E-mal
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 3,720
I pray I have self control when I come across Andy Robertson, he has a punchable face
Why wasn’t he getting to the ball? He was in front of VVD and alongside him. The only reason he was a mile behind him when VVD scored is because Endo blocked his path before he could even get going.I just don't think that should count as interfering, he was never getting to the ball. Its just too much looking for something to disallow a goal. If the goals given, no one says anything, and probably because most of the time those goals do stand.
I just want more goals, VAR seems to take more than it gives.
Still funny its happened to them though.
I'm not in the closet. Come on you blues.You're a closet Chelsea fan by that logic then?
Drurys definitely got a playbook of soundbites for them today. Even Sam Matterface would think that’s as subtle as a grenade in a bowl of cereal.The commentators collective ass kissing of Liverpool is extremely nauseating
InhalersHow are Liverpool not running out of energy?? They've been running all game, we don't run much and would be completely gassed by now
Need extra time to run them down even more
We were against FulhamIt's a nonsense decision. One of those that would never be given in real time, but is a result of VAR overanalyzing every goal and just looking for reasons to disallow.
If that was against United we'd all be fuming.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with the rule. Villa have been doing it all season and somehow getting away with it. It’s abusing the rulesI agree, going by the laws of the game I think it's a definite offside. No block and Colwill could win the ball or challenge to put VVD off.
I don't really like the rule but understand there is a great area over what is or isn't classed as involvement.
Agreed. Just ridiculous.It's a nonsense decision. One of those that would never be given in real time, but is a result of VAR overanalyzing every goal and just looking for reasons to disallow.
If that was against United we'd all be fuming.
One of the many reasons I’m not watching the game at all.The commentators collective ass kissing of Liverpool is extremely nauseating
This. Nobody on here would call that a correct decision if it wasn’t against Liverpool, and we all know it.I just don't think that should count as interfering, he was never getting to the ball. Its just too much looking for something to disallow a goal. If the goals given, no one says anything, and probably because most of the time those goals do stand.
I just want more goals, VAR seems to take more than it gives.
Still funny its happened to them though.
I’ve noticed decisions going against Liverpool are always extra seismic as if every club doesn’t have ridiculous decisions go against them.Game over. Literally. Football as a game. Over.
Exactly what I was thinking. That started before Endo got involved. Penalty. No 20 minutes review on that.Out of curiosity, does that decision totally wipe out the penalty for Chilwell having a great big dirty hold of Van Djik's shirt on the free kick?
To be fair after rewatching it, it is a clearer foul than on my initial viewingsWhy wasn’t he getting to the ball? He was in front of VVD and alongside him. The only reason he was a mile behind him when VVD scored is because Endo blocked his path before he could even get going.
He’s literally stood by VVD as free kicks taken?I just don't think that should count as interfering, he was never getting to the ball. Its just too much looking for something to disallow a goal. If the goals given, no one says anything, and probably because most of the time those goals do stand.
I just want more goals, VAR seems to take more than it gives.
Still funny its happened to them though.
The offside happens before that but they had hold of each other and you don't get pens when the ball ends up in the back of the net.Out of curiosity, does that decision totally wipe out the penalty for Chilwell having a great big dirty hold of Van Djik's shirt on the free kick?
Damn are you Alan shearer that exactly word for word what he just said on BBC PAGEI don't know how Disasi has missed it, he's only two yards out. I think he gets there ahead of the ball but he can only get a knee to it.
City pen against Hojlund “holding “It's a nonsense decision. One of those that would never be given in real time, but is a result of VAR overanalyzing every goal and just looking for reasons to disallow.
If that was against United we'd all be fuming.
Surprised somebody noticed thatDamn are you Alan shearer that exactly word for word what he just said on BBC PAGE
But they'll still win multiple trophies this seasonTake Klopp and Salah out of that squad and they look like us.
Yeah I’m not getting how people can’t see it. It was obstruction as much as offside! The thing is it’s not just something that happened in the moment, that will have been something they worked on in training. Villa do it all the time.To be fair after rewatching it, it is a clearer foul than on my initial viewings
Van Djik isn't touching Chilwell, it's 100% contact from one direction. And Van Djik was still Chilwell's man so that foul was happening regardless of any offside.The offside happens before that but they had hold of each other and you don't get pens when the ball ends up in the back of the net.
Drury is unbearable.Drurys definitely got a playbook of soundbites for them today. Even Sam Matterface would think that’s as subtle as a grenade in a bowl of cereal.