Ralf Rangnick | ex-interim manager | does anyone rate him?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
14,037
Location
Sunny Manc
What hissyfits?

I stated that our xG for has improved. And our xG against. Suggesting we are more structured, something which Klopp commented on before the match.

If you want actual details then fair enough. Our xG for under Ole v Ralf this season is 1.42 v 1.52 in favour of Ragnick. The xG against is 1.63 v 1.14, again in favour of Ragnick. Improvement in both areas.
So your argument of progress is a negligible difference in xG which is comparable to the dying days of Ole’s tenure? And that’s ignoring the actual results.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,222
Sounds to me like we just keep him in the wings until the new manager arrives.

We might tap him for some advice, but whether or not we execute on that advice is another matter.

Honestly after this spell in charge, I wouldnt trust him with making the team lunch let alone transfer decisions or personnel decisions.

Everybody and their mothers knows this team needs rebuilding. But 10-11 players? Thats well overboard. We have a few good players on our books. Its just that the last two managers weren't able to get the best out of them this season. Yes we have plenty of bad apples, but hopefully most will be gone in the summer.

The only reason he is asking for 10-11 players is because he has lost the respect of the players and probably the dressing room. They've not listened to him for whatever reason, and thats a DAMNING failure on his part. How you do that in such a short span of time is beyond me.
Personally despite his love of drama and creating negative press I would like the club to keep him around as an advisor.

The rebuild talk is overblown bringing in 10+ new players in one summer is unrealistic to say the least. We'll probably lose 10+ players but the squad has been bloated this season and could do with a lot of trimming. I reckon we'll only be signing 4-5 new players and promoting some youngsters next season. Ten Hag will hopefully succeed where Rangnick has failed in getting the squad morale and confidence back up and getting them playing as a team again.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
You are the authority on silly posts the amount of shit you've posted in this thread

I'm not surprised your mind takes more solace in xG over the facts
Says the guy who just wants to point to a league table and conclude everything from the situation. This is how Ed Woodward likely made all of his shit decisions at the club, your understanding along with a couple others in the thread is so ridiculously limited you're better off taking a break from the sport until the new season.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Moyes inherited a title winning team and was given money to buy players.
What's that got to do with anything? I wasn't comparing their situations I was saying this interim has had almost as many games as a full time manager so it's not a small sample size
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Says the guy who just wants to point to a league table and conclude everything from the situation. This is how Ed Woodward likely made all of his shit decisions at the club, your understanding along with a couple others in the thread is so ridiculously limited you're better off taking a break from the sport until the new season.
Enjoy attending the trophy parade for improved xG, it's all people like you deserve
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,821
Location
Oslo, Norway
What hissyfits?

I stated that our xG for has improved. And our xG against. Suggesting we are more structured, something which Klopp commented on before the match.

If you want actual details then fair enough. Our xG for under Ole v Ralf this season is 1.42 v 1.52 in favour of Ragnick. The xG against is 1.63 v 1.14, again in favour of Ragnick. Improvement in both areas.
This is daft. Ralf had 4 games against Norwich and Burnley, the two worst attacks who simply don't do goals. Those are 20 % of his games. Also will end up with 2 games against Brighton, the 3rd worst attack.
 

DSG

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
2,637
Location
A Whale’s Vagina
From such a small sample size.
I’m going to push back on this. If you know anything about statistics, yes, you need 30-50 data points before outliers don’t horribly skew the result.

However, he’s had 5 months and roughly 2500 minutes of on pitch football, along with training sessions, tactical prep, etc. If he had any positive impact, we would’ve begun to see the signs by now. Well, results-wise, he’s been awful and we are trending down.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,057
It’s becoming quite evident within this thread, and in a wider sense there is a true split between those who value data, playing style and structure and those who just want to see “wins at any cost. Don’t care about style.”

It’s quite clear what side most modern clubs take.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,048
Location
Cooper Station
So your argument of progress is a negligible difference in xG which is comparable to the dying days of Ole’s tenure? And that’s ignoring the actual results.
Improvement is improvement. You claimed that we had got worse. I’ve shown you that this isn’t the case.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,821
Location
Oslo, Norway
It’s becoming quite evident within this thread, and in a wider sense there is a true split between those who value data, playing style and structure and those who just want to see “wins at any cost. Don’t care about style.”

It’s quite clear what side most modern clubs take.
Playing style and structure? Have you watched a single game over the past two months? :lol:
 

bdspeedy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
2,010
Location
Ventura Highway
Ralf knows how a proper football team runs and should run. Years of agendas, neglect, nepotism, malfeasance and greed have taken a tremendous toll. We need a sea change at our club if we expect to return to our winning ways. We need to start from some reference point and build up from there. Hope that Doc Ralf can identify and cut out the diseased parts. Selfish players, selfish ex-players, clueless "coaches", bankers using the team as an ATM, journos undermining the team to get a story, etc,..... Our beloved team has become the host to thousands of parasites who put their own interests before the betterment of the club. Unfortunately, that includes a lot of us fans. Let's hope at the very least, "consultant" Ralf is allowed to act as the triage physician this organization needs. We've had years of spin doctors covering up the symptoms. Let's hope we haven't lost the patient.
 

devips

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
1,235
Such a whiner,, this Rangnick. He clearly has no interest in or empathy with the team and its players.To appoint him as coach was one of the gravest mistakes United board have committed.

I worry for Ten Hag. I hope he does not turn out to be all talk and no substance like this fraud.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,048
Location
Cooper Station
I’m going to push back on this. If you know anything about statistics, yes, you need 3data points before outliers don’t horribly skew the result.

However, he’s had 5 months and roughly 2500 minutes of on pitch football, along with training sessions, tactical prep, etc. If he had any positive impact, we would’ve begun to see the signs by now. Well, results-wise, he’s been awful and we are trending down.
I’m sorry but comparing 5 months to LVG/Mourinho/Ole who all got years and we’re allowed to spend hundreds of millions is not really a fair comparison.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
So let’s ignore all context then. Great stuff :lol:
Here's some context for you @Berbaclass

This is daft. Ralf had 4 games against Norwich and Burnley, the two worst attacks who simply don't do goals. Those are 20 % of his games. Also will end up with 2 games against Brighton, the 3rd worst attack.
I’m going to push back on this. If you know anything about statistics, yes, you need 3data points before outliers don’t horribly skew the result.

However, he’s had 5 months and roughly 2500 minutes of on pitch football, along with training sessions, tactical prep, etc. If he had any positive impact, we would’ve begun to see the signs by now. Well, results-wise, he’s been awful and we are trending down.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,222
That Woodward rumour has been widely shut down. What a ridiculous round about way to make your point. Again it seems you don’t understand the wider purpose of Rangnick’s role, which was also to assess the squad overall and not provide short-term bandaid fixes. He will stay in a consultancy role and his opinions should be given weight since they’ve been bang on so far.
:lol:

No one does including Ralf himself it seems but I'm sure @Giggsy13 off Redcafe has intimate knowledge of what his role and responsibilities will involve.


Genuinely don't know if you're on a wind up at this stage mate.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
Enjoy attending the trophy parade for improved xG, it's all people like you deserve
No one is actually saying we had a good season. It's just the thick posts insinuating the primary blame or a material blame of that form is on Rangnick that makes me chuckle. It's one of the most daft points of view I've seen in caf history, after Ole being endorsed by many posters here of course.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
:lol:

No one does including Ralf himself it seems but I'm sure @Giggsy13 off Redcafe has intimate knowledge of what his role and responsibilities will involve.


Genuinely don't know if you're on a wind up at this stage mate.
Do you understand this tweet? Serious question.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
No one is actually saying we had a good season. It's just the thick posts insinuating the primary blame or a material blame of that form is on Rangnick that makes me chuckle. It's one of the most daft points of view I've seen in caf history, after Ole being endorsed by many posters here of course.
and that's no one hear is taking you seriously because you literally bring Ole into it every single time

its absolutely perfectly ok to say Ole was shit and so is RR
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,923
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Such a whiner,, this Rangnick. He clearly has no interest in or empathy with the team and its players.To appoint him as coach was one of the gravest mistakes United board have committed.

I worry for Ten Hag. I hope he does not turn out to be all talk and no substance like this fraud.
Why is it a mistake?

This squad is toxic. It’s full to the brim with pampered egos who will never have the mentality nor technical ability to win the league and consistently compete for other trophies.

He’s the first one to publicly recognise this and he’s made it clear that it’s not good enough and needs to change. That means half of them are going to leave and he’s making sure that’s going to happen.

That’s literally the best possible thing that could happen this season. Getting in an interim manager who might have dragged this lot to Top 4, masked over the issues and set us on course for more mediocrity next season would have been a disaster.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,121
Question: Intellectually, is it possible to entertain the concept that Ralf can be bad AND the players can be bad too? Is that too difficult to process?

‘The players were performing poorly, Ralf has made them worse. Both are accountable for this disaster.
That's not what people are saying though is it. People are saying the players are only this bad because Ralf is the worst manager we've ever had. Both are culpable but, for some users, the players are being allowed to get away with it, again.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,155
Supports
Real Madrid
If you want actual details then fair enough. Our xG for under Ole v Ralf this season is 1.42 v 1.52 in favour of Ragnick. The xG against is 1.63 v 1.14, again in favour of Ragnick. Improvement in both areas.
I looked at the data in Understat. I get xG/90 of 1.56 for Ole and xG/90 of 1.63 for Rangnick. This is a difference of 0.07 xG/90, which is a similar amount as the difference you posted. This is not improvement. If you take xG literally, it means that under Rangnick the team is taking exactly one more crappy, low probability shot per match. To try to pass this off as improvement is simply not serious. The numbers are even worse if you look at NPxG/90. There, Ole's first 12 games came to 1.49; Rangnick comes to 1.55. That's a difference of 0.06 xG, basically nothing.

This lack of improvement in attacking performance, according to the xG model, matches quite well with what we see in reality: United are scoring less goals per game under Rangnick.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,567
That's not what people are saying though is it. People are saying the players are only this bad because Ralf is the worst manager we've ever had. Both are culpable but, for some users, the players are being allowed to get away with it, again.
No one is saying that.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
and that's no one hear is taking you seriously because you literally bring Ole into it every single time

its absolutely perfectly ok to say Ole was shit and so is RR
No, it isn't. Because Ole built this shit squad over 3 windows that had feck all training, overfed contracts, big egos and zero workrate.
Rangnick inherited the shitstorm of 10 players leaving the door and the others in cliques refusing to work off the ball.

Ole is brought into it because it's his feckup. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp. It's like if you burned down a house and then the police ask why you did it, with the response "hey why you looking at me, put out the fire".
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,048
Location
Cooper Station
I looked at the data in Understat. I get xG/90 of 1.56 for Ole and xG/90 of 1.63 for Rangnick. This is a difference of 0.07 xG/90, which is a similar amount as the difference you posted. This is not improvement. If you take xG literally, it means that under Rangnick the team is taking exactly one more crappy, low probability shot per match. To try to pass this off as improvement is simply not serious. The numbers are even worse if you look at NPxG/90. There, Ole's first 12 games came to 1.49; Rangnick comes to 1.55. That's a difference of 0.06 xG, basically nothing.

This lack of improvement in attacking performance, according to the xG model, matches quite well with what we see in reality: United are scoring less goals per game under Rangnick.
My figures are from fbref so I’m not sure which are more accurate if I’m honest.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,121
No one is saying that.
Such a whiner,, this Rangnick. He clearly has no interest in or empathy with the team and its players.To appoint him as coach was one of the gravest mistakes United board have committed.

I worry for Ten Hag. I hope he does not turn out to be all talk and no substance like this fraud.
Quotes like this are all over this thread
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
14,037
Location
Sunny Manc
It proves you wrong for starters. Although that's not too difficult.
I don’t need to prove he’s been a rubbish manager. It’s obvious to to everyone except a small contingent of obsessives in this thread.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
40,048
Location
Cooper Station
No, it isn't. Because Ole built this shit squad over 3 windows that had feck all training, overfed contracts, big egos and zero workrate.
Rangnick inherited the shitstorm of 10 players leaving the door and the others in cliques refusing to work off the ball.

Ole is brought into it because it's his feckup. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp. It's like if you burned down a house and then the police ask why you did it, with the response "hey why you looking at me, put out the fire".
He’s just a bit dense mate.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,186
I rate Ralf higher as a club strategist than a club manager. This interim stint in my opinion is a necessary step if we want to go in the right direction. Ralf gets a ground level look of this squad, how they train, how they play etc. He can then take these issues to the hierarchy and say what’s wrong and what needs to be done.

So if you want to use zero nuance at all, it’ll be ‘Ralf’s a fraud. We should have kept Ole’ to a considerable amount of people because they just looked at the results and based it off that.

I‘ll judge Ralf on his consultancy tenure which is the real reason why he’s here. If at worst we look like title challengers again by the time he goes and the club philosophy has changed for the better, then Ralf will qualify as a success. People will point at the slog of his interim period but then say it lead to positive change so it was worth it in the end.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,414
I don’t need to prove he’s been a rubbish manager. It’s obvious to to everyone except a small contingent of obsessives in this thread.
You really do. A guy who has overperformed broadly at RB, Hoffenheim, Shalke with a very identifiable brand of football. Comes to United with 10+ players leaving in 6 months, no vested interest to get injured overworking, would rather collect a paycheck and a broken squad thanks to his predecessor, no transfers of his own to work with and no pre season.

But yeah sure, lets just take this 6 months and override all of his other managerial performances because you know, banter. Honestly how must your brain function, it's just beyond me at this stage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.