What would it say about his legacy, also?
So Pep was a success in the CL while at City?Obvious success. SAF was 3 minutes and one JT slip from never winning the CL.
There’s so much luck involved there (unless you are Real Madrid), Pep built a ridiculously dominant machine and won 4 PL titles in 6 seasons so far.
Sure there’s room for criticism on how he handled some of the CL matches including the final but a failure? come on now.
If they were that obsessed with the Champions League they would've been after Ancelotti or even Mourinho (pre Chelsea 2nd time).Devil’s advocate: Was Pep brought to City for anything else other than elevating them to CL winners? Same as any manager who goes to PSG.
That’s now, not then. Regarding Ancelotti. Mourinho was already done by the time Pep went there.If they were that obsessed with the Champions League they would've been after Ancelotti or even Mourinho (pre Chelsea 2nd time).
What was so given about it? They weren't dominant pre pep.That’s now, not then. Regarding Ancelotti. Mourinho was already done by the time Pep went there.
Domestic dominance was supposed to be a given, wasn’t it?