Scott McTominay | Transfer discussion not performance discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
He needs to leave quickly, while he’s worth something. If he sticks around for another season, playing fifth or sixth choice, then you’d have to question his motivation to play.

West Ham is the perfect club for him, really. Moyes doesn’t give a shit if his midfielders aren’t particularly great on the ball, and he’s be an upgrade on Soucek in that box-to-box role.

£30 million and see him off. He’ll only go on a free down the line anyway.
 

edgecutter

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
4,669
Mickeza said:
Oh right. I didn’t realise we weren’t allowed a squad and had to compete with 11 players. My mistake.
Click to expand...
Why is it hard to accept that he should go? He isn't good enough. What is it with Scott McTominay that people love?

If he is cover for those players than our chances are truely fecked.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,631
edgecutter said:
Why is it hard to accept that he should go?
Click to expand...
It’s a good question. Look at City - they easily rid of the likes of Gundogan and Mahrez, and McTominay has never performed even close to that level. We should be more ruthless with moving players
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,225
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Alemar said:
It’s a good question. Look at City - they easily rid of the likes of Gundogan and Mahrez, and McTominay has never performed even close to that level. We should be more ruthless with moving players
Click to expand...
What’s the logic bringing up two players of a vastly higher quality who would obviously be easier to sell?
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,113
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
Alemar said:
It’s a good question. Look at City - they easily rid of the likes of Gundogan and Mahrez, and McTominay has never performed even close to that level. We should be more ruthless with moving players
Click to expand...
Yes. Gundogan is a wonderful example. City were very ruthless in getting rid of him on a free - what with them trying desperately to keep him.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,215
Location
...
West Ham should offer us the 40m that Chelsea rejected for Gallagher.
 

FerociousCorgis

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Messages
4,385
Come on moyes do us a favor and just do a 50 mill double deal for maguire and mctominay. For damn near same price as gallagher you can get both a midfielder and cb do ittttt
 

AbusementPark

Operates the Unfairest Wheel
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
2,624
Location
Belfast
Wonder what price they want for both, would be interesting to know what they consider a big price for both would be. Anything over £50m for both would be fantastic, would get us Amrabat and Hojlund in.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,947
Location
Wales
Berbaclass said:
Do you mean combined?
Click to expand...
£40m Maguire
£30m McTominay

Probably the lowest I’d go for either. I think they are worth more to us as squad players than less than that.
 

mikeyt

Full Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
796
I get our stance around McT being an important player, but his stock is probably as high as it's likely to be now. Good form with Scotland and has played plenty for us. Reality is we need better squad players and we need to learn from previous mistakes of allowing players to stay whereby their stock falls and we struggle to make decent sale prices. If Gallagher is going for £40million, McT is easily worth that and probably more. Learn fro mistakes, sell him and upgrade with Amrabat saving a few quid in the process.
 

Dannn411

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
2,492
Relfy said:
If Gallagher is priced at £40m then McT should be in and around the same price.
Click to expand...
Mctominay is worth £10m more. If Gallagher is fetching £40m we should accept no less than £50m for Mctominay and i'm not joking.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,237
Location
La-La-Land
WH trying to low balling us, good if we stay firm. On top, I'm sure both will attract several offers as they are decent players.
 

daba

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Messages
945
West Ham should genuinely use the 105m Rice money on Maguire 30m, McTominay 30m, Alex Scott 25m and Balogun 40m.

Net spend £20m
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,947
Location
Wales
kaku06 said:
Both staying then. Not even any of the Al clubs from Saudi league would offer that much for them.
Click to expand...
Don’t be so ridiculous.

People whinge when we can’t get decent transfer fees then are happy to just throw away players with actual value.
 

reddevilz007

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
1,815
kaku06 said:
20-25m for Mctominay and 25-30m for Maguire. Would you reject it?
Click to expand...
I’d rather take it than have those two sitting on the bench, or come on for the last 10 minutes.

we still have pennies to collect for Bailly and Williams, the sale of Fred, van de Beek and Hendo which would bring in another 40 mil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.