Dean Henderson | On loan at Forest | gives public outburst against United

Status
Not open for further replies.

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,891
Location
England
I hope we bring in a goalkeeper if we allow him to leave because de Gea isn't good enough to be a goalkeeper for a proactive/attacking team.

I've over the years had many disagreements with people regarding Wan Bissaka, ball playing CBs and now my focus is on de Gea.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,266
The problem with Henderson was not that he made a lot of mistakes but he showed poor handling of the ball in so many instances and looked very non-intimidating in goal. It was apparent by the end of last season he wasn't good enough to be the main keeper at Manchester United.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
I do know those stats don't directly compare, however they are a factor, especially when it forms part of a trend with De Gea and us defending better as a team with a different goalkeeper behind them.

More than happy to use individual relevant statistics though:

20/21
De Gea: +0.1 PSxG, crosses dealt with 4.6%, sweeping per game 0.35.
Henderson: +0.3 PSxG, crosses dealt with 8.6%, sweeping per game 1.12.

I'll compare De Gea this season Henderson's full season at Sheffield United too as that obviously counts a full season for both players?

21/22 De Gea: +7.0 PSxG, crosses dealt with 3.0%, sweeping per game 0.22
19/20 Henderson: +5.2 PSxG, crosses dealt with 7.9%, sweeping per game 0.47
The sweeping stat alone is ridiculous given De Gea is playing behind a team trying to play a high line and Henderson was playing behind a deep back 5.

As I've said lots of times, I'm not even the biggest fan of Henderson but it's pretty clear we're backing the wrong the horse if we are sticking with De Gea.
I already said in my first post there’s a debate to be had. De Gea is allergic to coming off his line and is an absolute pussy in the air. Henderson is well rounded but definitely short of the level required to be a top keeper. Is anyone even debating this or are you just posting stats for the sake of it?

Problem is DDG is on massive wages and he’d probably need to be released to get rid of him. Henderson can be sold for £40 million now or kept. Either way we’re looking for a new keeper in 2 years.

Also, we definitely aren’t trying to play a high line. We literally retreat to the halfway line every time we lose the ball.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
I already said in my first post there’s a debate to be had. De Gea is allergic to coming off his line and is an absolute pussy in the air. Henderson is well rounded but definitely short of the level required to be a top keeper. Is anyone even debating this or are you just posting stats for the sake of it?

Problem is DDG is on massive wages and he’d probably need to be released to get rid of him. Henderson can be sold for £40 million now or kept. Either way we’re looking for a new keeper in 2 years.

Also, we definitely aren’t trying to play a high line. We literally retreat to the halfway line every time we lose the ball.
I posted the stats because you questioned the results, as if 20+ games wasn't a large enough sample size of games to show the difference a goalkeeper that is even relatively average in most areas makes to us defensively. Also, there is this bizarre notion that Henderson is a poor shot stopper or that "failed" with his opportunity last season or showed that he wasn't good enough, which is ridiculous and the statistics prove that. He took his opportunity and did enough to earn the shirt for this season, which obviously didn't end up happening due to him getting Covid.

Like I said, I'm not saying I think he is good enough or that long term he's the correct choice, and if we are getting rid of him to fund a replacement for De Gea then I'm all for it. If we are getting rid of him to stick with De Gea for another season then the club is frankly insane and we should have brought in a manager who wants to defend deep and protect the goalkeeper. Personally I would have kept him and played him next season, we know he suits the defenders and the incoming managers style better than De Gea which means we can at least begin building properly and spend this years money in areas such as central midfield, full back and attack where we badly need players, before going for the gold-standard £50m+ goalkeeper (someone like Mike Maignan) next summer once we hopefully don't have some many holes in the team and are - also hopefully - back in the Champions League.

In terms of the high line, we played many games early on under RR trying to play high up the pitch but all it took was one ball over the heads of the centre halves and the opposition were in because the goalkeeper was not coming to deal with it. So I should correct myself to say we *tried* to play a high line, but realised relatively quickly that we couldn't with De Gea behind them.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,631
You should check out this site I know called YouTube. For reference, watch the highlights in full and see the difference facing De Gea clean through and Allisson clean through. Top of my head goals he's badly at fault were 3 & 4 in the home game and the first one in the away game. There's one across goal which he should be diving on as well but I won't class that as a bad error. And the ones he makes easy finishes (not saying he's directly at fault, just makes it very easy for the striker) are the first goal and last goals at Old Trafford and one in the away game but I can't remember which one.

There was so much focus (not wrongly) on Maguire and Shaw after the home game that everyone somewhat ignored the goalkeeper. IIRC Maguire copped more than Shaw which was bizarre because Shaw put in one of the worst performances at the top level we're ever likely to see with literally every goal coming down his side.
So that's a no. Cheers for that.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
So that's a no. Cheers for that.
If you're incapable of typing United 0-5 Liverpool or Liverpool 4-0 United into YouTube when I've already told you specifically what to look out for then you're not worth anyone's time are you? All the best.
 

BlueHaze

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
4,453
If we sell him a buy back clause should be included because there's a chance he'll turn out a very good keeper.
 

Paul778

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
1,176
Location
London
If we sell him a buy back clause should be included because there's a chance he'll turn out a very good keeper.
as if he'd choose to come back after all of the broken promises I'm sure he's already been given here.
 

Rocksy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2016
Messages
1,347
Supports
Blackburn Rovers
If we sell him a buy back clause should be included because there's a chance he'll turn out a very good keeper.
No one’s paying 40 million and putting a buy-back in. He’s not good enough for United anyway.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
If we sell him a buy back clause should be included because there's a chance he'll turn out a very good keeper.
He'll be 26 next season, he's not going to change much from here. If we don't think he's good enough now when we already own him then we're unlikely to be convinced he's better than any other option we could buy when we don't.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
I posted the stats because you questioned the results, as if 20+ games wasn't a large enough sample size of games to show the difference a goalkeeper that is even relatively average in most areas makes to us defensively. Also, there is this bizarre notion that Henderson is a poor shot stopper or that "failed" with his opportunity last season or showed that he wasn't good enough, which is ridiculous and the statistics prove that. He took his opportunity and did enough to earn the shirt for this season, which obviously didn't end up happening due to him getting Covid.

Like I said, I'm not saying I think he is good enough or that long term he's the correct choice, and if we are getting rid of him to fund a replacement for De Gea then I'm all for it. If we are getting rid of him to stick with De Gea for another season then the club is frankly insane and we should have brought in a manager who wants to defend deep and protect the goalkeeper. Personally I would have kept him and played him next season, we know he suits the defenders and the incoming managers style better than De Gea which means we can at least begin building properly and spend this years money in areas such as central midfield, full back and attack where we badly need players, before going for the gold-standard £50m+ goalkeeper (someone like Mike Maignan) next summer once we hopefully don't have some many holes in the team and are - also hopefully - back in the Champions League.

In terms of the high line, we played many games early on under RR trying to play high up the pitch but all it took was one ball over the heads of the centre halves and the opposition were in because the goalkeeper was not coming to deal with it. So I should correct myself to say we *tried* to play a high line, but realised relatively quickly that we couldn't with De Gea behind them.
You agreed that the stats didn’t directly compare, but presented them as if they did. That was what my reply concerned. I’m not sure why you’re trying to convince me about De Gea, I’ve already said he doesn’t come off his line and claim catches.

This isn’t the Rangnick thread I know, but I’m afraid we haven’t played a high line under RR, however much you want to believe it’s the case that we tried that and conceded because Maguire is slow and DDG doesn’t sweep, we just didn’t.

Clean sheet vs palace.
Conceded 1 vs young boys with Henderson in goal.
Clean sheet vs Norwich.
Conceded 1 vs Newcastle - nothing to do with DDG or high line.
Conceded 1 vs Burnley - Bailly error nothing to do with high line or DDG.
Conceded 1 vs Wolves with a shot from the edge of the area. After a defensive header.

Want to point at where we started conceding these goals over the top and suddenly stopped using a high line?
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,252
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
I think he's one of our most under rated players. He'll end up being a very, very good keeper for Newcastle. We just need the funds and he needs to play. It's a good deal for both parties imo.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
You agreed that the stats didn’t directly compare, but presented them as if they did. That was what my reply concerned. I’m not sure why you’re trying to convince me about De Gea, I’ve already said he doesn’t come off his line and claim catches.

This isn’t the Rangnick thread I know, but I’m afraid we haven’t played a high line under RR, however much you want to believe it’s the case that we tried that and conceded because Maguire is slow and DDG doesn’t sweep, we just didn’t.

Clean sheet vs palace.
Conceded 1 vs young boys with Henderson in goal.
Clean sheet vs Norwich.
Conceded 1 vs Newcastle - nothing to do with DDG or high line.
Conceded 1 vs Burnley - Bailly error nothing to do with high line or DDG.
Conceded 1 vs Wolves with a shot from the edge of the area. After a defensive header.

Want to point at where we started conceding these goals over the top and suddenly stopped using a high line?
Firstly, as you well know I was responding to a poster that said " the less he plays the better he gets it seems. It appears just charging off your line like a madman is all that matters in a goalkeeper for some", the differences in goals conceded vs De Gea would suggest he does a little more than just charging off his line like a madman.

I never said we conceded goals because of it did I? I said that it became clear that we were susceptible to balls over the top, which we are. I'm not saying it was a high line to the levels of City or Liverpool, or even compared to what Ten Hag will want, but we did initially play higher - I think another factor would be how poor the fitness levels were as RR would have seen the drop off in that first game v Palace from the first half to the second. In the games you mentioned both Palace and Newcastle found joy from balls over the top, particularly into the channels. From memory I think Norwich did as well, in particular their left winger, but I'm somewhat hazy on that one as I've literally seen nothing of that game since it happened. Burnley offered nothing at all and Wolves completely dominated the game so they controlled the space.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
Firstly, as you well know I was responding to a poster that said " the less he plays the better he gets it seems. It appears just charging off your line like a madman is all that matters in a goalkeeper for some", the differences in goals conceded vs De Gea would suggest he does a little more than just charging off his line like a madman.

I never said we conceded goals because of it did I? I said that it became clear that we were susceptible to balls over the top, which we are. I'm not saying it was a high line to the levels of City or Liverpool, or even compared to what Ten Hag will want, but we did initially play higher - I think another factor would be how poor the fitness levels were as RR would have seen the drop off in that first game v Palace from the first half to the second. In the games you mentioned both Palace and Newcastle found joy from balls over the top, particularly into the channels. From memory I think Norwich did as well, in particular their left winger, but I'm somewhat hazy on that one as I've literally seen nothing of that game since it happened. Burnley offered nothing at all and Wolves completely dominated the game so they controlled the space.
Pretty sure you’d said we conceded by balls over the top, but maybe it was conceding chances. Even if that is the case, I don’t understand why RR would suddenly want to change away from that after 7 points and two clean sheets in 3 games. Things should have only gotten better.

Much more likely is the players were really up for it at the beginning and it went to shit. Like the Palace game. People actually think RR taught them to press in a few days and it was only the fitness holding them back, then he told them not to bother. My opinion is the players were buzzing, that translated to what we saw in the first half, and confidence quickly drained. Nothing to do with him realising DDG couldn’t sweep and he had to revert back to a lower block.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
Pretty sure you’d said we conceded by balls over the top, but maybe it was conceding chances. Even if that is the case, I don’t understand why RR would suddenly want to change away from that after 7 points and two clean sheets in 3 games. Things should have only gotten better.

Much more likely is the players were really up for it at the beginning and it went to shit. Like the Palace game. People actually think RR taught them to press in a few days and it was only the fitness holding them back, then he told them not to bother. My opinion is the players were buzzing, that translated to what we saw in the first half, and confidence quickly drained. Nothing to do with him realising DDG couldn’t sweep and he had to revert back to a lower block.
I said it became apparent that teams were getting in from simple balls over the top. That still happens when we push up because teams know that balls over the top won't be dealt with by the goalkeeper (which they'd be correct, 8 times all season he's dealt with a ball over the top). As for the timeframe, I said nothing about a timeframe, you mentioned a specific set of games and I directly responded to those games. As I said initially, I think we *try* to play a high line, that's obviously gone out of the window over the past 2/3 months as our season has unravelled but in the first months we definitely attempted it, there was a clear difference in what we were trying to do compared with what we had been trying to do under Ole.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,391
I said it became apparent that teams were getting in from simple balls over the top. That still happens when we push up because teams know that balls over the top won't be dealt with by the goalkeeper (which they'd be correct, 8 times all season he's dealt with a ball over the top). As for the timeframe, I said nothing about a timeframe, you mentioned a specific set of games and I directly responded to those games. As I said initially, I think we *try* to play a high line, that's obviously gone out of the window over the past 2/3 months as our season has unravelled but in the first months we definitely attempted it, there was a clear difference in what we were trying to do compared with what we had been trying to do under Ole.
That time frame was used because they were the intial games. You’re saying we tried to initially play a high line. You’re pretty annoying to talk to :lol:

We can take it to the Rangnick thread if you want to talk about his initial attempted high line and press. If de Gea was such a problem, he has Henderson there, but he seemly decided to rip up all his tactics instead of use him.

My opinion on DDG is not far off yours. I’m just being realistic about why Henderson will be sold instead.
 

SadlerMUFC

Thinks for himself
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
5,757
Location
Niagara Falls, Canada
I'm not saying that Henderson is the right choice moving forward for United, but if we are depending on De Gea to be our #1 next year nothing will change. How many defenders do we have to go through before we realize what the real problem is? First Rio and VIdic. Then Smalling and Jones. Then Blind and Bailly. Followed by Maguire and Lindelof (and Varane). None of them were good enough. All while there has been one constant. De Gea. Sorry, but he's just not a good keeper. Sure, he's a great shot stopper. Probably one of the best in the world. But he is average to poor at every other aspect of his position. And if you really don't see what the problem with that is, you probably shouldn't comment...
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
The problem with Henderson was not that he made a lot of mistakes but he showed poor handling of the ball in so many instances and looked very non-intimidating in goal. It was apparent by the end of last season he wasn't good enough to be the main keeper at Manchester United.
I saw absolutely the opposite - commanded his area (and his defenders) much better than DDG, who could barely dominate his six-yard box. I've barely seen a keeper less intimidating than DDG, although his shot-stopping this season has been very good until the last few games. I think we'd got as much dosh for him as for hendo
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I hope we bring in a goalkeeper if we allow him to leave because de Gea isn't good enough to be a goalkeeper for a proactive/attacking team.

I've over the years had many disagreements with people regarding Wan Bissaka, ball playing CBs and now my focus is on de Gea.
with you on all that
 

Gurtej

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2014
Messages
524
Stop hyping our average or decent good players….

There are plenty of Dean Hendersons out there we can get for the 40-50m price tag!!

We need money this year to spend on way more important positions. If we need a new GK to play ETH way, we should go out and look for another Allison or Ederson!!

Getting 40m for him is a dream come true in a year where we need to find 5-6 outfield players !!
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,687
Location
india
There's a weird anti-De Gea cult on this forum that I will never understand. He was our best player this season and without him we would have finished much lower down the table. Henderson is just average.
Agree. DDG has been our best player this season and has won us many many points.

I'd prefer us moving towards a keeper better suited to possesion football but at what he does DDG used to be elite and still is very good.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I'm not saying that Henderson is the right choice moving forward for United, but if we are depending on De Gea to be our #1 next year nothing will change. How many defenders do we have to go through before we realize what the real problem is? First Rio and VIdic. Then Smalling and Jones. Then Blind and Bailly. Followed by Maguire and Lindelof (and Varane). None of them were good enough. All while there has been one constant. De Gea. Sorry, but he's just not a good keeper. Sure, he's a great shot stopper. Probably one of the best in the world. But he is average to poor at every other aspect of his position. And if you really don't see what the problem with that is, you probably shouldn't comment...
agree with everything said here about DDG. Just looking at his slight build has worried me from the start. He simply doesn't dominate his area of put the fear of god into forwards like Peter S or Edwin VdS
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
Stop hyping our average or decent good players….

There are plenty of Dean Hendersons out there we can get for the 40-50m price tag!!

We need money this year to spend on way more important positions. If we need a new GK to play ETH way, we should go out and look for another Allison or Ederson!!

Getting 40m for him is a dream come true in a year where we need to find 5-6 outfield players !!
not much point in that if we keep conceding goals that can be avoided by having a keeper who dominates his area, puts the fear of god into oncoming forwards and gives his own defenders confidence. Surely we could get the same sot of price for DDG. If we were to find one of those "plenty of Hendersons" (possibly Martinez or Fabianski, but Pope most likely if Burnley go down), then we could sell both Hendo and DDG, with someone like Sam Johnstone (or a youngster) as back up.

It really is time people saw through where so much of the trouble lies. In the old days, shot stopping was all that mattered (Bosnich was good at that and only suffered when the back pass rule changed)
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,678
DDG has its share of strengths and weaknesses just as any other player. No one complained back then that Bruce was slow, that Gaz was rash, that Irwin (during the treble) had lost a yard of pace, that Evra had a tendency to forget that he's a defender or that Rio needed a hardman at his side. We acknowledged their qualities and we've built around their weaknesses. The same had to be done with DDG who is one of the finest shot stoppers in football and had been bailing us out for years. The problem isn't DDG, its our managers who hadn't added players to exploit the strengths our team has while covering up its weaknesses.
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,722
40 million would be a good deal for both parties. He’s massively underrated by a selection of Utd fans who do everything they can to ignore De Geas deficiencies. We looked a better team with Henderson in goal that’s what I know.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
DDG has its share of strengths and weaknesses just as any other player. No one complained back then that Bruce was slow, that Gaz was rash, that Irwin (during the treble) had lost a yard of pace, that Evra had a tendency to forget that he's a defender or that Rio needed a hardman at his side. We acknowledged their qualities and we've built around their weaknesses. The same had to be done with DDG who is one of the finest shot stoppers in football and had been bailing us out for years. The problem isn't DDG, its our managers who hadn't added players to exploit the strengths our team has while covering up its weaknesses.
but you sort of make the point of DDG's weaknesses but naming those other players: why did we cope with those supposed weaknesses? Because they had a dominate, pro-active keeper behind them!
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,678
but you sort of make the point of DDG's weaknesses but naming those other players: why did we cope with those supposed weaknesses? Because they had a dominate, pro-active keeper behind them!
We won league titles with DDG in the team and a far then perfect squad
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,631
If you're incapable of typing United 0-5 Liverpool or Liverpool 4-0 United into YouTube when I've already told you specifically what to look out for then you're not worth anyone's time are you? All the best.
No mate, I watched the games and saw the highlights. You're the one making the claims De Gea threw a couple in his own net. I asked you to show me and you got all pissy over it.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
We won league titles with DDG in the team and a far then perfect squad
We one won title with DDG in goal and conceded 43 goals which was the most conceded by a title winner in the past 22 seasons. That title win was probably our 'luckiest' in the Fergie era. We conceded the most goals in the top 4 and we're 3rd best in terms of xG-xGA. It all hinged mostly on Robin Van Persie's brilliance. Remember DDG had Ferdinand, Evra, Vidic and Carrick in front of him in that season as well.

The signs of our decline were already there and what happened after wasn't such a great surprise with retrospect.
 

JB7

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
8,848
No mate, I watched the games and saw the highlights. You're the one making the claims De Gea threw a couple in his own net. I asked you to show me and you got all pissy over it.
If you saw the games then you're well positioned to disagree with the goals I said he was a) at fault for and b) made the finishes easy for, then. If you disagree that's fine but just moaning that I didn't post the highlights when you've already seen them is frankly ridiculous.
 

Dargonk

Ninja Scout
Scout
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
18,756
Location
Australia
I'd take the 40m for him. Solid keeper, but putting him in over DDG isn't really going to change our team a whole lot. Where spending that money on an outfield player will help us far more.
 

SambaBoy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
4,225
The problem is De Gea's wages. Even if Ten Hag did come in and decide he wanted to mix it up and get a new keeper - realistically what is the club going to do with De Gea? Let him sit on the bench, earning £400k and have the media constantly talking about it because I can't see any clubs going near him on the wages he's on. He'll run down his contract most likely.

Getting rid of Henderson is the easier option, we can command a high price for him and there would be many interested parties.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,631
If you saw the games then you're well positioned to disagree with the goals I said he was a) at fault for and b) made the finishes easy for, then. If you disagree that's fine but just moaning that I didn't post the highlights when you've already seen them is frankly ridiculous.
I didn't moan, I ask you to show us what you meant because visual medium is better than written. You then declined.
 

CoopersDream

Full Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
479
We one won title with DDG in goal and conceded 43 goals which was the most conceded by a title winner in the past 22 seasons. That title win was probably our 'luckiest' in the Fergie era. We conceded the most goals in the top 4 and we're 3rd best in terms of xG-xGA. It all hinged mostly on Robin Van Persie's brilliance. Remember DDG had Ferdinand, Evra, Vidic and Carrick in front of him in that season as well.
Didn't we concede most of those goals in the autumn when he shared the position with Lindegaard? In 2013, when he started all but 2 games (didn't start in two of the three last, including the last where we conceded 5), we conceded much less goals, something like 10 in 16 starts if I see it right. That certainly is a pretty decenet result. This just shows that amount of goals conceded depends on more than just the goalkeeper.
 

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Didn't we concede most of those goals in the autumn when he shared the position with Lindegaard? In 2013, when he started all but 2 games (didn't start in two of the three last, including the last where we conceded 5), we conceded much less goals, something like 10 in 16 starts if I see it right. That certainly is a pretty decenet result. This just shows that amount of goals conceded depends on more than just the goalkeeper.
That's a fair point. In the few worst defensive displays Lindegaard was in goal but if you look at a lot of the games where we conceded 2 or 3 goals then DDG was in goal. We did have a good run as you mentioned with DDG in net.

https://www.worldfootball.net/teams/manchester-united/2013/3/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.