Fluctuation0161
Full Member
Guido told him to.You sure you want to keep running with this Russia Today narrative?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/politi...-money-from-russia-today-than-labour-mps/amp/
Guido told him to.You sure you want to keep running with this Russia Today narrative?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/politi...-money-from-russia-today-than-labour-mps/amp/
Yep, and maybe it would have been nice if that election was/is looked at.If it had been released before the election then people might have been looking more closely at that election. Which is course isn’t covered by this report which was concluded before it.
The current government benefited from it so are unlikely to look at this in any depth. They've already covered it up and span the report as much as they could.Yep, and maybe it would have been nice if that election was/is looked at.
It’s not really gambling if it’s a planned and careful investment.Putin must have won a bet to get "Boris" as PM in the UK.
Wow, sounds familiar.Yep absolute joke. The right wingers trying to spin the story so it states there was no interference when the report does not state that. The brain dead will read those headlines and assume that is the case. The cycles keep going.
So basically, we never saw any evidence we deliberately didn’t look for, so there’s no need to look for any.We have seen no evidence of successful interference in the EU referendum.
The intelligence and security agencies produce and contribute to regular assessments of the threat posed by hostile state activity, including around potential interference in UK democratic processes. We keep such assessments under review and, where necessary, update them in response to new intelligence, including during democratic events such as elections and referendums. Where new information emerges, the government will always consider the most appropriate use of any intelligence it develops or receives, including whether it is appropriate to make this public. Given this long standing approach, a retrospective assessment of the EU referendum is not necessary.
The Government is just a full blown joke but they know they can keep getting away with it.Government response to the reports recommendation that the referendum should be investigated by the intelligence agencies..
So basically, we never saw any evidence we deliberately didn’t look for, so there’s no need to look for any.
People get what they deserve.The Government is just a full blown joke but they know they can keep getting away with it.
They’re not a joke, they are literally threatening U.K. democracy right here in front of us. Unless something is done and quickly, then the joke is going to be on all of us.The Government is just a full blown joke but they know they can keep getting away with it.
Labour need to be all over this. It doesn't matter what the government's assessment is if the conclusion from the investigation is that one needs to be done.Government response to the reports recommendation that the referendum should be investigated by the intelligence agencies..
So basically, we never saw any evidence we deliberately didn’t look for, so there’s no need to look for any.
Completely agree. Starmer needs to go nuclear over this.Labour need to be all over this. It doesn't matter what the government's assessment is if the conclusion from the investigation is that one needs to be done.
Government response to the reports recommendation that the referendum should be investigated by the intelligence agencies..
So basically, we never saw any evidence we deliberately didn’t look for, so there’s no need to look for any.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Because it was entirely built on the assumption people would work in good faith.What's the point in a report if they aren't going to investigate it? How is the system this broken everywhere?
Another whistleblower Shamir Shami also gave lots of evidence of wrong doing but nothing was done. It makes me feel angry and sick and even more so with the right wing and the Brexiters revelling in it.
Getting message out to his goons so they can brainwash their masses so they don’t read the actual report (not that I expect them to!).First tweet at 743am. How many hours before the report was released is that?
Probably got a copy leaked by the Russians.First tweet at 743am. How many hours before the report was released is that?
I love how Russian money that has some magical corrupting property unlike other normal money.The answer, according to those who gave evidence to the ISC, is the influence of Russia in the UK and especially the power of its money which has seeped deep into public life.
A whole class of people - lawyers, bankers, accountants and public relations professionals - have themselves become wealthy from the Russian money that has flowed into the UK, and particularly into the City of London.
That has created an influential group who have constantly pushed to avoid a hard line on Moscow, including on sanctions.
If the report does pay significant attention to political donations from Russia, this could prove controversial.
If that money is being used to influence people towards a viewpoint inherently damaging to the country, then how could it not be corrupting?I love how Russian money that has some magical corrupting property unlike other normal money.
Neh mate, Russians are famous for their philanthropy and ask for nothing in return I am sure.If that money is being used to influence people towards a viewpoint inherently damaging to the country, then how could it not be corrupting?
I agree it could be, but this suspicion towards large mounts of money should be much broader. I am actually scared at how much Russia crops up in Western liberal circles as this unique actor, reminds me of Indira Gandhi saying "foreign hand" whenever anything went wrong.If that money is being used to influence people towards a viewpoint inherently damaging to the country, then how could it not be corrupting?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Controversial.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Exactly. They think they can still peddle the same line. Essentially skirting around the truth.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That’s more like it!!