Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach | Thread locked during matches

Except here, all of them could've easily been goals. When you hit the bar and have shots cleared off the line, those can objectively be called legit chances. Had both gone in, we'd be signing an entirely different tune. Happiness is a matter of inches.

That simply isn't true though, the logic that hitting the bar automatically makes the attempt a legit chance just doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

Statistically we had 2 big chances, both of which fell to Maguire in added time. Better than Forest, but not demonstrating much creativity.
 
That simply isn't true though, the logic that hitting the bar automatically makes the attempt a legit chance just doesn't hold up to any scrutiny.

Statistically we had 2 big chances, both of which fell to Maguire in added time. Better than Forest, but not demonstrating much creativity.

Hitting the bar is a pretty good chance at scoring a goal. Its literally inches away, so its obviously a good chance. As for your second sentence, that may be your opinion, but it has nothing to do with statistics. I agree that Maguire had two good chances, but so did Mount in addition to those in the first half.
 
Forest are a completely different side to Lyon and Bilbao. Don’t think tonight has any bearing or is pointed towards anything that’ll happen in Europa.
I can tell you now we won’t be controlling games against Lyon and Bilbao (if we get through) as they are a lot more possession based.

People getting carried away tonight a bit ….over a defeat. To a team who treat the ball like a hot potatoe and have a defensive line deeper than Gervinhos hairline and who played 120 mins Saturday evening.
Forest are still where they are in the league though - 3rd. While Bilbao are 4th and lyon 7th or whatever. This in a more competitive league. Yes we may not see as much of the ball against other sides but that doesn't automatically make other sides tougher to play.

I don't think anyone is getting carried away. Just focusing on positives (of which there were a good few) as opposed to doom and glooming.
 


Great answer

Spot on answer. This is precisely why I couldn't care less by how players that have left are doing because they could not hack it here. And usually, vast majority of those players revert back to their usual levels eventually. I dont really remember any player that has left us in the last 10 years that I would say that I truly want back.
 
The absolutely massive difference is that LVG actually had some decent attacking players in his Utd squads.

Rooney, Van Persie, Welbeck, Chicarito, Falcao, Di Maria, Martial, Depay.

If we’d have had just one or two players like that today we probably would have scored a goal or two.

That's one of the worst pieces of revisionism I've seen. Falcao scored about 5 goals for us and Chelsea combined. Welbeck and Chicarito were sold and never played. Di Maria packed it because he got burgled. RVP ended up in Turkey soon after.

Our front line for LVG 2nd season was at the end 19yo Martial, 18 yo Rashford, Mata and Lingard.
 
That's one of the worst pieces of revisionism I've seen. Falcao scored about 5 goals for us and Chelsea combined. Welbeck and Chicarito were sold and never played. Di Maria packed it because he got burgled. RVP ended up in Turkey soon after.

Our front line for LVG 2nd season was at the end 19yo Martial, 18 yo Rashford, Mata and Lingard.
Which is still quite a bit better than what we have now, no?
 
Our attackers get plenty of chances and plenty of the ball. Garnacho just is a very wasteful player and Amad is injured at the moment. But you can’t say he didn’t get plenty of chances before he got injured.

We don’t need world class wingbacks, we just need someone on the right who has an actual final delivery unlike Dalot, and we just have to give our 20 year old newbie on the left a little time. As I said, he was brilliant the last game and even tonight almost had a game winning assist.

Dalot has a pretty good delivery in fairness to him, it's just there was never that much in the box for him to pick out, apart from his opposite wingback dorgu, who looks very unnatural in such positions.

Garnacho had 6 shots tonight none of which where genuine chances. Amad didn't do that much from the no 10 position before injury and was actually much better as a wingback because we than had a genuine attacking player overloading for us. But it creates defensive issues.

Is you play 2 really attacking wingers at wingbacks should produce a potent attack, but your back three have to be unbelievable if cover. If you play genuine full back defensive wingbacks your front three have to be unbelievable to make up for it.

If you play jack of all trades wingbacks I.e. traditional wing backs you get a solid enough system that is neither attacking enough or defensive enough at the top level.

Last night performances was fine a little unlucky not to get something out of it. Forest aren't that good though, missing a few key players just having a very good season. We got into to good attacking positions early in the game but couldn't take advantage, forest changed shape than we couldn't break them down at all, only in the last few mins when we threw Maguire on to try and cause chaos did we actually look like we could score.

A few additions in the summer we will probably have a solid system and team, maybe we can push for European places with a bit of luck, but I don't see this system producing anymore than that. Its got to many flaws.
 
And it means we create more chances for our wingbacks than our attackers because the wingbacks are the overloads.

Its flawed, and unless the wingbacks are absolutely worldclass players in both attack and defence (they don't exist) than it's a system that will continue to fail in the premier league.

You just end up with jack of all trade players getting into good attacking positions but not being actually good enough to do anything about it, while you genuine attacking talents are marked out of the game.
Just as importantly, numerically, you start with more defensive players than you do attacking players. That’s already setting you up on the back foot.
 
Hitting the bar is a pretty good chance at scoring a goal. Its literally inches away, so its obviously a good chance. As for your second sentence, that may be your opinion, but it has nothing to do with statistics. I agree that Maguire had two good chances, but so did Mount in addition to those in the first half.

Hitting the bar is a shot off target, being inches away doesn't mean it's a good chance, any combination of events could cause it to happen. In this case it was a header with 0.06xG, so it would be scored 6 times out of 100. Not at all a good chance.

My second paragraph isn't my opinion, the match stats state that we had 2 big chances, and our only chances with a reasonable xG were Maguire's chances. The others you're trying to class as legit chances were speculative low percentage attempts, not chances.
 
My point clumsily made while putting my teething son back to bed last night is this, the higher the xG the better chances and shots you take, our xG last night off of 20+ shots means the chances/shots we took were of low quality otherwise the xG would be higher which was my original point we didn't create good chances or opportunities so pointing to having 20+ shots kind of pointless when none of them looked like being a goal save for the end when we shoved Maguire up front
 
Excellent answer. Nobody would of ever expecting Elanga to score that type of goal tonight but it happened against his old club. Did he do that stuff at United? No he didn't.
You could argue that he's developed very well away from United though couldn't you? So what is not working at United that doesn't allow a player like Elanga to develop. Frankly, I saw as much from him as I ever have done from Garnacho, yet we keep the latter and sell the former. Not sure this belongs in a thread about Amorim though.
 
Last edited:
You could argue that he's developed very well away from United though couldn't you? So what is not working at United that doesn't allow a player like Elanga to develop. Frankly, I saw as much from him as I ever have done from Garnacho, yet we keep the latter and sell the former. Not sure this belongs in a thread about Amorim though.

Garnacho had done a lot more for us than Elanga ever did. Elanga always looked pretty toothless with us. Just pace but with limited technical abilities and no end product.
 
Ignore the bollocks posted on here tonight, we played well and everybody, bar some of our own fans that just enjoy shitting on their own team even when it’s not deserved, could see it. Tonight’s performance actually gave me more belief that we could win the EL as we played football at a higher level tonight, and I think we’d control games against most of the teams left in the competition. Some nice one touch football, some great link up play to beat the press and some solid individual performances in the build up. We forced turnovers well, which we’ve been getting better at recently and we had a better shape to us which also led to some promising situations.

Once again we were let down by some individual performances though and we’re not good enough to carry players, especially whether Bruno was one player having an off day. It was good to see Mount back in contention and other players returning, hopefully we can create competition for places and even rest players as needed, which might take us up another level also.
Totally agree mate. I’m starting to finally see what RA wants from this side and how we play. Players look assured of what’s needed of them - just a bit of quality in the execution is lacking.
Not sure if I agree with winning the EL though as I don’t see us scoring enough goals. We are so short of quality up front.
 
My point clumsily made while putting my teething son back to bed last night is this, the higher the xG the better chances and shots you take, our xG last night off of 20+ shots means the chances/shots we took were of low quality otherwise the xG would be higher which was my original point we didn't create good chances or opportunities so pointing to having 20+ shots kind of pointless when none of them looked like being a goal save for the end when we shoved Maguire up front

People need to use the eye test. Apparently the Maguire header wide was 0.6 of our xG. Most of our efforts were very low quality and scrappy, like from corners and scrambled efforts. Very few clean shots on goal from moving defenders around.
 
Totally agree mate. I’m starting to finally see what RA wants from this side and how we play. Players look assured of what’s needed of them - just a bit of quality in the execution is lacking.
Not sure if I agree with winning the EL though as I don’t see us scoring enough goals. We are so short of quality up front.

Same here. We will never be consistent with these forwards as we just can't guarantee goals, but you can see a structure there in the build up at least.
 
Totally agree mate. I’m starting to finally see what RA wants from this side and how we play. Players look assured of what’s needed of them - just a bit of quality in the execution is lacking.
Not sure if I agree with winning the EL though as I don’t see us scoring enough goals. We are so short of quality up front.
We looked more comfortable on the ball and at times progressed through midfield well. But this was against a team that were happy to sit back once they took the lead. Of more concern, I cannot see how we score goals, and its not just about a number 9. We need two attacking wing backs, not defenders turned poor wingers. Diallo may be one but I don't see Dorgu as the other. I don't like the formation, it just means we play too many defenders, and I hate the fact the manager has no other option.
 
How does he nail every answer?
Its not fair to ask Amorim this, it is a question for ETH. Who played Weghorst ahead of him, one of the most limited players ever to pull on the shirt, and then used the funds from his sale to buy Antony. Along with Onana, Antony and the rest, ETH has left an appalling legacy.
 
I’m absolutely astounded as to how low standards have dropped and how many fans just blindly accept this.
 
Its not fair to ask Amorim this, it is a question for ETH. Who played Weghorst ahead of him, one of the most limited players ever to pull on the shirt, and then used the funds from his sale to buy Antony. Along with Onana, Antony and the rest, ETH has left an appalling legacy.
I wanted ETH booted a good 18 months before he was sacked, but I’ll stick up for him over this. Elanga was absolutely fecking shit at United and very few managers would have played him.
 
Garnacho had done a lot more for us than Elanga ever did. Elanga always looked pretty toothless with us. Just pace but with limited technical abilities and no end product.
That sounds like Garnacho.
 
I feel like we are starting to see his style coming through now. There is a lot of work still to do but there are glimpses.

Our inability to score is a huge problem. Garnacho must have cut inside and taken a shot 10 times last night and not tested the keeper once.

I don’t understand how we are so bad at getting on the end of crosses and cutbacks. Cross it to the back post? Headed away. Cross it to the front post? Cleared. Cut it back along the ground? No one there.

As for Elanga, he’s thriving in a side that plays to his skill set. They sit back and hit you on the break, which allows him to use his speed and directness. He doesn’t have the guile to play for a team who controls the ball and has to unlock a defence patiently. Saying we should have kept him based on that performance is off the mark..
 
Strange reading these comments as I came out of it feeling really positive about him. We lack a cutting edge but then we knew that already. We looked a lot better with the ball, much crisper passing, and we restricted them to very little.

Thats my feeling towards it too. It was refreshing to see us actually look like a team with some control in midfield and put some nice passing moves together, i thought we dominated the ball and looked very much in control which we dont often see. Also the formation and tactics, which i've been very critical of, i could see starting to work last night, with the way the wide CB's brought the ball out and how the 2 in CM and 2 at no 10 were finding space. Definitely some positives to take.

Of course the result isnt what we wanted and the lack of cutting edge and quality in the final 3rd is still a concern, but im starting to be a bit more hopeful Ruben is moving us in the right direction.
 


Great answer


Weird question.

Why would it hurt him when he wasn't our manager at the time we sold him, he has never worked with him and there's a very good chance he'd never heard of him until recently?

Can't miss what you never had.
 
I’m absolutely astounded as to how low standards have dropped and how many fans just blindly accept this.
I dont think fans are blindly accepting anything other than where the side is at the moment and how big a job it is for Ruben or any manager to walk into.
 
Great answer
I was delighted when we got 15 million for Elanga, he wasn't up to it and has found his level in a super defensive counter attacking team.

I'm pleased he's doing well and wish him well, respect for not celebrating last night too, top man!
 
Just utterly bizarre questions as usual just trying to get a rise or a soundbite from the manager. Elanga isn't good enough for United. He might be good enough at this point in time but fecking Danny Welbeck is probably good enough for us at this time.

What top team does Elanga get into? None. So what a fecking stupid question. He scored a brilliant goal and played OK. Good for him. Its nice to see him having a good career away from United but that has no relevance to us. In the same way Antony doing well in an easier and slower league has no bearing on whether he is good enough for United.

I thought we were much better than we have been in a long time last night. Forest are just super solid defensively and we have no cutting edge. You can see that Amorims ideas are slowly creeping in and we simply don't have the quality required to make them effective. If we had any quality down our left hand side we would have won that game. Dorgu and Garnacho were both awful when it came to end product.
 
I feel like we are starting to see his style coming through now. There is a lot of work still to do but there are glimpses.

Our inability to score is a huge problem. Garnacho must have cut inside and taken a shot 10 times last night and not tested the keeper once.

I don’t understand how we are so bad at getting on the end of crosses and cutbacks. Cross it to the back post? Headed away. Cross it to the front post? Cleared. Cut it back along the ground? No one there.

As for Elanga, he’s thriving in a side that plays to his skill set. They sit back and hit you on the break, which allows him to use his speed and directness. He doesn’t have the guile to play for a team who controls the ball and has to unlock a defence patiently. Saying we should have kept him based on that performance is off the mark..
Interesting point, but as I have just posted in the Garnacho thread, I think Elanga lacked minutes at United and might have developed into a really good player for us. He's got pace. We lack that severely, and he has shown he can finish in the last two seasons at Forest. Also, some of our best football has been played counter attacking, so I am not sure I can agree that he doesn't fit our system.
 
I dont think fans are blindly accepting anything other than where the side is at the moment and how big a job it is for Ruben or any manager to walk into.
There is no big job for you to win 2 consecutive games.
We are 17 or 18 on conceding first half goals.
Amorim has had 22 points in 19 games.
When Amorim took over, we were 4 points away from top 4. Now we are 12 points away having played more game.
When Amorim took over, Liverpool were 13 points ahead of us, now they are 33 clear points. Yes 33 points. Thats 11 games winning streak.


If people are saying we are on right direction with such stats, then you wonder alot.
 
Last edited:
Just utterly bizarre questions as usual just trying to get a rise or a soundbite from the manager. Elanga isn't good enough for United. He might be good enough at this point in time but fecking Danny Welbeck is probably good enough for us at this time.

What top team does Elanga get into? None. So what a fecking stupid question. He scored a brilliant goal and played OK. Good for him. Its nice to see him having a good career away from United but that has no relevance to us. In the same way Antony doing well in an easier and slower league has no bearing on whether he is good enough for United.

I thought we were much better than we have been in a long time last night. Forest are just super solid defensively and we have no cutting edge. You can see that Amorims ideas are slowly creeping in and we simply don't have the quality required to make them effective. If we had any quality down our left hand side we would have won that game. Dorgu and Garnacho were both awful when it came to end product.
What top team does Garnacho get into?
 
Its not fair to ask Amorim this, it is a question for ETH. Who played Weghorst ahead of him, one of the most limited players ever to pull on the shirt, and then used the funds from his sale to buy Antony. Along with Onana, Antony and the rest, ETH has left an appalling legacy.
Yeah Ten Hag’s stint gets worse the more time goes on. Apart from the summer window just gone he signed some right turkeys.
 
Weird question.

Why would it hurt him when he wasn't our manager at the time we sold him, he has never worked with him and there's a very good chance he'd never heard of him until recently?

Can't miss what you never had.
One of those ‘don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story’ cases. The journalist doesn’t care about any of that, he’s just using it as a way to point out the irony that a player we deemed surplus has come back to bite us on the arse. Ruben quite rightly was having none of it.
 


Like this from him: just cut that stupid narrative to shreds straight out the bat.

When United were third and sixth under ETH and Ragnick, Elanga played and played and was shite. He’s a stand out player in a team built to play like Forest. You put him in our team last night and he’s on par with the nonsense Garnacho was doing.
 
Like those comments about other players.

Elanga was nowhere near the same player here, and I bet he doesn’t look the same player in a non counter attacking team.
 
You could argue that he's developed very well away from United though couldn't you? So what is not working at United that doesn't allow a player like Elanga to develop. Frankly, I saw as much from him as I ever have done from Garnacho, yet we keep the latter and sell the former. Not sure this belongs in a thread about Amorim though.
As has been mentioned the pressure at United is immense, the fact we they have to have an academy product in the matchday squads to keep the streak going, so you get kids sometimes rushed into the teams when really not ready. Injuries over a number of seasons have not helped that. Elanga has progressed well being away from the spotlight and getting regular football, good luck to him. Here he would be torn to bits if he doesn't turn into a Beckham.