Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach | Thread locked during matches

Should United part ways with Amorim?


  • Total voters
    850
  • This poll will close: .
Lets debase some myths here.

Its not petulant, lacking patience, knee jerky or having a meltdown to be unconvinced on Amorim.

-Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted).
-The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?
-I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things
-Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running
-Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing
-If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th.
-Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around
-Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?
-What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?
-IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper
-I feel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching.
-People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442.
-RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad.
-Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him.
-The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny
 
Lets debase some myths here.

Its not petulant, lacking patience, knee jerky or having a meltdown to be unconvinced on Amorim.

-Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted).
-The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?
-I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things
-Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running
-Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing
-If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th.
-Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around
-Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?
-What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?
-IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper
-I feel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching.
-People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442.
-RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad.
-Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him.
-The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny

The petulant life of a football fan. This was your take on him in mid December.

I'm very impressed with Amorim. I knew of him and his achievements before he took the united job, but had never heard him speak or seen his style of play.

Hes won me over on both counts. He has that charisma and communication skill that all good managers have. His tactics appear solid. Weve looked comfortable in most games bar the corners at Arsenal.

I hope that he has learned more about the players and keeps Mazraoui on the right. Maguire can be reintroduced now we dont play so high up the pitch. Amad has found his role as one of the two AMC's and even Anthony is beginning to pick up.

We just need a couple more quality match winners in the squad and we can push on and compete for 4th spot. The next 3 games are all winable.
 
The petulant life of a football fan. This was your take on him in mid December.
Things change. See the last sentence on my previous post. Fans are desperate to believe.

We have a larger body of work to judge him by. The honeymoon is over.

Not believing in someone or what they bring to the table isnt petulance. Its an opinion. We are all entitled to one. My opinion of fans like you is you think you are better fans because you are blindly loyal. A lemming. Or a turkey with their head in the sand.
 
It's never really been a thing and shouldn't.
I wouldn't mind it much if we had consistency from the senior management in terms of who they hired as the head coach, because that's always been our problem hasn't it? Apparently Tuchel was the ideal replacement and then it was actually Amorim. Completely different in terms of who they would want to recruit. I expected it from the Glazers but these guys are meant to be "best in class"...

I'm genuinely asking because I know feck all about football other than "he looks shite, he looks ok".
 
Things change. See the last sentence on my previous post. Fans are desperate to believe.

We have a larger body of work to judge him by. The honeymoon is over.
You change your opinion that drastically over the course of several weeks? :lol:
 
Like everyone else, I wanted him to suceed.

I don't think you do/did.

We didn't even lose the other night and some of you are absolutely losing your shit. It's bizarre. I can semi understand the situation if we'd lost and were also out of Europa. But we're through into the next stages of both cups.
 
I don’t really care the players can’t play this style. They either adapt or feck off.

He’s proven in works and if fans can’t handle some shit results until the players get use to it, that is their problem or not.

Manchester United or not, the embarrassment has been the last 12 years not what we are seeing right now. This is a culmination of shit investment and not modernising the way we play.
 
I don’t really care the players can’t play this style. They either adapt or feck off.

He’s proven in works and if fans can’t handle some shit results until the players get use to it, that is their problem or not.

Manchester United or not, the embarrassment has been the last 12 years not what we are seeing right now. This is a culmination of shit investment and not modernising the way we play.
So you , like many others, have not come to the realisation that we no longer can feck off everybody. Some additions will be made, but wide clear-outs are a thing of the past.
 
I don’t really care the players can’t play this style. They either adapt or feck off.

He’s proven in works and if fans can’t handle some shit results until the players get use to it, that is their problem or not.

Manchester United or not, the embarrassment has been the last 12 years not what we are seeing right now. This is a culmination of shit investment and not modernising the way we play.
"fecking off" the whole squad isn't feasible given our financial constraints, whether we want to or not
 
We now have two weeks of straight training. Im expecting to see a modicum of improvement. If there’s absolutely 0 then it’s slightly worrying. (But I’m all in for him until a good way through next season if it doesn’t approve at all)
 
People can direct the anger at me if it makes them feel better. But RA is in a doom loop death spiral already.

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
RA loses some fans, media criticise, RA flogs players harder

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
RA loses more fans, media intensify criticism, RA flogs players harder

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
Fans now disillusioned, media in negative frenzy, INEOS publicly back him

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
Fired

Only thing that breaks that cycle is if RA pushes his ego to one side, admit the squad cant play his way, works with what hes got, and try and get some decent results till he overhauls the squad in the summer.

You all know this is where we are. Its sliding doors. I think he will fall on his sword rather than change.
 
We now have two weeks of straight training. Im expecting to see a modicum of improvement. If there’s absolutely 0 then it’s slightly worrying. (But I’m all in for him until a good way through next season if it doesn’t approve at all)

Yeah, we've got a pretty decent February. Europa and FA Cup 5th round starts in March. So we actually have a decent 3 weeks or so of recovery and training.
 
People can direct the anger at me if it makes them feel better. But RA is in a doom loop death spiral already.

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
RA loses some fans, media criticise, RA flogs players harder

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
RA loses more fans, media intensify criticism, RA flogs players harder

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
Fans now disillusioned, media in negative frenzy, INEOS publicly back him

Players cant play said formation>>>Results are bad>>>>RA criticises players in press conferences/humiliates them with extra training>>>>Persists with plan A
Fired

Only thing that breaks that cycle is if RA pushes his ego to one side, admit the squad cant play his way, works with what hes got, and try and get some decent results till he overhauls the squad in the summer.

You all know this is where we are. Its sliding doors. I think he will fall on his sword rather than change.
This post is what ADHD generally feels like.
 
I don't think you do/did.

We didn't even lose the other night and some of you are absolutely losing your shit. It's bizarre. I can semi understand the situation if we'd lost and were also out of Europa. But we're through into the next stages of both cups.
We also outplayed City at the Etihad and went toe-to-toe with Liverpool at Anfield. Then there was the Arsenal game where, with 10 men, we fought like warriors and knocked them out. The performance when down to 10 men was the best I can remember from us as we usually crumble.

Some people don't realise or are purposely ignoring the mess he walked into, and what he's shown since joining has been very impressive.
 
It's never really been a thing and shouldn't.
I don’t believe it.. but it’s something our ex players have constantly preached. Strange they should abandon it the minute we get a manager who isn’t scared to ruffle a few feathers.
 
Would you have given David Moyes another transfer window here?
No. But I’m not the one whose been on tv talking about “manager’s needing 3 windows”

I was Moyes out by October. I think Amorim deserves backing. First manager to really try and change what’s gone wrong at United. Which funnily enough started when Moyes went of his way to keep a Rooney that should have been sold.
 
The team has won 6 of the last 8 games, sometimes you can't have everything all at once in regards to wins and good performances unfortunately.

Funnily enough I think we played quite well in parts against Forest, Bournemouth and Wolves but found ways to give those games away while doing our usual awful job at taking chances. Predominantly though we lost those games through mistakes.

This recent run of wins has been significantly worse in terms of chance creation and yet the results have been better.

It’s a similar pattern to the last few years when we’d win unconvincingly one week and then get beaten the next. It makes judging the coach particularly difficult. ETH may have not got sacked had he won the games against Palace and West Ham which I think we broadly deserved to.

I’m just not sure what to make of the Amorim era so far. I was really keen on him but the eye test doesn’t seem to show even slight glimpses of progress. Even with little training can it stay this disjointed all season?
 
Lets debase some myths here.

Its not petulant, lacking patience, knee jerky or having a meltdown to be unconvinced on Amorim.

-Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted).
-The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?
-I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things
-Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running
-Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing
-If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th.
-Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around
-Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?
-What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?
-IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper
-I feel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching.
-People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442.
-RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad.
-Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him.
-The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny

Some decent points and some over reactions but the bit I'd really focus on is that we have to be prepared for the eventuality that he gets sacked. There aren't that many 5-3-2 managers around and we can't deal with another half a decade of rebuild with a guy that wants to play 4-2-3-1. Giving him a couple of wing backs IMO isn't a huge deal. I don't see much else being done here to support him specifically. The only other potential concern is selling Garnacho or Mainoo but they seem to have backed off from that. Let's see.

Specific things to disagree with:

  1. Liverpool already have a WC squad and aren't building something from scratch. It makes sense that they tell a manager to feck off if they insist on a particular formation. We are not in their position, INEOS are basically rebuilding from scratch.
  2. He's still experimenting with players and Mainoo played one game at #9 and two games at #10 (one of those he looked really good!), so chill out a bit. If it's obvious to a random caftard, it'll be obvious to the manager.
  3. The squad is not built to play his style and yet.. he has been hired. It'll be more concerning if he were to just give up on his ideas and go to a 4 ATB system immediately.
  4. Anyone can win small leagues. Slot or Maresca or even Klopp might be randos. That's how it works in football - you hire a guy that looks promising and gettable and if it doesn't work out sack and move on. Well .. unless you have guys like Pep floating about that you make a 5 year plan for and get.
  5. The new manager bounce might not be all good anyway. It fades with time and well .. remember Ole and PSG?
Ultimately if he doesn't do well by December, it might be adios.
 
We talk about Hoijlund not being good enough. But he’s not getting chances. That’s because of an insistence on playing ‘inverted’ wing backs and wingers.

Basic human physiology dictates that it’s a thousand times more difficult for a left footed player, playing on the right, to whip a cross in. He has to turn back, which takes time, slows play and increases the chances of getting the ball taken off them.

The team has been screaming out for an attacking left back / wing back since Shaws injury. So, we buy one. And the manager, nobody else, chooses to play him on the right.

Dalot is decent on the right. He is absolutely terrible on the left. Terrible.

The decision is 1. Utterly incomprehensible and 2. 100% on the manager.

I want him to be a success. I really do. Decisions like that make it incredibly difficult to trust him though.

There was nothing stopping Garnacho squaring the ball for Hojlund on Friday either. If I was Hojlund I’d probably be fighting Garnacho on the pitch the next time he doesn’t pass me the ball.

I do agree though that it makes sense to have wing backs on their natural side. Dorgu played wide enough on the right but it just means we have nobody crossing on the run. So many passes backwards because of the way Dalot and Dorgu received the ball.
 
Things change. See the last sentence on my previous post. Fans are desperate to believe.

We have a larger body of work to judge him by. The honeymoon is over.

Not believing in someone or what they bring to the table isnt petulance. Its an opinion. We are all entitled to one. My opinion of fans like you is you think you are better fans because you are blindly loyal. A lemming. Or a turkey with their head in the sand.
Turkeys with their heads in the sand? That's new. But more importantly, re. your earlier post:

"Lets debase some myths here."
You mean strawman arguments, at least in part.

"Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted)."
A new manager bounce doesn't indicate quality. And it makes sense for Amorim to try players in various positions, given some of them are a poor fit for their more natural position in this system.

"The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?"

This was said a million times about Ten Hag, but hadn't even happened when he was fired. A pointless consideration.

"I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things."

That's a valid concern, but given Amorim got good results with this system in Portugal and in the CL (including against EPL teams), it's far from a hopeless case.

"Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running."

They got Slot because of the stylistic similarity to Klopp, which Amorim clearly didn't have. That means nothing for United, because no-one wanted a coach that would play like Ten Hag, and no-one thought United had a strong, stylistically cohesive squad that just needed a little TLC from the right coach.

"Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing"

You can't have it both ways. Ashworth was touted as best class by the people that thought Amorim was a good idea. So you trust them on the former but not on the latter? It's selective reasoning.

"If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th."

While the underperforming is true, there have also been plenty of green shoots in long periods of games - so you're exaggerating.

"Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around"

True, but some managers also do need time. Certainly with this United squad, instant results are unlikely from anyone. So this argument doesn't say anything interesting.

"Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?"

Who said that any coach should get carte blanche to spend a ton of money? That would be a terrible idea, no matter how successful the coach is.

"What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?"

That's a good question and hopefully something United's management considered before hiring Amorim. It's not an argument for or against anything Amirom does though.

"IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper"

If it was so simple, why has no manager gottwn the team going at United? Why does everything keep failing? And how do you know the 3-at-the-back decision isn't part of a long-term plan?

"Ifeel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching."

As if anyone is saying that everything's going great. Nope.

"People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442."

This contradicts a couple of point above. So the squad isn't quality? Or is Amorin is right to experiment with players, given they're not suitable in other positions? It feels like you're just lashing out randomly here.

"RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad."

Or he was hired with the mandate to implement this system. I mean, everyone and their dog knew that this is his approach. Surely United's management did as well and discussed with Amorim what he'd implement once hired.

"Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him."

Except Sporting didn't win titles in ages and Van Nistelrooij didn't actually win a title with PSV. But more generally, while winning a title anywhere doesn't guarantee success elsewhere, downplaying it as zero achievement makes no sense either.

"The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny"

Of course people are optimistic. Where's the fun in following sports if your outlook is negative? And your assessment of Amorim isn't 'the truth's, it's highly subjective and full of holes (as I argued below).

You can't possibly say that Amorim will definitely be a success and it would be important that his preferred playstyle (which wasn't defensive at Sporting) starts coming out more clearly in performances. But writing him off like you're doing here is way premature.
 
Don't get your hopes up, there won't be one either way

I honestly don’t think we need one as dramatic as people make out nor will signing players for Amorim be a problem if he’s sacked.

Players are adaptable despite the histrionics on here. Dorgu for example has played plenty of games at LB and RW. He isn’t just a wing back. Amad has already played well in multiple positions. The center backs are looking more comfortable playing in a back three in my opinion (not perfect by any means).

If we signed Quenda, a no10, a CM and a striker in the summer who wouldn’t be able to adapt to a new coach who plays with four at the back?
 
We also outplayed City at the Etihad and went toe-to-toe with Liverpool at Anfield. Then there was the Arsenal game where, with 10 men, we fought like warriors and knocked them out. The performance when down to 10 men was the best I can remember from us as we usually crumble.

Some people don't realise or are purposely ignoring the mess he walked into, and what he's shown since joining has been very impressive.

We fought like warriors? We usually crumbles?

We are still crumbling free falling, and we just got besieged by Leicester City and only won thanks to last minute goal
 
We fought like warriors? We usually crumbles?

We are still crumbling free falling, and we just got besieged by Leicester City and only won thanks to last minute goal
Did you not watch the arsenal game?
 
-Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?
-What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?

I think this idea is really overstated. Aside from I suppose the wingbacks, I don't really see any positions that require "532 system players". Centre backs are still centre backs, midfielders are still midfielders, a striker is still a striker.

I would also think that if/when we do move on from Amorim, any wingbacks we have should probably be able to play either wing or full back.
 
Turkeys with their heads in the sand? That's new. But more importantly, re. your earlier post:

"Lets debase some myths here."
You mean strawman arguments, at least in part.

"Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted)."
A new manager bounce doesn't indicate quality. And it makes sense for Amorim to try players in various positions, given some of them are a poor fit for their more natural position in this system.

"The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?"

This was said a million times about Ten Hag, but hadn't even happened when he was fired. A pointless consideration.

"I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things."

That's a valid concern, but given Amorim got good results with this system in Portugal and in the CL (including against EPL teams), it's far from a hopeless case.

"Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running."

They got Slot because of the stylistic similarity to Klopp, which Amorim clearly didn't have. That means nothing for United, because no-one wanted a coach that would play like Ten Hag, and no-one thought United had a strong, stylistically cohesive squad that just needed a little TLC from the right coach.

"Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing"

You can't have it both ways. Ashworth was touted as best class by the people that thought Amorim was a good idea. So you trust them on the former but not on the latter? It's selective reasoning.

"If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th."

While the underperforming is true, there have also been plenty of green shoots in long periods of games - so you're exaggerating.

"Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around"

True, but some managers also do need time. Certainly with this United squad, instant results are unlikely from anyone. So this argument doesn't say anything interesting.

"Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?"

Who said that any coach should get carte blanche to spend a ton of money? That would be a terrible idea, no matter how successful the coach is.

"What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?"

That's a good question and hopefully something United's management considered before hiring Amorim. It's not an argument for or against anything Amirom does though.

"IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper"

If it was so simple, why has no manager gottwn the team going at United? Why does everything keep failing? And how do you know the 3-at-the-back decision isn't part of a long-term plan?

"Ifeel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching."

As if anyone is saying that everything's going great. Nope.

"People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442."

This contradicts a couple of point above. So the squad isn't quality? Or is Amorin is right to experiment with players, given they're not suitable in other positions? It feels like you're just lashing out randomly here.

"RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad."

Or he was hired with the mandate to implement this system. I mean, everyone and their dog knew that this is his approach. Surely United's management did as well and discussed with Amorim what he'd implement once hired.

"Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him."

Except Sporting didn't win titles in ages and Van Nistelrooij didn't actually win a title with PSV. But more generally, while winning a title anywhere doesn't guarantee success elsewhere, downplaying it as zero achievement makes no sense either.

"The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny"

Of course people are optimistic. Where's the fun in following sports if your outlook is negative? And your assessment of Amorim isn't 'the truth's, it's highly subjective and full of holes (as I argued below).

You can't possibly say that Amorim will definitely be a success and it would be important that his preferred playstyle (which wasn't defensive at Sporting) starts coming out more clearly in performances. But writing him off like you're doing here is way premature.
That is an insane post for 3 am in the morning.
 
It's not exactly losing the plot, is it?

Both have played both
Yeah so play both on their lesser preferred positions? Sounds like losing the plot to me. Could have simply bought a RWB instead of a player who has played on the left the whole season?
 
As with anything there is always a level of responsibility that the players have to take, however, in your last sentence you put all the blame on the players and none on the manager.

Having the player's positions so defensive (at times 5 defenders marking 2/3 players or 3 CBs marking 1 striker) naturally means there will be less forward options to pass to. In a team that already struggled to score, you've then decided to make it even harder for them to create chances by neutering them even more. The fact we brought in a new attacking wingback and he also ended up just passing the ball back the majority of the time is also an indication its an issue with the tactics, not just the players.

It may be that Amorim's tactics work out in the long run, it’s also equally as possible that they don't work in the premier league. At the moment we are playing the worst football I've ever seen. It’s boring, uninspiring, 0 risk. That aspect is coming from the manager. Our players are bad, but they are not this bad.
I didn’t and don’t absolve Amorim of all blame. I was responding to a post which stated he was telling the players to play slow. He isn’t.

The relationships between the players in the system don’t work yet, that’s not a surprise given it’s new. But the system change is a red herring, the relationships in our team, in any system over the last 4-5 years haven’t worked.

Dorgu was fine, he was going forward, and trying to pass forward, but our movement is poor. For the reason above. So he did what everyone else was doing, retain and recycle it into the back 4.

I don’t know if Amorim will work out or not, but I’m inclined to just swallow the pill for a couple of seasons and let him work. I think the Ineos plan is to completely remove all high earners in the next two seasons and have a wage bill with little to no players over 120-150k. With that in mind, I think Amorim is a good choice, and hopefully we get intelligent hungry young players in and see where that takes us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
Yeah so play both on their lesser preferred positions? Sounds like losing the plot to me. Could have simply bought a RWB instead of a player who has played on the left the whole season?

Have you thought that planning horizon might exceed one match?

Are you certain he's played the whole season on the left? Seems like a big claim if you're not sure and one that can be easily disproved ..
 
I wouldn't mind it much if we had consistency from the senior management in terms of who they hired as the head coach, because that's always been our problem hasn't it? Apparently Tuchel was the ideal replacement and then it was actually Amorim. Completely different in terms of who they would want to recruit. I expected it from the Glazers but these guys are meant to be "best in class"...

I'm genuinely asking because I know feck all about football other than "he looks shite, he looks ok".

I'm not sure if I understand the question but the lack of consistency from senior management is an issue but it's kind of beside the point. The point was that people claim or think that there is a point in time where managers were given time in spite of poor performances, it has never been thing. I mentioned it earlier in the thread but that perception isn't born from reality the average tenure today is the same than the average tenure 30-40 years ago, it's around 82 league games, now that figure shouldn't be misinterpreted as managers being given more than 2 years while it's the average tenure it includes successful and moderately successful managers who stay longer, the ones that don't perform gets jettisoned quickly and have always been.

Now to your point, that's why most clubs have a DOF, he is the one supposed to bring consistency, United has failed in that department and it's crucial to fix it. We need to stop with the cult of an all powerful manager that is allowed to do whatever he wants and gut teams without any proof of concept.
 
We also outplayed City at the Etihad and went toe-to-toe with Liverpool at Anfield. Then there was the Arsenal game where, with 10 men, we fought like warriors and knocked them out. The performance when down to 10 men was the best I can remember from us as we usually crumble.

Some people don't realise or are purposely ignoring the mess he walked into, and what he's shown since joining has been very impressive.

We didn't really outplay City, that game was a terrible game of football which we won, but outplayed is pure hyperbole to make a point
 
We fought like warriors? We usually crumbles?

We are still crumbling free falling, and we just got besieged by Leicester City and only won thanks to last minute goal

Leicester didn't exactly besieged us did they. In the second half the game was played pretty much exclusively in their half.
 
Amorim will be gone by the summer as this isn’t getting any better, we don’t look any fitter, the players can not play the system, Amorim refuses to even tweak the system, players are playing in wrong positions, the players have zero confidence in themselves and possibly even now Amorim himself but yet again the club have done it to themselves as they continually repeat the same mistakes in allowing CEO’s, directors and non footballing people to make football decisions then wonder why it’s not worked out as thought.

We have zero idea from the top what we want to do in regards to a ‘United way’ style of play or an identity, no real structure, zero organisation between scouting to recruitment to negotiating and the fact Ineos and Berrada couldn't decide between ETH, Tuchel, Frank, Howe, Southgate, RVN and Amorim and others between the end of last season and Amorim coming in just smacks of how piss poor our supposed structure is.

Said it on here countless times in the last week or two that Brailsford and Berrada should be nowhere near footballing decisions yet Brailsford was the driving force in keeping ETH then wanted Southgate to succeed ETH whilst Berrada was adamant on Amorim to the point he was on the plane to Portugal within hours of ETH being sacked, it can be dressed up whatever way people want but those two making footballing decisions is no different to Woodward and Arnold.

The club brought two footballing men in to the club with Ashworth and Wilcox with Ashworth in the words of Ratcliffe himself coming in to run the footballing department and Ashworth wanted Howe or Frank because they were perfect for how we were going to play from the first team down to the academies and Wilcox would effectively be his right hand man.

The two biggest decisions that Ashworth was tasked with was whether to keep ETH on or not and then who would succeed him after ETH was fired and BOTH decisions were taken on by a director that’s a fecking cycling coach and a CEO who’s speciality is sponsorship deals, Ashworth may have proved to not be a great Sporting Director but he was brought in to run the football department and described as ‘best in class’ only to have directors make his decisions for him.

I’m afraid where we are right now is down to Brailsford and Berrada (and to a much lesser Amorim’s refusal to even tweak his system) as Brailsford kept ETH on after the club publicly courted other managers so clearly had no faith in him then gave ETH around £180 million to spend just to fire him weeks later then Berrada went all out to bring Amorim in and even told him in Amorim’s own words ‘it’s now or never’ even though Berrada would have known there was no money to bring players in to play Amorim’s system, ignored Ashworth’s advice on not having the players to play Amorim’s system and that Amorim was married to the system so wouldn’t change from it.

Things that are on Amorim is where players are playing positionally and after such a long drawn out process of bringing a left wing back in due to Dalot and Mazraoui being horrific there Amorim plays the left wing back on the right with Dalot yet again on the left as well as things like Mainoo as a striker, Amorim isn’t helping himself at all and if it doesn’t get better quick he won’t be backed in the summer as Ineos won’t have faith money can solve the issues.
 
I think this idea is really overstated. Aside from I suppose the wingbacks, I don't really see any positions that require "532 system players". Centre backs are still centre backs, midfielders are still midfielders, a striker is still a striker.

I would also think that if/when we do move on from Amorim, any wingbacks we have should probably be able to play either wing or full back.
I agree to be honest. No other club has this issue. End of the season the question is how well has he done with a squad who were 8th and won the FA cup - you give a bit of leeway (that is used up in my opinion we need to see something) but the simple fact is what we have seen is simply not good enough. He has time, he has a lot of fan patience (everyone wants to give him until end of season even with near relegation form) but it’s literally his job to win points.
 
No. But I’m not the one whose been on tv talking about “manager’s needing 3 windows”

I was Moyes out by October. I think Amorim deserves backing. First manager to really try and change what’s gone wrong at United. Which funnily enough started when Moyes went of his way to keep a Rooney that should have been sold.

How so?