Or he could bring out the individual qualities in players?
Why wouldn’t he stand out with a squad like Chelsea if that’s the case? Would West Ham be where they are with Ole in charge with their individual quality?
Im not saying he’s a great manager but feck me it’s not as if the league is full of these managers playing progressive, team football. 12 managers haven’t been sacked because they’re too good for the job
When did that happen ? His entire team was built around Bruno whom he bought and directly installed into the team. He didn't improve and of the existing players, and most of his other players he bought failed.
There's no reason a big club will think of him because considering the amount of spending and investment he did at United, he didn't win anything and didn't challenge for any major trophy. He's not English, not an ex legend at any top club to give him some slack like at United and he's 50 years old who has been managing for 10 years so he's not exactly a young and incoming manager to give him a chance.
Most relegation fodders or mid clubs don't really care about "reaching 2nd tier European competition final and finishing distant 2nd" spending 300m through to get these "achievements". They want someone to carry the squad, improve players and at the very least, grind out result if his football is poor so that they stay in the league. Ole doesn't serve any of these purposes.
It's not about playing progressive football. There're other managers who serve the needs of PL clubs better than Ole, both for the top and for the bottom clubs. He failed to achieve required targets for both of these on the two instances he managed in.