thegregster
Harbinger of new information
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2009
- Messages
- 13,567
They have got a worse version of Origi for 100m.He was very dangerous for Liverpool when he came on, I'll tell you that for free.
They have got a worse version of Origi for 100m.He was very dangerous for Liverpool when he came on, I'll tell you that for free.
What does made stuff happen even mean though? He got acres of space to work with that any attacker would salivate for, and then fecks up 2 comically easy chances and arguably a third (the cross toTrent was over hit, but at least it was a decent try). Him making runs is “making stuff happen”? Put any solid attacker (or Diaz if he was fit) in those situations and Liverpool wins 3/4-0Me too. Made stuff happen. I wouldn't be writing him off just yet. Much as I enjoy the donkey narrative.
Yet to see, maybe his scoring rate will drop a little without Kev but I think it will either way. He won't score in every game obviously and you are still on your day the best/second best team in the league, the game was an incredibly tight affair and unfortunately only Salah (and fortunately Nunez) were the only ones to find themselves in any sort of space. I'm not worried at all, on another day he could easily have had 3, he's just that type of player (as is Salah to be fair)Haaland got into the right positions to be fair. A header he would normally bury. Found space on the edge for a scuffed shot. And then the ball from Cancelo to an open goal tap in if not for VvD. It always seemed like there wasn't a player around a metre diameter of him each time.
But when happens when B Silva and De Bruyne get knackered from the world cup? Is Haaland not going to bring the party?
Yeah agree with you here.I know it’s en Vogue to slaughter him, and I thought he looked shocking in highlights for the touted fee when we were linked, but it’s painfully obvious that he’s absolutely desperate to impress, which is destroying any semblance of the game he actually has and replacing it with someone who looks completely lost.
Until he settles down a bit, you’re not really going to get a true representation of his ability.
Sorry, you're looking for me ro explain 'made stuff happen'? I'm not excusing his poor decision making in the situations he got himself in, just saying he shook things up, rattled them a bit, offered something different etc. Not a controversial view, I don't think.What does made stuff happen even mean though? He got acres of space to work with that any attacker would salivate for, and then fecks up 2 comically easy chances and arguably a third (the cross toTrent was over hit, but at least it was a decent try). Him making runs is “making stuff happen”? Put any solid attacker (or Diaz if he was fit) in those situations and Liverpool wins 3/4-0
He's barely played, so that stat doesn't mean an awful lot.
His xg is what he should be scoring given he was in position to score. His actual scoring is far lower.
You could argue the opposite actually
You definitely could, but I personally think it's a good sign. Not so much from the XG stat, but just the eye test and how even in cameos he's been able to get into positions and shown a real threat. There's no doubting the guy is a donkey, but he's adapting to a new league and a new team, and while he's been snatching at chances I think that facet of his game will settle down and he'll become a fairly consistent scorer with very apparent deficiencies to his game.You could argue the opposite actually
That applies both ways, whether you think he'll be fine or if he is a donkey.He's barely played, so that stat doesn't mean an awful lot.
His xg is what he should be scoring given he was in position to score. His actual scoring is far lower.
Darwin Gabriel Núñez Ribeiro scores an average of 0.63 goals for every 90 minutes that the player is on the pitch.
Haaland is almost twice his xg
Erling Håland scores an average of 1.6 goals for every 90 minutes that the player is on the pitch.
As has been discussed elsewhere the greatest goalscorer have high xG and their goals are at the same rate. Overachieving xG is rare, except for Messi. So as long as your xG is high, meaning you are getting chances, odds are you'll be fine in the long run. Particularly for Nunez whose weaknesses lie elsewhere and not finishing.You could argue the opposite actually
Except finishing is a weakness for him. He's quite average for a striker and has poor technique. Many detractors that had watched him pre-transfer said last season was a bit of an aberration with his goal numbers.As has been discussed elsewhere the greatest goalscorer have high xG and their goals are at the same rate. Overachieving xG is rare, except for Messi. So as long as your xG is high, meaning you are getting chances, odds are you'll be fine in the long run. Particularly for Nunez whose weaknesses lie elsewhere and not finishing.
I have been watching him for a few years in CONCACAF. He has always been this way. Flys all over the field and gets behind the line but does not score a lot of goals. I thought when Liverpool went for him that maybe he was different than when he plays for his country? Looks to be the same guy.As has been discussed elsewhere the greatest goalscorer have high xG and their goals are at the same rate. Overachieving xG is rare, except for Messi. So as long as your xG is high, meaning you are getting chances, odds are you'll be fine in the long run. Particularly for Nunez whose weaknesses lie elsewhere and not finishing.
All this confirms is he is shit at finishing. Heskey would probably have had similar stats.
and that's the real quiz.
You couldn't really tell what exactly he was trying to do it was that tragicHis chip 1 v 1 against the keeper was brilliant. He looked like a scene from Ace Ventura.
Not really, his xG is extremely unlikely to get better the more he plays.That applies both ways, whether you think he'll be fine or if he is a donkey.
Except finishing is a weakness for him. He's quite average for a striker and has poor technique. Many detractors that had watched him pre-transfer said last season was a bit of an aberration with his goal numbers.
Fair enough. I didn't realize finishing was a weakness. In which case he will flop if he continues to underachieve his xG.I have been watching him for a few years in CONCACAF. He has always been this way. Flys all over the field and gets behind the line but does not score a lot of goals. I thought when Liverpool went for him that maybe he was different than when he plays for his country? Looks to be the same guy.
I misunderstood you. Yes.Not really, his xG is extremely unlikely to get better the more he plays.
Yeah that was mostly the concern everyone had with him when we were heavily linked. Wasn't as much the technical limitations (you can get past that) as every Benfica fan saying he hit a monster purple patch that last season for them. At a certain point you kind of need to have something in your locker besides solid pace and an engine as a forward. Even Lukaku for all his faults has a fantastic left peg.Fair enough. I didn't realize finishing was a weakness. In which case he will flop if he continues to underachieve his xG.
He certainly didn’t intend for it to go where it did. He seemed surprised himself.The way his body was shaped I think he was aiming for the opposite corner.
Wasn't mistimed. He's been shit before this point but it was a good header.Just scored from a mistimed header/jump.
Fantastic goal. Future Ballon d'Or winner.Written off far too early on here.
Once he settles in and Klopp works his magic, he's going to be a better/more impactful player than Haaland. Just like I predicted! Great goal today!!This bodes well for Nunez. Don't know the source for xG.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Nunez doesn't have a proper system around him. If Liverpool build it just around him, with players feeding him, he will feast just like Haaland. There's not much difference between them and Nunez even looks better outside of goalscoring.