Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach | Thread locked during matches

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I hopped onto this convo, a poster was being called delusional for saying United should be finishing at least 6th-7th with this squad. 7th is midtable. So in this particular case that was very much not what people were saying.
6-7th is not midtable
 
This season Rashford has 4 league goals.

23/24 season 7 league goals.

22/23 season before the world cup he got 4. Mad goalscoring streak for ten week after the world cup. Then finished the season with 2 in 10.

21/22 season 4 league goals.

Second half of 20/21 season where I thought his decline began he got 4 in 22 league games. Everyone thinks Ronaldo messed up the 21/22 team but Rashford and Martial had already fallen of a cliff the season before.

I think we have to give up on this idea Rashford will become a 20 in the league type scorer just by a positional switch.
That's not true considering they both got close to 20 goals that season, prior to Ronaldo signing.
 
Yeah Garnacho has the same no obvious position problem Bruno has.

With the way both Hojlund and Garnacho were seemingly deployed against Ipswich he has a role as wide forward. The question is whether Amorim will stick with this or not, if I remember correctly @SCP said that it is one of the ways he deployed certain players with Sporting, it wasn't always 2 central attacking midfielders?
 
I don’t think we are as far away as results suggest and if we get rid of Rashford and Garnacho in the summer, I think it indicates a clear plan of what he wants to achieve. Standards are crucial and the club have allowed them to drop like a stone.

If we do those PSR (Rashford, Garnacho, and maybe even Kobbie) deals in the summer, we are an LWB, CM, a dynamic No.10 and CF away from being a very good team. I honestly think the margins are still that tight. A competent GK can be added to the list, and there are probably some options that could come in at very little cost.

That obviously has to be accompanied by a dressing room change and a complete overhaul of standards and squad mentality, but the recent fight in games, the Rashford exile and individuals like de Ligt and Ugarte coming in, suggest that this could be underway.

I like him and want to stick with him, I think he is slowly giving us what we need.
 
That's not true considering they both got close to 20 goals that season, prior to Ronaldo signing.

You've got that wrong I think.

20/21 was the season before Ronaldo. Martial scored 4 league goals. 7 in total.

As I've just said, Rashford got 4 league goals from January onwards in 20/21. That's in 22 games.

It's a myth Ronaldo stopped them scoring. That was already well underway.
 
With the way both Hojlund and Garnacho were seemingly deployed against Ipswich he has a role as wide forward. The question is whether Amorim will stick with this or not, if I remember correctly @SCP said that it is one of the ways he deployed certain players with Sporting, it wasn't always 2 central attacking midfielders?
Lets see how he does against good opposition and more consistently but hopefully he can grow into it. I don't know if he has the ability to be more than a winger at the moment though.
 
Lets see how he does against good opposition and more consistently but hopefully he can grow into it. I don't know if he has the ability to be more than a winger at the moment though.

That's the point you can play in 343 with wingers.
 
In a 4-3-3 mid press with zirkzee as a false 9 and Rashford and Amad playing as genuine wide forwards, Rashford and Amad would probably both get towards 20 league goals, even replacing one with garnacho he would probably get 10-15.

Definitely make a run for top 4 with that set up.

:lol:

Jesus Christ this thread man
 
Amad's not even shown he can stay fit for a full Prem League season yet.

It's so premature to say he can bag 20 league goals.

His best time for United has come in a 3-4-3 system as wing back but yeah some people think that he scores 20 goals in a 4-3-3 system.

What people would say just to get formation changed
 
Exactly this.. don't know how many times I've mentioned it here. But no matter if Amorim is here or not, we need better players and need to replace most of the current players. And the fact that the type of players Amorim wants are, better athletic and good technical players is only a good thing for us as a club.

And also, the excuse of "oh but he's getting players for 3-4-3" or whatever, doesn't work either imo. Becuase these are players that can easily slot into 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 as well.
I appreciate we need more athletic players but still don't buy that recruiting to players who suit a 3421 won't mean recruiting different players than we wpuld be if we were playing a 433
 
I think so many United fans are living in a complete fantasy land right now. We’ve seen how some players suddenly get better on their eyes when they’ve been injured for a few weeks, suddenly they become amongst the best in the league if we change formation.
Just wait until we have a proper preseason. We will be totally awesome.
 
Amad's not even shown he can stay fit for a full Prem League season yet.

It's so premature to say he can bag 20 league goals.

Yes, also...

Zirkzee hasn't shown that he can operate and link well with others as a false #9 in the most congested area of the pitch.

Rashford hasn't shown in kind of consistency as the main attacking threat.

The question still remains regarding Bruno and the false #9 trying to occupy the same pockets of space.

Dalot, Mazraui and Dorgu haven't shown that they can provide creativity in the wide areas.

The centre-halves won't become any quicker and more proactive in a back-four.

If only football was played on a piece of paper.
 
There are countless posts in this very forum, from different time periods where
Ugarte is an amazing midfielder
Dalot is out best player
De ligt is world class
Martinez is our best defender
Onana was City's worst problem in the CL final
Bruno is world class
Mainoo is a wonder kid
Mazraoui is our best player
Garnacho and Amad are the best young wingers
Now everybody has turned rubbish and our squad is worse than Ipswich's
The truth is our squad is good enough to be 6th or 7th.
And a manager that is the best in the world should be able to push that squad even above what they are capable of with formations training and motivation.
Phycology also plays a huge part in a teams performance. I don't think are players are motivated.
With Garnacho and Amad both fit playing with 2 wingers would definitely make us better, and maybe get the whole squads moral back and players playing to their capabilities and even rasmus scoring.
And not a single one of them was ever remotely true.
 
The Caf is notoriously fickle. As always the truth is somewhere between extremes. Elanga for example was commonly thought on here not to be good enough yet is playing for a Forest team ahead of us. So either we can and do our underrate players or you can overperform with a team of pretty average players, in the right system and coaching - which is beyond the nuance that many would admit.
We are probably the team that underperform the most in the PL. Our players should be good enough for top 10, but not top 6, without overperforming one bit.
 
My debate was, Inter playing a 3 man defence with attacking power might be explained by the Italian league being not very strong. In that you can attack more because the opposition lacks world class attack.

Also this was my theory for Sporting being attacking in Portugal. In England balance is key, too attacking you will leak goals, you become defensive you wont win games.
Ah I see. Fair enough. No worries.
 
I appreciate we need more athletic players but still don't buy that recruiting to players who suit a 3421 won't mean recruiting different players than we wpuld be if we were playing a 433
Never said that... if I understand you correctly(that we would be buying different players if we played 433). I'm saying either way, 433 or 3421, we are getting players that are better than what we have and the players we have needs to get sold.
 
People defend Amorim because they like him and want him to succeed. That’s not a bad thing. But yes, performances and results have been poor.

The reason he gets a bit of understanding and patience is because the performances and results were poor before too, with the same group of players, coupled with the fact he hasn’t been able to bring many of his own signings in.

He deserves time and a window or two. But we definitely need to see the green shoots of progress at the start of next season.
No manager deserves that. They have to earn it.
 
On the positive side,
- 3 points
- we showed more intent (with little quality) in the first half, even with the early howler
- Team was resilient and was competitive even with 10 men

On the downside,
- System still feels negative and defenders see more of the ball than desired
- Some of the substitutions were quite baffling. Taking Garnacho off, replacing Hojlund with a midfielder rather than Obi
- Losing Dorgu for 3 matches
- Onana continues to be a huge liability
Agreed
 
No but close to where we are now. Don't pursue short term results in place of actually doing proper change to how we play and trying to drill that in. Pretty much every manager in the past has reverted back to a counter attack style or found something that suits the players temporarily in the aim of not losing their job. I think if Amorim had been here for longer he'd probably have been fired by now, but the board clearly recognise he's trying to perform a quite hefty change in many areas so he's likely got a free hit from now until at least the start of the next season.
People wouldn't have a problem with a rebuild if it looked like Arsenal's. Being in the mix for European football but just falling short but there are green shoots of progress.

What they don't want is a team to be near the relegation zone in a rebuild. Surely that's not difficult to see? The short term pain fans talk about is qualifying for the Europa League or Conference League.

The club hasn't been in a financial position for years now to be in the position we're in. That's why managers do what they did.
 
We are good enough to finish 4th-8th in my opinion. Amorim is definitely underperforming, as was Ten Hag this season. Ten Hag might have turned it around, while I‘m not seeing any good signs under Amorim.

I‘m glad we won against Ipswich, but all it was, was avoiding an embarrassment.

If Amorim wants to experiment the remaining games, I‘m fine with it. I don‘t want to see the same ineffective shit any longer though.
If we had all the players performing to their capabilities this season including those out on loan, then yeah I agree with your assessment of where we should be finishing. Unfortunately, a lot has gone wrong including with the managers and executives and the players. Perfect storm. No one can escape blame for this mess on the football side of the club.
 
People wouldn't have a problem with a rebuild if it looked like Arsenal's. Being in the mix for European football but just falling short but there are green shoots of progress.

What they don't want is a team to be near the relegation zone in a rebuild. Surely that's not difficult to see? The short term pain fans talk about is qualifying for the Europa League or Conference League.

The club hasn't been in a financial position for years now to be in the position we're in. That's why managers do what they did.
We were already in 12th before Amorim got here. It’s not insane that we’ve dropped a mere two places in that time where we’ve lost a lot of our forward players and tried a new style.

The short term pain fans talk about is not real pain if they think that’s just lower European places. They aren’t prepared for an actual rebuild.
 
The forward line is an issue and there's been a clear overall drop off since March 2023 where the Rashford purple patch ended and Casemiro ran out of gas. However, we still won enough games by the odd goal to finish top 3 at the end of that season.

The major drop off since August 2023, which has seen us go from battling top 4 every year to genuine midtable crap, has been because of the goalkeeper we signed. We now can barley nick games anymore as the keeper isn't saving us late on like he used to, and in fact, he's actively throwing games in the other teams favour with huge blunders at a remarkable rate you wouldn't even have thought Taibi was capable of. A striker is incredibly important, but I'd argue getting a good goalkeeper is where the manager should start. Start with the most important foundation.
I'd say it's both. Hojlund isn't good enough to be a starter consistently and we've potentially ruined him. Shouldn't have signed him unless we were sure we could have got rid of Martial last season and replace him with a dependable experienced forward. Also, Onana isn't good enough period.
 
Not the season before Ronaldo, Rashford got 21 but only 11 of those were in the league and Martial managed only 7 in all competitions with 4 coming in the league.
Yeah Rashford regularly got good goal scoring outputs for the season but at least half of them were in the cups not the league so it skews how his numbers are viewed.
 
We were already in 12th before Amorim got here. It’s not insane that we’ve dropped a mere two places in that time where we’ve lost a lot of our forward players and tried a new style.

The short term pain fans talk about is not real pain if they think that’s just lower European places. They aren’t prepared for an actual rebuild.
So you're saying Arsenal's rebuild is not a proper rebuild because they didn't finish in the lower half of the table when they changed both almost the whole squad and their executives?

Also, we were 12th after 11 games. That's not even 1/3 of the season gone yet. Plenty of time to improve and be in the top half. Bournemouth were in the bottom half and Newcastle were 10th and now both are in the European places. Palace were also in the relegation zone and are now midtable.
 
So you're saying Arsenal's rebuild is not a proper rebuild because they didn't finish in the lower half of the table when they changed both almost the whole squad and their executives?

Also, we were 12th after 11 games. That's not even 1/3 of the season gone yet. Plenty of time to improve and be in the top half. Bournemouth were in the bottom half and Newcastle were 10th and now both are in the European places. Palace were also in the relegation zone and are now midtable.
Obviously not. Why would I say that it’s not a proper rebuild? There’s just different ones. Theirs worked (although they’ve barely won anything). We’re going a different route.
 
I don't disagree that United have a weak attacking roster right now.

But a lot of the discussion about squad quality ends up being based on league position / current performance, which ends up eliminating influence of manager, tactics, form, etc.

Good on Chris Wood for scoring 18 goals. Nottingham Forest are 3rd. But surely nobody believes they are the 3rd or 4th or 5th squad in the PL.

Arsenal have been 2nd in the PL the last three seasons even though their strikers are not really at that top top level, but they are a well-drilled team, hence they score goals.

But look at Arsenal struggling now they have a few forwards out injured. Haven't scored in 3 of their last 4 games. The one they did score in was against Leicester.

How well drilled you are can only do so much if you don't have the talent.
 
Arsenal had and have forwards capable of scoring 10-15 league goals. Saka, Havertz, Martinelli...
It's exactly what we're missing.
Havertz is memed a lot, but he has scored more goals this season than our entire frontline put together.

Speculating that Zirkzee as false 9 in 442 would lead to Rashford and Amad scoring 20 goals each is some next level theorycraft.
 
Arsenal had and have forwards capable of scoring 10-15 league goals. Saka, Havertz, Martinelli...
It's exactly what we're missing.
Havertz is memed a lot, but he has scored more goals this season than our entire frontline put together.

Speculating that Zirkzee as false 9 in 442 would lead to Rashford and Amad scoring 20 goals each is some next level theorycraft.
I can see Zirkzee becoming very good at holding up the ball and putting others through. His final ball isn‘t good enough yet, but he is good at dribbling out of tight spaces.

Højlund looks broken, imo he needs a loan somewhere.
 
I can see Zirkzee becoming very good at holding up the ball and putting others through. His final ball isn‘t good enough yet, but he is good at dribbling out of tight spaces.

Højlund looks broken, imo he needs a loan somewhere.

Hojlund and Zirkzee are not the only problems.
Garnacho has scored 2 out of what...17 big chances? Appaling, considering his selfishness and ego.

If some of these 3 doesn't hit form we are in big trouble.
 
But look at Arsenal struggling now they have a few forwards out injured. Haven't scored in 3 of their last 4 games. The one they did score in was against Leicester.

How well drilled you are can only do so much if you don't have the talent.
Arsenal have scored 51 goals this season despite the fact that none of their attackers have individually done amazingly. A poor run of form in 4 games is not very meaningful IMO, many teams have such runs of form throughout the season regardless of injury situations.
 
Last edited:
Arsenal have scored 51 goals this season despite the fact that none of their attackers have individually done amazingly. A poor run of form in 4 games is not very meaningful IMO, many teams have such runs of form throughout the season regardless of injury situations.

You don't think recently struggling to score goals and recently suffering more injuries up top are linked?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.