The Casemiro/Mount/Bruno midfield

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,592
Chelsea have pretty much got a team of new players and looked a whole lot more cohesive yesterday than we did today. We’ve got the same team as last year, where we also had the same issues. Wolves lost their manager last week and here they are completely outplaying us at home. People who are worried are stating what they watched tonight. Awful performance and the whole team should take a look at themselves. That was a very tough watch.
Ah well, best write it off now, it’ll never improve. feck me, life must be agony for some people
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
The idea is for Mount and Bruno to push high and one of the defenders to tuck in beside Casemiro to create a box midfield. The same set up Arsenal and Liverpool are using.

However, while Liverpool have their own problems (namely no DM), the player they will have tucking in beside that DM whenever they get him is TAA, who is obviously excellent in possession.

Meanwhile Arsenal don't just have Timber (excellent on the ball) and Zinchenko (regularly played as a midfielder) in their inverted role, but even used Partey (an actual midfielder) as their nominal RB in their last game.

In our case Bruno and Mount are doing what they're supposed to do and pushing high into attacking positions, but I don't see how they get sufficient quality of support behind them. Unless that gets addressed it will be very difficult for this to work. We need whoever is stepping in to take up those central positions to be very good on the ball, because they're basically playing as an auxillary midfielder.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,422
Exactly. People point to Arsenal/City/Liverpool as evidence that two advanced 8's can work, but Bruno has never been good as a positionally disciplined player, and neither has Mount. Both prefer to run around like madmen, but the adverse is that you stick Casemiro on an absolute island if you are getting beat in the first phase like they did today.

It also doesn't help going forward when both Case and Bruno are pretty terrible in carrying the ball. Makes us much easier to defend structurally if they aren't playing brilliant killer balls. Either Mount will have to be told to play as more of a connector, or we need Amrabat in ASAP. It's the same issue I had when we were first linked to Mount, and why I wanted Caicedo so bad.

It also doesn't help that both starting wingers offered basically nothing when we DID get into space and won the ball back high up the pitch.
I think the bigger issue is that our midfield isn't set up to keep the ball well. City have Rodri, Kovacic and KDB, a much more suited trio to keep possession. The profiles of their midfielders had players who are better at keeping the ball and generally less loose or risky in their passes.

As much as Bruno and Mount are an issue, I don't think Casemiro is a good fit for them either as I think he's quite reckless in his passing at times too.
 

CloneMC16

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
4,565
Balance is wrong. We made the wrong signing. Did not want Mount as soon as the links to him began. The very early performances are backing up my fears. We have 3 chaos ballers and 2 players that want to play in similar areas of the pitch. Casemiro is also looking old. How ETH fixes this is gonna be interesting.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,935
It is shite and average.
Casemiro is not at it anymore and I'm not been knee jack.
Bruno does not respect possession and Mount is is not good at anything
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,635
Location
Manc
But I do prefer a thread for the three of them...nice idea.

Losing the midfield battle tonight was collectively their fault...be interesting to see what a week's training can do.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,186
Location
England
Bruno roaming around doing what he wants won’t mean that signing Amrabat will magically make the midfield better. The same problems will remain
 

Ibi Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
6,191
People bigging up Mount before we signed him were saying he was a managers dream, because he's so intelligent and flexible and can carry out tactics brilliantly. That clearly wasn't the case today

Obviously he deserves time, but it wasn't a good start
 

The Hilton

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
4,223
Genuine question…do you think it will work? And if so, why?
Not who you quoted, but I think it can work.

They didn't perform well tonight, but there looked to be potential there for an effective unit, both on and off the ball, the main issue I saw is that the players weren't operating in tandem - often one or two would press, while others stood watching or reacted too slowly. It was the same story on the ball most of the time, players not expecting a pass they received, reacting too slowly to loose or 50/50 balls, and generally not being on the same wavelength with each other. We were a half stride away from shutting down a lot of the counter attacks before they really started, so hopefully that's something we can work on in training so players are more coherent with the counter press.

We were also giving the ball away while the team was unbalanced, either due to a poor ball or a receiving player not anticipating the pass, and those patterns can be drilled, so that we're losing the ball in safer areas or when we're set to take a risk. Which, again, would give us a lot more control.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
It won't surprise me when few months into the season we drop Mount for good.

He's just a bang average player and he's disturbing our midfield if he's useless in the attack. This midfield is way too weak defensively and its offensive output isn't worth it to sacrifice stability.

And looking at those 3 players, it's clear Mount is the worst out of them.
 

-Supreme-

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
2,449
We need at least one ball carrier in midfield, I don’t see how Bruno and Mount partnership will be a success IMO, particularly when we have Casemiro and Bruno who struggle to keep hold of the ball when pressed
 

flameinthesun

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2014
Messages
2,092
Location
London
Reckon the whole team will need a few proper games to better understand what EtH wants from them in this tweak to formation. Personally I'll wait to see Rasmus up top before making a judgement because at the moment we are basically playing with a striker who doesnt press or challenge. The three will need games together and mount will need games to better understand the switch to playing as an 8.

Mounts not my ideal signing but I think by the international break we will have a clearer idea whether this is something that can potentially work or ends up a dud.
 

Shane88

Actually Nostradamus
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
35,327
Location
Targaryen loyalist
This is exactly why I don't understand the Mount signing.

Casemiro is glacially slow, he has lost even more pace. We needed to sign a destroyer to help him, not an attacking mid to help Bruno.

Last season's worst attacking team in the league created countless chances against us and walked through our midfield time and time again. Imagine what a decent side will do against this midfield.
 

Offside

Euro 2016 sweepstake winner
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
26,787
Location
London
Can tell it won’t work. We don’t have any technicians in the team and haven’t for years. Our passing has been atrocious since that 4 month period Scholes came back. What I don’t understand is ETH goes in for De Jong one Summer then decides on Mount the next.
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,872
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
Matheus Cunha ran through the middle so many times.

I think the issue is that Mount and Bruno are up trying to press and we dont have our press organized well enough, so its getting bypassed too easy.

The forwards need to be starting the press. Not Mount and Bruno. It leaves Casemiro exposed.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,071
Location
Austria
Doesn't look very promising. Casemiro looks a bit slow these days and Mount seems a bit of a nothing footballer. Let's see. Early days
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,252
Mount as an "individual" isn't a problem but I am still not convinced how Casemiro-Mount-Bruno is better than Casemiro-Fred-Bruno. The balance is completely off, Bruno is dropping too deep and Casemiro after todays game probably needs 2 weeks rest.
I said this in the match thread. 3 good players,.don't see how they work together.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,553
Replacing Casemiro, I think he does too. Paired with Casemiro and think it would be fine.
They are both too slow and we’ll still get run over. I think thats why hes looking at Onana
 

Silas

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
4,688
Location
UK
Almost all of us saw this coming. I was at least interested (while being pretty pessimistic) to see if Mount could adapt into a deeper player, but it doesn’t even seem like he’s trying/being instructed to play like an 8 alongside Case.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,511
Location
London
I watched about 23 mins of our pre season games before the Lens game then watched the Lens game in full at Old Trafford and it was very obvious very quickly that that midfield is going to be fecking shite. I didn’t mind the Mount signing but I thought the tactical set up would be different to what it has been:
if we continue like this through the season we’re going to finish mid table.
The amount of times Lens and Wolves players would just run through our midfield unchallenged with so much space is actually shocking. And how we have a football manager who thinks this is okay going forward is extremely worrying.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,252
The idea is for Mount and Bruno to push high and one of the defenders to tuck in beside Casemiro to create a box midfield. The same set up Arsenal and Liverpool are using.

However, while Liverpool have their own problems (namely no DM), the player they will have tucking in beside that DM whenever they get him is TAA, who is obviously excellent in possession.

Meanwhile Arsenal don't just have Timber (excellent on the ball) and Zinchenko (regularly played as a midfielder) in their inverted role, but even used Partey (an actual midfielder) as their nominal RB in their last game.

In our case Bruno and Mount are doing what they're supposed to do and pushing high into attacking positions, but I don't see how they get sufficient quality of support behind them. Unless that gets addressed it will be very difficult for this to work. We need whoever is stepping in to take up those central positions to be very good on the ball, because they're basically playing as an auxillary midfielder.
It needs to be martinez I think. It nullifies all Shaw strengths playing him narrow.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
We don't do proactive squad planning. We will wait until Casemiro is on his last legs with little to offer before even thinking about a long-term replacement.
This has been our issue for years. We neglect to sort out the squad and get ahead every summer and are always playing catch-up.
 

Xaviboy

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2018
Messages
998
Location
Dublin
Not going to work. Think we will be on end of a hammering soon if we continue.
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,099
Mount as an "individual" isn't a problem but I am still not convinced how Casemiro-Mount-Bruno is better than Casemiro-Fred-Bruno. The balance is completely off, Bruno is dropping too deep and Casemiro after todays game probably needs 2 weeks rest.
Completely agree. I don't know how you could look at Bruno and his wildness on and off the ball and think 'need another attacking player in there'. The profile of Fred was actually perfect for the balance of that midfield - we just needed a better player. Not a player who has spent most of his career in AM or the wing.
 

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,252
People bigging up Mount before we signed him were saying he was a managers dream, because he's so intelligent and flexible and can carry out tactics brilliantly. That clearly wasn't the case today

Obviously he deserves time, but it wasn't a good start
He did though..listen to brunos interview. Eth wants them pressing high. It's whatever is happening behind it is the problem. There's no way he has it set up for them to press high and someone from defense to not slide in beside casemiro.
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,149
I get the feeling one of the centrebacks is meant to step in with Casemiro as a bit of a proxy midfield partner as Mount and Bruno push up. I’m interested to see whether Pavard is going to be another potential candidate for that if we were to buy him, because at the moment it’s Martinez as the current best option with Lindelof filling in.