Nevilles.Wear.Prada
Full Member
I am very very sure that in all of europe we can at least get decent senior striker, a non moronic LWB and a midfieder who can do some running, all on loan. Do something.
Problem with Rashford is he relies on speed and I think that has dropped off a bit, but the big thing with wingers is they have to be productive, either with assists and goals, prefably both. Ideally they also have to be capable of tracking back when needed. You cannot carry lots of players who are not willing or able to do that.Arrrreee you Henry Winter in disguise
I am not doubting him, this has happened too many times, eventually the current players have to be looked at.Are some fans already starting to doubt him? Seriously? The guy has only been here for a short time, without the benefit of a full preseason, and we're already seeing a more structured style of play. We're no longer as exposed as we were during Erik's tenure, and our ball possession has noticeably improved. How hard is it for some fans to grasp that there are no miracles that can undo the damage of the past decade overnight?
I don't think I've ever completely disagreed with someone so often as I have with Howson. Wasn't he vehemently defending ETH right until the very end as well?We've already starting seeing the first U-Turn with Howson going hard on Amorim and defending Rashy.
I don't think I've ever completely disagreed with someone so often as I have with Howson. Wasn't he vehemently defending ETH right until the very end as well?
Stretford Paddock also did.That was Goldbridge I think. The situation had gone so silly on that front that at one point people were calling his channel the United SEG
3 loan signings for 3 key positions, in January no less? We might be able to bring in one loanee in the Weghorst mould but we'd be working miracles for anything beyond that.I am very very sure that in all of europe we can at least get decent senior striker, a non moronic LWB and a midfieder who can do some running, all on loan. Do something.
Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
MDL, Mazraoui, Yoro, Ugarte and Zirkzee are crap?
You can argue those were Ineo's approved signings. It's well documented ten hag wanted to keep Mctominay and didn't even start Ugarte.
Yoro was definitely an ineos signing so was Ugarte and Zirkee, debatable with Mazrarious as he had previously worked with Ten Hag.
However there is no denying Ten wasted near to a billion on overpriced sub standard players and has done untold damage to the club to the point it's disgusting
I like the negative energy sponge analogy. Sums up the collective mental frailty of this bunch of sappy wasters.
Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
It’s not a niche formation though. More and more teams are playing it now. And the idea that you sign specialist players who can only play this formation and no other doesn’t make any sense at all. Good footballers can play many different formations. They’re not being asked to play a different sport!
It's still niche. Which other top teams play 3 at the back every week?
And I'm not sure I agree on the players not being specialist either, If they weren't specialists then why are we talking about needing to sign players to suit the new formation?
Not saying it can't work though, and if It can I think Amorim has a good of a chance as anybody.
Doubt any manager will automatically resign at united.
The big loss is definitely on Amorim. No way Rashford and Hojlund will allow a 3-0 thrashing at home to Bournemouth.
It's still niche. Which other top teams play 3 at the back every week?
And I'm not sure I agree on the players not being specialist either, If they weren't specialists then why are we talking about needing to sign players to suit the new formation?
Not saying it can't work though, and if It can I think Amorim has a good of a chance as anybody.
Because we have utter dross in certain positions? Whether we played a 343 or 433 we’d still need to upgrade that LB position.
Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
Surely something not true is deniable?You can argue those were Ineo's approved signings. It's well documented ten hag wanted to keep Mctominay and didn't even start Ugarte.
Yoro was definitely an ineos signing so was Ugarte and Zirkee, debatable with Mazrarious as he had previously worked with Ten Hag.
However there is no denying Ten wasted near to a billion on overpriced sub standard players and has done untold damage to the club to the point it's disgusting
I agree this formation should be a success in the modern game. We just have too many deficiencies, having not really upgraded at left back or right back since we bought Diego Dalot under Jose. Thats pretty massive given the system really relies on wingbacks to work well.This fixation from fans with the 3-4-3 is odd. Most teams build with 3 at the back now, so do we, when we defend sometimes we defend in a 4-4-2 (when Amad was playing wing back) like most teams do and sometimes we defend with a flat 5 which is pretty common too, we’ve even seen Arsenal defend with a back 6 this season.
I don’t think it matters what formation we play, we do not have players who run relentlessly, win tackles and headers, take players on and score goals. You can do whatever you want but you are not winning any league titles with the types of players we have now.
Yh it’s not something I can be arsed to work out, I was just thinking is every team we play coming away with a +1 or +2 for example. That piece was written just after Arsenal beat us with two set piece goals and the gap between them and the 7th best team is 2. It’s a very small range of values.That’s really just semantics though. The point is we’ve been conceding set piece goals against teams that have a very good record of scoring set piece goals this season. That Dec 5th piece has Everton right up there as well. So Amorin has already had to negotiate four of the best set piece clubs in the league.
We don't need to sign a left wingback to suit the formation. We need to because we don't have a capable availabe left back in the squad at all who could play either formation.It's still niche. Which other top teams play 3 at the back every week?
And I'm not sure I agree on the players not being specialist either, If they weren't specialists then why are we talking about needing to sign players to suit the new formation?
Not saying it can't work though, and if It can I think Amorim has a good of a chance as anybody.
Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
Would be good to just see us defend well to start.Early days but I’m not seeing it yet.
He’s trying to give more control but that’s hard to do without raising the floor of the team, either by being hard to stop or hard to beat. Possession counts for little if we’re soft at both ends simultaneously.
For me, the number one sign of a good Utd manager (or any attacking manager) is if he can get the attackers and fullbacks firing, even if they’re average. Once he can do that, we know he can be backed to improve incoming transfers.
In any case, we’ve bet the house on him and his 3-4-3. Let’s hope he can show something without needing 22 of his own players.
Even back four systems have a 3 at the back build-out shape now at top teams, with one of the full-backs inverting. It's a viable way of playing but you need the right players for it. The killers for us right now are no proper wing backs and slow CBs with mediocre ball carrying ability. Oh and a shit attack.Got to say. I really really like Amorim but i hate this formation.
It's a big risk ploughing another few hundred million in to specialist players to suit such a niche formation. I hope the recruitment does have one eye on the fact that if Amorim fails there is a 99% chance the next manager goes back to some variation of a 4-3-3 / 4-5-1 and we should have players capable of that.
God I hope he gets it right but I do have worries about 3 at the back in the PL.
Exactly. It's not some obscure formation that is only used by Amorim. Actually some of the most impressive teams of recent years like Atalanta, Inter and Leverkusen have used it frequently.While that would traditionally be true, it's worth noting that most of the managers we were linked with to replace Ten Hag have played some variation of three at the back previously, either some or all of the time. Amorim, Tuchel, Frank, Alonso, Inzaghi, Southgate, Naglesmann, etc. Plus other managers who weren't linked to us, like Glasner at Palace or Gasperini at Atalanta.
And that's not counting rarer, more infrequent uses of the formation for specific games too. As per an article on the Premier League's website, "only five of 20 Premier League clubs did not start a single match with a three-man defence in 2023/24".