BusbyMalone
First Man Falling
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 10,362
Seems as much an Antony decision as it does a club oneTerrible decision by the club.
The Greenwood backlash definitely played a part in this. Social media FC.
Seems as much an Antony decision as it does a club oneTerrible decision by the club.
The Greenwood backlash definitely played a part in this. Social media FC.
No point as we seem to go with public opinion anyway and as most of the public are anti-United it will be the same outcome hereWill the club be holding an “internal investigation”, the same as it did with Greenwood?
He hasn't been charged with a crime. He's on bail from the police while the investigation continues.I’m a bit curious about why this is, not living in England. Wasn’t Mendy named in a similar legal situation? And why is it more important to not mention a guy that is charged and out on repeated bail as opposed to someone only accused of something?
Would you have preferred an announcement done by the medium of dance?Club Statement FC
When I said that last week I had seen reports that the girl had posted damming evidence in the Brazilian media.Huh last week you was one of the people asking why, and this is your words why should this cnut play and not Greenwood? And that was before 2 other women came forward so what's changed?
Well hopefully the club aren't paying him his salary while he has the time off he desires.Seems as much an Antony decision as it does a club one
No public evidence. Therefore nothing United could know about.You do not know there is no evidence, just because the Greenwood stuff leaked doesn't mean it doesn't exist for this case because it hasnt leaked, if anything this might mean there is evidence
Up until Thursday you where saying it's looking worse and worse... So what's changed between then and now? Also mutual agreement on having time off isn't suspension.When I said that last week I had seen reports that the girl had posted damming evidence in the Brazilian media.
I had also seen people discussing some audio evidence
Since then I looked to see if there was any smoking gun evidence like the Greenwood case and I haven't see any. Have I missed something?
So basically with Greenwood immediate suspension made sense as there was a lot of evidence. With Antony I don't see any public evidence at all so surely every allegation of a footballer cant result in them being suspended from football for years.
Basically the situations are quite different.
Yeah, basically. We’ll be better off without him.Good move by the club, we must act decisively and correctly when these arise.
A perhaps silver lining is, this will also improve us on the pitch because the lad is utter toilet.
There was more evidence coming out. It was looking worse. But as I said since looking at those reports and everything there isn't anything near the likes of the MG situation.Up until Thursday you where saying it's looking worse and worse... So what's changed between then and now? Also mutual agreement on having time off isn't suspension.
He’s not suspended. He’s been given a bit of time to try and get it sorted out whilst he’s in BrazilUntil he’s been arrested or charged with anything it’s absolutely ridiculous to suspend him.
Of course, since our other options on the right are much better....Good move by the club, we must act decisively and correctly when these arise.
A perhaps silver lining is, this will also improve us on the pitch because the lad is utter toilet.
How has it not got worse since your initial statement? He's been dropped by his national team and had multiple women come out about alleged abuse. If anything it's worse and Greenwood's situation shouldn't be the bench mark for when the club should or shouldn't take action.There was more evidence coming out. It was looking worse. But as I said since looking at those reports and everything there isn't anything near the likes of the MG situation.
Suspension, Mutual agreement. Doesn't really matter. If they are waiting for the police or court case to resolve this then it could likely take years.
That's a long time out.
It is the right the to do, but let's hope other clubs come under the same scrutiny in the future. Somehow I doubt it.I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.
This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.
I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).
I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.
A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
there is a post just above yours seemingly accusing women’s aid of just thatI’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down
Good post.I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.
This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.
I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).
I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.
A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
diallo might be an option soon?So with Sancho in the bad books our only realistic options at RW are Bruno, Mount and Pellistri?
Fun times.
Oh give it a rest ffs. Cancel culture brigadeThis club's a joke, once again bowing to trial by social media and appeasing the cancel culture brigade. I bet Getafe are licking their lips.
Seems to be a very polarizing subject. Some would call that astonishing in itself (I wouldn't disagree).I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.
This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.
I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).
I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.
A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
probably but unfortunately not much anyone can do about that as he will be protected under his contract. It’s a major life incidence so it will have to be dealt with. Not really something you can just brush under the carpet is it ? It’s real life and some things are bigger than football.Is he gonna take time off receiving his 250-300k a week salary as well ?
My personal experience was one where I was falsely accused but my default stance is to give credence to accusations. How does that equate to me being scarred by personal experience?You don’t have an agenda but you’ve been affected by these issues personally and it’s hurt and scarred you.
I have also, and am also scarred by them, deeply.
I remember talking with you in the past and you said that your kids have been affected by these issues in posts that I found really upsetting and moving.
I think this, understandably, puts you into a fatherly and protective mode the moment any issue linked with this topic comes up, both noble qualities and far better than the opposite.
But I think it means that you take anyone offering nuance or a more neutral stance as a bit personal - as if they must be a bad person.
I always remember when I said that after seeing Mason and H’s baby photo, it made me hope that they’re a happy family and who cares about the football side of it - and you said you found it sinister, whereas all I meant was exactly what I said. Something that I think is realistically the best thing to hope for.
On top of this you’re having to mod the biggest Utd forum on the internet during the most divisive and troubled time the club has experienced in modern history.
You’re always going to get a variety of viewpoints but I think the majority of comments in this thread have been reasonable.I’ve found some of the comments here astonishing.
This isn’t a witch-hunt against your club for pity’s sake, this is a very serious criminal matter which needs to be calmly investigated and a process followed. In my opinion your club have acted swiftly in light of the new allegations and I don’t see how else they could’ve responded.
I’ve seen some posts implying conspiracies to hold your club down, victim blaming, criticism of Rachel Riley (!!).
I understand the anger and disappointment that this has happened again so soon with one of your own, but the allegations deserve to be addressed - not least for the player himself, to have the opportunity to clear his name if free from wrongdoing.
A little perspective perhaps; guys? Let the private process happen.
It's part of their job to react to high profile cases of (alleged) domestic violence? They also put out a statement when the story of a "premier league footballer who can't be named for legal reasons" first came out in the media.Why have Women's Aid decided to put out a statement about Man Utd?? As if this is the only allegation of domestic abuse at the moment.
How come Arsenal have avoided coming under any scrutiny?
Yes, Rachel and her social media torch and pitchfork mob are on the case!No point as we seem to go with public opinion anyway and as most of the public are anti-United it will be the same outcome here
Doesn't alter the fact that Arsenal still have a player in exactly the same situation freely plying his trade for the club.It's part of their job to react to high profile cases of (alleged) domestic violence? They also put out with a statement when the story of a "premier league footballer who can't be named for legal reasons" first came out in the media.