UnitedSofa
You'll Never Walk Away
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,875
Some of the takes in this thread are fecking disgusting.
He’s right though. We are miles behind in terms of internet content. You see the stuff PSG and even City put out and it’s crazy. It creates a better relationship with fans, and expands potential markets too.The bit about internet content being miles behind shows hits real focus. Glad he's gone... wonder if he'll ever grow up.
Not really. That’s how the world is going. There’s clubs that are smaller than United but hit target markets with their content. United have always been slow when it comes to the tech side of things. Their social media account used to lag behind the other clubs long before the rise of TikTok and Instagram.The bit about internet content being miles behind shows hits real focus. Glad he's gone... wonder if he'll ever grow up.
He's a player, it really shouldn't be his focus in any way. That is the point being made.He’s right though. We are miles behind in terms of internet content. You see the stuff PSG and even City put out and it’s crazy. It creates a better relationship with fans, and expands potential markets too.
I know this forum is full of Flintstones, but there’s nothing wrong with what he said
He’s right though. We are miles behind in terms of internet content. You see the stuff PSG and even City put out and it’s crazy. It creates a better relationship with fans, and expands potential markets too.
I know this forum is full of Flintstones, but there’s nothing wrong with what he said
He should stick to doing the job he's paid for. He's not a social media consultant, a brand adviser, or a digital content specialist. He's (nominally) a footballer. I'm no Luddite but it seems weird to me that a footballer would have any sort of say on a club's digital content strategy. It seems symptomatic of someone whose primary focus has shifted to pratting around on TikTok.Not really. That’s how the world is going. There’s clubs that are smaller than United but hit target markets with their content. United have always been slow when it comes to the tech side of things. Their social media account used to lag behind the other clubs long before the rise of TikTok and Instagram.
Hilarious, isn’t it?The bit about internet content being miles behind shows hits real focus. Glad he's gone... wonder if he'll ever grow up.
I think one of the main reasons why we didn't have as much success post SAF that Jesse missed out on was mediocre players being allowed to stick around for years playing 100-200 games for United. Jesse himself played 230 games and was first choice for long stretches, that wouldn't have happened under SAF with the players we had the previous two decades.I haven't listened and don't plan to but there was a TLDW on reddit:
Eh? He clearly states in the interview Ole supported him.Sounds like he wasn't a fan of Ole...
City buy followers on Instagram etc. Remember their official Twitter Account was banned for having large numbers of fake followers and about 58% of their Instagram followers are fake accs. It's kind of nonsense.People laugh at being behind on the internet stuff but fan engagement is huge now. Look at the stuff Arsenal, City etc. do in comparison.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Less that, more the type of content they put out on YouTube.City buy followers on Instagram etc. Remember their official Twitter Account was banned for having large numbers of fake followers and about 58% of their Instagram followers are fake accs. It's kind of nonsense.
Oh I see. I guess it's nice to have more quality content than less so good for them, but I'm not sure in the grand scheme of things it's a great yardstick to measure a club with... But as said in the thread maybe that's because I'm behind a bit, and the best club should have the best everything.Less that, more the type of content they put out on YouTube.
I'm actually kinda curious about this. Could you (or anyone!) give examples of the differences between what United and other clubs do? I only really monitor Manchester United in social media, and only a bit at that as I don't cover all social media places (left Facebook, for example, and only use Twitter if I have to for company support since they often use it for that).Less that, more the type of content they put out on YouTube.
Yeah, I think I'm in a similar boat / viewpoint. I don't really bother with much of social media, especially for football stuff - but I do think it is probably important to be good at it for a club in this new modern era, as fans will use it more and more in the long run.Oh I see. I guess it's nice to have more quality content than less so good for them, but I'm not sure in the grand scheme of things it's a great yardstick to measure a club with... But as said in the thread maybe that's because I'm behind a bit, and the best club should have the best everything.
Nothing wrong with that, shows which club cared more. I’d choose a company that shower more willingness to hire me over another.Watched the video, it was sad what he went through on a personal level.
However, he came across a little bit entitled and not having the winners mentality.
What summed it up for me was his reason to choose Nottingham Forest over West Ham. In his own words, “They showed him more love and flew him here and there”. Nothing wrong with it but shows he has his priorities crossed.
Are players not allowed to relax and intergrate/bond & form working relationships with the team then? Because that’s what a games room is forGames room and behind on the internet.
Probably mad United didn't make an esport team and let him captain it.
He's a player, it really shouldn't be his focus in any way. That is the point being made.
So players should just "shut up and dribble" and not care about anything else pertaining the club? Players don't only/just get paid for kicking ball on the pitch by the wayHe should stick to doing the job he's paid for. He's not a social media consultant, a brand adviser, or a digital content specialist. He's (nominally) a footballer. I'm no Luddite but it seems weird to me that a footballer would have any sort of say on a club's digital content strategy. It seems symptomatic of someone whose primary focus has shifted to pratting around on TikTok.
Not how I put it. However, if a player is underperforming the last thing he should be worried about is his club's presence on social media.So players should just "shut up and dribble" and not care about anything else pertaining the club? Players don't only/just get paid for kicking ball on the pitch by the way
Literally impossible.Not how I put it. However, if a player is underperforming the last thing he should be worried about is his club's presence on social media.
Mental to think otherwise.
We do hear about them though, Ronaldo didn't really say anything that we didn't know about the facilities, there's been stories on it for years now.The clip about him thinking his mum had depression since he was born is sad.
I dont get why a lot of people hate him. Hes not our player anymore. And hes talking about behind the scenes stuff, which he is privvy to. The one bit about the Ronaldo interview that was worth listening to was him talking about the club facilities etc, parts we dont really get to hear about or see.
Who is paying you for broadcasting these opinions? The ROI can't be too good, whoever it is.He should stick to doing the job he's paid for. He's not a social media consultant, a brand adviser, or a digital content specialist. He's (nominally) a footballer. I'm no Luddite but it seems weird to me that a footballer would have any sort of say on a club's digital content strategy. It seems symptomatic of someone whose primary focus has shifted to pratting around on TikTok.
No but him having an opinion on social media strategy is like him having an opinion on the club's loan refinancing or IT infrastructure. It's baseless and only serves to emphasize that he really wants to be an influencer and not a footballer.So players should just "shut up and dribble" and not care about anything else pertaining the club? Players don't only/just get paid for kicking ball on the pitch by the way
So now you're equating disinterested members of the public on a forum sharing opinions on something to which they have no professional connection with someone that's been remunerated handsomely by their employer over a period of years talking shit about a side of the business that they've little intimate knowledge of? Yeah, nice one.Who is paying you for broadcasting these opinions? The ROI can't be too good, whoever it is.