England 2002 seems more like USSR 62. Team with some very strong qualities that couldn't quite cope with the domestic pressure and expectation on them. Worth a mention once all the usual suspects have been brought up, but the game against Brazil was a tame, choking performance, not just a loss. you can't have a team like that among the best ever not to win, despite the potential that was there.
I think the 70 and 82 England team was arguably better. 82 was at least as good as the French during the first two group stages of that tournament, being directly superior in the first groupstage and just getting a tougher 2nd group, but still going out undefeated. The structure of that world cup was garbage.
From the prehistoric world cups, maybe the '34 Czechoslovakia and '38 Hungary teams are worth a mention alongside the Austrian wunderteam, despite the lack of footage. 30s and 40s (if the war hadn't interrupted) was a golden era for depth and development of cutting edge tactics in those countries, with the 54 Hungary team merely a continuation of the strength of that era, not one that appeared out of nowhere.
Sweden 58 are another team i really like. Much better football (relative to era) than the 94 team.