New Jose Interview with Telegraph

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
35,984
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
It's like saying a 09/10 Hargreaves would be the best midfielder in our club right now. Sure but what use if he is never available.
It's not like saying that, at all. Saying he's "not that good" is just plain wrong.

The situation is also vastly different from Hargreaves considering the extent of the injuries, their nature, and the amount of games played by both players.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,515
From the board’s perspective, they had backed him with a few “old” players with no resale value and it didnt work. How can a guy we allowed to break the world record fee complain about being backed? By the way we went on to pay about the same for Lukaku the following summer. Never mind the unreal amount of money we paid for Sanchez.
Some transfers don't work out, if a club backs a manager they move on from them. See City and Pep, do you think all the signings Pep made in his first 2 seasons worked out?
Jose was never the right manager for United but we should stop pretending the club backs managers just because they make a few signings.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,375
Location
Salford
But you can better Mourinho's second place finish and not a hole in one?

Still a bad headline as the only way most would think you could do that is to win the league which everyone knows we haven't done, unless they started to bring points totals whilst 2nd into it too? I can't even read the article to see, paywalled. Tried private browser/incognito mode but that didn't work either.
The Article
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,735
Location
USA
I love how he triggers so many people, for no apparent reason.
The interview did not reveal anything new about Jose or his time at United. And he was obviously going to big himself up, because he is looking for a new job.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,735
Location
USA
United fans saying Shaw isn't that good is a laughably bad take. He is easily one of our best players and has been for quite a while now but sadly can not stay fit.
Which makes all his "best abilities" pointless. It was obvious years back, it is obvious now. He can't stay fit.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,686
United fans saying Shaw isn't that good is a laughably bad take. He is easily one of our best players and has been for quite a while now but sadly can not stay fit.
I don't rate him as some seem to, but if it is him that Mourinho's on about then it's referring to his professionalism rather than ability. I've no gripes with Shaw on that level from a fan's perspective.

I think his positioning is poor at times which is why he gets booked so often. It's after being caught out much of the time. Helps if he had a functioning team around him that didn't give the ball away as much, which he hasn't for a lot of his stay here, but even so I think that's quite a big hole in his game. It's not just yellow cards that his positioning costs, it's goals too. That's not me saying he's bad and we've had worse players by far over the duration of his time at United. I don't think he's top drawer though while being decent enough.

Cheers! I'll have a read now.
 
Last edited:

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
585
I think Mourinho is always guilty of a bit of revisionism, but there might be an element of truth to some things. For example, Ten Hag was backed to implement his authority and get rid of Ronaldo, remove the captaincy from Maguire, outcast Sancho. Part of the problem is Mourinhos, as his past means there's an air of potential toxicity around him always, but there is definitely no secret that he wanted rid of Martial and Shaw, and Rashford too didnt seem particularly rated by him. Initially we at least an air of authority under him on the pitch, with Ibrahimovic very much being in his mould.

These wouldnt have been revelatory signings but if we're going back to Mourinho's time, lets say the summer of 2017, after his first season. That's almost 7 years ago. It is quite incredible that Martial is still here, and while Shaw is in my opinion a brilliant player, we wouldnt have crumbled without him. The players we were linked with at that time, namely Perisic and Willian:

Perisic went to Inter in summer of 2017. He played 254 games in the next 6 seasons, with Inter, Bayern and Spurs, by which point he was around 33. He also scored 44 goals in that time, played and scored in a world cup final, won 2 domestic leagues and a champions league. He is a consumate professional and a consistent performer, and if I remember rightly almost the entire united fanbase turned their nose up in scorn at the very idea of signing him.

Willian was at Chelsea in summer 2017. He was pretty much ever present, never injured for the next 3 seasons at chelsea, playing 158 times in three seasons (!) and scoring 32. Years later, after a stint in brazil, he still plays PL football week in week out though of course would likely have been moved on from united in that time.

If we compare those 2 players, to shaw and martial in that time - Mourinho is obviously right. There does seem in retrospect to have been a culture under mourinho where he was treated with a certain suspicion, and he should have been backed to bring in these 2 continually fit, experienced model professionals in particular.
Not sure i understand this take.

Mourinho arrived and we signed players for close to €200mill, not to mention the overall cost of Zlatan with his wages. We brought in Zlatan,Pogba, Mkhi and Bailly. Following season we spent similar amounts on bringing in Lukaku, Matic, Lindelof, and Sanchez. We did our outmost to sign Antoine Griezmann, at his request. We did our best to ship out whoever he wanted gone. We tried signing Perisic, but he didn't want to leave Inter at the time (according to himself). The not longer special one was backed to the hilt.

The higher ups only started to put their foot down on Jose's request at the end of his second season, and rightly so, after he wanted to replace his own signings with even more expensive players because they turned out to be rather crap. Rashford and Martial were enjoying a very good season, where they were pushing each other for the left wing spot, Jose was dead set on signing Sanchez in january and we shipped Mkhi, an expensive dud, the other way + a transfer fee, making Sanchez one of the best paid players in the league. He then instantly made Sanchez his first choice on the left wing, where he was a disaster for us, and Rashford and Martials form collapsed after they were reduced to fighting for the backup role to Sanchez.

Bailly was a failure, Lindelof wasn't very good, both of them expensive players, so now Mourinho insisted on Maguire, who would've easily cost more than he did when we signed him the following summer, who we could've signed for feck all when Hull got relegated and Mourinho first walked in the door and signed Bailly for close to €35mill (Maguire was signed for £12mill that summer). Mourinho's relationship with Pogba was getting worse and Lukaku wasn't exactly looking cheap either.

Mourinho was afforded support until it became obvious that he was a part of the problem and not the solution, which is the same for the vast majority of managers. Ten Hag, if he's still the manager, isn't going to be offered the same level of support, simply because there's going to be a lot more scrutiny, which is only natural on the basis of our performances this season.

Also, Willian was a fecking shitshow towards the end at Chelsea. It would've been an extremely expensive mistake to bring him to United, one that would've been difficult to rectify. Thank god we didn't sign him.
 

led_scholes

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
2,463
Shaw has proven him wrong if that’s who he is referring to. His injury record isn’t great, but you cannot question his ability or professionalism.
Shaw was atrocious for a whole season in 2021/2022, after having his best season. He was also really average in 2019/2020, that's why we bought Telles.

If anything, Shaw being unable to reach his 2021 level again, proved Jose was right. Only this year, he gets a pass due to injuries. But even at the beginning of the season he was underwhelming.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,746
Feck the old faded cnuts, spent tonnes of millions and won't keep his mouth shut about his failures.
Fact that he has remained woeful since we allowed him to feck off prove he was a bad manager for us.

Everyone is driving the knife in, feck them lot
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
585
Ya but its always a balancing act. We needed some experienced heads then as much as we do now. The idea that every player should have a resale value isnt the best policy. What resale vale might kane have at bayern. What did Lewandowski get them? I do believe he was backed in the market and few would argue otherwise, but he should have been allowed to get rid of those he judged needed to go too. What good has keeping martial done this club
We got rid of the majority of players he wanted to get rid of.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,023
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
No we wouldn't, you do not secure top 4 with an ever changing back 4
Excuses for a rubbish manager. Remember Brentford? Their entire first choice back four were out, yet they still spanked us, what makes it even more embarrassing is us bringing on £350 million worth of substitutes in the second half.
And what has the back 4 got to do with us having zero shots on target at home for 50 minutes?
Keep up with the excuses for ETH. Man's not good enough.
 

DON’T PANIC ™

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2011
Messages
1,209
Location
Ireland
Can’t believe there’s fans here that would have him back, even as interim.
As bad as things are, the worst period I have ever experienced in 40+ years as a fan was during Mourinho’s last few months. Completely toxic and narcissistic.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,762
Washed up manage using other failed managers for some validation.

Wish players were also open in their interviews talking about managers.
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,252
Supports
Arsenal
It is interesting to see which big club will offer him a job next.
I think Mourinho is always guilty of a bit of revisionism, but there might be an element of truth to some things. For example, Ten Hag was backed to implement his authority and get rid of Ronaldo, remove the captaincy from Maguire, outcast Sancho. Part of the problem is Mourinhos, as his past means there's an air of potential toxicity around him always, but there is definitely no secret that he wanted rid of Martial and Shaw, and Rashford too didnt seem particularly rated by him. Initially we at least an air of authority under him on the pitch, with Ibrahimovic very much being in his mould.

These wouldnt have been revelatory signings but if we're going back to Mourinho's time, lets say the summer of 2017, after his first season. That's almost 7 years ago. It is quite incredible that Martial is still here, and while Shaw is in my opinion a brilliant player, we wouldnt have crumbled without him. The players we were linked with at that time, namely Perisic and Willian:

Perisic went to Inter in summer of 2017. He played 254 games in the next 6 seasons, with Inter, Bayern and Spurs, by which point he was around 33. He also scored 44 goals in that time, played and scored in a world cup final, won 2 domestic leagues and a champions league. He is a consumate professional and a consistent performer, and if I remember rightly almost the entire united fanbase turned their nose up in scorn at the very idea of signing him.

Willian was at Chelsea in summer 2017. He was pretty much ever present, never injured for the next 3 seasons at chelsea, playing 158 times in three seasons (!) and scoring 32. Years later, after a stint in brazil, he still plays PL football week in week out though of course would likely have been moved on from united in that time.

If we compare those 2 players, to shaw and martial in that time - Mourinho is obviously right. There does seem in retrospect to have been a culture under mourinho where he was treated with a certain suspicion, and he should have been backed to bring in these 2 continually fit, experienced model professionals in particular.
I agree with you that if Perisic and Willian joined United back then to provide services for Lukaku from both wings, United would probably perform a lot better in that season. These two players are also role model for being professional and would definitely help out on the culture of the dressing room.
 
Last edited:

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,401
Still like the guy, just wished we'd either hired him before his second Chelsea stint, or given him what he asked for after finishing 2nd, and got rid of Martial and Pogba.

Even it didnt lead to a title it would have been nice to actually have a proper go with him rather than the club being more interested pandering to players.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,286
Location
Voted the best city in the world
There's only Rashford, Martial, mctominay, Shaw, Lindelof and Dalot who played under him. He without a doubt like Dalot and McTominay. Shaw proved him wrong. I always got the impression he liked Rashford and he spoke about Rashford not that negatively in the Rio podcast not long ago. Lindelof he signed and was there for 1 season, nothing wrong with mentality but he just isn't that great.

Martial is the obvious one, he probably is thinking about Shaw but he's wrong about him. But it's irrelevant anyway. Mourinho's problem, like so many other managers, is tactically the game moved on and he couldn't keep up.
Spot on. Jose was right about a few things, he was also wrong about a few things and the club was also correct in dismissing him. Jose will do and say just about anything to absolve himself of blame.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
I honestly believe that the reason why Real Madrid have been so successful in the CL in the last ten years is that they didnt buy into this "new football" crap.

Pressing has been around for a long time but is very risky when you play sides who your players are not vastly superior to as you are leaving space at the back by defending in the attacking third.

Thats why you see conservative sides continue to do better at the biggest stage - CL, WC and the likes.

I also do not see any evidence that this "new football" improves one's fortunes in domestic leagues. You will beat teams with higher scorelines when things go well, but domestic leagues are almost exclusively won by teams with most expensive squads. I have seen no evidence of the "new football" elevating sides in terms of league finishes.

So, no, I dont think the game has passed him by I think he did not buy into the hype and rightly so.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,950
Location
France
There's only Rashford, Martial, mctominay, Shaw, Lindelof and Dalot who played under him. He without a doubt like Dalot and McTominay. Shaw proved him wrong. I always got the impression he liked Rashford and he spoke about Rashford not that negatively in the Rio podcast not long ago. Lindelof he signed and was there for 1 season, nothing wrong with mentality but he just isn't that great.

Martial is the obvious one, he probably is thinking about Shaw but he's wrong about him. But it's irrelevant anyway. Mourinho's problem, like so many other managers, is tactically the game moved on and he couldn't keep up.
And the thing about Martial is that he repeatedly took Rashford place up until Mourinho's sacking. Martial later struggled with injuries and has been useless due to being largely unavailable but was Mourinho right about a player that performed well enough to be a starter instead of one of his favorite?
 

big_jeffstar

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
473
The amount of protection shaw gets on this forum always astounds me… he plays about 5 games a year. (Always manages to come back when another left back is threatening his position for some reason) Has two decent games, then he’s off again for another 6 months.. and we all have to talk wistfully about how badly we miss him.. I’d happily replace him with someone not made of polystyrene tbh
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,762
Aye, mind boggling how there’s a few who actually wouldn’t mind him back again either :nervous:
Yeah, I'll never understand why anyone still wants him back, even for short term.
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,252
Supports
Arsenal
I honestly believe that the reason why Real Madrid have been so successful in the CL in the last ten years is that they didnt buy into this "new football" crap.

Pressing has been around for a long time but is very risky when you play sides who your players are not vastly superior to as you are leaving space at the back by defending in the attacking third.

Thats why you see conservative sides continue to do better at the biggest stage - CL, WC and the likes.

I also do not see any evidence that this "new football" improves one's fortunes in domestic leagues. You will beat teams with higher scorelines when things go well, but domestic leagues are almost exclusively won by teams with most expensive squads. I have seen no evidence of the "new football" elevating sides in terms of league finishes.

So, no, I dont think the game has passed him by I think he did not buy into the hype and rightly so.
There is more than one way to play football and it is absolutely fine to play a counter attacking system. The team however needs to be flexible enough to know how to play against teams that play with low block though. Pep has a lot of success with his tactics and lots of team are copying him at the moment, just like back then teams ditched 442 and copied Mou's 433 if I remember correctly.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,950
Location
France
Points. He was 2nd with 81 points. Solskjaer was 2nd with 74.
I thought that it might be it. But it's important to keep in mind that point totals aren't actually relevant from one season to the other.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,731
Not sure i understand this take.

Mourinho arrived and we signed players for close to €200mill, not to mention the overall cost of Zlatan with his wages. We brought in Zlatan,Pogba, Mkhi and Bailly. Following season we spent similar amounts on bringing in Lukaku, Matic, Lindelof, and Sanchez. We did our outmost to sign Antoine Griezmann, at his request. We did our best to ship out whoever he wanted gone. We tried signing Perisic, but he didn't want to leave Inter at the time (according to himself). The not longer special one was backed to the hilt.

The higher ups only started to put their foot down on Jose's request at the end of his second season, and rightly so, after he wanted to replace his own signings with even more expensive players because they turned out to be rather crap. Rashford and Martial were enjoying a very good season, where they were pushing each other for the left wing spot, Jose was dead set on signing Sanchez in january and we shipped Mkhi, an expensive dud, the other way + a transfer fee, making Sanchez one of the best paid players in the league. He then instantly made Sanchez his first choice on the left wing, where he was a disaster for us, and Rashford and Martials form collapsed after they were reduced to fighting for the backup role to Sanchez.

Bailly was a failure, Lindelof wasn't very good, both of them expensive players, so now Mourinho insisted on Maguire, who would've easily cost more than he did when we signed him the following summer, who we could've signed for feck all when Hull got relegated and Mourinho first walked in the door and signed Bailly for close to €35mill (Maguire was signed for £12mill that summer). Mourinho's relationship with Pogba was getting worse and Lukaku wasn't exactly looking cheap either.

Mourinho was afforded support until it became obvious that he was a part of the problem and not the solution, which is the same for the vast majority of managers. Ten Hag, if he's still the manager, isn't going to be offered the same level of support, simply because there's going to be a lot more scrutiny, which is only natural on the basis of our performances this season.

Also, Willian was a fecking shitshow towards the end at Chelsea. It would've been an extremely expensive mistake to bring him to United, one that would've been difficult to rectify. Thank god we didn't sign him.
I think you're joining two things here. Im not claiming he wasn't back with money - but Perisic was supposedly to be signed in 2017, and mourinho has since said he believes woodward deliberately collapsed that deal. Im talking specificially about players that the club supposedly refused to sanction the release of: Shaw and Martial, (and potentially rashford along the line). This was a mistake and I think its undeniable. In 2018, only signign fred and dalot was a big mistake. We'd just finished second and the club showed a real lack of intent.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
585
I think you're joining two things here. Im not claiming he wasn't back with money - but Perisic was supposedly to be signed in 2017, and mourinho has since said he believes woodward deliberately collapsed that deal. Im talking specificially about players that the club supposedly refused to sanction the release of: Shaw and Martial, (and potentially rashford along the line). This was a mistake and I think its undeniable. In 2018, only signign fred and dalot was a big mistake. We'd just finished second and the club showed a real lack of intent.
But it's all connected... No idea what Mourinho believes, not sure i care, but Perisic have been quoted quite a few times saying that he was flattered by the interest but he wanted to stay.

In hindsight it's obvious that we should have sold Shaw, Martial and most likely Rashford when their stock was at their highest, doesn't mean it was obvious at that specific time. 1,5 season into Ole's reign and it looked like it would've been madness to sell either of them. Good luck to whoever suggesting last summer that we should've sold Rashford. The lack in support of getting rid of young talented players also coincided with Mourinho gradually losing the plot

We didn't show a lack of intent, we were unsure of Mourinho's future and rightly so, therefore the willingness to spend insane amounts wasn't there. Mourinho signed Bailly and Lindelof for a combined fee of over £60mill, since they were dodgy as hell he wanted the latest shiny toy which happened to be Harry Maguire, who had spent two seasons at Leicester and was available for £12mill the season we signed Bailly. We entertained the idea and held talks with Leicester, but the fee they wanted was even more bonkers than what we ended up paying a year later. This was also after we spent the odd £30'ish mill on Sanchez and made him one of the highest paid players in the league, his best performance being the piano video.

Again, Mourinho will say whatever suits his own agenda and his agenda is obvious, just as he consistently tries to rewrite the past in terms of Salah and De Bruyne and what made them leave Chelsea.

The entire concept is either way daft, not even Guardiola gets every single player he wants the club to sign
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,870
Rashford and Shaw I think.
Lindelof, McTominay and Dalot played under him but I think he liked them.
He signed Lindelof and Dalot which got me thinking. Who did he sign that he did not play as much as you would expect?
LVG had Depay, although he did play him a lot initially.
Ole had Donny.
Sanchez & Mkhitaryan?
 

SSSSnake

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
3,583
I’d have him back just for some excitement. I miss a manager that has some charisma! ETH puts me to sleep every time he talks.
 

didz

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1,766
He signed Lindelof and Dalot which got me thinking. Who did he sign that he did not play as much as you would expect?
LVG had Depay, although he did play him a lot initially.
Ole had Donny.
Sanchez & Mkhitaryan?
Fred?