Antony under investigation by Brazilian authorities for domestic abuse | Back in the squad

Melville Red

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
1,043
Location
Arm chair or Pub
Excellent news, the club has acted quickly and positively. Probably a quick phone call telling him that the club didn’t need the same shitstorm as before and to stay in Brazil for now and go to the beach and enjoy himself, no cancel that just relax.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,578
I’m a bit curious about why this is, not living in England. Wasn’t Mendy named in a similar legal situation? And why is it more important to not mention a guy that is charged and out on repeated bail as opposed to someone only accused of something?
He hasn't been charged with a crime. He's on bail from the police while the investigation continues.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,585
Location
Ireland
So with Sancho in the bad books our only realistic options at RW are Bruno, Mount and Pellistri?

Fun times.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,546
Huh last week you was one of the people asking why, and this is your words why should this cnut play and not Greenwood? And that was before 2 other women came forward so what's changed?
When I said that last week I had seen reports that the girl had posted damming evidence in the Brazilian media.

I had also seen people discussing some audio evidence

Since then I looked to see if there was any smoking gun evidence like the Greenwood case and I haven't see any. Have I missed something?

So basically with Greenwood immediate suspension made sense as there was a lot of evidence. With Antony I don't see any public evidence at all so surely every allegation of a footballer cant result in them being suspended from football for years.

Basically the situations are quite different.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,466
It's probably just got to the point where he needs a break from playing as it will be a distraction to Antony himself and to the club. There's been too much noise around this directly from the women and Antony himself that it's probably for the best for all involved to have a break. Suppose the question would be for how long, as this probably won't be resolved soon.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,546
You do not know there is no evidence, just because the Greenwood stuff leaked doesn't mean it doesn't exist for this case because it hasnt leaked, if anything this might mean there is evidence
No public evidence. Therefore nothing United could know about.

Every allegation can't result in a footballer losing years of their career as that is treating people as guilty from the outset.
 

90 + 5min

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
5,387
Good that they have found a mutual agreement. This is a personal issue and needs to be resolved. And it is not the same situation as MG unless there are some recordings.

On football note. Have been pretty poor to be honest. Not Sanchol-level but still not good enough. Lot of energy and good defensivly but you need your wingers to produce.
 
Last edited:

Murder on Zidanes Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
29,086
Good move by the club, we must act decisively and correctly when these arise.

A perhaps silver lining is, this will also improve us on the pitch because the lad is utter toilet.
 

Frank White

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2017
Messages
1,568
When I said that last week I had seen reports that the girl had posted damming evidence in the Brazilian media.

I had also seen people discussing some audio evidence

Since then I looked to see if there was any smoking gun evidence like the Greenwood case and I haven't see any. Have I missed something?

So basically with Greenwood immediate suspension made sense as there was a lot of evidence. With Antony I don't see any public evidence at all so surely every allegation of a footballer cant result in them being suspended from football for years.

Basically the situations are quite different.
Up until Thursday you where saying it's looking worse and worse... So what's changed between then and now? Also mutual agreement on having time off isn't suspension.
 

Nogho

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 6, 2022
Messages
386
Location
Left this forum.
If the women involved in this only wanted attention they could just have used social media, couldn’t they? Why involve the authorities and risk being sued and drag through a lot of controversy?

If both the Brazilian federation and now United have left Antony to defend himself something must have happened.

And also, since the allegations has been ever present a couple of years now something can’t be right.

Also, I do think the club has known this a long while but hoped that it would go away without any kind of fuzz. But the world today won’t work that way anymore.

I really think this will be another £80m down the drain…sadly.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,546
Up until Thursday you where saying it's looking worse and worse... So what's changed between then and now? Also mutual agreement on having time off isn't suspension.
There was more evidence coming out. It was looking worse. But as I said since looking at those reports and everything there isn't anything near the likes of the MG situation.

Suspension, Mutual agreement. Doesn't really matter. If they are waiting for the police or court case to resolve this then it could likely take years.

That's a long time out.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,657
Location
Manc
Trial by media...not saying this is the right or wrong decision but this is just another mess to clean up.

Looks like the club are going to get hammered for everything they do on and off the pitch this season...as fans we just need to take it on the chin and try to stay neutral.
 

RedPed

Whatabouter.
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
14,558
Why have Women's Aid decided to put out a statement about Man Utd?? As if this is the only allegation of domestic abuse at the moment.

How come Arsenal have avoided coming under any scrutiny?
 

Frank White

Full Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2017
Messages
1,568
There was more evidence coming out. It was looking worse. But as I said since looking at those reports and everything there isn't anything near the likes of the MG situation.

Suspension, Mutual agreement. Doesn't really matter. If they are waiting for the police or court case to resolve this then it could likely take years.

That's a long time out.
How has it not got worse since your initial statement? He's been dropped by his national team and had multiple women come out about alleged abuse. If anything it's worse and Greenwood's situation shouldn't be the bench mark for when the club should or shouldn't take action.
 

UTAretro

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Messages
436
Supports
Brighton
I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.

This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.

I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).

I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.

A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
 

fergies coat

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
2,807
Location
Wythenshawe, Manchester
I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.

This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.

I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).

I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.

A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
It is the right the to do, but let's hope other clubs come under the same scrutiny in the future. Somehow I doubt it.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,507
Location
Manchester
I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.

This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.

I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).

I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.

A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
Good post.

I think the Partey case has frustrated many in how Arsenal have not bothered dealing with it but there’s a media blackout and zero criticism levelled. That’s fuelled the being treated differently angle.

That said United acted quickly to suspend Greenwood and now a leave of absence for Antony.

Would sooner the club act like this than do nothing and ignore it.
 

sepulturite

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
2,307
This club's a joke, once again bowing to trial by social media and appeasing the cancel culture brigade. I bet Getafe are licking their lips.
Oh give it a rest ffs. Cancel culture brigade :rolleyes:

He's been rightfully given time off to sort this out. Do you really think he would've been in any kind of decent head space to play football right now? He would be a liability on the pitch with everything going on.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
19,578
I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.

This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.

I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).

I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.

A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
Seems to be a very polarizing subject. Some would call that astonishing in itself (I wouldn't disagree).

Anyway, the club could have acted more swiftly (yes, I'm being extremely critical but I honestly don't think they deserve to be cut much slack at the moment) given that it was inevitable how this thing would play out.
 

ForeverRed1

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
5,550
Location
England UK!
Is he gonna take time off receiving his 250-300k a week salary as well ?
probably but unfortunately not much anyone can do about that as he will be protected under his contract. It’s a major life incidence so it will have to be dealt with. Not really something you can just brush under the carpet is it ? It’s real life and some things are bigger than football.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,802
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
You don’t have an agenda but you’ve been affected by these issues personally and it’s hurt and scarred you.

I have also, and am also scarred by them, deeply.

I remember talking with you in the past and you said that your kids have been affected by these issues in posts that I found really upsetting and moving.

I think this, understandably, puts you into a fatherly and protective mode the moment any issue linked with this topic comes up, both noble qualities and far better than the opposite.

But I think it means that you take anyone offering nuance or a more neutral stance as a bit personal - as if they must be a bad person.

I always remember when I said that after seeing Mason and H’s baby photo, it made me hope that they’re a happy family and who cares about the football side of it - and you said you found it sinister, whereas all I meant was exactly what I said. Something that I think is realistically the best thing to hope for.

On top of this you’re having to mod the biggest Utd forum on the internet during the most divisive and troubled time the club has experienced in modern history.
My personal experience was one where I was falsely accused but my default stance is to give credence to accusations. How does that equate to me being scarred by personal experience?

The poster I was replying to. Said 'Rubbish Post'. That's not nuance. It's the lack of nuance I have issue with. The first I post I engaged with in this sequence said the woman in question was telling a 'hideous' lie. Where's the nuance there?

On the sinister comment, yeah. My background is media. And the period of silence bookended by the disturbing video and the soft focus image of the happy family was jarring.

Your post reads well but it's not connected to reality in any way I dint think.

I don't engage with neutral posters, just problematic ones. That last poster was banned (not by me) for comments in the Greenwood thread. They were far from neutral.
 
Last edited:

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,412
Location
UK
I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.

This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.

I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).

I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.

A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
You’re always going to get a variety of viewpoints but I think the majority of comments in this thread have been reasonable.
 

klsv

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
1,918
Why have Women's Aid decided to put out a statement about Man Utd?? As if this is the only allegation of domestic abuse at the moment.

How come Arsenal have avoided coming under any scrutiny?
It's part of their job to react to high profile cases of (alleged) domestic violence? They also put out a statement when the story of a "premier league footballer who can't be named for legal reasons" first came out in the media.
 
Last edited:

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
To be fair its good move by the club. Antony has already been dropped by Brazil national team, and was under investigation in 3 different assaults.
 

RedPed

Whatabouter.
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
14,558
It's part of their job to react to high profile cases of (alleged) domestic violence? They also put out with a statement when the story of a "premier league footballer who can't be named for legal reasons" first came out in the media.
Doesn't alter the fact that Arsenal still have a player in exactly the same situation freely plying his trade for the club.