Scott McTominay | Transfer discussion not performance discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
If we don’t sell him now then we’ll get about £10 or £15 million for him down the line, as his value depreciates sat on the bench.

He must have started about ten Premier League games last season. He should be champing at the bit to move on.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
5,011
Mctominay absolutely has to go. Missing out on another CM signing because we're keeping Mctominay will be awful.

If Casemiro is out, a Mount and McT midfield os definitely not going to cut it.
 

Foolsgold21

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
264
Should've sold when we had the chance - guess he at least makes up the numbers in midfield and our homegrown quota
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
23,257
Location
Inside right
And even if not WH, he’ll definitely find a club by the end of the season willing to meet the asking.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,789
If he stays it's fine. He just can't be Casemiro's cover.

If we sign someone to cover for Casemiro and McTominay plays exclusively as an 8 then that is fine.
 

prateik

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
42,219
People realize they were in for McT before there was any news of Paqueta leaving, right?
They are getting over 70m and need another midfielder.

They might go for someone else, but they will sign another midfielder.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,705
People realize they were in for McT before there was any news of Paqueta leaving, right?
They are getting over 70m and need another midfielder.
They need at least two midfielders with Rice and Paqueta leaving. McFred maybe? They also seem to be getting JWP, so that’s a McFred - JWP midfield trio. Doesn’t sound bad
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,508
People realize they were in for McT before there was any news of Paqueta leaving, right?
They are getting over 70m and need another midfielder.

They might go for someone else, but they will sign another midfielder.
This is what I also think.

Even if Paqueta doesn't go and they get JWP, that doesn't mean McTominay is off the cards. The team had a terrible finish last season and they need better players.
 

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
11,020
Location
Wales
People whinging now that the club got greedy by trying to get what they deem fair value :wenger:

I’ll say it again, the club are not as desperate to let him go as the fans on here are.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,789
People realize they were in for McT before there was any news of Paqueta leaving, right?
They are getting over 70m and need another midfielder.

They might go for someone else, but they will sign another midfielder.
Yeah it could very possibly be that they opted for McTominay over JWP even though the JWP deal was easier to do and now with the Paquetta news they have realised they will get both so pulled the trigger on JWP.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,592
ETH has only ever used Mctominay as an 8, never a 6. In fact when he comes on he's usually the one leading the press and playing very high up.

I'm not surprised we rejected 30m, I think ETH wants to keep him as an option and would only consider selling if we received a good enough offer. Contrary to what a lot of people say here he's a good player and offers something different. I'd rather keep Mctominay than Fred or DVB.
Have we watched the same season? He was Casemiro's backup all season, with very few games played as an 8.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,453
Location
UK
We set a price because we want to sell. Despite any public posturing that we may be attempting. I’ve seen several United players that we don’t wish to sell. This one is clearly available for a certain price, and not even the most prohibitive price in the world either.

If Manchester United genuinely ‘didn’t want to sell’ Scott McTominay there is no chance West Ham United of all fecking clubs would be trying to buy one of our unavailable guys.
We don’t need to sell, not want. It’s no problem if he stays. He can go for the right price but we’re not desperate to get rid. He’s not deadwood.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,732
Location
London
ETH has only ever used Mctominay as an 8, never a 6. In fact when he comes on he's usually the one leading the press and playing very high up.

I'm not surprised we rejected 30m, I think ETH wants to keep him as an option and would only consider selling if we received a good enough offer. Contrary to what a lot of people say here he's a good player and offers something different. I'd rather keep Mctominay than Fred or DVB.
Not even remotely true. He played as a #6 in the beginning of the season until Casemiro kicked on. Just off the top of my head, we played with McTominay as #6 at Man City when we lost 6-3. And when we beat Arsenal 3-1 at OT. The midfield was McTominay, Eriksen and Bruno in both games.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,508
They need at least two midfielders with Rice and Paqueta leaving. McFred maybe? They also seem to be getting JWP, so that’s a McFred - JWP midfield trio. Doesn’t sound bad
Might sound daft, but I actually think a McFred combination would be great for them. A little surprised they aren't looking at Fred, tbh. He could be a fantastic player for them and the fans would love him.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,592
We don’t need to sell, not want. It’s no problem if he stays. He can go for the right price but we’re not desperate to get rid. He’s not deadwood.
We shouldn't wait for him to become deadwood, this is the perfect time to sell him.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,358
Location
...
We don’t need to sell, not want. It’s no problem if he stays. He can go for the right price but we’re not desperate to get rid. He’s not deadwood.
We don’t need to sell anyone. We don’t need to sell Maguire, we don’t need to sell Fred. If they stay, they stay, and will likely feature plenty. They are players that are available though. We don’t ‘want to keep’ them, if we did, then we would comfortably keep them away from the tempting clutches of the likes of West Ham and Fulham.

The moment someone offers 40m+ for Scott (reportedly now reduced to 35m+), he’ll be off. This isn’t an offer too good to refuse for a player we want to keep.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,358
Location
...
People realize they were in for McT before there was any news of Paqueta leaving, right?
They are getting over 70m and need another midfielder.

They might go for someone else, but they will sign another midfielder.
And they had also abandoned their pursuit of Prowse, which they have clearly reactivated.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,992
Location
London
We don’t need to sell anyone. We don’t need to sell Maguire, we don’t need to sell Fred. If they stay, they stay, and will likely feature plenty. They are players that are available though. We don’t ‘want to keep’ them, if we did, then we would comfortably keep them away from the tempting clutches of the likes of West Ham and Fulham.

The moment someone offers 40m+ for Scott (reportedly now reduced to 35m+), he’ll be off. This isn’t an offer too good to refuse for a player we want to keep.
We want to improve. Typically, a squad improves by selling players who are not good enough and buying better players.

Maguire and McTominay are not good enough for us. So we need to sell them and upgrade those positions.

There is also a limited amount of money we have, there is the FFP we need to consider, and there is a limited number of players we can play. So while we do not need to sell them in the sense of we won’t go bankrupt if we keep them, we definitely need to sell them. Selling McTominay and using that money for Amrabat improves our squad while significantly improving our FFP position, and leaving us a couple of millions extra in cash flow.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,358
Location
...
We want to improve. Typically, a squad improves by selling players who are not good enough and buying better players.

Maguire and McTominay are not good enough for us. So we need to sell them and upgrade those positions.

There is also a limited amount of money we have, there is the FFP we need to consider, and there is a limited number of players we can play. So while we do not need to sell them in the sense of we won’t go bankrupt if we keep them, we definitely need to sell them. Selling McTominay and using that money for Amrabat improves our squad while significantly improving our FFP position, and leaving us a couple of millions extra in cash flow.
You’re speaking to the wrong person mate, my point is that McTominay is for sale, and is clearly not on the list of players that we want to keep.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,453
Location
UK
We shouldn't wait for him to become deadwood, this is the perfect time to sell him.
We have a valuation the buyer has to meet, we shouldn’t let players go for less just because the fans think he “isn’t good enough”.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,789
Maguire and McTominay are not good enough for us. So we need to sell them and upgrade those positions.
McTominay is good enough to be a squad player for us as a number 8. He just can't be the cover for Casemiro's position as that doesn't suit him at all.

As long as we have enough to bring in cover for centre back and a holding midfielder (which it seems we will with Fred, Donny and Maguire going) we are in a pretty strong position here.

To he only possible concern would be if we ditched the Amrabat deal and said Scott would be the cover there.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,685
Location
Manc
So much drama. McTom is valued by the club and manager, if nobody meets that valuation he stays.

The transfer muppets have 3 shiny new toys to play with already this summer...and the no.1 hated player leaving.

Just be happy.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,739
ETH has only ever used Mctominay as an 8, never a 6. In fact when he comes on he's usually the one leading the press and playing very high up.

I'm not surprised we rejected 30m, I think ETH wants to keep him as an option and would only consider selling if we received a good enough offer. Contrary to what a lot of people say here he's a good player and offers something different. I'd rather keep Mctominay than Fred or DVB.
ETH isn’t setting the price for him, Mctominay like Maguire, Fred, Henderson and numerous others is on the list of players who can go. Whether or not they do is dependent on finances now.

Mctominay isn’t a good player for us, he rarely offers anything above mediocre and we’ll never play to his strengths. It be real shame if we let this opportunity pass by, and it won’t be doing Mctominay any favours either as I can’t see him starting many games.

At West Ham with Moyes as a manager he is potentially a completely different player especially if he can score a lot of goals which he has shown glimpses of being able to do.
 
Last edited:

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,992
Location
London
McTominay is good enough to be a squad player for us as a number 8. He just can't be the cover for Casemiro's position as that doesn't suit him at all.

As long as we have enough to bring in cover for centre back and a holding midfielder (which it seems we will with Fred, Donny and Maguire going) we are in a pretty strong position here.

To he only possible concern would be if we ditched the Amrabat deal and said Scott would be the cover there.
We have Eriksen as backup 8. We likely are going to sign Amrabat. In that case we would have Cas, Amrabat, Mount, Eriksen and Bruno with Mainoo and Hannibal (and possibly Sancho as Bruno backup) for the three midfield positions. We do not need another body there.

He still has value, and he can be easily upgraded by Amrabat for that fifth choice midfielder position. It is a no brainer.
 

doomy20

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
1,524
Does West Hams JWP signing influence this or are they completely different midfield roles?
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,923
I hope JWP's deal won't have an impact on McTominay deal. They might lose Paqueta, so still hope we can get 35-40 million for him.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,789
We have Eriksen as backup 8. We likely are going to sign Amrabat. In that case we would have Cas, Amrabat, Mount, Eriksen and Bruno with Mainoo and Hannibal (and possibly Sancho as Bruno backup) for the three midfield positions. We do not need another body there.

He still has value, and he can be easily upgraded by Amrabat for that fifth choice midfielder position. It is a no brainer.
Yeah selling him would be good but he can do a job for us and who knows how Amrabat, Hannibal and Mainoo work out whilst Eriksen is a huge question mark himself.

I'm just saying let's not panic as in the very, very worst case scenario I'd only worry if the Amrabat deal was dependant on him which I don't believe seems to be the case and he can also offer something.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
£45m and we can call it a deal if Amrabat is coming.

£105m for Rice, £70m for Paqueta.. so that would be a fair deal. He could be great for them playing further forward. Never a holding midfielder.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,358
Location
...
We have a valuation the buyer has to meet, we shouldn’t let players go for less just because the fans think he “isn’t good enough”.
We also have a valuation that nobody else thinks he’s worth, which is the topic of debate. If he was seen as a valuable player here, we would not be talking about a few million here or there. There would be no conversation at all. The player himself is happy to stay after all, so if we were similarly happy, the conversation would be moot. We are posturing and trying to get money, but at a price nobody agrees with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.