Escobar
Shameless Musketeer
Agreed. Especially Bruno nerds to be more present. I also think Rashy could do more for our overall gameEriksen and Bruno need to do more in the final third. Just not good enough from them.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Agreed. Especially Bruno nerds to be more present. I also think Rashy could do more for our overall gameEriksen and Bruno need to do more in the final third. Just not good enough from them.
He avoids the Liverpool example and Nick's post like the plague because it might prove him wrong. He's one of those types.NO HE DOESNT. Are you thick or a troll?
Got a hit with the left foot, which allowed Reading to clear the ball. Thats a penaltyPlayer gets fouled?
VAR has people thinking the most innocuous brush is a foul. The amount of times you see nothing contact called a blatant pen in match threads is comical.
The McT one a couple of games back was a clear pen, other than that there has been little egregious.
Saw a player sliding in just touching the ball a little bit to make a player onside again.Clear the foam from your mouth or you'll be getting points soon. He is not in complete control of the ball. That's what is now required by the rule to make a player onside.
Besides, refereeing making mistakes, even with VAR isn't something out of the ordinaryPretty obvious. Anyone arguing this is either dense or a Liverpool fan
If something is going wrong, blame the easy target.We are making chances, it is finishing we are not doing.
Doofus! Don't points me pleaseNo one's getting points for calling someone a doofus
I'll stop foaming when it finally gets into your brain It's like arguing with a 5 year old.
Nothing in the wording you've just posted says anything about complete control. I will never agree with you on this, as we have LITERAL VIDEO PROOF of a goal that was scored a month ago that was allowed. If you're happy being screwed that's on you.
The pass was never to WeghorstThe pass was intented for Weghorst who was offside, that happens before the attempt to play the ball
Yes. Just maximise the game window?Any way to minimise that godawful sidebar on the ITV web player?
Bissakenbauer.Bissaka is popping up everywhere. Almost like ETH has given him a free role. Playing alright so far as well.
Harry has been alright. He also needs a run of games. We’re an injury away from having to rely on him. I’d give him full game both tonight and against north forest.Getting Licha on for Harry will make a huge difference m
Thus, the goal should have stood. Referees do whatever the feck they wantThis bit might explain it.
"If the pass, attempt to gain possession or clearance by the player in control of the ball is inaccurate or unsuccessful, this does not negate the fact that the player 'deliberately played' the ball."
Or has this been changed since the Liverpool Wolves game?
Mate, are you looking at the same situation as the rest of us? The first pass forward leading up to the goal was not aimed for Weghorst, not even close.The pass was intented for Weghorst who was offside, that happens before the attempt to play the ball
I'd like to be able to do other things at the same time. Thanks.Yes. Just maximise the game window?
We need a versatile number 10 to come and rotate with him. He’s playing too much.Think ETH needs to sit Bruno down and show him all his daft decision making in this game and demand he does better. What the hell is he thinking with that shit shot?
Darren England