Television Netflix is getting stupid password sharing guidelines

Port Vale Devil

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
3,378
Supports
Port Vale
IPTV is better anyway. I remember during lockdown watching Rocky 1,2 and 3 on Netflix then 4 was on Prime ( I think) and 5 onwards were on pay as you watch platforms.
 

DatIrishFella

Band of Brothers, Thief
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,585
Location
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
When this comes into effect in Ireland I'll cancel and just sail the seven seas if netflix have content I desire post cancellation.

:)
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,057
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Netflix has gone to shit the past few years. The content is poor except for a few bits far and few between. Others have taken the model and run away with it with much better content and I'm not gonna miss Netflix at all. Hilariously stupid idea to claw back profits but it'll go back to norm within 6 months.

Hopefully other streaming services don't follow suit.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
What about people with 2 houses? Tonnes over here have a Summer house, what the feck classes as “home wifi”?
I’ll make my phone home wifi in that case, as will everyone with half a brain, the stupid cnuts.
I haven’t got Netflix, but when I first heard the news this was my first thought. Connect to your phone once a month and you’re sorted
 

Pscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,331
Location
Fresno, CA
The other thread is over a year old so...

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...delines-for-cracking-down-on-password-sharing

Basically their plan is that you'll need to connect to your home WiFi on the viewing device at least once every 31 days otherwise they'll block your account. So if you don't use home WiFi for your device in the first place, or you're away for work for more than a month, you're fecked.

It's especially dumb because someone like me hasn't even used their Netflix account in a month because there's feck all I want to see, yet I'm still paying for it. This plan would mean they would be losing out on money from forgetful morons like me who haven't cancelled their subscription.
Just open it up every few days ...start something for ten seconds or so. Bob's your uncle.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,744
What about people with 2 houses? Tonnes over here have a Summer house, what the feck classes as “home wifi”?
I’ll make my phone home wifi in that case, as will everyone with half a brain, the stupid cnuts.
Won't someone think of the people with multiple homes!!!
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,121
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Because it has an affect on the thing I'm being charged for? What a daft question.
And you find it hard to log in once a month?

I can understand people who use it on different TVs/houses and are sharing their accounts with others, but you literally said your biggest concern is that you will forgot to log in once a month, which seems like a real first world problem.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,307
I could even see some clever company offering to bundle home wifi and perhaps even mobile phone plans with the subscription services, wouldn't that be wild.
Already being offered similar here in India
 

Drawfull

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
4,887
Location
Just close your eyes, forget your name
I'd expect it'll work like Now did, before Brexit. I had to get someone in the UK to log in once a month for it to continue to work in the EU without a VPN. Since Brexit, I just use the VPN and accept occasional buffering.

As others have said, having to buy the top Netflix package to get 4K and Atmos is a pisstake, and I share my account with three other family members. If I can't just log in occasionally to keep it active, they can whistle. There's very little on it anyway - the last time I logged on was to watch Glass Onion over a month ago.
 

AaronRedDevil

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
9,573
So is there a plan to actually pay for others to use it or are they getting rid sharing entirely. I already pay €20 a month for Netflix.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,708
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
We're back to the point where it's now cheaper to just have a SKY subscription than it is to subscribe to streaming services you want. Full circle.
 

SuperiorXI

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
14,640
Location
Manchester, England
We're back to the point where it's now cheaper to just have a SKY subscription than it is to subscribe to streaming services you want. Full circle.
We were always going to end back here, it's the way of capitalism. Money men can't help themselves.

Pirating has always been the way... to report things and keep honest companies like Netflix afloat. £20 a month is a small price to pay for a better world.

I've been reporting TLOU links for 3 weeks now, they've been posting high def versions when HBO MAX can show them for a small fee. The world is a cruel place.
 

Stookie

Nurse bell end
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
9,113
Location
West Yorkshire
So you can't even watch your own Netflix account on a hotel TV anymore? How do you connect that device to your home wi-fi to stop getting blocked?

And how is it determining what my home wi-fi is, compared to my mobile data?

Seems like this will punish more than password-sharers, but anyone who uses Netflix outside of their own house.
that’s what it seems like to me…. And for that reason I’m out.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,838
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.
I think about this, but then sometimes I feel like the overlords of said smart people, who are only focused on the income of the here and now, overrule the people saying that this isn't a good idea and demand doing the thing that they think will make more money now.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,708
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
What happens if you want to watch Netflix on your phone while you're on the treadmill at the gym? Or on a train or something? Feck that guy I guess.
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,929
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
Netflix talk about revenue and cutting costs, they should consider not paying for some of the absolute tripe shows and movies they've put on their platform the last few years.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,344
Location
The stable
I'll be surprised if Netflix doesn't end up much much smaller

They have
1. Few strong IPs remaining
2. Constant cancellations so they aren't building many strong IPs
3. Rising costs
4. Heavy competition
5. Draconian measures like the one discussed here
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,583
Supports
Everton
Haven't used Netflix in ages. We switched to Disney plus and are enjoying their collection far more.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,195
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,344
Location
The stable
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke
The problem is they are asking people to pay up when they have a worse library.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,851
Supports
A Free Palestine
The Netflix made content is shite. It’s usually a Ryan Reynolds movie where he’s phoning it in.

The series don’t fare much better. Better Call Saul is done. Stranger Things will be done this year / next year. Ozark is done (I think). What other shows will pull people in? They’re scraping the barrel with their content.

The other thing is - 90% of the non-Netflix content on their service can be found on Prime anyway.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,344
Location
The stable
The Netflix made content is shite. It’s usually a Ryan Reynolds movie where he’s phoning it in.

The series don’t fare much better. Better Call Saul is done. Stranger Things will be done this year / next year. Ozark is done (I think). What other shows will pull people in? They’re scraping the barrel with their content.

The other thing is - 90% of the non-Netflix content on their service can be found on Prime anyway.
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
There's a reason it's being trialled in Timbuktu. Presumably they will figure out a better method, like getting the people who connect from two different locations at the same time.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,851
Supports
A Free Palestine
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
The only one I can see being a draw is Squid Game.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,195
The problem is they are asking people to pay up when they have a worse library.
Of course but they know that. So instead of doing this way of saying own a whole account or feck off, they should have just charged extra households and caused less drama
 

Drawfull

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
4,887
Location
Just close your eyes, forget your name
Initially it made sense for them because they needed to get bigger and bigger. The more people that talk about them and see the content the better. Now they are sadly in a position to turn that back on us and say it's time to pay up

What has genuinely surprised me, or maybe I've missed it, they aren't doing an option for additional household. It would be so much more logical to add an option to say if you live elsewhere then that person/home can be added for an extra £2 a month or something. You are almost guaranteed to keep more customers that way and I don't think people would be that annoyed. Then slowly over the years increase that cost

I hope the cnuts go broke
This is literally what they have been trialling (about 3USD a month), but I don't know if that's what they're going to use going forward, or how it affects those already with multi-device subs.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
The flaws in this idea are numerous. Companies supposedly have clever people working for them so why can’t they think of these before coming out with such a dogshit dumb idea? These streaming companies need to learn to stay humble and realise their success is built on cheap entry and mass interest.
And that's the flaw in your question.
 

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
You is finishing this year

They have now The Witcher (sans Henry Cavill), Emily in Paris, Squid Game and maybe Alice in Borderland.

It's hardly a stellar line up, they've cancelled a lot of series with potential too.

They can pump out decent miniseries like Dahmer but these won't keep people coming back.
Stranger Things?
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,971
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
There's a reason it's being trialled in Timbuktu. Presumably they will figure out a better method, like getting the people who connect from two different locations at the same time.
Yeah, that’s the most obvious/simple solution. Although still has flaws. I pay for Netflix for my household I don’t want to be stopped from watching it on my iPad on a business trip because my kids log on at home at the same time.

One thing I’m surprised they haven’t done is the Sky approach. Each account gets a fixed number of devices only.
 

Eplel

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2016
Messages
1,938
So if my "home wifi" is my phone's hotspot, how would they know?