Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
32,061
Location
Ginseng Strip
I agree, there is no objective benchmark. I am not sure there is any path to agree on one. The polarization is so huge and the topic is so sensitive, and so many actors, with different goals, feelings of injustice etc. Therefor any discussion will neccesarilly ends in clash what is the standard. I mean, there are for sure legal definitions. But as demonstrated in this thread in everyday use the same word can carry many different definitions.



Look, Jews have been persecuted for thousands of years by many different entities because of ethnicity. No other people suffered so much and at such intensity, culminated in soa. Therefore it is extremely sensitive to compare/accuse them of a such behavior. I hope there is no need to point out it is not exclusive. Any people should not be unjustifiably compare/accused of such actions.

Does it give them freepass/immunity to do whatever they want. Of course not. The same applies to Bosnian Muslims, Armenians, Ukrainians (Stalin or Putin) and so on.

But it also does not give anybody free pass to use label genocide/ethnic cleansing etc. just as they see fit. I mean, of course, free speech. But do not be suprised by the reaction in return (I dont mean you personally).

I fundamentally disagree with the precedent you pointed out. I don't want to say it is complicated, because nothing in the world politics is easy. But it is complex. I am not sure I would like to turn this into historical exercise. I will now say Israel was attacked by Arab countries. Israel was victim of attack and successfully defended itself. Arab countries were aggressors and their goal was to destroy Israel. And they lost. You will then mention Plan D, Deir Yassin, and so on. Then we will start to talk about refugees, where again are strong differences. I will start asking why all world refugees belong to UNHCR and Palestinians have special organization. I will ask if Jews have right to return to Gaza settlements, that were there for hundrets of years before 1948. I will ask if 3rd generation of Sudeten Germans descendants have right to return to the Czech cities, and if Czech Republic is obliged to give these territories back to Germany.

I don't want to cut off the debate like this, to usurp the right of the last word. I will gladly read your response (no sarcasm). But I don't want to get into long historical debates. At least not now. So I apologize in advance if I wont make any further comment to your reply.
Fair enough. I think we'll agree to disagree on this one, and perhaps hone in on other contemporary points in this thread.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
32,061
Location
Ginseng Strip
I think what we see is also something different. We see that the law of armed conflicts has not kept up with the evolution of war. It is not sufficiently equipped to deal with urban or cyber warfare for example. A lot of the law in this field goes back to 1907. This is also not the first time this has happened. The Geneva Convention was expanded after 1945 to include some form of civilian protection which was not in the law before. It is an unfortunate reality that international law often lags behind reality and has to be adapted ex post.
You make a valid point.

The issue for me are how these laws, antiquated or otherwise are being interpreted and to what means, or rather the consistency of which they're being enforced. Its why I brought up the ongoing Ukraine conflict as a yard stick, since to most in the western world there is little to no ambiguity over the violations perpetrated by the Russians, nor is there any debate over the semantics of terminology used to validate these crimes. Accusations of targeting civilians, genocide and other classifications under the 'war crime' umbrella are aimed at the Russians with little to no scrutiny over their authenticity or validity. Contrast that to Israel, where you can use this thread as a microcosmic case study as to how its suddenly deemed paramount that we scrutinise these claims, despite the overwhelming consensus amongst various charitable, human rights and relief organisations that Israel are guilty of these same crimes.

Even if we were to refresh these conventions to apply to the modern realities of warfare, I don't think we'd succeed in establishing objective markers for the rules of war. Instead we'll still see them used selectively to condemn or absolve various factions based on geopolitical or personal agendas.
 

RedC

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
5,773
But it also does not give anybody free pass to use label genocide/ethnic cleansing etc. just as they see fit. I mean, of course, free speech. But do not be suprised by the reaction in return (I dont mean you personally).
People aren't arbitrarily claiming it, a ground swell of subject matter experts are stating it, and laymen are agreeing, based on the arguments being put forward by those experts.
 

ManUtd1999

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,665
12 Thai nationals released so far.
Great news. These poor Thai nationals were just looking for living.

So, we expect a total of 25 today to be released. Far from being a complete list, but a good development.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,989
10/7 is a textbook example of "pride comes before the fall".

It partly explains why the military retaliation is so disproportionate, even by Israeli standards. Israel's reputation of invincibility that's been carefully crafted for decades has been utterly shattered in an instant. By as small group of inmates with limited means, operating from the most watched prison in the world. It has to be restored and a message to all the inmates has to be sent. Except it won't and all what Israel has managed is to create even more angry and desperate people while dragging their own image through the mud.

It would also never have been so "successful" if Netanyahu didn't send most of his army in the West Bank to protect and help the settlers do settler shit.

It never worked in the past and never will. History is full of cautionary tales and Israel is on the wrong side of it at the moment.
Good take.

Regarding the bolded, when a future retaliation inevitably happens (assuming the status quo continues), the discourse will be right back here again with "OMG 8/4 (Or whatever the date is), antisemitism! Israel has a right to defend herself! Hamas charters!" without any understanding for why said events have happened.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,975
Location
Hollywood CA
I hope they get as many of them as possible and then bring the thunder on the scum. I do not hope, they will.
The trouble for Hamas is they will be incentivized to stop swapping hostages at some point (probably when they are left with mostly only Israeli males and IDF soldiers) because continuing to give away hostages will only decrease their leverage and invite the Israelis to eventually blow up or flood the entire tunnel network. Will be interesting to see what happens after the four days and whether Hamas opt to extend on a day by day basis.
 

jadaba

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
677
Location
Paris
The cynic in me believes the goal isn't complete subjugation, but rather forcing them out through suffocation and desperation. Its why it hasn't surprised me that certain voices from the Israeli side have called for neighbouring nations to take them in under 'humanitarian' guises. Its why I also believe the Israelis have no sincere intention to wipe out Hamas, a viewpoint bolstered by Netanyahu's own admission that its in his camps interest to bolster them. Since it allows Israel to prolong their casus belli against the Palestinian people, essentially quashing any plan for Palestinian statehood, and in their eyes hopefully kickstarting another Nakba, allowing their settlers to swallow up the abandoned land. This of course is happening in parallel to the events in the West Bank, where settlers under the indirect blessing of the government and Israeli security forces are essentially colonising patches of territory in a way thats uncannily cutting off Palestinian territories on a daily basis.

Obviously a flat out genocide is terrible optics for Israel, so stepping short of that and inflicting a carnage-filled campaign with the hope that ethnic cleansing serves as an alternative 'kindness' allows them to achieve their goals of homogenising the land without resorting to violently purging Palestinians with the eyes of the world watching. Its also why I believe its no coincidence they've caused the amount of structural damage they have, destroying huge blocks of homes, hospitals, educational institutions and essential civilian apparatus, deeming the region completely inhospitable for years to come.

Now the conspiracy theorists might indulge the idea that Israel knew such an attack was forthcoming and perhaps allowed it to play out to give them carte blanche to - and I quote Jordan Peterson - 'give em hell'. Personally I'm reluctant to entertain such theories, but its an interesting thought to ponder nonetheless considering the increasingly convincing evidence that these warnings were plentiful and timely, coupled to Israeli's sophisticated intelligence network who you'd feel would be privy to such plans well ahead of time.
Yep, subjugation is not a goal in itself but a prelude to mass expulsion, and the destruction of the city's civilian infrastructure will be framed as a compelling reason for a 'humanitarian' ethnic cleansing, but to pursue such a goal is detached from reality when countries are already announcing red lines regarding this, not to mention the fact that Palestinians themselves won't let a Nakba occur again. I don't believe it'll happen, but I believe extremist voices won't want to waste the opportunity of pursuing it.

The idea that Israel allowed 7th October to occur doesn't seem convincing to me, it's likely going to prove fatal for Netanyahu, the final outcome of this war remains unpredictable, and now Israelis will feel that no matter how many billions have been spent on defence and security, it can be overcome through a comparatively unsophisticated weapons and technology, that's not a feeling that Israel's security apparatus will want its citizens to have.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,244
Supports
Real Madrid
The Israeli-Palestinian problem deciding the Presidential election in the US would be the height of insanity, though. Criticize Biden all day long for how he has handled it, but don't kid yourself into believing that it would be any different under a Republican president. They would just encourage Israel even more.

Biden and his administration has been handed a lose-lose situation with this, and it might end up costing the US and the world a lot of progress on many fronts, if it means another Trump term.
He's picked the worst possible path.
 

ManUtd1999

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,665
The Israeli-Palestinian problem deciding the Presidential election in the US would be the height of insanity, though. Criticize Biden all day long for how he has handled it, but don't kid yourself into believing that it would be any different under a Republican president. They would just encourage Israel even more.

Biden and his administration has been handed a lose-lose situation with this, and it might end up costing the US and the world a lot of progress on many fronts, if it means another Trump term.
I vote for whom I believe would defend American democracy. This conflict doesn’t change that. Regardless, Biden did his best in this terrible and tragic situation. He managed to prevent a regional war, and today we see potentially some end (I know that’s it’s just a pause, but who knows if this wouldn’t develop into a larger ceasefire). He also did well with the Ukraine.

Biden has my vote.
 

jadaba

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
677
Location
Paris
10/7 is a textbook example of "pride comes before the fall".

It partly explains why the military retaliation is so disproportionate, even by Israeli standards. Israel's reputation of invincibility that's been carefully crafted for decades has been utterly shattered in an instant. By as small group of inmates with limited means, operating from the most watched prison in the world. It has to be restored and a message to all the inmates has to be sent. Except it won't and all what Israel has managed is to create even more angry and desperate people while dragging their own image through the mud.

It would also never have been so "successful" if Netanyahu didn't send most of his army in the West Bank to protect and help the settlers do settler shit.

It never worked in the past and never will. History is full of cautionary tales and Israel is on the wrong side of it at the moment.
I completely agree, and re-establishing a reputation of invincibility will be unrealistic if Israel returns to a status quo of occupation after all this, a more sophisticated or brutal occupation can be enforced but there'll be the latent awareness that it'll only provide Israelis with security until it doesn't. There has to be a recognition of the urgency to reach a proper and fair solution to this, otherwise we'll be in this thread every twenty years repeating our conversation.
 

Giggsy PO

Wimbledon Prediction Champion 09
Joined
Aug 22, 2004
Messages
11,138
There have been numerous articles and videos posted in this thread. There was a Raz Segal video in the last few pages on it, here is an article stating similar: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-experts-point-evidence-genocidal-incitement-against-palestinians-2023-11-16/#:~:text=GENEVA, Nov 16 (Reuters),grave violations" committed by Israel
I will quote from the article you posted:

Asked about the independent experts' statement at a press briefing, Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, said a determination of genocide could only be made by a relevant U.N. judicial body.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
25,192
Location
Rehovot, Israel
I vote for whom I believe would defend American democracy. This conflict doesn’t change that. Regardless, Biden did his best in this terrible and tragic situation. He managed to prevent a regional war, and today we see potentially some end (I know that’s it’s just a pause, but who knows if this wouldn’t develop into a larger ceasefire). He also did well with the Ukraine.

Biden has my vote.
The voice of sanity.
 

united for life

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
2,277
The world went crazy when isealis were taken hostages. Now, in this exchange, israel is returning tens of Palestinian hostages taken years ago without anyone noticing (caring). The world we live in is absolute shit.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
32,061
Location
Ginseng Strip
He sided with Israel over Hamas, which is what any pro-Israel politician in the US would’ve done. The only ones that are objecting to this are fringe extremists on the left and right, so all things said, Biden has made all the right moves politically. His age and domestic issues like inflation are his main problem. His Israel position will only help him, whereas Trump’s recent spat with Netanyahu likely won’t help him.
What was the recent spat between Trump and Netanyahu?
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,975
Location
Hollywood CA
I don't know who's more stupid - the creators of Israeli propaganda, or the consumers of it
There’s plenty of propaganda to go around on both sides. Even worse, most people seemed to get a one sided, heavily curated version of events from feeds they follow because they already agree with.
 

Real Madras

Full Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
1,086
Location
London
Supports
Real Oviedo
The Israeli-Palestinian problem deciding the Presidential election in the US would be the height of insanity, though. Criticize Biden all day long for how he has handled it, but don't kid yourself into believing that it would be any different under a Republican president. They would just encourage Israel even more.

Biden and his administration has been handed a lose-lose situation with this, and it might end up costing the US and the world a lot of progress on many fronts, if it means another Trump term.
How so? Biden and his adm
I vote for whom I believe would defend American democracy. This conflict doesn’t change that. Regardless, Biden did his best in this terrible and tragic situation. He managed to prevent a regional war, and today we see potentially some end (I know that’s it’s just a pause, but who knows if this wouldn’t develop into a larger ceasefire). He also did well with the Ukraine.

Biden has my vote.
Biden is complicit in genocide and is also responsible for killing babies. He's a despicable man and the sooner he's out of office, no matter who comes in, America will be a better place.
 

That_Bloke

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
3,107
Location
Cologne
Supports
Leicester City
How so? Biden and his adm

Biden is complicit in genocide and is also responsible for killing babies. He's a despicable man and the sooner he's out of office, no matter who comes in, America will be a better place.
Yeah, no.