward's man. In fact now that Woodward has left I won't be surprised if Murtough and/or Fletcher would be the next to go.

Regarding Fletcher, Cech is an advisor whose role is covered in a 2 line sentence

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/teams/managers/petr-cech

The legendary former Chelsea goalkeeper returned to the club at the beginning of 2019/20 in a new role in which he provides advice on all football and performance matters throughout the club as well as helping to maintain strong links between our men’s and Academy teams, ensuring that the various support departments are working together effectively.

While Fletcher has a role which is so complex that even Rangnick struggle to understand it fully. That include coaching the first team, interviewing and having a say on who will be our next manager, delivering technical advice across all aspects of the football department as well as contributing to the communication and delivery of our football philosophy across all areas of the club and helping to bring young players through and further develop the football side of the club. Which is quite amazing for someone who started as U16 coach in October 2020, he was promoted as first team coach in January and ended up Technical director by March. This guy is either a genius or...

Regarding Ole, the guy was part of a transfer committee that also included Murtough. As the official website had stated John (not Woodward, John Murtough) had been working closely with Ole FOR YEARS to create the structures processes and culture to deliver :cough: sustained success :cough: on the pitch. That included successful overhauls of the academy and the recruitment department. So while Ole has to carry his own share of blame he was not alone in this mess and should pay the same ultimate price Ole did.


Regarding Pogba the contract extension had been reported by many tier 1 journalists including Romano



Please note that Pogba is currently on 350k a week so an increased salary would probably take him to the 400k-500k a week.

To wrap it up I have no problems with us promoting from within but only when the system in place is successful and well structured. We seem promoting failure and giving on the job training within a structure were no one is capable of doing his job correctly let alone mentor successfully. Meanwhile there's little doubt that Jon Murtough is a Woodward's man (he got hired and promoted during his tenure) and I won't be surprised if he and/or Fletcher is shown the door. I am not the only one to think that. During Howson's last video he suggested that Fletcher might not be sticking around for long.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
I'm going with Adnan. Either Woodward prevented him or Murtough just simply didn't care enough, the club was in a deep shit and there were so many things to fix that its understandable people didn't know where to start. Also devilish is a Juventus fan what does he know about Murtough?
I am not a Juventus fan.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
:lol:
If Lawlor had indeed been marginalised (possibly because of an unwillingness to embrace modern comms technology) then why has he been kept on until now? Surely it would have been better to pension him off generously?

So it looks like Murtough either:
  1. hadn’t a clue what was going on until it was spelled out to him by Ralf; or
  2. was well aware of it all but was prevented from doing anything about it by Woodward
1. = @devilish 2. = @Adnan - take your pick…

I’m Team @Adnan right now, but may well swap sides depending on how things go over the summer.
My point is very simple. Can you imagine a CEO of a multi billionaire club having the time to play football manager? I don't. Woodward had his football people just as Berlusconi had Galliani and Moratti had Branca. In this case everything points at Jon Murtough. Jon was hired during Woodward's tenure and kept getting promoted during this time up until he ended up head of the football pyramid. I find it very hard to believe that Murtough had no say whatsoever and that its everyone else fault. Its a theory that doesn't make sense and is not supported by the official site itself.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
My point is very simple. Can you imagine a CEO of a multi billionaire club having the time to play football manager? I don't. Woodward had his football people just as Berlusconi had Galliani and Moratti had Branca. In this case everything points at Jon Murtough. Jon was hired during Woodward's tenure and kept getting promoted during this time up until he ended up head of the football pyramid. I find it very hard to believe that Murtough had no say whatsoever and that its everyone else fault. Its a theory that doesn't make sense and is not supported by the official site itself.
Oh I’m not saying there’s no chance you could be right. We shall see over the next few months.

It does seem unlikely that the change in direction taken recently is unconnected with the departure of Woodward though.
 

macheda14

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
4,720
Location
London
https://www.manutd.com/en/news/deta...t-of-football-director-and-technical-director

This appointment builds on the work John has already undertaken in recent years, working closely with Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and the rest of the football staff to create the structures, processes and culture to deliver sustained success on the pitch. This has included successful overhauls of the club’s Academy and recruitment department.


Do you really think that the CEO of a multi billionaire company would micromanage everything? Do you seriously believe that an accountant would go on signing the players he liked as if he's on football manager? These days football had grown so big that even managers struggle to keep up with transfers. In fact that's why full time specialists like DOFs and head of recruitment are appointed. Now in the absence of such role at United the club relied on a small group of people to call the shots ie the famous transfer committee. That included the manager but also football people close to Woodward. Who could be closer to Woodward then Jon Murtough ie a guy whom under his reign ended up at the top of the football pyramid? Jon ended up the boss of both SAF's protegees ie Lawlor and Fletcher but also Woodward's own matey from University ie Judge. That's the very personification of a Woodward's man. In fact now that Woodward has left I won't be surprised if Murtough and/or Fletcher would be the next to go.

Regarding Fletcher, Cech is an advisor whose role is covered in a 2 line sentence

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/teams/managers/petr-cech

The legendary former Chelsea goalkeeper returned to the club at the beginning of 2019/20 in a new role in which he provides advice on all football and performance matters throughout the club as well as helping to maintain strong links between our men’s and Academy teams, ensuring that the various support departments are working together effectively.

While Fletcher has a role which is so complex that even Rangnick struggle to understand it fully. That include coaching the first team, interviewing and having a say on who will be our next manager, delivering technical advice across all aspects of the football department as well as contributing to the communication and delivery of our football philosophy across all areas of the club and helping to bring young players through and further develop the football side of the club. Which is quite amazing for someone who started as U16 coach in October 2020, he was promoted as first team coach in January and ended up Technical director by March. This guy is either a genius or...

Regarding Ole, the guy was part of a transfer committee that also included Murtough. As the official website had stated John (not Woodward, John Murtough) had been working closely with Ole FOR YEARS to create the structures processes and culture to deliver :cough: sustained success :cough: on the pitch. That included successful overhauls of the academy and the recruitment department. So while Ole has to carry his own share of blame he was not alone in this mess and should pay the same ultimate price Ole did.


Regarding Pogba the contract extension had been reported by many tier 1 journalists including Romano



Please note that Pogba is currently on 350k a week so an increased salary would probably take him to the 400k-500k a week.

To wrap it up I have no problems with us promoting from within but only when the system in place is successful and well structured. We seem promoting failure and giving on the job training within a structure were no one is capable of doing his job correctly let alone mentor successfully. Meanwhile there's little doubt that Jon Murtough is a Woodward's man (he got hired and promoted during his tenure) and I won't be surprised if he and/or Fletcher is shown the door. I am not the only one to think that. During Howson's last video he suggested that Fletcher might not be sticking around for long.
Contract offer since last July - that was written in December. So a contract offer on the table for a year and a half.

Hence why I said Cech is technical director in all but name, they don’t have a technical director so he’s been their stand in. But yes also ignore absolutely everyone else I mentioned.

Ah yes Howson who doesn’t really have much insight beyond Ronaldo resigning.

Yes you can trust the website, which is PR or see that actually it looks like since February the decisions being made behind the scenes seem to be pushing us in the right direction.

Again let’s use Edwards as an analogy here - very much FSGs man, gets to the top and then with a good manager everything turns around. I just don’t see the point in having some militant agenda against the man. We aren’t changing him, but it’s now looking like there is some optimism on the horizon. Bask in the hope rather than being a negative Nancy who pretends to support United but actually support Juventus.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
30,018
Location
England
:lol:
If Lawlor had indeed been marginalised (possibly because of an unwillingness to embrace modern comms technology) then why has he been kept on until now? Surely it would have been better to pension him off generously?

So it looks like Murtough either:
  1. hadn’t a clue what was going on until it was spelled out to him by Ralf; or
  2. was well aware of it all but was prevented from doing anything about it by Woodward
1. = @devilish 2. = @Adnan - take your pick…

I’m Team @Adnan right now, but may well swap sides depending on how things go over the summer.
I can't predict how things will go in the future but I think there's room for optimism with Murtough now reportedly the de-facto DoF. And i'm humble enough to admit that things could go wrong as well. But for me as a Manchester United supporter, it's healthier to look at things with a positive frame of mind, rather than constantly attack John Murtough like some are doing, which I find quite disturbing and something that's bordering on the obsessive. I would rather be wrong in my support towards John Murtough and my club, than resort to a constant barrage of criticism which is easily refutable.

I also think it's important to understand what Murtough's role has been at the club for a large part of his time since he joined the club. And his role at the club has been to oversee the development of everything beneath the first team. And it's a role that has been common at other English clubs for a even longer time. And as you well know, we've had a tradition going back decades in the UK where the first team manager controlled the football side of the club. So what transpired (as things evolved) was that instead of having Sporting directors at first team level, English clubs created the very same role overseeing all things beneath the first team. John Murtough was the Sporting director outside of the first team fold with the first team manager controlling affairs at first team level.

I can give you several examples of the same role at other English clubs, but i'll use the one at Tottenham. Tottenham when they fired Pochettino, did their fans blame John McDermott, who like Murtough was tasked with overseeing the development of the club, beneath the first team? The answer to that is they didn't, because John McDermott had nothing to do with the failure at first team level. McDermott has since joined the English FA as the Technical Director. And even when he was at Spurs, Levy is known to have confided in agents to bring managers in. And Woodward has also reportedly confided in agents when appointing managers, because I don't believe football men like McDermott/Murtough would ever overlook the mid to long-term, when appointing a coach. Because the aforementioned two, prioritise development (from the evidence hand) and take a holistic approach to hiring and firing from what i've read and heard via podcasts. So i'm not surprised Murtough opted for ten Hag.

Murtough only became the de-facto DoF, when Solskjaer was sacked. So he didn't have the authority to make major decisions because according to reports, Solskjaer didn't report to Murtough but rather to Woodward. And unless there's a buffer between the head coach and board members, then there's no active DoF model in play. It looks like that may not be the case anymore, with a head coach and not manager coming in.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,959
Oh I’m not saying there’s no chance you could be right. We shall see over the next few months.

It does seem unlikely that the change in direction taken recently is unconnected with the departure of Woodward though.
I am not saying that I am 100% right. All I am saying is that I find it naïve that every mistake done was all down to Woodward (as if a CEO has time to play football manager) and Ole especially since Murtough had seen his career flourish during the Woodward's administration. Its also common for people whose under pressure to put all the blame on outgoing staff (ex LVG, Mourinho, Ole, Bout and Lawlor etc) as it is create some breathing space for those staying to operate.

Regarding Fletcher/Murtough, Howson has just stated that he won't be surprised if Fletcher leaves and the guy seems to have good links with United former players (Rio, Gaz and co). Which means that almost everyone under Murtough will be gone (Lawlor, Bout and Fletcher). Now that Jon M has lost his 'protector' could we see a change at United with Rangnick and Mitchell taking over?
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
30,018
Location
England
Which goes to show he’s involved in the micro management of the club. This is definitely not the guy to micromanaging a club back to success. I’m also fairly sure the glazer kids all have a say on major transfers and that’s why our sagas go for 75% longer then other clubs. I have a feeling they look at it it like it’s literally money out of their pockets and the speed at which we operate (and backtrack) makes us look totally indecisive
I agree, it's not good enough and they have to relinquish control when it comes to the decision making process. And the Glazers are my biggest worry.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,696
I am guessing you have spoken to Fletcher and seen his qualifications to say he is underqualified.

Also, it seems you lack football knowledge, In Germany, technical directors do sit on the bench.

Finally, the reason Fletcher is on the bench is because when we fired Ole, all the coaching staff left and RR needed help on the training ground. He was there to help and has continued.

If you do some research, you will realise that people speak highly of him and his football insight.
You're wasting your time, s/he's obviously got an agenda against Fletcher.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,581
Watch now as Lawlor goes to a rival and they become the new Dortmund. Let’s just hope Murtough actually knows what he’s at. It wouldn’t be like us to get an appointment right let alone lots of appointments. I’ve also read on here from one of our members (and I’ve suspected it myself) that the day to day running of the club is clunky and everything is kicked up to america and the time difference can leave people waiting around an extra day before making even the most simple calls.
This explains our late subs.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,157
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
:lol:
If Lawlor had indeed been marginalised (possibly because of an unwillingness to embrace modern comms technology) then why has he been kept on until now? Surely it would have been better to pension him off generously?

So it looks like Murtough either:
  1. hadn’t a clue what was going on until it was spelled out to him by Ralf; or
  2. was well aware of it all but was prevented from doing anything about it by Woodward
1. = @devilish 2. = @Adnan - take your pick…

I’m Team @Adnan right now, but may well swap sides depending on how things go over the summer.
I think a lot of people need to accept on here that since Fergie and Gill left, a lot of people who remained at the club have been phoning it in, from Woodward, to Jim all the way down to the players. The difference is you can spot when a player has given up, ala Van Persie, staff is not so easy.
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,696
Looks like this to me, too. Murtough has been in the vicinity of plenty of disasters, though he seems to have improved the youth side of things (the players you produce are more important than trophies/league tables there). Just since becoming director he's been around rewarding OGS with an undeserved contract, re-signing Ronaldo, sticking with Ole for too long, letting Conte go to Spurs, the usual terrible injury record, hiring an interim manager, taking 6 months to hire Ten Hag, and plenty more. Maybe he needs time, but no-one can say it hasn't got worse since he's been in. That could just be a coincidence, but I'm sure there'd be plenty who could do a much better and faster job than what he's doing.

It reminds me of how United tried to "make it work with Ole". Are they trying to "make it work with John"? To me, there are a few too many parallels between Ole and Murtough.
How much of that was due to Woodward interfering and niot giving Murtough a free hand?
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
I think a lot of people need to accept on here that since Fergie and Gill left, a lot of people who remained at the club have been phoning it in, from Woodward, to Jim all the way down to the players. The difference is you can spot when a player has given up, ala Van Persie, staff is not so easy.
I’m sure you’re right.

Even so, if Neville “knew” that Jim had been marginalised, surely someone in the club would have spotted? Unless, as you suggest, Woodward was doing as much phoning in as anyone else.

It must have been all very frustrating for those staff who were actually in possession of a professional attitude. I suppose Murtough could occupy himself in projects like the women’s team and academy restructure in order to give himself a reason to turn up for work other than his regular pay cheque.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,735
Looks like this to me, too. Murtough has been in the vicinity of plenty of disasters, though he seems to have improved the youth side of things (the players you produce are more important than trophies/league tables there). Just since becoming director he's been around rewarding OGS with an undeserved contract, re-signing Ronaldo, sticking with Ole for too long, letting Conte go to Spurs, the usual terrible injury record, hiring an interim manager, taking 6 months to hire Ten Hag, and plenty more. Maybe he needs time, but no-one can say it hasn't got worse since he's been in. That could just be a coincidence, but I'm sure there'd be plenty who could do a much better and faster job than what he's doing.

It reminds me of how United tried to "make it work with Ole". Are they trying to "make it work with John"? To me, there are a few too many parallels between Ole and Murtough.
Some of the criticism here is unwarranted in my opinion.

He didn’t hire Ole and was not in charge of manager appointments/firings/contracts when Ole was renewed.

Not hiring Conte (we don’t know if this is a mistake yet) that is purely a short termist view.

Taking 6 months to hire ETH? Its been quite clear for the first time we have actually done a comprehensive review of who to hire (which is why an interim was necessary and not Conte). That interim was also involved in the hiring decision. Time will tell but I think you’ll find hes got that part right (long term point of view).

Its not his fault that when he took up this responsibilty that the club didn’t already have a detailed succession plan (and its good he brought in someone with more knowledge than himself to help him out on this).

Worst thing for him to do would have been to quickly hire Conte (who would not have accepted an interim position) and potentially miss out on Ten Hag this summer but get top 4 with a manager who has a record of success but by:

1. Not playing the football we want to see
2. Hiring short term players of the wrong age to get success (see his time at Inter)

Conte would have been a Jose type appointment for United longer term it would have caused many issues.
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,730
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
Is there anything that Glazers bring to the club that wouldn't be done better by a literal mannequin?
Mannequins don’t saddle you with crippling debt and take dividends every year. So there’s that.
 

V.O.

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
8,287
I’m sure you’re right.

Even so, if Neville “knew” that Jim had been marginalised, surely someone in the club would have spotted? Unless, as you suggest, Woodward was doing as much phoning in as anyone else.

It must have been all very frustrating for those staff who were actually in possession of a professional attitude. I suppose Murtough could occupy himself in projects like the women’s team and academy restructure in order to give himself a reason to turn up for work other than his regular pay cheque.
The Neville tweet is just him saying "my mate isn't to blame" again. Wouldn't give it any weight.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,216
So what is Hayden Croft’s reputation and reliability like for stories? Never heard of him until now but there’s always someone who’ll get wind of something before the usual suspects do.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,735
So what is Hayden Croft’s reputation and reliability like for stories? Never heard of him until now but there’s always someone who’ll get wind of something before the usual suspects do.
Romano actually mentioned this was in the making. Wouldnt be surprised if this happens. Don’t know who this person posting about it is though
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,901
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
No wonder Remington is our official sponsor. All the new hires look like they don't need a pair of scissors for a hair cut.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,753
Either the changes made were reactionary or have to question why everything takes so long to sort out. You’d think if there was any kind of strategy we’d have someone in place straight away, especially given how important the summer transfer window is.
 

AdNani

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,751
a lot of talk in twitter about paul mitchell being brought in, I'm beginning to have real hope
 

SAF is the GOAT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 27, 2021
Messages
3,233
Sounds like that "Hayden Croft" account just wants to be the 1 who put this Exclusive first
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,393
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
I agree, it's not good enough and they have to relinquish control when it comes to the decision making process. And the Glazers are my biggest worry.
If they go back on their word to ten Hag, the supporters need to take action.
and I do not mean the ridiculous type of walking in after 17 minutes stuff.
Direct action to stop matches at Old Trafford taking place.

That will hurt them financially.

Lets hope it does not come to that.
 

Red4Life_#7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
1,112
This is definitely something that needed to be done. Look at Liverpool's recruitment over the last 6-7 years, compared to ours. We have no vision towards a particular goal, it's just buy and shoe in time signings.

How did we lose out on both Van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate?? We have more money, but obviously no sense. Konate was 21 and a strong presence even when we played Leipzig, £36m is peanuts compared to the 50m and 80m on AWB and Maguire.

It's going to take 4-5 more years to rebuild this club, lets not fool ourselves.
 

SAF is the GOAT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 27, 2021
Messages
3,233
This is definitely something that needed to be done. Look at Liverpool's recruitment over the last 6-7 years, compared to ours. We have no vision towards a particular goal, it's just buy and shoe in time signings.

How did we lose out on both Van Dijk and Ibrahima Konate?? We have more money, but obviously no sense. Konate was 21 and a strong presence even when we played Leipzig, £36m is peanuts compared to the 50m and 80m on AWB and Maguire.

It's going to take 4-5 more years to rebuild this club, lets not fool ourselves.
On VVD I agree with you but with Konate he was a major problem in that he was so injury prone in Leipzig, I don't think we needed to risk it.