Scott McTominay | Transfer discussion not performance discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

holdsteady

Hates Sir Alex Ferguson
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
5,439
Harvey Barnes just went for 43m so I don't see why you all are hand wringing about the fee
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,799
35-40m is pretty decent value. Good attacking style midfielder that can shoot well and is capable getting a decent amount of goals.

A midtable club playing him in the more advance midfield role will get a lot more out of him. We've been hoping some of our attacking midfielders at the club for years could play deeper but unsurprisingly it's not worked.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,444
We have a player going for £100+ m from that team and we are talking about being happy with low number for McTominay? No, they should pay up if they want him. Specially when McTominay is no worse.

Although I think that every player is overpriced, don't settle for low numbers.
 

RyRy11

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,606
£40m is just what we are stating so West Ham will haggle us down to £35m and feel like they've got themselves a good deal. Anything above £30m is very good for us.
 

SalfordRed18

Netflix and avocado, no chill
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
14,135
Location
Salford
Supports
Ashwood City FC
Our fanbase is truly special. Sell a player for too little, complain it's too low. Set a good price, complain it's too high. Don't sell a player, complain he's still here.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,575
he’s much better than McT at football though in fairness

anyway, I hope we get 40 but doubt it
And he scored 13 goals last season. He would've cost more if Leicester weren't relegated and having financial problems.
 

BuzzKillington

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Messages
1,593
Location
Greater Manchester
I don’t hate McTominay like lots seem to on here, but think it’s best for all concerned if he goes and plays his football elsewhere.

Hopefully the £45m figure is negotiable and is set high to get us our target price. Anything more than £25m is reasonable in my opinion, wouldn’t argue with £45m though.
 

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,488
I think he'll be sold to West Ham for £35m. Not sure how he'll do. Definitely not similar to Rice but he's quite box to box which is kinda what Soucek was like. I'm intrigued to see if he can step up at a smaller club the way Perreira has. I think Pereira's the more technically talented of the 2 for sure, but I can see how Scott's energy could be useful. He's quite good at attacking the penalty box to be fair to him, which we didn't make use of very much.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Then you’re criminally overrating what Rice brings to a team. The reason he looks great at West Ham is because he has the ball all to himself in his own third, just like McTomminay would. You’re about to see that Rice will look just like McTomminay does in a top team when he’s asked to do things he’s not capable of.
Rice is genuinely outstanding defensively. McTominay, who often tries to play the same role, fails at this miserably.

Rice will work very well in a top team for this reason. That’s his job and he’ll do it brilliantly.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,146
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Rice is genuinely outstanding defensively. McTominay, who often tries to play the same role, fails at this miserably.

Rice will work very well in a top team for this reason. That’s his job and he’ll do it brilliantly.
Because Rice played for a team that plays counter attacking football and all the oppositions attacks are funnelled into his area to clean up, you’ll see McTomminay doing the exact same if he goes there and you’ll see Rice struggle at Arsenal while he tries to do what McTomminay does for United.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Because Rice played for a team that plays counter attacking football and all the oppositions attacks are funnelled into his area to clean up, you’ll see McTomminay doing the exact same if he goes there and you’ll see Rice struggle at Arsenal while he tries to do what McTomminay does for United.
No, you won’t see McTominay doing exactly the same. He hasn’t got the awareness, positioning or tackling technique in order to play the role effectively. It’s why he’s a shite defensive midfielder.

Rice is genuinely brilliant at those things. If you can’t recognise that then football probably isn’t your bag. I can understand reservations people may have when Rice is on the ball (and even then, he’s pretty good), but defensively he is absolutely sensational, and more than good enough to play that role in a top team.
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,885
Location
Manchester
We have a player going for £100+ m from that team and we are talking about being happy with low number for McTominay? No, they should pay up if they want him. Specially when McTominay is no worse.

Although I think that every player is overpriced, don't settle for low numbers.
I'm sure you've said this before. Sorry but come on, in what world is McTominay no worse than Rice. Rice is much better. Do you even watch West Ham games? Be honest.
 

red.knight

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2023
Messages
655
Am I the only one who doesn't know what Mctomminay’s position is? He is poor in midfield especially alongside Fred. I thought Fred was the issue but it isn't Fred as he has proven alongside Eriksen and Casemero. I like McTominays attitude but his technical abilities are just not good enough. He will thrive in a team where he can run free and is heavily relied on like for Scotland, but that isn't going to happen at united. Sell him and bring in better players like Amrabat.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
West Ham have a gaping hole in central midfield - and McTominay is a Rice-light. They sold Rice for £105 million - are you saying they will walk away from let's say £35+5 million including add-ons ? I am pretty certain they wouldn't, because it wouldn't be easy to find that kind of player who is better than McTominay, cheaper than McTominay and who wants to play for West Ham - in addition to the fact that Moyes needs an established player - he can't gamble on signing a replacement for Rice who needs 6 months to get used to the P.L

If West Ham really want McTominay - £40 million wont scare them away
Great just get the fecker sold.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Am I the only one who doesn't know what Mctomminay’s position is? He is poor in midfield especially alongside Fred. I thought Fred was the issue but it isn't Fred as he has proven alongside Eriksen and Casemero. I like McTominays attitude but his technical abilities are just not good enough. He will thrive in a team where he can run free and is heavily relied on like for Scotland, but that isn't going to happen at united. Sell him and bring in better players like Amrabat.
Fellani’s position minus the hair and heading
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,736
Am I the only one who doesn't know what Mctomminay’s position is? He is poor in midfield especially alongside Fred. I thought Fred was the issue but it isn't Fred as he has proven alongside Eriksen and Casemero. I like McTominays attitude but his technical abilities are just not good enough. He will thrive in a team where he can run free and is heavily relied on like for Scotland, but that isn't going to happen at united. Sell him and bring in better players like Amrabat.
He grew up as an attacking mid didn't he, and that's probably his favoured position, getting up and down, primarily getting forward.

1 or 2 games a season he looks utterly superb at it, like that 2 goal Leeds game.
But in general, as per Fred, who probably prefers the exact same role as above, they are badly utilised as defensive players despite lacking a lot of the key attributes.

A proper player there like Casemiro shows what we were missing out on.
 

ThinkTank@Cafe

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
2,390
Location
Kazakhstan
McTominay is a much worse player for a possession football than he is for a counter attacking team. He performed brilliantly against the biggest teams. For a side like West Ham (Moyes) he is worth £50m. Easily.
 

In Rainbows

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
6,812
Fecking Disneyland, mate. Guy really was an absolute clown and moron when it came to football. Set us way back with his mismanagement IMO.
Don't forget Matt Judge. He was Woodward's guy in charge of contract negotiations.
 

Rossa

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
10,495
Location
Looking over my shoulder.
30m for McT and 40m for Maguire. I like McT he’s an athlete and a hard worker but it’s time to go.
McTominay looks like an athlete, but where is he athletic?

He isn’t fast, not particularly strong in a challenge. He’s never shown a great leap. His stamina doesn’t appear to be anything special. So what is his athleticism except a nicely sculpted chest?
 

Dorris

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
510
McTominay looks like an athlete, but where is he athletic?

He isn’t fast, not particularly strong in a challenge. He’s never shown a great leap. His stamina doesn’t appear to be anything special. So what is his athleticism except a nicely sculpted chest?
He’s literally all those things.
 

IrishRedDevil

Full Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Messages
12,362
Location
N.Ireland
McTominay looks like an athlete, but where is he athletic?

He isn’t fast, not particularly strong in a challenge. He’s never shown a great leap. His stamina doesn’t appear to be anything special. So what is his athleticism except a nicely sculpted chest?
:lol:
This is a good post. We are saying opposite things, right?
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,545
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Don't forget Matt Judge. He was Woodward's guy in charge of contract negotiations.
Yeah agreed but CEO takes ultimate accountability and I’m sure those massive contracts wouldn’t have been offered or signed off without that clowns approval. Sorry I shouldn’t get so worked up, but the sheer ineptitude of woodward just infuriates me.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
No, you won’t see McTominay doing exactly the same. He hasn’t got the awareness, positioning or tackling technique in order to play the role effectively. It’s why he’s a shite defensive midfielder.

Rice is genuinely brilliant at those things. If you can’t recognise that then football probably isn’t your bag. I can understand reservations people may have when Rice is on the ball (and even then, he’s pretty good), but defensively he is absolutely sensational, and more than good enough to play that role in a top team.
We see it for Scotland though..
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,444
I'm sure you've said this before. Sorry but come on, in what world is McTominay no worse than Rice. Rice is much better. Do you even watch West Ham games? Be honest.
I’ve said before. It is one thing to play for a team that plays deep defending with 10 players. It is another where you need to show more quality both attacking and defending. We have seen Rice playing for England and how it goes.
 

Swedish_Plumber

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Messages
5,155
Location
Edinburgh
Even if we all see his limitations for us, he’s done enough for his country (and united!) against good sides to be worth as much as the likes of Connor fecking Gallagher. What he did at palace isn’t any better than what Scott could do at the same level.
 

Waynne

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
1,981
Yes hit 'em with the United tax. It should apply to outgoing players too.

Hell, I'd put the price for Scott at 60 million.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
32,146
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
No, you won’t see McTominay doing exactly the same. He hasn’t got the awareness, positioning or tackling technique in order to play the role effectively. It’s why he’s a shite defensive midfielder.

Rice is genuinely brilliant at those things. If you can’t recognise that then football probably isn’t your bag. I can understand reservations people may have when Rice is on the ball (and even then, he’s pretty good), but defensively he is absolutely sensational, and more than good enough to play that role in a top team.
Rice has been in a system that plays to his strengths, anyone can look brilliant in that setup and you’ll see it this season when he struggles to replicate any kind of form for Arsenal, then we’ll discuss who doesn’t know football.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.