So... Was it a red? (Casemiro / Hughes Royal Rumble)

Was it a red?

  • Red

    Votes: 409 33.5%
  • Yellow

    Votes: 415 34.0%
  • No card

    Votes: 270 22.1%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 69 5.6%
  • Can you repeat the question?

    Votes: 59 4.8%

  • Total voters
    1,222

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
He put his hands up.

that’s the only relevant bit
It’s clearly not the only relevant bit because multiple players put their hands up yet only one got sent off. To understand why you have to somehow differentiate between what Casemiro did that was so much worse than what Ayew, for example, did. Which is that they believed that Casemiro was holding Hughes in a chokehold. Something which, based on evidence, some of which was available at the time but deliberately not shown to the referee, was shown not to be the case, especially given the context of other footage that has later appeared on the internet.
 

georgipep

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
2,474
Location
Not far enough
That’s such a dishonest argument because nobody’s allowed to engage in a melee on the pitch. Do you expect the referee to send 20 players off every time this happens?
I said multiple times that there were other players who should've been sent off too.
It does not absolve Casemiro one bit.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,341
Love how there are still people doubling down on him strangling him when it’s clear he didn’t. The ban won’t be rescinded because that’s VAR admitting it messed up but it will get shortened.
Has anyone said he strangled him?
 

RedNome

Cnut Rating: 9 (Conservative)
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
17,473
Love how there are still people doubling down on him strangling him when it’s clear he didn’t. The ban won’t be rescinded because that’s VAR admitting it messed up but it will get shortened.
Yeah, I think that is the best we can hope for, probably a one match ban.
 

georgipep

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
2,474
Location
Not far enough
I don't think anybody is arguing it's a mistake, but there's a big difference between grabbing somebody by the throat and throttling them - or gripping their shirt by the collar.

We see brawls like this all the time, why is a physical shove (which happens plenty) less aggressive than gripping a shirt? is it ok to push and shove but not ok to grab a shirt?

It's simply not bad enough to warrant a red card for me. The VAR and ref got it wrong.

MOTD were right - it's handbags at dawn, tell them all to get their heads in check and move on.
I think the ref should've sent off Ayew too, and alongside the yellows for Schlupp and Antony it would've been an OK result of the incident.

The refs messed it up but as far as Casemiro's red card is concerned, that was the right decision in my book.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
Has anyone said he strangled him?
I’m assuming that the referee’s match report is saying exactly that because that’s what the VAR told him and that’s what the VAR attempted to show him by slowly looping the footage from the side that we now know falsely makes it look like he’s choking him.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
I think the ref should've sent off Ayew too, and alongside the yellows for Schlupp and Antony it would've been an OK result of the incident.

The refs messed it up but as far as Casemiro's red card is concerned, that was the right decision in my book.
A matter of opinion then, but for me it's no different than a push or shove and that usually just gets ignored as handbags.

I've seen similar situations where people grab like that and not get sent off, so it's frustrating.

I GENUINELY don't think he would have been sent off if he was shown the rear footage instead.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,341
The words ‘choke’ and ‘chokehold’ have been used. It’s the same thing, don’t be pedantic
Nobody who used either choke or chokehold in the last few pages was one of the people suggesting Casemiro did anything more than hold his collar (Zlatan and Anustart) though.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
I said multiple times that there were other players who should've been sent off too.
It does not absolve Casemiro one bit.
It does not but it questions the referee’s objectivity when he’s intentionally misrepresented a situation with the images to make it look like something to the main referee. Nobody’s calling for Ayew to get retrospectively banned because nobody really expects him to get sent off there, and a more honest and objective referee would have looked at the situation, seen that he indeed wasn’t strangling him and let it go. But this guy, whoever Tony Harrington is, obviously wanted to enter proceedings and did so in a dishonest way.

I just strongly disagree with the statements that “once the hands go up then you’re off” because it obviously doesn’t apply for the same ref if you’re not Casemiro, so it’s obvious that if the ref had not focused on the angle that doesn’t show that he’s got him by the collar then he wouldn’t have been sent off.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,107
Location
Dublin, Ireland
It’s clearly not the only relevant bit because multiple players put their hands up yet only one got sent off. To understand why you have to somehow differentiate between what Casemiro did that was so much worse than what Ayew, for example, did. Which is that they believed that Casemiro was holding Hughes in a chokehold. Something which, based on evidence, some of which was available at the time but deliberately not shown to the referee, was shown not to be the case, especially given the context of other footage that has later appeared on the internet.
No don’t agree, ayew should have gone too
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,527

referring to 6 to the fans is probably the Liverpool 6 CL titles. I have no other explanation.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,280
Location
NYC
Did Schlupp not get a yellow card?
he got the yellow card after the fight was over. In the other words, he won’t get any punishment if there was no fight and the game would continue with us taking threw.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,180
Location
Oslo, Norway
I'd much rather ask you in return why you would tolerate such scenes, and how you think one should distinguish tolerable from untolerable.

Isn't it much better to define nogos broadly, (e.g. violent conduct, or red for a tackle from behind), - again regardless of the force you apply, the face the guy makes or the heat of the moment? (Noone justifies the tackle against Eriksen with the fcker did play the ball, instead in the spirit if the game we say tackle from behind and do not care about minute details.)

I think we enter troublesome territory when trying to justify this scene with the positioning of his thumbs, because it opens up all sorts of problems elsewhere. (Although admittedly, it's seemingly what the industry looks for, see new hands rules, VAR, etc). Point being is if a point for violent conduct can be made, the decision for red is fair, and when the point must be made, it's unfair not to decide on red.

Apart from that, VAR threatens to change the culture towards stuff that's very doubtful, to say the least. Real-time feeling vs slow-motion vs standstills - you bet it isn't long before playing the VAR becomes fashionable, and virtually noone wants this neither, right?

(I confessed earlier that I really dislike brawls, and as someone said above, even halfway aggressive behavior in a brawl counts.)
It’s not a matter of splitting hairs when differentiating between a grip on someone’s wind-pipe vs their collar.

I’m with you, I wouldn’t mind getting more stringent and stomping things out. But it’s all or nothing. You achieve very little by just making a statement with a Casemiro red. Feel free to bemoan the current regulations, but I really don’t get why you’re troubled by people saying Casemiro’s red is harsh, and maybe even flat-out wrong when you consider how these things go.
 

RedNome

Cnut Rating: 9 (Conservative)
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
17,473

referring to 6 to the fans is probably the Liverpool 6 CL titles. I have no other explanation.
What a prick. I think that answers any question of him coming to Casemiro's aid.
 

Amarsdd

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
3,299
I think I'm convinced now. Definitely a red card, and Hughes should press charges for assault as well. Casemiro nearly ripped out his throat there.
 

darko

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2000
Messages
3,473
Location
Toronto, Canada
I think the ref should've sent off Ayew too, and alongside the yellows for Schlupp and Antony it would've been an OK result of the incident.

The refs messed it up but as far as Casemiro's red card is concerned, that was the right decision in my book.
Schluup deserved a red for his hit on Antony. If tge officiating clamped down on that, there wouldn't be the mess that there was afterwards.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,053
The right decision would have been to book both Casemiro and Ayew, but there’s no doubt that Marriner was within his right to send off Casemiro. However, having made that decision, he should have also sent off Ayew.

But now that we’re here, the ban should be reduced to one match. There was clearly 100% without question no violent intent whatsoever.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,053
I’ve just reviewed footage posted by The Mirror — yes, but it is footage — that shows Casemiro and Hughes hugging and laughing after it was over.
 

Natener

Full Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
1,929
It's a red card offence once you put your hands up on another player like that, whether it be neck or collar. The problem is it's incredibly poor officiating to punish one isolated incident in a melee. Either everyone who had their hands up where it doesn't belong get sent off or you dish out a few yellows and warn both teams to calm down. As ETH said it's inconsistent, why we get singled out but others get a pass.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,784
@Dion views have influenced a few voters as it's now Red 34.2% and Yellow 33.8% but still close
 

Trumpeter Whydah

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2022
Messages
290
Supports
Full Members
It’s not a matter of splitting hairs when differentiating between a grip on someone’s wind-pipe vs their collar.

I’m with you, I wouldn’t mind getting more stringent and stomping things out. But it’s all or nothing. You achieve very little by just making a statement with a Casemiro red. Feel free to bemoan the current regulations, but I really don’t get why you’re troubled by people saying Casemiro’s red is harsh, and maybe even flat-out wrong when you consider how these things go.
A good morning northwards.

Both a grip on someone’s wind-pipe and on their collar is red in my book. Differentiation is all fine by me when it comes to the number of match bans, afterwards; but on the pitch, from a ref's perspective, it is exactly that, splitting hairs, I'm afraid. Hence my statement, yet I'll admit it achieves little.

Let's not get a quote ping pong get the better of us; you are right, everyone sees it their way, and I'm aware my stance may simply not be shared. I can't see how the ref could not have shown red, but that doesn't make me want to fall on your nerves, or someone elses, if I'm honest. Anyway, rules are there, enforcing not really, and better refereeing is definitively appropriate. Have a great day!
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
What part is difficult to comprehend? The thread asks “was it a red card?”, some justifying one way and others justifying another way. I don’t think we need to descend into insults and passive aggressive posting
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
It’s clearly not the only relevant bit because multiple players put their hands up yet only one got sent off. To understand why you have to somehow differentiate between what Casemiro did that was so much worse than what Ayew, for example, did. Which is that they believed that Casemiro was holding Hughes in a chokehold. Something which, based on evidence, some of which was available at the time but deliberately not shown to the referee, was shown not to be the case, especially given the context of other footage that has later appeared on the internet.
EXACTLY….If you’re sending players off for simply raising their hands then that applies to everyone who raised their hands in the melee. It has to.

If that’s not the case then context and weight come into it. The context of Casemiro actually stopping Hughes from getting to Antony, explaining to him part way through, hugging and smiling afterwards completely ignored. The weight of the offence was given in a totally misrepresented light that couldn’t have looked worse or be much different from what actually happened.

Seems like some want to just shut this debate down and force everyone down to having to agree with them by removing any context. Then your point is 100% correct. If context doesn’t come into it then everyone with raised hands is off.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,257
Luckily Hughes didn't have a problem with breathing after that.
There was no force he was holding him, but putting your hand on someone's neck is a red still, hold his torso or his shirt.

Holding by the neck I think should be a red, just as any action on a players face or head.

Ayew maybe should have faced punishment too.

There is a lack of consistency with VAR but you can't look at a video and decide how much force is used that's the problem.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,289
Location
Croatia
There was no force he was holding him, but putting your hand on someone's neck is a red still, hold his torso or his shirt.

Holding by the neck I think should be a red, just as any action on a players face or head.

Ayew maybe should have faced punishment too.

There is a lack of consistency with VAR but you can't look at a video and decide how much force is used that's the problem.
It was a red but what angers me is the same thing you wrote and ETH mentioned, lack of consistency.

What did Ayew do btw?

Also Fred was a bit daft too, he waved his hands towards a Palace player but it didn't connect.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,673
There was no force he was holding him, but putting your hand on someone's neck is a red still, hold his torso or his shirt.

Holding by the neck I think should be a red, just as any action on a players face or head.

Ayew maybe should have faced punishment too.

There is a lack of consistency with VAR but you can't look at a video and decide how much force is used that's the problem.
But why?

We see late cynical challenges that actually hurt players all the time, nasty challenges that puts players out for a few weeks, maybe months, all the time. And these are rarely, very rarely red cards. Touching someone in the face or nearby doesn´t endanger their health.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
It’s stranage to see so many pundits side with United on something. Richard Keyes Andy Gray Linekar Shearer Wright Waddle all in agreement that this was misrepresented to the referee and what actually happened didn’t warrant a red. Waddle calling it one of the worst decisions he’s ever seen. In isolation it isn’t. But in the context of the melee it absolutely is.

What is worse for me is that you have to question the integrity of VAR.