80 million on anthony and 60 on mount. He loves a big fee for an average player
Last edited:
Manchester United name John Murtough as Football Director and Darren Fletcher as Technical Director
- Thread starter Tom Van Persie
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik @Rood and Imran @Annihilate Now! start with the good news by celebrating Manchester United Women's emphatic FA Cup win over Spurs at Wembley and the future of manager Marc Skinner.
Then it's the bad news and the ever worsening form of our Men with losses to Arsenal and Palace.
Finally the main debate - ETH Out now or keep him until the end of the season - if not longer. Are you Team Nik or Team Imran?
Why do you think that's true? Was a Shaw deal announced by the club when ETH was asked about it?
Touchè. Let's see how quick Onana happens.One down, one to go
Sack this fecking donkey. Offering Mason fecking mount 300k. I hope the first thing the new owners do is bin this absolute useless director.
Tell me this is not the case, please.
I thought it was 250k
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hopefully bonuses that are hard to achieve like goals + trophies and not appearances or whatever.
fecking ridiculous, those are talisman wages. A player like Mount should only get to wages like that after years of proving they’re a key player for the club.
How much will Mac Allister be on at Liverpool I wonder, after they bought him for 35m.
Seems like difficulty with FFP and moving on players doesn't have any effect on our ability to overpay.
I won't be surprised if we are offering 200k for De Gea to be a back up GK.
I won't be surprised if we are offering 200k for De Gea to be a back up GK.
£250k per week on Mason Mount sure sends a message alright.
Well the add ons for the total transfer fee are rumoured to be hard to achieve I.e major success for the club based so hopefully the wages are the same.
Even without the add ons those wages are fecking insane.
250k a week for a player in Mount’s form and also his position is fecking self sabotage.
How the feck would Law know the details of the contract anyway.
They are pretty high. That’s just typical Utd though in recent years and that won’t change until the ownership does.
Let’s hope he’s wrong and his wages aren’t that insane.
What was he on at Chelsea does anyone know?
Somebody said 80k, and they offered him 200k which is what he rejected. If that's true then I imagine that is the minimum we offered too.
I think people who thought we'd be signing him on £100k a week are kidding themselves a bit though.
That's not going to change with new owners mate. Until we're in a position to guarantee trophies again we're going to have to overpay anyone to a certain extent.
If we get Qatari owners I believe major success won’t be far off, so attracting players won’t be solely based on paying extortionate wages.
Oil money can be spent awfully too. Hopefully they are more like the city people (can't believe I just said that) and not the PSG people. That club is a circus.
He's really not though. They all work together on transfers. As for de Jong, yeah United probably stuck around for too long on that one but did it really hurt us in the end? We had a good plan B option lined up in Casemiro which once we decided to pivot to got done very quickly. The overpay for Antony I don't think was the club's fault. The Glazers only decided to loosen the purse strings after the Brentford disaster. I think Murtough/ten Hag would've liked to have had the Antony deal done earlier in the window but due to uncertainty of the amount available and prioritizing other positions, we decided to wait and hope Ajax lower the price.
A lot of our problems in the market come down to how the Glazers operate and I fail to see how another director would've changed some of these issues the club has faced in recent years. As I said a few pages back, I still don't know how good Murtough is at his job as I don't believe he's really had a good crack at it. He seems to be held back a lot by the owners.
It will be obvious the wages are huge that is why he is coming to us…as with many players.
Wouldn't mind one if mbappe is the bear
I read 80k
- See second tweet. Surely Murtough would tell ETH before having it announced. It's not a huge deal but it's a minor detail that looks bad. We have very little to work with concerning John Murtough's performance in his role as there's so many factors that affect it (especially the Glazers). But there's lots of little hints that the guy, at times at least, lacks some basic communication skills. I'm all for the new owners giving existing staff a chance but I'm not convinced Murtough will prove he's anywhere near 'best in class'.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He’d already turned down 200k at Chelsea, why would he join us for less?
In that case 175-200k should be fine as an absolute max. Anymore than that and it’s an awful deal imo coupled with the fee.
A player of Mount’s level should not be on elite wages. Let him prove it first, then offer it when earned.
I find it funny that some seem to view the club's money as their own, and worked up whenever they feel the club's overspent.
So... about that wage cap...
If you mean well to this club you would be concerned as well. Otherwise it’s one of the most stupid takes someone can make out off all the mess from the last 10 years.
For people playing at home, Mount is probably going to be the successor to Bruno in 3 or 4 years time, or at least have that opportunity in a much different stable team with or without EtH.
Which has been adjusted down due to Ronaldo leaving, DDG leaving or on much reduced terms, and has increased due to United being in the CL again.
Wage structure is crucial to squad management and affects what you see on the pitch.
A club with a broken wage structure very rarely excels. Utd has a very broken wage structure and it needs to be fixed for the club to turn itself around.
Have you seen the absolute state of our finances recently?
Well yes, but people are also thinking of how hard it is for us to move failed signings on because of the well above market rate wages United tend to pay.
I’m pretty confident Mount will do well for us, but in the event that he does flop, those huge wages (if true) will make it hard to get rid of him.
If we didn't overspend last summer we could probably put in a big enough bid to tempt Levy this summer. Also look at what happened in January because of how the summer window unfolded. In the end we only had enough for weghorst. It's not my money but I do care about how it affects the clubs future dealings.
He’s seriously illMaybe time to get Overmars in?
Whilst I’ll agree with Antony on the fee, Mount is a good player and it’s 55. We will all be happy to pay an extra 5 if he’s successful.
He had a stroke but is fine. He's doing a great job as a DOF at Antwerp, with Van Bommel as Manager.
I love how people think that replacing DoF with another will make a huge difference.
Well he can stay there the pervey fecker. We are collecting enough reprobate players without adding staff to the collection