Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 53,226
Do the gnomes in the VAR hut just drift off to sleep sometimes? Or are they busy on their phones or something to miss those calls?
Second one not his fault, was unsighted.Moss up to his usual nonsense there
And he stole it tooMoss having a snack?
Oh absolutely, penalties are a ridiculously imbalanced punishment imo, and should get some major changes. But still shouldn't vary this much match to match!It certainly would be. And for Bruno or Ronaldo, too.
As a fan though I'd rather not every collision with minimal contact was given as a pen. Especially when a player goes looking for it instead of just playing on
I dunno. He clearly caught the attacker with a dangling leg as he was running full pelt. Alright, he made the fall look dramatic but he was clearly tripped.I don't think it's a penalty at all. It appears the forum is split 50/50 even when looking at it multiple times. VAR has done its job here as it's not a clear and obvious error.
Unsighted but never unsalted: The story of Jonathan Moss.Second one not his fault, was unsighted.
Mikolas Ashkanopolos.Mike Ashley's Greek brother owns Forest?
Actually thought that was much clearer than first where there looked a tiny clip if that.Not as clear as the first one, but should probably have had their second penalty there.
Why isn’t it looking at it?!Did VAR even check the second one? What's going on? Huddersfield are being royally fecked here.
Evangelos MarinakisMike Ashley's Greek brother owns Forest?
Was hardly a dangerous tackle he had to avoid for his own safety. More likely to injury himself from the ridiculous starfish.When a defender puts his leg/foot out in the path of a running opposition forward and gets nowhere near the ball, the forward has two options: 1) run straight into the defenders leg/foot and risk injuring himself, or 2) try pulling his legs away from or jump over the defender's leg/foot to avoid hard contact and possible injury.
Should the ref really give different decisions depending on the forwards decision in the above scenario?
Location: W.YorksWhy stupid fat feck Jon Moss has been given this game I do not know.
Ridiculous
Tiny clip? Did you see the replays? He is running at the defender who sticks his leg out, getting none of the ball but hitting the the attackers leg.Actually thought that was much clearer than first where there looked a tiny clip if that.
Very clumsy from Lowe, not sure on his fitness but surprised Huddersfield didn't start Duane Holmes. Given them more power since he came on.
From the angle from behind the Huddersfield player you can see that their shins contact long before the starfishWas hardly a dangerous tackle he had to avoid for his own safety. More likely to injury himself from the ridiculous starfish.
And OlympiakosMike Ashley's Greek brother owns Forest?
2 doesn't preclude landing in a normal way. I imagine that's what went against him in this caseWhen a defender puts his leg/foot out in the path of a running opposition forward and gets nowhere near the ball, the forward has two options: 1) run straight into the defenders leg/foot and risk injuring himself, or 2) try pulling his legs away from or jump over the defender's leg/foot to avoid hard contact and possible injury.
Should the ref really give different decisions depending on the forwards decision in the above scenario?
He was already going to starfish before contact was even madeFrom the angle from behind the Huddersfield player you can see that their shins contact long before the starfish
I imagine you'll be delighted then if the result stays this way?Id love to see Forest back in the big time
No he wasn't. Watch the angle from behind him.He was already going to starfish before contact was even made
cock out already mateI imagine you'll be delighted then if the result stays this way?
exactlyLast time Forest were in the Premier League, we won the Treble. Just saying.