Scholes is on the level of Modric, KDB, while the other two are just a tier down. I'd even put Gerrard a tier lower than Lamps.
Like look at their skillset, who would you fancy to hit the ball outside the box? They all had good long range efforts but Scholes would win it for me.
Vison wise, Scholes is ondifferent level to them both.
Passing those two never reached Scholes passing levels, he could hit any kind of pass from anywhere on the pitch with a pinpoint accuracy.
Defensively Scholesy might be slightly behind butI think he was great positionally and reading of the game, only later in his career he just mistimed tackles for fun because he was simply old.
What we should also consider is the goals and assists from the open play, Scholes unlike Lampard wasn't on penalties, because there were others to take, otherwise he would surpass even Lampard I am sure of that, didn't take many freekicks and corner either, because of obvious reasons having the best set piece taker probably in the history of the game in the squad as well, while he could easily do that.
What's driving me crazy that it is just very difficult to convince some people outside of United because simply Lampard and Gerard being captains and infinitely more exposed players in media and so much bias was created around them., while Scholes simply rained from 18-36 of age from start to finish, easily because he was so good he could adapt to new roles, tactics etc...