£35m for Andy Carroll | On loan @ WHU (the big, long, useless streak of pi**...)

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,962
Because he now plays off the front man, NOT in Central Midfield like at Bolton. How hard is that to understand?
So you think moving twenty yards up the pitch would make that much of a difference?

If thats made such a difference to his goals scoring then clearly he is a much much better player than he has ever had credit for. Clearly he has benefitted from the system and playing alongside Carroll.

Worth pointing out that he often also does play in Central midfield, when Ameobi and Carroll played as against Sunderland when I think he got a hat trick.
 

spinoza

Paz's ion
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Messages
24,080
Location
Walking in a whisky wonderland.
Suarez was a mite expensive, and Carroll is just daylight robbery.

Good additions to the squad though. The true problem will be Liverpool's missed opportunity to strengthen their defence and their wings, instead of spunking all the dosh on 2 strikers.
 

MPTutd

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
4,535
Location
Oxfordshire
To spend 35m on a player I would want:

1) 25 goals a season on average over his time at the club
2) Champs league qualification on a regular basis
3) England regular

Number three I can see happening, but not 1 or 2.
 

sully07

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
2,365
Location
Limbo
If you look at the big picture, Liverpool traded in a player who didn't want to be there, is injury prone and off form for 2 younger players with great potential for a net spend of £8 mil. Personally I think they are the stronger for it.

Carroll was bought for around twice his market value but they sold Torres for £20mil over the odds in my opinion when you consider David Villas fee.
 

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,962
Erm... yes, of course :lol:
Ok then. Average central midfielder with half decent goal record moves up the pitch (sometimes) and starts scoring 1 in 3 for his average club?

I suspect his goal tally will drop now he has to rely on Ameobi leading the line.
 

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,962
To spend 35m on a player I would want:

1) 25 goals a season on average over his time at the club
2) Champs league qualification on a regular basis
3) England regular

Number three I can see happening, but not 1 or 2.
25 goals isn't that many if your side is in europe or has a decent cup run.

Not sure whether they'll be regulars in the CL but the owners may spend big to try and ensure it happens - even if its just to increase the value of the club leading to a sale in the next ten years.
 

Marching

Somehow still supports Leeds
Joined
Apr 21, 2001
Messages
39,656
Marching, Carroll worth £35m?

Or £15m?
The only reason he's gone for £35m is because Ashley knew liverpool had £50m to spend and desperately need a CF.

Carroll's value is a difficult one...he's a very good player which probably gives him a value of up to £20m and the rest is the potential they are buying which always comes with an element of risk attached to it.
 

Lynott

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
3,372
Their hands weren't tied. They were arsefecked by Newcastle.

Liverpool could have waited until the summer and probably gotten Carroll for at least £15m less.
Their hands were tied in terms of letting Torres go.

As for your second point, it's all hearsay and I disagree.
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
The only reason he's gone for £35m is because Ashley knew liverpool had £50m to spend and desperately need a CF.

Carroll's value is a difficult one...he's a very good player which probably gives him a value of up to £20m and the rest is the potential they are buying which always comes with an element of risk attached to it.
There's a particular element of risk when the player concerned is also a total nutjob who can't stop punching people.

It's true Liverpool got 2 strikers in for one, and if you discount the money it's not a bad deal. He looks a good prospect.

But I'd be very surprised if he reached Torres' level, and that's the key, Torres is one of the few players around who can win and save games on his own even when the side is performing woefully. In the larger scheme of things, it's not a good look for a club that believes it should be challenging for honours. A side that a couple of years ago had 5 world-class players now has 2, one the wrong side of 30 and the other quite possibly off in the summer.

If you'd asked 100 Liverpool fans last week, "Would you swap Fernando Torres and ten million quid for Suarez and Andy Carroll?", I reckon about 3 would have said yes.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
If you'd asked 100 Liverpool fans last week, "Would you swap Fernando Torres and ten million quid for Suarez and Andy Carroll?", I reckon about 3 would have said yes.
We didn't have this choice.

I personally think Liverpool made the most of the dire situation Torres left us in. Potentially an excellent strike force. Time will tell.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
Is there seriously nobody on here afraid of the possibility that this thread could be bumped by people like my good self at some point in the future ? :smirk:
Nope.

Andy Carroll - the 7th most expensive signing of all time. For this thread to be bumped up in the future, he'd want to have turned into Gabriel Batistuta.
 

Plechazunga

Grammar partisan who sleeps with a real life Ryan
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
51,762
Location
Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header
We didn't have this choice.

I personally think Liverpool made the most of the dire situation Torres left us in. Potentially an excellent strike force. Time will tell.
I think that's fair. My guess is that injury and the likelihood that he didn't really want to leave will mean he doesn't massively take off this season. Next season he might well bang in a lot of goals (if he isn't in prison), and if so your lot won't really care about the money. But if you're going to challenge any time soon you'll need to buy a lot more good players in the summer, two good strikers aren't enough, you have very few top-class players, a rubbish defence and literally no wingers.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
I think that's fair. My guess is that injury and the likelihood that he didn't really want to leave will mean he doesn't massively take off this season. Next season he might well bang in a lot of goals (if he isn't in prison), and if so your lot won't really care about the money. But if you're going to challenge any time soon you'll need to buy a lot more good players in the summer, two good strikers aren't enough, you have very few top-class players, a rubbish defence and literally no wide players.
Agree with most of that.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
Nope.

Andy Carroll - the 7th most expensive signing of all time. For this thread to be bumped up in the future, he'd want to have turned into Gabriel Batistuta.
You lot are making far too much of the fee.

If Ferguson wants a player, he will generally pay what it takes. If that means paying a few extra million, he will still do it.
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,933
Location
Behind You
Not if he can get better players (or even the same one!) for less money in the summer. And that is bollocks considering he has been saying "no value in the market" for the last year.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
And that is bollocks considering he has been saying "no value in the market" for the last year.
That's a bollocks statement in reality and not one he adheres to. He paid £7m for a streetkid.

If Ferguson wants a player, he will generally pay and do what it takes to get them. Numerous examples of this.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
Nope.

Andy Carroll - the 7th most expensive signing of all time. For this thread to be bumped up in the future, he'd want to have turned into Gabriel Batistuta.
:nono:

Carroll is moulded on the Vieri template.
 

MPTutd

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
4,535
Location
Oxfordshire
If Ferguson wants a player, he will generally pay what it takes. If that means paying a few extra million, he will still do it.
Agreed.

But don't need to rebuild a team when we do it.

Liverpool need a centre back, left back, two wingers and a central midfielder.

Surely the money would have been better spent buy those as well. Why blow it all on two strikers.
 

Lynott

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
3,372
The fee is irrelevant.

A more relevant fee was us paying 30+ million for Berbatov. We hadn't just received 50 million for another player and were screwed by the fact that City came in for him giving Spurs the power to inflate the price by 10-12 million.

Alot of what is being said in here is childish and silly to be honest. Carroll is quality and I think Liverpool have gotten themselves a real quality player who will cause defenders havoc and will only get better.

Liverpool have swapped a want-away striker for two. It's not bad business considering alot of it was done in 48 hours.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
Agreed.

But don't need to rebuild a team when we do it.

Liverpool need a centre back, left back, two wingers and a central midfielder.

Surely the money would have been better spent buy those as well. Why blow it all on two strikers.
we did try to sign a midfielder and a winger both.

I think too much is made out of this point right now. It's the January transfer window - how many clubs rebuild in January?

We just sold our top striker which left us in a position of grave weakness, not just playingwise, but in terms of our standing as a club. Imo, we needed a statement of intent to show Europe we don't mean to take such a sale on the chin and go back to our midtable existence without him.

If we don't actually spend much on the areas of the team that need rebuilding in the summer, I'll concede the point. But for January? Nope.
 

Lynott

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
3,372
But SAF has a proven track record in buy players.

Dogleash and/or Comolli don't.
Jesus lads can we have a little bit of sense in here please?

Ferguson has many an expensive mistake. Let's try not to make fools of ourselves.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
we did try to sign a midfielder and a winger both.

I think too much is made out of this point right now. It's the January transfer window - how many clubs rebuild in January?

We just sold our top striker which left us in a position of grave weakness, not just playingwise, but in terms of our standing as a club. Imo, we needed a statement of intent to show Europe we don't mean to take such a sale on the chin and go back to our midtable existence without him.

If we don't actually spend much on the areas of the team that need rebuilding in the summer, I'll concede the point. But for January? Nope.
Back to it? Isn't that were you are?
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,933
Location
Behind You
That's a bollocks statement in reality and not one he adheres to. He paid £7m for a streetkid.

If Ferguson wants a player. he will generally pay and do what it takes to get them. Numerous examples of this.
I wouldn't take that as an example considering that I'm fairly sure that there's all kinds of dodgy stuff going on with agents considering Jorge Mendes is behind it and the president of Vitoria (?) said that they didn't get £7m for him.

And you have to ask yourself why is he looking at bringing in relatively unproven kids rather than going for established players anyway.

We only generally pay over the odds when our hand is forced -- see Anderson, Rooney, Ronaldo. Other big fees have been for proven players not guys with half a season of premier league football under his belt.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
But SAF has a proven track record in buy players.

Dogleash and/or Comolli don't.
:confused::lol:

Yeah, Dalglish never could spot a player, could he?

And Commoli: Berbatov, Modric, Bale, Taarabt, Kaboul, Gomes, Assou-Ekotto, Hutton, Boateng and Pavyluchenko - terrible signings for spurs.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
And you have to ask yourself why is he looking at bringing in relatively unproven kids rather than going for established players anyway.
We have to be realistic about our targets. The top echelon of players wouldn't consider Liverpool at the moment.

We only generally pay over the odds when our hand is forced -- see Anderson, Rooney, Ronaldo. Other big fees have been for proven players not guys with half a season of premier league football under his belt.
So you think Liverpool's hand wasn't forced? Jeebus, there is coffee needed to be woken up to and whiffed here.
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,933
Location
Behind You
Odd choice of signings considering that Taarabt is currently lingering in the Championship, Kaboul was with Harry at Spurs, Gomes is still dodgy; Boateng, Hutton and Pav hit and miss. Only Berbatov, Modric and Bale are really successes and it's not like they were under the radar since we wanted Berbatov and Bale at the time.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
KK clearly does. Just 25 years ago!

Time will tell if he can still spot a player.
More like 15 years ago. He didn't do to badly with his signings for Blackburn either.
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,933
Location
Behind You
So you think Liverpool's hand wasn't forced? Jeebus, there is coffee needed to be woken up to and whiffed here.
You don't really have anything to play for this season and Carroll's injured anyway and might even go to prison before the summer. You were better off waiting until then and getting him for half that.
 

Ole's_toe_poke

Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
36,846
And Commoli: Berbatov, Modric, Bale, Taarabt, Kaboul, Gomes, Assou-Ekotto, Hutton, Boateng and Pavyluchenko - terrible signings for spurs.
Comolli has a decent record.

Although he does has previous when it comes to deadline day panics. When we were after Berbatov for a month all he could muster up as a replacement was Frazier Campbell on loan, leaving Spurs well short upfront.

Time will tell if Carroll is a good panic buy or a bad panic buy, but make no mistake it was a panic buy.
 

Sam.G

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
6,812
Location
Balamory
You don't really have anything to play for this season and Carroll's injured anyway and might even go to prison before the summer. You were better off waiting until then and getting him for half that.
My point is, the King obviously wanted the player and paid what it took to get him. Ferguson has a track record of regularly doing this.

The merit of actually signing Carroll is another discussion.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,609
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
You don't really have anything to play for this season
Why do people say this? European qualification, the Europa League. Bothy important targets for us right now.

Finishing 5/6th with a a European trophy will make a hell of a difference to our ability to attract players than finishing out of the top 10 with nothing.