MERGED: Rooney signs new contract!

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,299
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Gullit explained: “Normally you change club if you want to find a better club for yourself as a top player.

“There is not only the finances to think about, but also the sporting ambitions and perspective.

“But how can you find a better and bigger club if you already play for the best and biggest club in the world?

“When you look at the list of clubs who can afford Wayne Rooney, then there are only three. Real Madrid, *Manchester City and *Chelsea.

“I think Wayne realised this at the last minute and decided to choose the safe haven of Old Trafford.”
I think Gullit is dead right.
 

TheMancRedDevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
4,821
Location
GCHQ Saved The World!
First of all, your taking his word for it that he was not given assurances. Sound like a load of complete horseshit to me. You think Gill just sat there and said, "no, we'll probably slip out of a CL spot. Maybe become a mid table team." Ridiculous thing to believe.

Second, it became public because Rooney's people made it public.
Yes, that's exactly what I believe Gill said. :rolleyes:

Have you believed 100% that we can compete for big name signings for the last few months?

The hypocrisy on here is unbelievable. Almost everyone has been expressing concerns about the calibre of player we have allowed to leave vs the calibre of player brought in. Why is it so unbelievable that Rooney also had similar concerns and that, when he asked Gill about it, Gill's response wasn't entirely convincing?

Again, most people on here believe Gill is lying every time he opens his mouth and is only saying stuff to keep his job.

I still don't know why Rooney's people made it public first. There were some rumours in the paper a day or two before Fergie went public with it and then Rooney made a public statement in response to Fergie's, iirc.
 

TheMancRedDevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
4,821
Location
GCHQ Saved The World!
1. Because the supporters eventually pay for the wage hike. Do you think it comes out of the Glazer's pocket personally?
2. With the club in debt, there will be some restrictions surrounding the budget and Gill wouldn't have a blank check on the wage bill of the squad. Paying Rooney far more than he is worth means less for the rest of the squad. It may mean a Carrick being sold or JOS being transferred. They are not as important as Rooney but the squad wins trophies, not one player. Weakening the squad to pay more to one player doesn't improve us a team.
3. The squad would improve if we paid say Sneijder and Higuain 180k a week combined rather than pay that to one player in Rooney. He is no where near as good to command twice as much as a top class player.
We have no idea of the details of his contract but it could be something along the lines of a pretty "normal" basic wage which could go up to something crazy if he reaches certain scoring targets, if the team wins PLs and CLs and if a certain amount of Rooney merchandise gets sold. That kind of thing.

I doubt very much it is just a straight £250k or something which he just gets as a basic and all this other stuff is on top of that.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
I just read Rooney will be making 250,000 a week?? Is this right?
I would not believe all you read and how you expect any of us to know... I'll give wayne a quick bell. See what he says :)
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Are we adamant like Rooney was adamant he wanted to leave? Because if so, we'll change our minds in 2 days.
I can say I don't fancy someone, I can say it a million times. Does that actually mean I don't? How do you know what's going on in my head? Psychology is a good subject for anyone to realize these things. It is a fear that drives people to other thoughts so that they can accept it and dream of other things. No one wants to potentially deal with disappointment but no one will.
 

Lailiani

(Sadly not) Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
4,287
Location
Van der Sar's saved it... United again!
2. With the club in debt, there will be some restrictions surrounding the budget and Gill wouldn't have a blank check on the wage bill of the squad. Paying Rooney far more than he is worth means less for the rest of the squad. It may mean a Carrick being sold or JOS being transferred. They are not as important as Rooney but the squad wins trophies, not one player. Weakening the squad to pay more to one player doesn't improve us a team.
3. The squad would improve if we paid say Sneijder and Higuain 180k a week combined rather than pay that to one player in Rooney. He is no where near as good to command twice as much as a top class player.
Agree. It's the same when fans question transfer fees and someone tells them they don't need to care because it's not out of their pockets. Well, they do need to care because the money will lack elsewhere.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
1. Because the supporters eventually pay for the wage hike. Do you think it comes out of the Glazer's pocket personally?
2. With the club in debt, there will be some restrictions surrounding the budget and Gill wouldn't have a blank check on the wage bill of the squad. Paying Rooney far more than he is worth means less for the rest of the squad. It may mean a Carrick being sold or JOS being transferred. They are not as important as Rooney but the squad wins trophies, not one player. Weakening the squad to pay more to one player doesn't improve us a team.
3. The squad would improve if we paid say Sneijder and Higuain 180k a week combined rather than pay that to one player in Rooney. He is no where near as good to command twice as much as a top class player.
Thing is I think they're both on £100k a week plus, Sneijder I think is on £130k, so yes while theoretically it would improve our squad to have them both on £180k it could never happen.

Rooney is simply getting the rate of a top player, Messi, Ronaldo, Kaka, Ibra, Eto'o are all getting more as things stand.
 

Instant Karma

Closet Gooner
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,134
Location
Fletchcafe - Population: 5 (May 2006)
Sneijder would be about 110k a week. Higuain is probably at 70k or 80k a week - I dont think he is on 100k+ a week.

Kaka, Ibra, Eto'o are not being paid 250k a week. Not sure about Ronaldo or Messi but they are on a different planet altogether based on both footballing and commercial ability.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
Sneijder would be about 110k a week. Higuain is probably at 70k or 80k a week - I dont think he is on 100k+ a week.

Kaka, Ibra, Eto'o are not being paid 250k a week. Not sure about Ronaldo or Messi but they are on a different planet altogether based on both footballing and commercial ability.
Including image rights which is where the 250k a week figure comes from I think the evidence suggests they are, its discussed in fair depth in this thread: https://www.redcafe.net/f7/messis-wages-289845/. Also remember these figures are last seasons, so all the yearly wage increases would have kicked in by now raising the levels probably between 10-25% depending on the contract. (Ronaldo and Kaka were both reported to have 25% year on year increases.)

At the end of the day no-one really knows the true levels, but I think from the evidence there is around its fair to assume that Rooney is just about roughly on a par with the top earners. We are competing in an international market, if we were to sign Higuain or Sneijder do you think they would not ask for similar top whack when it is fairly certain City would blow us out the water whatever we offered.
 

Transfer United Till I Die

I am totally in the know, honest
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
7,627
Location
pessimismium
1. Because the supporters eventually pay for the wage hike. Do you think it comes out of the Glazer's pocket personally?
2. With the club in debt, there will be some restrictions surrounding the budget and Gill wouldn't have a blank check on the wage bill of the squad. Paying Rooney far more than he is worth means less for the rest of the squad. It may mean a Carrick being sold or JOS being transferred. They are not as important as Rooney but the squad wins trophies, not one player. Weakening the squad to pay more to one player doesn't improve us a team.
3. The squad would improve if we paid say Sneijder and Higuain 180k a week combined rather than pay that to one player in Rooney. He is no where near as good to command twice as much as a top class player.
We've got two players in Hargreaves and neville who don't actually play who's salaries will cover the difference.
 

TheMancRedDevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
4,821
Location
GCHQ Saved The World!
I believe Ronaldo is the highest paid player in the world on £11.3m which is obviously ridiculous but he is arguably the best player in the world so we can't have too many complaints, I suppose.

What has made a mockery of it all is that Yaya Toure is on a reported £11.1m at City.

Yes, he's a decent enough player but should he be paid almost as much as Ronaldo and more than the likes of Messi etc?
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
I believe Ronaldo is the highest paid player in the world on £11.3m which is obviously ridiculous but he is arguably the best player in the world so we can't have too many complaints, I suppose.

What has made a mockery of it all is that Yaya Toure is on a reported £11.1m at City.

Yes, he's a decent enough player but should he be paid almost as much as Ronaldo and more than the likes of Messi etc?
Clearly not, how are City going to get around this financial fair play thing?
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,722
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Personally looking at the situation that unfolded, I wonder if Stertford had been whispering things to Rooney and manipulating the situation to engineer a move away and get himself a payday.

I **** the crisis talks that happened was an opportunity for Ferguson to sit down with Rooney, cut the crap, tell him straight what we all know. I wouldn Lynne surprised if the contract accepted was the one he didn't look at in the summer.
 

Instant Karma

Closet Gooner
Joined
May 7, 2006
Messages
7,134
Location
Fletchcafe - Population: 5 (May 2006)
We are competing in an international market, if we were to sign Higuain or Sneijder do you think they would not ask for similar top whack
The contract that Higuain signed before the start of this season was for about 3.5 million euros a year and Sneijder is currently on 4 million euros a year. Both of them would jump at the chance of playing for us at anywhere close to Rooney's earlier wages of 90k per week
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
The contract that Higuain signed before the start of this season was for about 3.5 million euros a year and Sneijder is currently on 4 million euros a year. Both of them would jump at the chance of playing for us at anywhere close to Rooney's earlier wages of 90k per week
Sneijder wanted 6m at the beginning of the negotiations which was an obstacle. As he has established himself now and attracts more interest, I guess 6m would be the starting point. In other words 110k pounds a week.
 

Lailiani

(Sadly not) Banned
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
4,287
Location
Van der Sar's saved it... United again!
Sneijder wouldn't jump at the chance to play for us, he has stressed that he doesn't want to leave because he's happy at Inter. After the nightmare he had in Spain it's hardly surprising that he doesn't want to leave a club where he's happy.

Other than that very reasonable words from Instant Karma.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
The contract that Higuain signed before the start of this season was for about 3.5 million euros a year and Sneijder is currently on 4 million euros a year. Both of them would jump at the chance of playing for us at anywhere close to Rooney's earlier wages of 90k per week
I just can't see that happening. As said above Snejder's current negotiations are dragging on and I would assume he is looking for way in excess of 100k a week and if true about Higuain's contract I'm surprised but could you really see a situation where we had a bit accepted that City wouldn't match that bid then offer nearly 200k wages in order to get their man. I'd be willing to bet they would considering what they already pay to Adebayor.
 

TheMancRedDevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
4,821
Location
GCHQ Saved The World!
Clearly not, how are City going to get around this financial fair play thing?
Well, that's something I have been wondering for months now. Their wage bill exceeds their turnover at the moment and even CL football won't make that much of a difference in that regard.

In the meantime, players are looking at those wages and using it as a barometer. Seems to be a case of "we'll worry about that later - in the meantime, fill your wallet!"
 

Red Defence

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
12,940
Location
“United stands for attacking, attractive football
I still don't know why Rooney's people made it public first. There were some rumours in the paper a day or two before Fergie went public with it and then Rooney made a public statement in response to Fergie's, iirc.
There was widespread coverage in the media, apparently because someone from Rooney's camp had contacted a fair few journos one night, explained that it wasn't an exclusive because they were informing a lot of them, and that Rooney wanted to leave OT because of an irreparable breakdown in his relationship with Fergie.

As expected, the media had a field day and the fans were distraught. That's why United/Fergie had to make a statement isn't it. Then Rooney foolishly countered with a different reason for why he wouldn't sign.
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,249
Ferguson has been in charge of United for 24 years but can rarely have been in charge through a more turbulent week.

Persuading Rooney to stay may yet prove to be his lasting legacy but he insists the power struggles he has had to contend with come with the turf.

He said: "It is always tough at United.

"There are always issues to deal with. When your top players come towards the end of their contracts you have to do something to get them a new one.

"They are all the same. You have to deal with agents of this world today, which is difficult.

"The players are no problem. There is no problem with players. Some agents are difficult
 

Seveneric

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
5,951
Location
Sh*t creek
I've always been personally convinced United were gonna spend big this summer anyway, it'll now look like it was Rooney's influence that brought about it.

Now if United do spend big in Januray, maybe.
 

Allforone

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
11,614
Location
United could spend £85million on David De Gea, Phi
Is Rooney really injured? What happened to the ankle strapping?

Id offer you very short odds on this picture and that question being in one of tomorrows daily rags, especially by those in the media who have already depseartly been forced to convince themselves its only a short term agreement otherwise there are a certain number of media individuals who have been made to look very silly with there "100% guranteed Rooneys leaving" stuff.

Just take a moment to think what poor old Stan the mans going through right now, he was offering 'any money you like' bets that Rooney was joining City......bless him, hope a Utd fan took him up on that! :lol:
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,249
Id offer you very short odds on this picture and that question being in one of tomorrows daily rags, especially by those in the media who have already depseartly been forced to convince themselves its only a short term agreement otherwise there are a certain number of media individuals who have been made to look very silly with there "100% guranteed Rooneys leaving" stuff.

Just take a moment to think what poor old Stan the mans going through right now, he was offering 'any money you like' bets that Rooney was joining City......bless him, hope a Utd fan took him up on that! :lol:
Rio ;)
 

zub2007

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
2,498
Even if we do go and buy some players i dont think its becuse Rooney has done anything. Fergie even said earlier this season that when Giggs, Scholes etc.... retire we will have to go and buy, nothing to do with Wayne.

Do you think he watched the game or is he just having a nice break in Dubai. Also is he really injured as why would we let him go abroad for a holiday if he was injured.
 

zub2007

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
2,498
Even if we do go and buy some players i dont think its becuse Rooney has done anything. Fergie even said earlier this season that when Giggs, Scholes etc.... retire we will have to go and buy, nothing to do with Wayne.

Do you think he watched the game or is he just having a nice break in Dubai. Also is he really injured as why would we let him go abroad for a holiday if he was injured.
 

Sw33t

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
10,766
Have we been disrespectful to the club for doubting that we have the money (or the ambition) to compete with the likes of Chelsea, Real, Barca and City, too?
I don't know about you, but I for one never doubt this clubs ambition. I have faith and loyalty to it. And we don't have the same money as Chelsea, City, Real - saying that isn't disrespectful in any sense. Just fact.

Barca don't seem to have the money really now (seeing about all their rumoured debt) but they still have the players to do well like us and the fans and players have the confidence they can win it all (unlike one of ours).
 

kps88

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
22,513
Talk about a break out clause in case the Glazers go back on any promises made. I can't understand how that would work exactly and what sort of conditions would need to be met for the clause not to be activated.

Say we win the lot this season and Fergie decides no real investment is needed in the squad, then Rooney has the option to leave.
 

Allforone

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
11,614
Location
United could spend £85million on David De Gea, Phi
Talk about a break out clause in case the Glazers go back on any promises made. I can't understand how that would work exactly and what sort of conditions would need to be met for the clause not to be activated.

Say we win the lot this season and Fergie decides no real investment is needed in the squad, then Rooney has the option to leave.
Tabloid bollox is my guess, they all had him as having gone, all of them, they all had 'inside info' that the deal with City was done, now they've all been made to look pretty fecking stupid, oops erm maybe the inside info was wrong? nope cant say that makes us look like a bunch of idiots so we say he signed ONLY to keep his value high and with unprecedented escape clauses.....righto.

The media like Rooney havnt come out of this at all well, they're trying to save face with all these clauses and other conspiracy theories.